切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 528 -532. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.05.009

论著

成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝肠缺血风险与干预时机
段梦平1, 李仕虎1, 董发庭1, 段周彬1, 张艳虹2, 杨莉2, 尹晓燕1, 宋代洪1,†()   
  1. 1675000 云南楚雄,楚雄彝族自治州人民医院普外一科
    2675000 云南楚雄,楚雄彝族自治州人民医院消化内一科
  • 收稿日期:2026-05-27 出版日期:2026-10-18
  • 通信作者: 宋代洪

Bowel ischemia risk and timing of intervention in adults with incarcerated inguinal hernia

Mengping Duan1, Shihu Li1, Fating Dong1, Zhoubin Duan1, Yanhong Zhang2, Li Yang2, Xiaoyan Yin1, Daihong Song1,†()   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery I, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Chuxiong 675000, Yunnan Province, China
    2Department of Gastroenterology I, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital, Chuxiong 675000, Yunnan Province, China
  • Received:2026-05-27 Published:2026-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Daihong Song
引用本文:

段梦平, 李仕虎, 董发庭, 段周彬, 张艳虹, 杨莉, 尹晓燕, 宋代洪. 成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝肠缺血风险与干预时机[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 528-532.

Mengping Duan, Shihu Li, Fating Dong, Zhoubin Duan, Yanhong Zhang, Li Yang, Xiaoyan Yin, Daihong Song. Bowel ischemia risk and timing of intervention in adults with incarcerated inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 528-532.

目的

探讨成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者术前炎性指标、CT征象与肠缺血性坏死的关系,并描述不同干预时机下的术式选择及近期结局。

方法

采用单中心回顾性队列设计。回顾性分析2022年11月至2025年2月楚雄彝族自治州人民医院收治的57例成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。按初始干预分为急诊手术组(34例)和平诊手术组(23例)。平诊手术组包括手法复位成功15例及短期观察8例,均于同次住院期间手术,实际间隔为1~4 d。记录2组患者的炎性指标(白细胞计数、C反应蛋白、中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比值)、CT征象、手术方式、肠切除、补片修补及并发症。

结果

平诊手术组年龄[(58.1±16.9)岁比(67.1±13.2)岁,t=2.254,P=0.028]、术前炎性指标升高比例[4.3%(1/23)比58.8%(20/34),P<0.001]均低于急诊手术组。7例不可逆性肠缺血性坏死患者均伴炎性指标升高及至少1项CT缺血相关征象,均在急诊手术组并行肠切除。平诊手术组病历、手术记录及随访中未记录到临床诊断的迟发性肠坏死。平诊手术组腹腔镜术式应用比例较高。2组共有5例发生术后并发症,均经保守处理后好转。

结论

本队列中肠坏死病例均同时存在炎性指标升高和CT缺血相关征象。对经综合评估严格筛选的低风险患者,手法复位后同次住院期间安排平诊手术可能可行;本研究观察到的1~4 d不应解读为经验证的最佳时间窗。

Objective

To evaluate the association of preoperative inflammatory markers and CT findings with bowel ischemic necrosis in adults with incarcerated inguinal hernia and to describe the selection of surgical procedure and short-term outcomes according to different timing of intervention.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective cohort study. Clinical data of 57 adults patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia admitted to Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture People's Hospital between November 2022 and February 2025 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided as emergency surgery group (n=34) or scheduled surgery group (n=23) according to the initial intervention. The scheduled group comprised 15 patients after successful manual reduction and 8 after short observation; all underwent surgery during the same admission, with an observed interval of 1-4 days. Inflammatory markers (white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio), CT findings, operative approach, bowel resection, mesh repair, and complications of the two groups were recorded.

Results

The scheduled group was younger than the emergency group [(58.1±16.9) versus (67.1±13.2) years, t=2.254, P=0.028] and had a lower proportion of elevated inflammatory markers [4.3% (1/23) versus 58.8% (20/34), P<0.001]. All seven patients with irreversible bowel ischemic necrosis had elevated inflammatory markers and at least one CT sign related to ischemia; all underwent bowel resection in the emergency group. No clinically diagnosed case of delayed bowel necrosis was documented in the scheduled group based on medical records, operative findings, and follow-up. Laparoscopic procedures were performed more frequently in the scheduled group. A total of five patients in the two groups developed postoperative complications, all of which resolved after conservative management.

Conclusion

In this cohort, every case of bowel necrosis was accompanied by elevated inflammatory markers and CT findings related to ischemia. Scheduled surgery during the same admission after manual reduction may be feasible in carefully selected low-risk patients; the observed 1-4 days interval should not be interpreted as a validated optimal time window.

图1 成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝术前CT横断面图注:黄色箭头表示腹腔内容物经腹壁缺损进入腹股沟区并嵌顿,可见局部肠管扩张、肠壁增厚及周围渗出,提示闭襻性肠梗阻及缺血风险。
表1 2组成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者基线资料比较
表2 2组成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝患者术式选择和围手术期结果比较
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(3): 409-417.
[2]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[3]
Stabilini C, van Veenendaal N, Aasvang E, et al. Update of the international HerniaSurge guidelines for groin hernia management [J]. BJS Open, 2023, 7(5): zrad080.
[4]
Birindelli A, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S, et al. 2017 update of the WSES guidelines for emergency repair of complicated abdominal wall hernias[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2017, 12: 37.
[5]
Farrell MS, Zhang Z, Kirsch J, et al. Surgical management of incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernias requiring urgent surgical intervention: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and practice management guideline from the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2025, 99(5): 795-803.
[6]
Melkemichel M, Holmberg H, Dahlstrand U, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes after emergency groin hernia surgery: a nationwide population-based study from the Swedish Hernia Register[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(7): 2397.
[7]
Brown LR, Clyde DR, Li LQ, et al. Demographics, diagnostics, treatment, and outcomes of patients presenting with acute groin hernia: 15-year multicentre retrospective cohort study[J]. BJS Open, 2023, 7(5): zrad091.
[8]
Tastaldi L, Krpata DM, Prabhu AS, et al. Emergent groin hernia repair: a single center 10-year experience[J]. Surgery, 2019, 165(2): 398-405.
[9]
Pawlak M, East B, de Beaux AC. Algorithm for management of an incarcerated inguinal hernia in the emergency settings with manual reduction: taxis, the technique and its safety[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(5): 1253-1258.
[10]
Bouliaris K, Efthimiou M, Chatzikomnitsa P, et al. Manual reduction of incarcerated abdominal wall hernias: a feasible option during COVID-19 pandemic: a prospective study[J]. Surg J (NY), 2022, 8(1): e46-e51.
[11]
Kohga A, Kawabe A, Yajima K, et al. Emergency surgery versus elective surgery after reduction for patients with incarcerated groin hernias[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2020, 90(6): 1086-1091.
[12]
Bouassida M, Dougaz MW, Beji H, et al. Intestinal ischemia in patients with incarcerated groin hernia: proposal and validation of a score[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2022, 407(6): 2547-2554.
[13]
Chen L, Chen L, Wang YY, et al. A predictive model of bowel resection for incarcerated inguinal hernia based on the systemic immune-inflammation index[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 990481.
[14]
Zhou Z, Li Y, Li B, et al. Construction and validation of a predictive model for the risk of bowel resection in adults with incarcerated groin hernia[J]. BMC Surg, 2023, 23(1): 375.
[15]
Xie X, Feng S, Tang Z, et al. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the severity of incarcerated groin hernia[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23: 5558-5563.
[16]
Murasaki M, Nakanishi T, Kano KI, et al. Point-of-care procalcitonin may predict the need for surgical treatment in patients with small bowel obstruction[J]. Am J Emerg Med, 2020, 38(5): 979-982.
[17]
Moncy AA, Kavalakat AJ, Vikraman B. Utility of serum L-lactate in identifying ischemia in acute intestinal obstruction: a prospective observational study[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(5): e38443.
[18]
Millet I, Taourel P, Ruyer A, et al. Value of CT findings to predict surgical ischemia in small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Eur Radiol, 2015, 25(6): 1823-1835.
[19]
Sartori A, Balla A, Botteri E, et al. Laparoscopic approach in emergency for the treatment of acute incarcerated groin hernia: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(3): 485-501.
[20]
Sæter AH, Fonnes S, Li S, et al. Mesh versus non-mesh for emergency groin hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2023, 11(11): CD015160.
[21]
Marcolin P, de Figueiredo SMP, de Melo VMF, et al. Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for incarcerated and strangulated groin hernia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(6): 1397-1413.
[22]
Hentati H, Dougaz W, Dziri C. Mesh repair versus non-mesh repair for strangulated inguinal hernia: systematic review with meta-analysis [J]. World J Surg, 2014, 38(11): 2784-2790.
[1] 于灏天, 杜成旭, 魏靖伟, 张斌, 冯文丰, 杨昕达, 王帅, 毕愿博, 李秋生, 吕海涛, 李冬瑞. 术中超声联合三维可视化及多模态影像融合导航技术在腹腔镜肝癌切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(06): 458-464.
[2] 易小江, 刁竞芳. 头侧入路联合中间翻页式清扫腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 362-362.
[3] 侯刘进, 贺智翔, 戴清清, 黄帆, 耿小平, 赵红川, 汪正广. 三种同期手术切除方式治疗结直肠癌肝转移的安全性和预后比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 291-296.
[4] 杨进宝, 李伟, 张冰, 陈健, 王吉哲, 王玉佳, 王顺, 蒋志斌, 杨建玲. 基于解剖学基础的新辅助治疗后腹腔镜低位直肠癌适形保肛术技术难度的因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 297-301.
[5] 易小江, 刘佳丽, 蒋天明, 梁超, 黄海鹏, 刁竞芳. 腹腔镜根治性右半结肠切除术手术入路文献回顾[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 325-329.
[6] 阿巴拜克日·阿卜力孜, 李泽鑫, 张腾辉, 张力为. 补片在食管裂孔疝修补中的临床价值与安全性:系统评价与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 352-361.
[7] 李俊, 李干斌, 杨盈赤. 局部进展期直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 421-421.
[8] 张国灵, 薛岳, 张皓寻, 王久亮, 焦治兴, 贾光, 齐奥, 于逸鹏, 王渤文, 熊枫, 王春阳. Off-clamp与On-clamp机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗cT1期肾癌的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 527-533.
[9] 李骏, 马军, 宋康颉. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 513-517.
[10] 张曌雄, 张鑫, 王毅, 姜慧员, 宋丽娟, 焦雪萍, 王鹏程, 曹海磊, 刘海义. NOSES Ⅰ式A法对比传统腹腔镜手术在低位直肠癌中的短期效果分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 427-433.
[11] 候晓亚, 刘吉祥, 胡军红. 改良抵钉座体外置入法在腹腔镜低位直肠癌经肛门外翻切除标本腹部无辅助切口手术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 434-441.
[12] 石一航, 赵志勋, 王洋啸龙, 索立达, 刘恒昌, 关旭, 陈海鹏, 王锡山. 右半结肠癌合并不同部位第二原发恶性肿瘤的NOSES手术策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 460-465.
[13] 索立达, 石一航, 王洋啸龙, 赵志勋, 王锡山, 陈海鹏. 右半结肠癌合并胃间质瘤经直肠取标本(NOSES)附一例报告[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 466-469.
[14] 孙太冉, 吕建东, 罗冰清, 席江伟, 乔舒巍, 王瑄. 乌四汤加减方在胆总管结石患者腹腔镜联合胆道镜探查取石术胆道一期缝合术后的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 457-462.
[15] 张欣扬, 蒋留琴, 靳乐. 甲苯磺酸瑞马唑仑复合舒芬太尼对老年腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后细胞免疫功能、苏醒质量及肺部并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 469-473.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?