切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (01) : 27 -29. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.01.007

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

负压引流措施对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后临床血清肿发生率的影响
王维1,(), 郭文静2   
  1. 1. 017000 内蒙古,鄂尔多斯市第二人民医院外科
    2. 017000 内蒙古,鄂尔多斯市中心医院肿瘤科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-01 出版日期:2020-02-18
  • 通信作者: 王维

Effect of negative pressure drainage on the incidence of seroma following laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair

Wei Wang1,(), Wenjing Guo2   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, the Second People's Hospital of Ordos, Inner Mongolia 017000, China
  • Received:2019-04-01 Published:2020-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Wei Wang
引用本文:

王维, 郭文静. 负压引流措施对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后临床血清肿发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(01): 27-29.

Wei Wang, Wenjing Guo. Effect of negative pressure drainage on the incidence of seroma following laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(01): 27-29.

目的

探讨负压引流管对减少腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)患者术后血清肿发生率的影响。

方法

收集2017年2月至2018年2月,鄂尔多斯市第二人民医院接受TAPP术式的成人单侧腹股沟疝患者50例。引流组患者26例,将十字形负压引流管放置于疝补片与腹膜之间,经过腹膜外从同侧戳卡孔引出接负压;对照组患者24例,未放置引流管。对比分析引流组与对照组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、术后血清肿发生率。

结果

50例患者中直疝11例、斜疝39例。引流组平均手术时间[(69.04±3.49)min]较对照组[(64.38±3.41)min]长,但差异无统计学意义(P=0.345)。引流组术后平均住院时间与对照组相仿[(1.69±0.09)d vs(1.71±0.09)d],差异无统计学意义(P=0.904)。术后短期(2 d),引流组的血清肿发生率明显低于对照组[2(7.69%)vs 8(33.33%)],差异有统计学意义(P=0.032);引流组与对照组术后长期(7、14 d)的血清肿发生率比较,差异无统计学意义[7 d:2(7.69%)vs 5(20.83%),P=0.181;14 d:0 vs 1(4.17%),P=0.302]。

结论

负压引流可减少TAPP术后早期血清肿的发生,对长期血清肿的发生无明显影响。

Objective

Our research was to evaluate whether negative pressure drainage could reduce seroma incidence in patient receiving laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernia repair.

Methods

The clinical data of 50 cases of patients with unilateral hernia admitted to the Second People's Hospital of Ordos from Feb. 2017 to Feb. 2018 were collected and assigned to either drainage group (26 cases) or control group (24 cases). A cross-type negative pressure drainage tube was placed between the mesh and peritoneum only in the drainage group patients before peritoneum suture. The data of operative time, hospitalized stay and post-operative seroma incidence was collected and analyzed statistically in the drainage group and the control group.

Results

Of all 50 cases, 11 patients were direct inguinal hernia and 39 were indirect inguinal hernia. The average operative time was longer in the drainage group (69.04±3.49) minutes than that in the control group (64.38±3.41) minutes, however, without significance (P=0.345). The hospitalized stay were similar in both groups (drainage group vs control group: 1.69±0.09 days vs 1.71±0.09 days; P=0.904). But the post-operative seroma incidence was significantly lower in the drainage group [7.69% (2/26)] than in the control group [33.33% (8/24)] in short-term period (2 days) after TAPP surgery (P=0.032). While there was no significance in long-term period (7 days, 14 days) of comparison between the drainage group and control group after surgery [(7 days: drainage vs control: 7.69% (2/26) vs 20.83% (5/24), P=0.181; 14 days: drainage vs control: 0 (0/26) vs 4.17% (1/24), P=0.302].

Conclusion

Negative pressure drainage can reduce the incidence of early post-operative seroma in TAPP repair, while there is no significant effect on long-term post-operative seroma.

表1 引流组与对照组单侧腹股沟疝男性患者一般资料比较
[1]
李健文,王明刚,唐健雄, 等. 腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术规范化操作指南[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2013, 33(7): 566-570.
[2]
李俊生,邵翔宇,程韬, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝术后浆液肿的预防措施[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 1-4.
[3]
Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan BH, et al. Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(2): 325-328.
[4]
Ferzli GS, Kiel T. The role of the endoscopic extraperitoneal approach in large inguinal scrotal hernias[J]. Surg Endosc, 1997, 11(3): 299-302.
[5]
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr, Camps J, Cornet DA, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy. Results of a multicenter trial[J]. Ann Surg, 1995, 221(1): 3-13.
[6]
Lau H, Lee F. Seroma following endoscopic extraperitonealinguinal hernioplasty[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(11): 1773-1777.
[7]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[8]
Birch DW. Characterizing laparoscopic incisional hernia repair[J]. Can J Surg, 2007, 50(3): 195-201.
[9]
Muysoms F, Campanelli G, Champault GG, et al. EuraHS: the development of an international online platform for registration and outcome measurement of ventral abdominal wall hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 239-250.
[10]
曾玉剑,孙亮,施承民, 等. 经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术618例[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5): 409-411.
[11]
Robinson TN, Clarke JH, Schoen J, et al. Major mesh-related complication following hernia repair: events reported to the Food and Drug Administration[J]. Surg Endosc, 2005, 19(12): 1556-1560.
[12]
纪光伟,吴志远,王旭, 等. 高频电刀对腹部切口愈合影响的实验和临床研究[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2002, 82(17): 1199-1202.
[13]
Novik B, Hagedorn S, Mork UB, et al. Fibrin glue for securing the mesh in laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a study with a 40-month prospective follow-up period[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(3): 462-467.
[14]
司仙科,李炜,杨佳华, 等. 负压引流在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后减少血清肿的临床应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 30-33.
[15]
吴日钊,隋梁,李亮. 开放式双侧腹股沟疝腹膜前修补术防治血清肿的临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2011, 5(8): 282-288.
[1] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[2] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[3] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[4] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[5] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[6] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[7] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[8] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[9] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[10] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[11] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[12] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[13] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[14] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[15] 臧宇, 姚胜, 朱新勇, 戎世捧, 田智超. 低温等离子射频消融治疗腹壁疝术后补片感染的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-692.
阅读次数
全文


摘要