切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2018, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 217 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.03.015

所属专题: 文献

循证医学

轻型补片与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中有效性和安全性的荟萃分析
张振名1, 张著杰1, 李坡1,()   
  1. 1. 734000 甘肃张掖,河西学院附属张掖人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-11 出版日期:2018-06-18
  • 通信作者: 李坡

Comparison of lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh in inguinal hernia repair: A Meta-analysis

Zhenming Zhang1, Zhujie Zhang1, Po Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Zhangye People's Hospital of He Xi College, Zhangye 734000, China
  • Received:2017-10-11 Published:2018-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Po Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Po, Email:
引用本文:

张振名, 张著杰, 李坡. 轻型补片与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中有效性和安全性的荟萃分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(03): 217-222.

Zhenming Zhang, Zhujie Zhang, Po Li. Comparison of lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh in inguinal hernia repair: A Meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 217-222.

目的

系统评价轻量型补片与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中的有效性和安全性。

方法

计算机检索PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国科技期刊全文数据库、中国期刊全文数据库。全面收集比较轻量型补片与传统补片在腹股沟疝修有效性和安全性的随机对照试验(randomized controlled trials,RCTs),2名评价者独立评价纳入文献的方法学质量,用RevMan 5.3软件进行统计分析。

结果

共纳入19篇RCTs,Meta分析结果显示,轻量型补片组与传统传统补片组患者在复发率方面比较,差异无统计学意义[RR=0.82,95% CI(0.56~1.19),P=0.30];在慢性疼痛[RR=0.68,95% CI(0.57~0.81),P<0.000 1]、异物感[RR=0.67,95% CI(0.56~0.81),P<0.000 1]及其并发症[RR=0.63,95% CI(0.51~0.77),P<0.000 1]方面比较,差异均有统计学意义。

结论

轻量型补片与传统传统补片在无张力疝修补术中的复发率方面相似,而轻量型补片减轻慢性疼痛、异物感及并发症发生方面优于传统补片。

Objective

To systematic review the efficacy and safety of use of lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Chinese biomedicine literature database, Chinese Journal full-text database and Chinese Scientific Journals full-text database for randomized controlled trials comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh in inguinal hernia repair. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of included studies. We analyzed the statistic data using Review Manager (version 5.3).

Results

19 randomized controlled trials were included. Meta analysis showed that there was no significant difference between lightweight mesh and heavyweight mesh in recurrence rate [RR=0.82, 95% CI (0.56, 1.19), P=0.30], but significant differences were existed in chronic groin pain [RR=0.68, 95% CI (0.57,0.81), P<0.000 1], foreign body sensation [RR=0.67, 95% CI (0.56, 0.81), P<0.000 1] and complication incidence [RR=0.63, 95% CI (0.51, 0.77), P<0.000 1].

Conclusion

Compared with heavyweight mesh, the application of lightweight mesh for inguinal hernia repair was similar in hernia recurrence rate. Lightweight mesh reduced the incidence of chronic groin pain and the risk of foreign body sensation as well as complication incidence.

表1 纳入文献基本特征表
图1 纳入文献方法学质量评价图
图2 轻型与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中复发率的Meta分析
图3 轻型与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中慢性疼痛的Meta分析
图4 轻型与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中异物感的Meta分析
图5 轻型与传统补片在腹股沟疝修补术中其他症状的Meta分析
[1]
Groene SA, Prasad T, Lincourt AE, et al. Prospective, multi-institutional surgical and quality-of-life outcomes comparison of heavyweight, midweight, and lightweight mesh in open ventral hernia repair[J]. Am J Surg, 2016, 212(6): 1054-1062.
[2]
Awad SS, Fagan SP. Current approaches to inguinal hernia repair[J]. Am J Surg, 2004, 188(6A Suppl): 9S-16S.
[3]
O'Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, et al. Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(2): 166-170.
[4]
Burgmans JP, Voorbrood CE, Simmermacher RK, et al. Long-term results of a randomized double-blinded prospective trial of a lightweight(ultrapro) vs a heavyweight mesh(prolene) in laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair(TULP-trial) [J]. An Surg, 2016, 263(5): 862-866.
[5]
Bringman S, Heikkinen TJ, Wollert S, et al. Early results of a single-blinded, randomized, controlled, Internet-based multicenter trial comparing Prolene and Vypro II mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty[J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(2): 127-134.
[6]
Post S, Weiss B, Willer M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of lightweight composite mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2004, 91(1): 44-48.
[7]
Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, et al. One year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing Prolene and Vypro II-mesh in Lichtenstein hernioplasty[J]. Hernia, 2005, 9(3): 223-227.
[8]
Bringman S, Wollert S, Osterberg J, et al. Three-year results of a randomized clinical trial of lightweight or standard polypropylene mesh in Lichtenstein repair of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2006, 93(9): 1056-1059.
[9]
Heikkinen T, Wollert S, Osterberg J, et al. Early results of a randomised trial comparing Prolene and VyproII-mesh in endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair(TEP) of recurrent unilateral hernias[J]. Hernia, 2006, 10(1): 34-40.
[10]
Paajanen H. A single-surgeon randomized trial comparing three composite meshes on chronic pain after Lichtenstein hernia repair in local anesthesia[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(4): 335-339.
[11]
Champault G, Bernard C, Rizk N, et al. Inguinal hernia repair: the choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(2): 125-128.
[12]
Koch A, Bringman S, Myrelid P, et al. Randomized clinical trial of groin hernia repair with titanium-coated lightweight mesh compared with standard polypropylene mesh[J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95(10): 1226.
[13]
Smietański M, Bigda J, Łukasiewicz J, et al. Randomized clinical trial comparing a polypropylene with a poliglecaprone and polypropylene composite mesh for inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95(12): 1462-1468.
[14]
Agarwal BB, Agarwal KA, Mahajan KC. Prospective double-blind randomized controlled study comparing heavy- and lightweight polypropylene mesh in totally extraperitoneal repair of inguinal hernia: early results[J]. Surg Endosc, 2009, 23(2): 242-247.
[15]
Nikkolo C, Lepner U, Murruste M, et al. Randomised clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh with heavyweight mesh for inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Hernia, 2010, 14(3): 253-258.
[16]
Chowbey PK, Garg N, Sharma A, et al. Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing lightweight mesh and heavyweight polypropylene mesh in endoscopic totally extraperitoneal groin hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(12): 3073-3079.
[17]
Chui LB, Ng WT, Sze YS, et al. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial comparing lightweight versus heavyweight mesh in chronic pain incidence after TEP repair of bilateral inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2010, 24(11): 2735-2738.
[18]
Smietański M, Bury K, Smietańska IA, et al.Five-year results of a randomised controlled multi-centre study comparing heavy-weight knitted versus low-weight, non-woven polypropylene implants in Lichtenstein hernioplasty[J]. Hernia, 2011, 15(5): 495-501.
[19]
Peeters E, Spiessens C, Oyen R, et al. Sperm motility after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair with lightweight meshes: 3-year follow-up of a randomised clinical trial[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18(3): 361-367.
[20]
Fitzgibbons RJ. Can we be sure polypropylene mesh causes infertility? [J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 241(4): 559-561.
[21]
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Conze J, et al. Modified mesh for hernia repair that is adapted to the physiology of the abdominal wall[J]. Eur J Surg, 1998, 164(12): 951-960.
[1] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[2] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[3] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[4] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[5] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[6] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[7] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[8] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[9] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[13] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[14] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[15] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
阅读次数
全文


摘要