切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 177 -180. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.015

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

老年腹股沟疝患者手术中保温措施的重要性分析
华靓1,(), 许英1   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽省第二人民医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-21 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 华靓
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金(1808085MH237)

Analysis of the importance of heat preservation during inguinal hernia operation procedure in the elderly patient

Liang Hua1,(), Ying Xu1   

  1. 1. Operating Room, the Second People's Hospital of Anhui Province, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2020-09-21 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Liang Hua
引用本文:

华靓, 许英. 老年腹股沟疝患者手术中保温措施的重要性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 177-180.

Liang Hua, Ying Xu. Analysis of the importance of heat preservation during inguinal hernia operation procedure in the elderly patient[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 177-180.

目的

探讨老年腹股沟疝患者术中保温措施的应用效果。

方法

分析2017年5月至2020年6月在安徽省第二人民医院接受开腹无张力修补手术治疗的腹股沟疝老年患者60例。对照组患者30例,采用围手术期常规护理干预;观察组患者30例,采用常规护理干预联合术中保温措施。观察2组患者的手术情况(麻醉时间、手术时间、失血量、输液量)、术中体温情况、术前1 d与术后3 d的炎性因子水平[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)]、术后恢复情况(下床活动时间、肠功能恢复时间、首次进食时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、住院时间)、术后并发症。

结果

2组的麻醉时间、手术时间、失血量、输液量、术前体温和手术开始后5 min体温数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者的手术开始后30 min和手术结束时体温差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3 d,2组的IL-6、TNF-α、CRP均明显增高,观察组在术后3 d的IL-6、TNF-α、CRP均低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者的下床活动时间、住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的肠鸣音恢复时间少于对照组(P<0.05)。2组的术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于接受腹股沟疝手术的老年患者,手术中使用常规护理措施的基础上采取保温措施进行干预,有利于保持体温,促进术后恢复,降低并发症风险。

Objective

To explore the effect of perioperative heat preservation measures during inguinal hernia surgery in the elderly.

Methods

From May 2017 to June 2020, a total of 60 elderly patients with inguinal hernia who underwent open tension-free repair surgery at the Second People's Hospital of Anhui Province were analyzed. Thirty patients who received routine care intervention during the perioperative period served as the control group, and 30 patients who received routine care intervention combined with intraoperative heat preservation as the observation group. The operation status of the two groups of patients (anesthesia time, operation time, blood loss, fluid infusion), intraoperative body temperature, the concentration of inflammatory factors [interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP)], postoperative recovery (time to get out of bed, time to recover bowel sounds, first eating time, bowel sound recovery time, length of hospital stay), and postoperative complications were observed.

Results

The differences in anesthesia time, operation time, blood loss, fluid infusion volume, preoperative body temperature and body temperature at 5 minutes after starting operation between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There were significant differences in body temperature between the two groups at 30 minutes after starting operation and at the end of operation (P<0.05). On the 3rd postoperative day, IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in the two groups were significantly increased, and the IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group on the 3rd postoperative day (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the time of getting out of bed and length of stay in the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The recovery time of bowel sounds in the observation group were shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). The difference in postoperative complications data between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

For elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, conventional nursing measures combined with heat preservation measuresduring the operation is beneficial to maintain body temperature, can promote postoperative recovery and reduce the risk of complications.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料对比
表2 2组患者手术情况(±s
表3 2组患者术中体温变化情况比较(℃,±s
表4 2组患者术前1 d与术后3 d的炎性因子浓度情况(±s
表5 2组患者术后恢复情况(±s
表6 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
[1]
王建平. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(8): 1342-1344.
[2]
林栓琴,赵亚笙. 腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术后术区感染的相关因素探析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(14): 1854-1856.
[3]
Romanowska M, Okniński T, Pawlak J. Hybrid technique for postoperative ventral hernias-own experience[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2016, 10(4): 534-540.
[4]
Torossian A, Brauer A, Hocker J, et al. Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(10): 166-172.
[5]
Özer AB, YildizAltun A, Erhan ÖL, et al. The effect of body mass index on perioperative thermoregulation[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12: 1717-1720.
[6]
马颂章. 疝外科学[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 222.
[7]
刘铮,孙雪峰,吴成四, 等. 快速康复理念对腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术效果影响研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(7): 817-818.
[8]
吴昊,徐茂奇,方寅, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝急诊手术术后复发影响因素的Cox回归分析[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2020, 39(4): 362-364, 375.
[9]
Frisch NB, Pepper AM, Rooney E. et al. Intraoperative hypothermia in total hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2017, 40(1): 56-58.
[10]
Horosz B, Nawrock AK, Malecmilewsk AM. Anaesthetic perioperative management according to the ERAS protocol[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2016, 48(1): 49-54.
[11]
李红峰,吴慧辉. 手术患者术中低体温的护理[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2018, 25(6): 671-672.
[12]
李娟,隋丽娟,于英, 等. 术中低温危害及防治研究进展[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(16): 199-200.
[13]
钟昌艳,易凤琼,胡军, 等. 电阻加温垫与充气加温毯预防胸腔镜手术患者低体温效果比较[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(4): 39-41.
[14]
董玉梅,何艳. 综合保温措施应用于腹腔镜手术患儿围手术期对其凝血功能的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2019, 25(2): 302-303.
[15]
Joung CY, Yun LS, Kyong KT, et al. Effect of prewarming during induction of anesthesia on microvascular reactivity in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized clinical trial[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(7): 1-15.
[1] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 孙一娇, 包润发, 董平, 束翌俊. PBL结合手术视频剪辑教学在普通外科专科医师规范化培训中的应用与思考[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 96-99.
[9] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
[10] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[11] 刘柏隆. 女性压力性尿失禁阶梯治疗之手术治疗方案选择[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 126-126.
[12] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[13] 陈宗杰, 胡添松. 肝外伤破裂患者治疗后胆漏发生影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 836-840.
[14] 张耕毓, 唐冲, 张昆, 张辉, 张清华, 刘家帮. 股骨头坏死髓芯减压术的文献计量学分析及单中心病例报道[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 771-780.
[15] 胡云鹤, 周玉焯, 付瑞瑛, 于凡, 李爱东. CHS-DRG付费制度下GB1分组住院费用影响因素分析与管理策略探讨[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 568-574.
阅读次数
全文


摘要