切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 177 -180. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.015

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

老年腹股沟疝患者手术中保温措施的重要性分析
华靓1,(), 许英1   
  1. 1. 230022 合肥,安徽省第二人民医院手术室
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-21 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 华靓
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省自然科学基金(1808085MH237)

Analysis of the importance of heat preservation during inguinal hernia operation procedure in the elderly patient

Liang Hua1,(), Ying Xu1   

  1. 1. Operating Room, the Second People's Hospital of Anhui Province, Hefei 230022, China
  • Received:2020-09-21 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Liang Hua
引用本文:

华靓, 许英. 老年腹股沟疝患者手术中保温措施的重要性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 177-180.

Liang Hua, Ying Xu. Analysis of the importance of heat preservation during inguinal hernia operation procedure in the elderly patient[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 177-180.

目的

探讨老年腹股沟疝患者术中保温措施的应用效果。

方法

分析2017年5月至2020年6月在安徽省第二人民医院接受开腹无张力修补手术治疗的腹股沟疝老年患者60例。对照组患者30例,采用围手术期常规护理干预;观察组患者30例,采用常规护理干预联合术中保温措施。观察2组患者的手术情况(麻醉时间、手术时间、失血量、输液量)、术中体温情况、术前1 d与术后3 d的炎性因子水平[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)]、术后恢复情况(下床活动时间、肠功能恢复时间、首次进食时间、肠鸣音恢复时间、住院时间)、术后并发症。

结果

2组的麻醉时间、手术时间、失血量、输液量、术前体温和手术开始后5 min体温数据差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组患者的手术开始后30 min和手术结束时体温差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后3 d,2组的IL-6、TNF-α、CRP均明显增高,观察组在术后3 d的IL-6、TNF-α、CRP均低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组患者的下床活动时间、住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组的肠鸣音恢复时间少于对照组(P<0.05)。2组的术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

对于接受腹股沟疝手术的老年患者,手术中使用常规护理措施的基础上采取保温措施进行干预,有利于保持体温,促进术后恢复,降低并发症风险。

Objective

To explore the effect of perioperative heat preservation measures during inguinal hernia surgery in the elderly.

Methods

From May 2017 to June 2020, a total of 60 elderly patients with inguinal hernia who underwent open tension-free repair surgery at the Second People's Hospital of Anhui Province were analyzed. Thirty patients who received routine care intervention during the perioperative period served as the control group, and 30 patients who received routine care intervention combined with intraoperative heat preservation as the observation group. The operation status of the two groups of patients (anesthesia time, operation time, blood loss, fluid infusion), intraoperative body temperature, the concentration of inflammatory factors [interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP)], postoperative recovery (time to get out of bed, time to recover bowel sounds, first eating time, bowel sound recovery time, length of hospital stay), and postoperative complications were observed.

Results

The differences in anesthesia time, operation time, blood loss, fluid infusion volume, preoperative body temperature and body temperature at 5 minutes after starting operation between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). There were significant differences in body temperature between the two groups at 30 minutes after starting operation and at the end of operation (P<0.05). On the 3rd postoperative day, IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in the two groups were significantly increased, and the IL-6, TNF-α, and CRP in the observation group were lower than those in the control group on the 3rd postoperative day (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the time of getting out of bed and length of stay in the two groups of patients (P>0.05). The recovery time of bowel sounds in the observation group were shorter than that in the control group (P<0.05). The difference in postoperative complications data between the two groups was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

For elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, conventional nursing measures combined with heat preservation measuresduring the operation is beneficial to maintain body temperature, can promote postoperative recovery and reduce the risk of complications.

表1 2组患者一般临床资料对比
表2 2组患者手术情况(±s
表3 2组患者术中体温变化情况比较(℃,±s
表4 2组患者术前1 d与术后3 d的炎性因子浓度情况(±s
表5 2组患者术后恢复情况(±s
表6 2组患者术后并发症情况[例(%)]
[1]
王建平. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者的疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2020, 20(8): 1342-1344.
[2]
林栓琴,赵亚笙. 腹股沟疝患者无张力疝修补术后术区感染的相关因素探析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(14): 1854-1856.
[3]
Romanowska M, Okniński T, Pawlak J. Hybrid technique for postoperative ventral hernias-own experience[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2016, 10(4): 534-540.
[4]
Torossian A, Brauer A, Hocker J, et al. Preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia[J]. Dtsch Arztebl Int, 2015, 112(10): 166-172.
[5]
Özer AB, YildizAltun A, Erhan ÖL, et al. The effect of body mass index on perioperative thermoregulation[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12: 1717-1720.
[6]
马颂章. 疝外科学[M]. 5版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2002: 222.
[7]
刘铮,孙雪峰,吴成四, 等. 快速康复理念对腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术效果影响研究[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2020, 48(7): 817-818.
[8]
吴昊,徐茂奇,方寅, 等. 嵌顿性腹股沟疝急诊手术术后复发影响因素的Cox回归分析[J]. 皖南医学院学报, 2020, 39(4): 362-364, 375.
[9]
Frisch NB, Pepper AM, Rooney E. et al. Intraoperative hypothermia in total hip and knee arthroplasty[J]. Orthopedics, 2017, 40(1): 56-58.
[10]
Horosz B, Nawrock AK, Malecmilewsk AM. Anaesthetic perioperative management according to the ERAS protocol[J]. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther, 2016, 48(1): 49-54.
[11]
李红峰,吴慧辉. 手术患者术中低体温的护理[J]. 中国中西医结合急救杂志, 2018, 25(6): 671-672.
[12]
李娟,隋丽娟,于英, 等. 术中低温危害及防治研究进展[J]. 当代医学, 2017, 23(16): 199-200.
[13]
钟昌艳,易凤琼,胡军, 等. 电阻加温垫与充气加温毯预防胸腔镜手术患者低体温效果比较[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(4): 39-41.
[14]
董玉梅,何艳. 综合保温措施应用于腹腔镜手术患儿围手术期对其凝血功能的影响[J]. 血栓与止血学, 2019, 25(2): 302-303.
[15]
Joung CY, Yun LS, Kyong KT, et al. Effect of prewarming during induction of anesthesia on microvascular reactivity in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: A randomized clinical trial[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(7): 1-15.
[1] 李辉, 吴奇, 张子琦, 张晗, 王仿, 许鹏. 日间全膝关节置换术早期疗效及标准化流程探索[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 889-892.
[2] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[3] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[4] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈旭渊, 罗仕云, 李文忠, 李毅. 腺源性肛瘘经手术治疗后创面愈合困难的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 82-85.
[8] 纪凯伦, 郝少龙, 孙海涛, 韩威. 减重术后胆囊结石形成机制的新进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 100-103.
[9] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[10] 范小彧, 孙司正, 鄂一民, 喻春钊. 梗阻性左半结肠癌不同手术治疗方案的选择应用[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 500-504.
[11] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[12] 程相阵. 腹茧症9例诊治分析并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 968-971.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要