切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 557 -562. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.05.014

论著

经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后患者出院准备度的影响因素分析
刘海露, 刘红†()   
  1. 226500 江苏,如皋市人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-24 出版日期:2026-10-18
  • 通信作者: 刘红
  • 基金资助:
    如皋市指令性科技攻关计划项目(SRGS(24)043)

Factors influencing readiness for hospital discharge after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

Hailu Liu, Hong Liu†()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Rugao People's Hospital, Rugao 226500, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2026-01-24 Published:2026-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Hong Liu
引用本文:

刘海露, 刘红. 经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后患者出院准备度的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 557-562.

Hailu Liu, Hong Liu. Factors influencing readiness for hospital discharge after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 557-562.

目的

探讨腹股沟疝患者接受经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)后出院准备度的影响因素。

方法

本研究采用回顾性横断面调查方法。收集2024年6月至2025年6月在如皋市人民医院行TAPP的110例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。收集患者的一般资料、疾病与手术特征及术后恢复情况,采用中文版出院准备度量表(RHDS)评估其出院准备度。比较不同特征患者的RHDS评分差异,分析其独立影响因素。

结果

110例患者RHDS总分为(89.23±20.28)分。单因素分析显示,年龄>70岁、农村居住地、未婚状态、自费医疗、主要照顾者为非家人或无人、独居、采用开放手术、疝类型为直疝或复合疝、合并慢性疾病、术后发生局部水肿或尿潴留、术后疼痛视觉模拟评分≥4分及感知自理能力下降的患者,其RHDS评分均较低(P<0.05)。年龄>70岁(β=-18.502,95% CI -24.425~-12.613)、农村居住地(β=-6.054,95% CI -10.534~-1.642)、未婚状态(β=-12.106,95% CI -18.449~-5.821)及术后中重度疼痛(β=-15.204,95% CI -23.815~-6.601)是TAPP患者术后出院准备度不足的独立危险因素。

结论

腹股沟疝患者TAPP术后出院准备度受多种因素影响,其中高龄、农村户籍、未婚及术后中重度疼痛是主要独立危险因素。临床应针对以上高风险人群,重点加强围手术期疼痛管理与个体化出院指导。

Objective

To investigate the factors associated with readiness for hospital discharge among patients undergoing transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted involving 110 patients who underwent TAPP inguinal hernia repair at Rugao People's Hospital between June 2024 and June 2025. Data on patient demographics, disease- and surgery-related characteristics, and postoperative recovery were collected. Readiness for hospital discharge was assessed using the Chinese version of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Scale (RHDS). RHDS scores were compared among patients with different clinical and demographic characteristics, and independent factors associated with discharge readiness were identified.

Results

The mean RHDS score among the 110 patients was (89.23±20.28). Univariate analysis showed that patients aged >70 years, those residing in rural areas, unmarried patients, self-paying patients, those whose primary caregivers were non-family members or who had no primary caregiver, those living alone, those who underwent open surgery, those with direct or combined inguinal hernias, those with chronic comorbidities, those experiencing postoperative local edema or urinary retention, those with a postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score ≥4, and those reporting a perceived decline in self-care ability had significantly lower RHDS scores (all P<0.05). Multivariable analysis identified age >70 years (β=−18.502, 95% CI −24.425 to −12.613), rural residence (β=−6.054, 95% CI −10.534 to −1.642), unmarried status (β=−12.106, 95% CI −18.449 to −5.821), and moderate-to-severe postoperative pain (β=−15.204, 95% CI −23.815 to −6.601) as independent factors associated with lower RHDS scores.

Conclusion

Readiness for hospital discharge after TAPP inguinal hernia repair is associated with multiple factors, particularly advanced age, rural residence, unmarried status, and moderate-to-severe postoperative pain. Greater attention should be given to patients with these characteristics, with an emphasis on optimizing perioperative pain management and providing individualized discharge education to improve discharge readiness.

表1 不同特征患者经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后出院准备度量表评分的单因素分析(n=110)
因素 例(%) 出院准备度评分(分,±s) t/F值 P值
年龄a 14.028 <0.001
≤70岁 78(70.91) 99.62±10.93
>70岁 32(29.09) 63.91±14.68
性别 1.849 0.067
男性 94(85.45) 88.33±20.79
女性 16(14.55) 98.20±11.18
文化程度 2.188 0.094
小学及以下 25(22.73) 80.48± 22.54
初中 35(31.82) 92.26 ± 16.80
高中 20(18.18) 89.55 ± 19.93
专科及以上 30(27.27) 92.77 ± 21.06
居住地 8.123 <0.001
城镇 65(59.09) 99.57±11.99
农村 45(40.91) 74.29±20.57
婚姻状况 3.723 <0.001
已婚 100(90.91) 91.38±18.72
未婚 10(9.09) 67.70±23.63
医保方式 2.092 0.039
自费 18(16.36) 80.22±26.42
医保 92(83.64) 90.99±18.52
主要照顾者 20.405 <0.001
家人照顾 85 (77.27) 94.92 ± 17.21
其他人照顾 12 (10.91) 66.50 ± 11.09
自己照顾 13 (11.82) 73.00 ± 22.76
居住状态 9.671 <0.001
独居 22(20.00) 61.73±17.24
非独居 88(80.00) 96.10±14.29
疝类型 32.849 <0.001
斜疝 82 (74.55) 96.49 ± 15.61
直疝 23 (20.91) 68.65 ± 17.97
复合疝 5 (4.55) 64.80 ± 15.19
疝部位 1.661 0.100
单侧 101(91.82) 90.18±20.01
双侧 9(8.18) 78.56±21.37
合并慢性疾病 7.066 <0.001
否 63(57.27) 99.03±13.86
是 47(42.73) 76.09±20.18
术后局部水肿 9.908 <0.001
否 62(56.36) 101.48±9.29
是 48(43.64) 73.40±19.68
术后尿潴留 9.329 <0.001
否 68(61.82) 99.82±12.26
是 42(38.18) 72.07±18.96
术后疼痛VAS评分 12.263 <0.001
<4分 75(68.18) 99.75±10.37
≥4分 35(31.82) 66.69±17.80
感知自理能力下降 11.648 <0.001
否 80(72.73) 98.45±12.22
是 30(27.27) 64.63±16.68
手术时长 1.506 0.135
≤60 min 98(89.09) 91.50±13.84
>60 min 12(10.91) 85.18±12.63
术中出血量 0.946 0.346
≤20 ml 96(87.27) 90.57±14.52
>20 ml 14(12.73) 86.72±11.81
表2 110例经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后患者出院准备度量表评分得分情况(分,±s)
表3 经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后患者出院准备度影响因素赋值表
表4 经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后患者出院准备度影响因素的多重线性回归模型
[1]
李坤, 李洪涛, 范瑞芳, 等. 1990—2021年中国腹股沟疝、股疝和腹部疝的疾病负担分析及未来预测[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(2): 213-220.
[2]
Correia de Sá T, Jácome F, Basto T, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal(TAPP) repair for emergency groin hernia: a systematic review[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(4): 1005-1015.
[3]
Feldbusch H, Schmidt M, Steeb EM, et al. Theoretical concepts and instruments for measuring hospital discharge readiness: A scoping review[J]. Heliyon, 2024, 10(5): e26554.
[4]
徐美玲, 陈莉. 日间手术模式下腹股沟疝患者出院准备度影响因素分析[J]. 现代消化及介入诊疗, 2022, 27(1): 63-67.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(1): 1-8.
[6]
Lin YH, Kao CC, Huang AM, et al.[Psychometric testing of the Chinese version of the readiness for hospital discharge scale][J]. Hu Li Za Zhi, 2014, 61(4): 56-65.
[7]
Perez AJ, Campbell S. Inguinal hernia repair in older persons[J]. J Am Med Dir Assoc, 2022, 23(4): 563-567.
[8]
Akeel N. Short-Term Outcomes of Inguinal Hernia Repair in Older Patients: A Retrospective Review at a Tertiary Center[J]. Cureus, 2021, 13(9): e18170.
[9]
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Ferraro SD, et al. Treatment of inguinal hernia: systematic review and updated network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Ann Surg, 2021, 274(6): 954-961.
[10]
安若轩, 陈圆圆, 刘良红, 等. 出院准备度的概念分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2025, 40(2): 104-107.
[11]
王莹, 杨芳, 韩燕, 等. 老年病人出院准备度研究进展[J]. 护理研究, 2022, 36(15): 2713-2720.
[12]
Golik D, Jędras K, Sroczyński P, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in the elderly population: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2024, 19(3): 325-329.
[13]
Chan CL, Diehl KM, Hall KE, et al. Unrealistic Postsurgical Expectation of Independence Predicts Complex Hospital Discharge [J]. J Surg Res, 2019, 235: 501-512.
[14]
李雪, 童新格, 刘婷, 等. 老年腹股沟疝患者术后出院准备度影响因素及干预策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(2): 213-216.
[15]
Huang J, Deng B, Shuai J, et al. Effect of different routes of administration on early cognitive function following inguinal hernia repair[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(7): 7882-7889.
[16]
Liu H, Wang Z, Hu J, et al. Measuring the continuing care needs of inpatients in rural China[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2024, 24(1): 308.
[17]
黄静, 叶春花, 商玉环. 流程化沟通模式对腹股沟疝日间手术患者出院准备度的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(1): 105-108.
[18]
屈坤鹏, 张琪, 成晓舟, 等. 成人腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床治疗策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2021, 20(7): 779-784.
[19]
倪荔, 张伟英, 汤舟青, 等. 快速康复理念对行腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者自我效能的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 665-668.
[20]
仝聪, 陈曦, 周哲琦, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与Lichtenstein手术对腹股沟疝患者术后早期疼痛和行动力的影响[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2024, 23(12): 1530-1537.
[1] 罗舒琪, 张丽君, 纪世召, 胡晓燕, 冯苹, 周万芳. 烧伤患者创伤后应激障碍的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(05): 384-388.
[2] 蔡洁琛, 余晓宁, 谢健琦. 根尖周炎根管治疗疗效列线图预测模型的构建及效能验证[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 404-409.
[3] 刘宝平, 徐爱忠. 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术中轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 485-489.
[4] 杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 周烨, 杨建玲. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 343-346.
[5] 张浩然, 王实现, 王凯, 缪骥. SSLA治疗复发性阑尾炎的疗效与手术时间因素研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 379-383.
[6] 谢华林, 刘宾, 孙倩男, 王道荣. 改善术后肠造口功能研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 398-401.
[7] 李骏, 马军, 宋康颉. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 513-517.
[8] 钱海婷, 景金凤, 郭芸青. 青年单侧腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术的远期预后比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 518-522.
[9] 段梦平, 李仕虎, 董发庭, 段周彬, 张艳虹, 杨莉, 尹晓燕, 宋代洪. 成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝肠缺血风险与干预时机[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 528-532.
[10] 阿米娜·艾合买提, 刘辉, 王雅琪, 王晶, 阿尔新·哈布丁. 完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与腹横纹小切口手术对小儿腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 533-538.
[11] 张丽康, 杨硕, 张文峰, 马成. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中电钩热分离与分离钳冷分离疝囊的临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 546-551.
[12] 王文青, 孙宇, 吴恺明. α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术切口管理中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 390-393.
[13] 程正武, 李浩然, 奚士航, 王俊峰. 后鞘后入路单孔腹腔镜全腹膜外补片修补术治疗腹股沟疝[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 394-398.
[14] 王英, 尤理想, 郑成, 吴石兵. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术用于老年急性嵌顿性腹股沟疝的疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 399-404.
[15] 高敬, 余安, 冯莉, 薛振峰. 智能镇痛与常规镇痛对腹股沟疝修补术后患者的镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 405-409.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?