切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (05) : 375 -378. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.05.015

所属专题: 文献

论著

轻量型网塞在治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝患者中的应用价值
于宏伟1,(), 邓海1, 刘立民1, 朱明文1, 张宗明1   
  1. 1. 100053 首都医科大学北京电力教学医院
  • 收稿日期:2017-11-09 出版日期:2018-10-18
  • 通信作者: 于宏伟

Application value of lightweight mesh plug for recurrent inguinal hernia in elderly patients

Hongwei Yu1,(), Hai Deng1, Limin Liu1, Mingwen Zhu1, Zongming Zhang1   

  1. 1. Beijing Electric Power Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100053, China
  • Received:2017-11-09 Published:2018-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Hongwei Yu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yu Hongwei, Email:
引用本文:

于宏伟, 邓海, 刘立民, 朱明文, 张宗明. 轻量型网塞在治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝患者中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(05): 375-378.

Hongwei Yu, Hai Deng, Limin Liu, Mingwen Zhu, Zongming Zhang. Application value of lightweight mesh plug for recurrent inguinal hernia in elderly patients[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(05): 375-378.

目的

探讨网塞在老年复发性腹股沟疝修补术中的应用价值。

方法

收集2013年8月至2016年8月,北京电力医院行疝环充填式无张力疝修补术的老年复发性腹股沟疝54例患者的临床资料,按照术中使用补片的不同分为试验组和对照组。试验组患者30例,术中均使用轻量聚丙烯网塞行疝环充填手术。对照组患者24例,术中均使用标准聚丙烯网塞行疝环充填手术。对比2组患者的手术时间、术后住院时间、血清肿发生率、局部异物感、慢性疼痛、复发率及切口感染等指标。

结果

2组患者的一般资料如年龄、ASA分级、手术时间、术中出血、住院时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者均未出现复发、感染、慢性疼痛的病例,2组患者的住院花费、血清肿发生率和异物感发生率差比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

轻量型网塞在治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝的价格随略高于标准型网塞,但能能够减低术后血清肿和异物感的发生。

Objective

To investigate application value of lightweight mesh plug for recurrent inguinal hernia in elderly patients.

Methods

A total of 54 elderly patients of recurrent inguinal hernia receiving mesh plug operation in Beijing Electric Power Hospital from August 2013 to August 2016 were divided into two groups according using of lightweight mesh plug or standard mesh plug. There were 30 cases in lightweight mesh group and 24 cases in standard mesh group. The clinical data were collected and compared including operation time, post-operative hospital stay, incidence of seroma, foreign body sensation, chronic pain, recurrence rate and surgical site infection.

Results

The differences of age, ASA, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative hospital stay between two groups were not statistically significant. No case of recurrence, chronic pain or surgical site infection was observed. The differences of hospital cost, incidence of seroma and foreign body sensation were significant between two groups.

Conclusion

It’s worthy to promote lightweight mesh plug in elderly patients with recurrent inguinal hernia although it may cost more. It can reduce the incidence of seroma and foreign body sensation.

表1 2组患者观察指标比较
[1]
Jakhmola CK, Kumar A. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the Armed Forces: A 5-year single centre study[J]. Med J Armed Forces India, 2015, 71(4):317-323.
[2]
唐健雄,黄磊,李绍杰, 等. 我国疝和腹壁外科前景展望[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(1):15-19.
[3]
刘子文,孙蒙清,张立阳, 等. 开放式腹膜前间隙修补术与Lichtenstein无张力修补术治疗腹股沟疝的比较研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2014, 52(9):682-85.
[4]
Öberg S, Andresen K, Rosenberg J. Surgical approach for recurrent inguinal hernias: a Nationwide Cohort Study[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(6):777-782.
[5]
李民,刘小卫,熊俊, 等. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术712例术后并发症原因分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(5):270-274.
[6]
Sanders DL, Samarakoon DH, Ganshirt SW, et al. A two-centre blinded randomised control study comparing the Lichtenstein patch, Perfix plug and ProLoop plug in the repair of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(5):499-503.
[7]
Hirose T, Takayama Y, Komatsu S, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight or heavyweight mesh for mesh plug repair of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(2):213-219.
[8]
李颖如. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后积液的B超诊断[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2010, 4(2):117-118.
[9]
Fang Z, Ren F, Zhou J, et al. Biologic mesh versus synthetic mesh in open inguinal hernia repair: system review and meta-analysis[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2015, 85(12):910-916.
[10]
Samaali I, Zenaidi HH, Dougaz W, et al. Treatment of inguinal hernia by lichtenstein technique: an open prospective study[J]. Tunis Med, 2016, 94(12):872.
[11]
唐健雄, 华蕾, 张逖. 上海地区腹股沟疝发病情况的初步流行病学调查[D]. 中华医学会第十四届全国外科学术会议论文汇编, 上海, 2001: 70.
[12]
Pisanu A, Podda M, Saba A, et al. Meta-analysis and review of prospective randomized trials comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein techniques in recurrent inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(3):355-66.
[13]
裴国清 杨帆 倪晓春, 等. 轻量型和中量型补片用于腹股沟疝无张力修补术的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(1):4-9.
[14]
Fortelny RH, Petter-Puchner AH, Redl H, et al. Assessment of pain and quality of life in lichtenstein hernia repair using a new monofilament PTFE mesh: comparison of suture vs. fibrin-sealant mesh fixation[J]. Front Surg, 2014, 1:45.
[15]
Demetrashvili Z, Khutsishvili K, Pipia I, et al. Standard polypropylene mesh vs lightweight mesh for Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Int J Surg, 2014, 12(12):1380-1384.
[16]
Ki V, Rotstein C. Bacterial skin and soft tissue infections in adults: A review of their epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and site of care[J]. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol, 2008, 19(2):173-184.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[4] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[5] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[6] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[7] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[8] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[9] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[10] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[11] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[12] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[13] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[14] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?