切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 233 -237. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.03.006

所属专题： 文献；

临床论著

腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术患者术后快速康复中的作用
张珏颢1, 杨学林1, 张凯2,†()   
  1. 1. 210008　南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院麻醉科
    2. 210008　南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-01 出版日期:2020-06-18
  • 通信作者: 张凯

Application of transversus abdominis plane block in enhanced recovery after inguinal hernia repair

Juehao Zhang1, Xuelin Yang1, Kai Zhang2,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, The Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing 210008, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, The Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical College, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2019-12-01 Published:2020-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Kai Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Kai, Email:
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

张珏颢, 杨学林, 张凯. 腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术患者术后快速康复中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 233-237.

Juehao Zhang, Xuelin Yang, Kai Zhang. Application of transversus abdominis plane block in enhanced recovery after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 233-237.

目的

探讨腹横肌平面阻滞在腹股沟疝修补术患者术后快速康复中的应用价值。

方法

选择2017年7月至2019年6月在南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院行腹股沟疝修补术患者100例，年龄≥45岁，随机数字表法分为试验组（T组）和对照组（C组），每组各50例。T组患者全身麻醉后行患侧腹横肌平面阻滞（TAPB），给予0.375%罗哌卡因20 ml。记录所有患者术后2 h（T1）、6 h（T2）、12 h（T3）、24 h（T4）、3 d（T5）静息和运动视觉模拟疼痛（VAS）评分；记录术中镇静药物和镇痛药物使用量及术后不良反应发生情况；记录术前、术后1、3、7 d医院焦虑抑郁量表（HADS）评分结果和简易智能精神状态量表（MMSE）评分结果。

结果

T组患者术后T1、T2、T3、T4时点静息和运动VAS评分显著低于C组（P<0.05），T5时点运动VAS评分显著低于C组（P<0.05）；T组患者术中镇静药物、镇痛药物使用量较C组显著减少（P<0.05），术后恶心、呕吐发生率也显著降低（P<0.05）；T组患者术后1 d HADS评分显著低于C组（P<0.05）；T组患者术后1、3 d MMSE评分均显著低于C组（P<0.05）。

结论

TAPB可安全应用于腹股沟疝修补术患者，提供完善的术后镇痛效果，同时减少术后不良情绪的发生，预防术后认知水平的下降，符合术后快速康复的理念。

关键词: 疝，腹股沟, 疝修补术, 腹横肌平面阻滞
Objective

To observe the effect of transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) in patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

From July 2017 to June 2019, one hundred patients (age more than 45 years old) undergoing inguinal hernia repair in the Drum Tower Hospital affiliated to Nanjing University Medical College were divided into either TAP block group (group T) or control group (group C), with 50 cases in each group. Group T was treated with transversus abdominis plane block after general anesthesia while group C was treated with general anesthesia. The visual analogue scale scores at rest and on movement were applied to evaluate pain degrees 2 hours after surgery (T1), 6 hours after surgery (T2), 12 hours after surgery (T3), 24 hours after surgery (T4), and 3 days after surgery (T5). The incidences of adverse reactions and the use of sedative drugs and analgesics after surgery were recorded. The hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and mini-mental state examination (MMSE) were applied before surgery as well as 1, 3 and 7 days after surgery.

Results

The VAS scores during rest and movement in group T at T1, T2, T3 and T4 were lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The VAS scores on movement in group T at T5 were lower than that in group C (P<0.05). The use of sedative drugs and analgesics were significantly lower in group T than that of group C (P<0.05). The incidences of nausea and vomiting in group T were lower than those in group C (P<0.05). The scores of HADS in group T were lower than those in group C at one day after surgery (P<0.05). The scores of MMSE in group T were lower than those in group C at both one day and three days after surgery (P<0.05).

Conclusion

TAPB can be safely applied to patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. It provides an efficacy for postoperative analgesia as well as prevents the accident of depression and cognitive dysfunction after surgery, which accords with the idea of enhanced recovery after surgery.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Herniorrhaphy, Transversus abdominis plane block
表1 2组患者一般情况比较
组别 例数 性别(男/女) 年龄(岁,±s) 身高(cm,±s) 体重(kg,±s) ASAⅡ/Ⅲ级(例) 手术时间(min,±s)
T组 50 48/2 66.4±10.3 170.0±6.9 67.8±8.0 29/21 42.4±16.6
C组 50 47/3 67.2±22.4 170.0±7.1 69.1±8.0 33/17 43.8±13.2
χ2/t值 ? 0.003 0.229 0.000 0.813 0.002 0.467
P值 ? 0.602 0.819 1.000 0.418 0.410 0.642
表2 2组患者镇静药物、镇痛药物使用情况比较（±s）
组别 例数 丙泊酚(mg) 瑞芬太尼(μg) 芬太尼(μg)
T组 50 114.3±50.0 176.9±80.0 276.0±105.1
C组 50 184.7±50.1 232.6±54.4 351.0±96.6
t值 ? 7.033 4.072 3.676
P值 ? 0.000 0.000 0.000
表3 2组患者术后不同时点视觉模拟评分比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 静息 运动
T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5
T组 50 0.3±0.4 0.5±0.5 1.0±0.5 1.2±0.5 1.5±0.5 0.6±0.7 1.2±0.6 1.8±0.7 2.0±0.6 1.8±0.5
C组 50 0.6±0.6 1.1±0.6 1.7±0.5 2.0±0.4 1.6±0.5 1.4±0.9 2.0±0.6 2.5±0.8 2.4±0.7 2.0±0.5
t值 ? 3.366 5.455 7.000 8.791 1.000 4.969 6.667 4.667 3.077 2.000
P值 ? 0.001 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.320 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.048
表4 2组患者术后不良反应发生情况比较[例（%）]
组别 例数 恶心 呕吐
T组 50 4(8.0) 2(4.0)
C组 50 12(24.0) 8(16.0)
χ2值 ? 2.381 2.000
P值 ? 0.029 0.046
表5 2组患者不同时点HADS评分及MMSE评分比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 HADS评分 MMSE评分
术前 术后1 d 术后3 d 术后7 d 术前 术后1 d 术后3 d 术后7 d
T组 50 3.7±0.8 4.5±0.8 5.3±1.0 5.4±0.9 29.0±1.0 28.1±1.6 28.3±1.1 28.4±1.2
C组 50 3.5±0.8 5.0±0.8 5.6±0.7 5.7±0.6 29.0±1.0 27.2±1.3 27.4±0.8 28.3±0.8
t值 ? 1.250 3.125 1.734 1.961 0.000 2.400 3.082 0.490
P值 ? 0.214 0.002 0.086 0.053 1.000 0.018 0.003 0.625
[1]
Erqonenc T, Beyaz SG, Ozocak, et al. Persistent postherniorrhaphy pain following inguinal hernia repair: A cross-sectional study of prevalence, pain characteristics, and effects on quality of life[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 46: 126-132.
[2]
孙立，陈杰，申英末. 国产新型生物疝修补片与聚丙烯产品在腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 101-104.
[3]
刘子嘉，黄宇光，罗爱伦. 麻醉与加速术后康复[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2016, 36(8): 909-912.
[4]
李向南，李建立，容俊芳. 腹横肌平面阻滞在临床麻醉中的研究进展[J]. 河北医药, 2018(1): 2842-2846.
[5]
Smeds S, Nienhuijs S, Kullman E, et al. Identification and management of the ilio-inguinal and ilio-hypogastric nerves in open inguinal hernia repair: benefits of self-gripping mesh[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(1): 33-41.
[6]
Bona S, Rosati R, Opocher E, et al. Pain and quality of life after inguinal hernia surgery: a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing lightweight vs heavyweight mesh(Supermesh Study)[J]. Updates Surg, 2017, 70(1): 77-83.
[7]
Alfieri S, Amid PK, Campanelli G, et al. International guidelines for prevention and management of post-operative chronic pain following inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(3): 239-249.
[8]
张笛，谭嗣伟，梁存河, 等. 腹股沟疝手术多模式镇痛及快通道外科研究进展[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(4): 62-66.
[9]
Zhang Y, ChenY, Ma L. Depression and cardiovascular disease in elderly: Current understanding[J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2017, 47: 1-5.
[10]
Ji RR, Xu ZZ, Gao YJ. Emerging targets in neuroinflammation- driven chronic pain[J]. Nat Rev Drug Discov, 2014, 13(7): 533-548.
[11]
Huang Y, Coupland NJ, Lebel RM, et al. Structural changes in hippocampal subfields in major depressive disorder: A high-field magnetic resonance imaging study[J]. Biol Psychiatry, 2013, 74(1): 62-68.
[12]
Guo P, Hu S P. Thalidomide alleviates postoperative pain and spatial memory deficit in aged rats[J]. BiomedPharmacother, 2017, 95: 583-588.
[13]
Xuling L, Yang Y, Shengmei Z, et al. Inflammatory markers in postoperative delirium(POD) and cognitive dysfunction(POCD): A meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(4): e0195659.
[14]
姜徽，李元海，周磊, 等. 不同镇痛方法对老年食管癌患者术后疼痛及早期认知功能的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(5): 472-475.
[15]
Wang Y, Cheng J, Yang L, et al. Ropivacaine for Intercostal Nerve Block Improves Early Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction in Patients Following Thoracotomy for Esophageal Cancer[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2019, 25: 460-465.
[16]
李静，董补怀，蔡文博, 等. 连续腰丛阻滞降低老年患者髋关节置换术后早期认知功能障碍的发生[J]. 中南大学学报(医学版), 2018, 43(8): 858-863.
[17]
Odor P M, Chis Ster I, Wilkinson I, et al. Effect of admission fascia iliaca compartment blocks on post-operative abbreviated mental test scores in elderly fractured neck of femur patients: a retrospective cohort study[J]. BMC Anesthesiol, 2017, 17(1): 2.
[18]
杨学林，张凯，杜颖, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对老年腹股沟疝修补术患者术后疼痛的影响[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 441-444.
[19]
Kassiani T, Panagiota P, Athanasia T, et al. The effect of transversus abdominis plane block on acute and chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. A randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2019, 63: 63-70.
[20]
牟俊英，赵博，袁泉, 等. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞对无张力疝修补术后患者疼痛及生存质量的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(15): 2541-2543.
[21]
Arzu K, Mehmet AE, Ulku O, et al. Ultrasound-guided transversusbdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia in living liver donors: prospective, randomized, double-blinded clinical trial[J]. Clin Anesth, 2017, 37: 103-107.
[1] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[2] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术（TAPP）[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[3] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[4] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[5] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[6] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[9] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[10] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[11] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[12] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[13] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[14] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[15] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号