切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 413 -416. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.04.009

临床论著

不同剂量罗哌卡因联合利多卡因对腹股沟疝无张力修补术后麻醉效果及应激反应的影响
李晓伟1, 袁晓光1,(), 孙蕾2, 支小军1, 张丹妮1   
  1. 1. 014010 内蒙古包头,内蒙古包钢医院疼痛科
    2. 014010 内蒙古包头市九原区医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-17 出版日期:2022-08-18
  • 通信作者: 袁晓光
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(202201514)

Effects of different doses of ropivacaine combined with lidocaine on anesthetic effect and stress response after tensorless inguinal hernia repair

Xiaowei Li1, Xiaoguang Yuan1,(), Lei Sun2, Xiaojun Zhi1, Danni Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Pain, Inner Mongolia Baotou Iron and steel hospital, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Jiuyuan District Hospital, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2021-09-17 Published:2022-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoguang Yuan
引用本文:

李晓伟, 袁晓光, 孙蕾, 支小军, 张丹妮. 不同剂量罗哌卡因联合利多卡因对腹股沟疝无张力修补术后麻醉效果及应激反应的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 413-416.

Xiaowei Li, Xiaoguang Yuan, Lei Sun, Xiaojun Zhi, Danni Zhang. Effects of different doses of ropivacaine combined with lidocaine on anesthetic effect and stress response after tensorless inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 413-416.

目的

探讨不同剂量罗哌卡因联合利多卡因用于腹股沟疝无张力修补术,对患者术后应激反应的影响。

方法

选择2020年2至10月内蒙古包钢医院收治的拟在局部麻醉下行腹股沟疝无张力修补手术患者80例,随机分为复合组和对照组,每组各40例。对照组给予0.25%罗哌卡因联合1%利多卡因进行麻醉,复合组给予0.75%罗哌卡因联合1%利多卡因进行麻醉。比较2组患者各时段应激反应指标[皮质醇、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)]水平、Ramsay镇静评分、疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分、术后患者苏醒状况与术中不良反应情况。

结果

术后2组患者术前1 d(T0)时,术后2 h(T1)和术后4 h(T2)的VAS评分与治疗前相比呈下降趋势,术后各时间段复合组的VAS评分比对照组更低(P<0.05);所有患者应激反应指标对比,T1时2组血清皮质醇、IL-6水平较T0时期增高,但复合组低于对照组(P<0.05),在T2时间段2组患者应激反应指标水平比T1时间段下降,且复合组应激反应水平比对照组低(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,Ramsay镇静评分显著降低(P<0.05)。2组患者术后苏醒情况比较,复合组苏醒时间短于对照组(P<0.05);术中不良反应发生率复合组(1/40)明显低于对照组(7/40)(P<0.05)。

结论

0.75%罗哌卡因联合1%利多卡因对腹股沟疝术后的患者有显著的镇痛效果,可以降低炎症,不良反应少,有临床推广的意义。

Objective

To investigate the effects of different doses of ropivacaine combined with lidocaine on stress response after inguinal hernia.

Methods

A total of 80 patients with tension-free inguinal hernia repair under local anesthesia admitted to Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital from February to October 2020 were selected and randomly divided into two groups: the compound group and the control group, with 40 cases in each group. The control group was given 0.25% ropivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine for anesthesia, and the compound group was given 0.75% ropivacaine combined with 1% lidocaine for anesthesia. Stress response indexes [cortisol, interleukin6 (IL-6)], Ramsay sedation score, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, postoperative recovery, and incidence of intraoperative adverse events were compared between 2 groups at each time.

Results

The VAS score at 2 hours and 4 hours after surgery was gradually decreased in both groups, and the VAS score of the compound group was lower than the control group at each time point after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The comparison of stress response indexes between the two groups showed that the levels of serum cortisol and IL-6 in T1 groups were higher than those in T0 stage, but lower in the compound group than in the control group (P<0.05); the levels of serum cortisol and IL-6 in T2 groups were lower than those in T1 stage, but lower in the compound group than in the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05). The Ramsay sedation score was significantly decreased compared with the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). The recovery time of patients in the compound group was shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of intraoperative adverse reactions in compound group (1/40) was significantly lower than that in control group (7/40), and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The combination of 0.75% ropivacaine with 1% lidocaine has a significant analgesic effect in patients after inguinal hernia surgery, which can reduce inflammation, has few adverse reactions, and has clinical promotion significance.

表1 2组患者不同时间视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表2 2组患者手术前后的Ramsay评分比较(分,±s
表3 2组患者手术后麻醉情况比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者应激反应指标对比(±s
表5 2组患者不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
魏欣,黄丹,江为, 等. 腹股沟疝术后补片感染24例临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(5): 422-424.
[2]
Berndsen MR, Gudbjartsson T, Berndsen FH. Inguinal hernia - review[J]. Laeknabladid, 2019, 105(9): 385-391.
[3]
王伟,赵宇斌. TAPP与传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术对成人腹股沟疝手术应激及疼痛影响的对比研究[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(4): 504-507.
[4]
Chen LS, Chen WC, Kang YN, et al. Effects of transabdominal preperitoneal and totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(2): 418-428.
[5]
Li J, Zhang W. Comment to: Laparoscopic extraperitoneal repair versus open inguinal hernia repair: 20-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(6): 989.
[6]
Vadivelu N, Kai A M, Dai F, et al. Analysis of Multiple Routes of Analgesic Administration in the Immediate Postoperative Period: A 10-Year Experience[J]. Curr Pain Headache Rep, 2019, 23(3): 22.
[7]
陈学良. 罗哌卡因复合利多卡因连续硬膜外麻醉对老年腹股沟疝患者麻醉效果的影响[J]. 山西卫生健康职业学院学报, 2020, 30(3): 59-60.
[8]
林诗发. 罗哌卡因辅助局麻对腹股沟疝修补术中血流动力学及术后镇痛效果的影响[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2019, 22(6): 484-486, 490.
[9]
丁继兵,林家国,刘小军. 地塞米松复合罗哌卡因腹横肌平面阻滞对腹腔镜结肠癌术后急性疼痛和炎症因子的影响[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(18): 3087-3090, 3097.
[10]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[11]
王伟,赵宇斌. TAPP与传统腹股沟疝无张力修补术对成人腹股沟疝手术应激及疼痛影响的对比研究[J]. 医学临床研究, 2021, 38(4): 504-507.
[12]
左晓春. 罗哌卡因联合利多卡因对超声引导下腋路臂丛神经阻滞麻醉的临床效果观察[J]. 中国医刊, 2018, 53(12): 1377-1379.
[13]
Huang Y, Yin J, Sun Z, et al.Percutaneous endoscopic lumbardiscectomy for LDH via a transforaminal approach versus an interlaminar approach: a meta-analysis[J]. Orthopade, 2020, 49(4): 338-349.
[14]
Inage K, Mizusawa H, Mimura Y, et al. Patient with inguinal hernia containing the urinary bladder complicated by bladder stones[J]. IJU Case Rep, 2019, 2(5): 276-278.
[15]
马翔,骆霞岗,鲁明, 等. 腹腔镜"杂交手术"修补腹壁巨大切口疝合并隐匿性疝临床体会[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(2): 115-117.
[16]
El-Feky E, Abd El A, Caudal A, et al. Ultrasound-guided inguinal field block, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block as an adjuvant to general anesthesia in unilateral inguinal hernia repair in pediatrics: a comparative study[J]. Res Opin Anesth Intensive Care, 2018, 5(3): 213-219.
[17]
陈建新,李瑞平,李力波. 帕瑞昔布结合切口局麻用于腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛的临床研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2018, 33(6): 505-507.
[18]
侯化梅,华东. 罗哌卡因和利多卡因在腹股沟疝手术中的效果对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 48-52.
[1] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[3] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[4] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[5] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[6] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[9] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[12] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[13] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[14] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[15] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
阅读次数
全文


摘要