切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 117 -121. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.02.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

回肠代膀胱术后造口疝二种术式的疗效
陈元浩1, 刘敏2, 陈杰2, 申英末2, 韩修武1,(), 张鑫1, 李高1   
  1. 1. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院京西院区泌尿外科
    2. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-12 出版日期:2019-04-18
  • 通信作者: 韩修武

Observation of two surgical treatment approaches of Paraileostomal Herniorraphy

Yuanhao Chen1, Min Liu2, Jie Chen2, Yingmo Shen2, Xiuwu Han1,,(), Xin Zhang1, Gao Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
    2. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2018-10-12 Published:2019-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiuwu Han
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Han Xiuwu, Email:
引用本文:

陈元浩, 刘敏, 陈杰, 申英末, 韩修武, 张鑫, 李高. 回肠代膀胱术后造口疝二种术式的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(02): 117-121.

Yuanhao Chen, Min Liu, Jie Chen, Yingmo Shen, Xiuwu Han, Xin Zhang, Gao Li. Observation of two surgical treatment approaches of Paraileostomal Herniorraphy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(02): 117-121.

目的

探讨杂交以及Keyhole2种方式治疗回肠代膀胱造口疝相关并发症的比较研究。

方法

收集2013年1月至2018年1月,首都医科大学附属朝阳医院京西院区住院治疗的回肠代膀胱术后并发造口疝30例患者的临床资料,其中杂交法组14例,Keyhole组16例。比较其术前、术后第1天、术后1周肌酐变化,统计术后泌尿外科相关并发症发生率等。

结果

杂交法组与Keyhole组在年龄、体质量指数、术前血肌酐、术后1周血肌酐、回肠膀胱术后至出现造口疝时间、出现造口疝至手术时间、疝囊大小、疝环大小、住院时间,术中出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。杂交法组手术时间明显长于Keyhole法组,杂交法组术后第1天血肌酐明显高于Keyhole组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),但2组术后1周血肌酐水平比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。双肾积水发生率Keyhole组为0%,杂交法组为21%(3/14);其中术后7 d内有2例患者出现双肾积水,均于回肠膀胱造口留置尿管后解除;1例患者术后2个月出现双肾积水,通过双肾穿刺造瘘后解除尿路梗阻。

结论

对于回肠代膀胱术后并发造口疝患者,杂交法及Keyhole均为有效手术治疗方式,杂交法较Keyhole法出现术后短期一过性肌酐升高及肾积水的概率更高,但经保守治疗大部分可于短期内缓解,故推荐使用Keyhole法治疗回肠代膀胱造口疝。

objective

To evaluate the clinical outcome and urological complications of Keyhole surgery and hybrid technique in the treatment of paraileostomal herniorraphy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 30 cases of paraileostomal herniorraphy after radical cystectomy in Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from January 2013 to January 2018 was conducted, including 16 cases with Keyhole approaches and 14 cases with hybrid technique. Clinical effects and characteristics and the serum creatinine level of pre/post-operative were compared.

Results

Two approaches showed no significant differences in age BMI, pre-operative serum creatinine level, post-operative serum creatinine level at 1 week, the duration time of hernia history, the duration time of hernia occurrence to surgery, size of hernia sac, length of hernia, hospitalization time, volume of intraoperative blood loss. Operation time in hybrid group was apparently longer than that in Keyhole group (P<0.05). Serum creatinine level at 1 d after operation showed significant difference between two approaches, and hybrid group were higher than Keyhole group. Bilateral hydronephrosis was not observed in Keyhole group. The incidence of two bilateral hydronephrosis was 3/14 in hybrid group: 2 patients occurred within first week after surgery. The bilateral hydronephrosis were relieved after catheter placement. 1 patient was diagnosed bilateral hydronephrosis at 2 months after surgery, which relieved by bilateral percutaneous nephrostomy.

Conclusion

Hybrid and Keyhole approaches were both effective approaches for paraileostomal herniorraphy, hybrid group are more likely to have bilateral hydronephrosis and short-term increased serum creatinine level after surgery, and however it can be resolved through the effective treatment in short time. We suggest that the serum creatinine level should be monitored at least one week after surgery. If the hydronephrosis were observed it should be resolved properly.

图1 杂交法术中
图2 Keyhole法术中
表1 Keyhole组与杂交法组患者一般资料比较(±s
[1]
Stein JP, Lieskovsky G, Cote R, et al. Radical cystectomy in the treatment of invasive bladder cancer: long-term results in 1054 patients[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2001, 19(3): 666-675.
[2]
Donahue TF, Bochner BH. Parastomal hernias after radical cystectomy and ileal conduit diversion[J]. Investig Clin Urol, 2016, 57(4): 240-248.
[3]
Movassaghi K, Shah SH, Cai J, et al. Incisional and Parastomal Hernia following Radical Cystectomy and Urinary Diversion: The University of Southern California Experience[J]. J Urol, 2016, 1963 777-781.
[4]
Cingi A, Cakir T, Sever A, et al. Enterostomy site hernias: a clinical and computerized tomographic evaluation[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2006, 49(10): 1559-1563.
[5]
Kouba E, Sands M, Lentz A, et al. Incidence and risk factors of stomal complications in patients undergoing cystectomy with ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer[J]. J Urol, 2007, 178(3 Pt 1): 950-954.
[6]
Goligher JC, Lloyd-Davies OV, Robertson CT. Small-gut obstructions following combined excision of the rectum with special reference to strangulation round the colostomy[J]. Br J Surg, 1951, 38(152): 467-473.
[7]
Cuthbertson AM, Collins JP. Strangulated para-ileostomy hernia[J]. Aust N Z J Surg, 1977, 47(1): 86-87.
[8]
何凯,姚琪远,陈浩, 等. 腹腔镜下回肠袋膀胱造口旁疝补片修补术初步体会[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2007, 1(2): 110-112.
[9]
吴海啸,王先道,余谦, 等. 全膀胱切除术后输尿管梗阻的诊断和微创治疗[J]. 中华泌尿外科杂志, 2003, 25(3): 180-182.
[10]
Hyams ES, Winer AG, Shah O. Retrograde ureteral and renal access in patients with urinary diversion[J]. Urology, 2009, 74(1): 47-50.
[11]
Narang SK, Alam NN, Campain NJ, et al. Campain .Parastomal hernia following cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion: a systematic review[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(2): 163-175.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[9] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[10] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[11] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[12] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[13] 陈金水, 陈金福, 郑开福, 祝晓路, 王铁虎, 谭俊, 李正平. 腹腔镜疝修补术治疗原发性耻骨上疝七例的临床体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 548-551.
[14] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[15] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?