切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 181 -185. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.016

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

不同麻醉方法在腹股沟疝修补术的效果比较
张丹妮1, 段霞光1, 郝春光1, 支小军1, 黄再青1,()   
  1. 1. 014010 包头,内蒙古包钢医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-16 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 黄再青
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2018MS08041)

Comparison of anesthesia effects of different anesthesia methods in inguinal hernia repair

Danni Zhang1, Xiaguang Duan1, Chunguang Hao1, Xiaojun Zhi1, Zaiqing Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2020-10-16 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Zaiqing Huang
引用本文:

张丹妮, 段霞光, 郝春光, 支小军, 黄再青. 不同麻醉方法在腹股沟疝修补术的效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 181-185.

Danni Zhang, Xiaguang Duan, Chunguang Hao, Xiaojun Zhi, Zaiqing Huang. Comparison of anesthesia effects of different anesthesia methods in inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 181-185.

目的

探讨超声引导下的腰方肌阻滞、腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术的麻醉效果差异。

方法

选择2018年8月至2020年8月在内蒙古包钢医院接受腹股沟疝修补手术治疗的患者56例。28例超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞的患者作为对照组,28例超声引导下腰方肌阻滞的患者作为观察组。对比2组的血流动力学指标[麻醉前、手术开始、手术15 min、手术30 min的平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)、血氧饱和度(SpO2)]、右美托咪定使用量、利多卡因使用例数、术后4、8、12、24、48 h患者的视觉模拟评分法(VAS)、血清炎性因子指标[C反应蛋白(CRP)、白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)]、术后并发症情况。

结果

2组患者在麻醉前、手术开始、手术15 min、手术30 min的MAP、HR、SpO2水平差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者的右美托咪定使用量与利多卡因使用例数差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组在术后24 h、48 h的VAS评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组在术后4、8、12 h的VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后1 d,2组的CRP、IL-6、TNF-α均增高(P<0.05),但观察组的CRP、IL-6、TNF-α均低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于接受腹股沟疝修补手术的患者,采用超声引导下的腹横肌平面阻滞和腰方肌阻滞,均可以获得较为理想的麻醉效果,患者的心率和血压等指标在手术过程中均可保持稳定,均具有良好的安全性。腰方肌阻滞在术后可以持续更长时间的镇痛作用,同时更有利于稳定血清炎性因子水平。

Objective

To investigate the difference of anesthesia effect between quadratus lumbarum block and transversus abdominis plane block guided by ultrasound in inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

From August 2018 to August 2020, 56 patients with inguinal hernia repair in Inner Mongolia Baogang Hospital were selected. 28 patients with ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block were served as control group, and 28 patients with ultrasound-guided quadratus lumbarum block were used as observation group. The hemodynamic indexes (MAP, HR, SpO2 before anesthesia, at the beginning of surgery, at 15, 30 minutes during the surgery), dexmedetomidine dosage, cases number of lidocaine used, pain score (VAS) at 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours, serum inflammatory factor index [C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α)], and postoperative complications were compared between the two groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in MAP, HR and SpO2 between the two groups before anesthesia, at the beginning of operation, 15 and 30 minutes during operation (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the dosage of dexmedetomidine used and the number of cases of lidocaine used between the two groups (P>0.05). The VAS score of the observation group at 24 and 48 hours after operation was lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in VAS score between the two groups at 4, 8 and 12 hours (P>0.05). The levels of CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in both groups were increased on the 1st day after operation (P<0.05). However, the levels of CRP, IL-6 and TNF-α in the observation groupat 1st day after operation were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

For patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair surgery, ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and quadratus lumbarum block can obtain ideal anesthesia effect. The heart rate and blood pressure data of patients can be maintained stable during the operation, and both have good safety. Quadratus lumbarumblock can last longer analgesic effect after operation, and it is more conducive to stabilize the level of serum inflammatory factors.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料比较
表2 2组患者手术不同时间的平均动脉压比较(mmHg,±s
表3 2组患者手术不同时间的心率比较(次/min,±s
表4 2组患者手术不同时间的血氧饱和度比较(%,±s
表5 2组患者右美托咪定使用量与利多卡因使用例数比较
表6 2组患者术后视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表7 2组患者血清炎性因子比较(±s
[1]
马先,贺杰,马俊帅. 丹红注射液结合抗菌药物对腹股沟疝术后血清MMP-2、MMP-9、TIMP-2、TIMP-1及应激指标作用机制研究[J]. 世界中医药, 2019, 14(9): 2404-2407.
[2]
Blanco R, AnsariT, Girgis E. Quadratus lumborum block for postoperativepain after caesarean section: a randomized controlled strial[J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2015, 32(11): 812-818.
[3]
刘铮,孙雪峰,吴成四, 等. 快速康复理念对腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术效果影响研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(7): 817-818.
[4]
王亚萍,韩快娟. 全身麻醉复合硬膜外麻醉对老年腹部手术患者的影响[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2020, 17(19): 2798-2801.
[5]
Chakraborty A, Goswami J, Patro V. Ultrasound-guided continuousquadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in apediatric patient[J]. A A Case Rep, 2015, 4(3): 34-36.
[6]
刘香君,赵林林,刘超, 等. 超声引导下腰方肌阻滞联合全身麻醉用于腹腔镜肾脏手术镇痛的研究[J]. 医学研究杂志, 2020, 49(7): 165-170.
[7]
马颂章. 疝外科学[M]. 5 版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 222.
[8]
来源,张锦,李凯. 右美托咪定不同给药方式对老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者神经阻滞麻醉效果与安全性的影响[J]. 药物不良反应杂志, 2020, 22(5): 283-288.
[9]
朱尤壮,柴军. 两种麻醉方法在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中效果的比较[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2020, 43(9): 779-783.
[10]
张珏颢,杨学林,张凯. 腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术患者术后快速康复中的作用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 233-237.
[11]
Spence NZ, Olszynski P, Lehan A, et al. Quadratus lumborum cathetersfor breast reconstruction requiring transverse rectus abdominismyocutaneous flaps[J]. J Anesth, 2016, 30(3): 506-509.
[12]
Murouchi T. Quadratus lumborum block intramuscular approach forpediatric surgery[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan, 2016, 54 (4): 135-136.
[13]
Blanco R. TAP block under ultrasound guidance: the description of a"nonpops" technique[J]. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2007, 32(Suppl1): S111-S130.
[14]
Kadam VR. Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block as a postoperativeanalgesia technique for laparotomy[J]. J Anaesth Clin Pharmacol, 2013, 29(4): 550-552.
[15]
余卓颖,翟文雯. 腰方肌阻滞的临床应用研究进展[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(8): 725-727.
[1] 吴香敏, 吴鹏. 超声引导下收肌管阻滞联合腘动脉与膝关节后囊间隙阻滞在老年患者全膝关节置换术中的应用效果[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 516-522.
[2] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[3] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[4] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[5] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[6] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[7] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[8] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[9] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[10] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[11] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[12] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[13] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[14] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
[15] 戴俊, 李硕, 曹影, 汪守峰, 宋红毛, 蔡菁菁, 邵敏, 陈莉, 程雷, 怀德. 鼻内镜下改良高选择性翼管神经低温等离子消融术对中重度变应性鼻炎的效果研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 689-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要