切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 552 -556. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.05.013

论著

体重指数与Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝多层螺旋CT测量的相关性分析
王凤玉1, 肖烨2, 苏可婕1, 魏鑫1, 陈高红3,†()   
  1. 1221004 江苏省,徐州医科大学医学影像学院
    2221006 江苏省,徐州医科大学附属医院消化内科
    3221006 江苏省,徐州医科大学附属医院影像科
  • 收稿日期:2025-11-07 出版日期:2026-10-18
  • 通信作者: 陈高红

Correlation between body mass index and multidetector computed tomography measurements in patients with type I hiatal hernia

Fengyu Wang1, Ye Xiao2, Kejie Su1, Xin Wei1, Gaohong Chen3,†()   

  1. 1School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221004, Jiangsu Province, China
    2Department of Gastroenterology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu Province, China
    3Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou 221006, Jiangsu Province, China
  • Received:2025-11-07 Published:2026-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Gaohong Chen
引用本文:

王凤玉, 肖烨, 苏可婕, 魏鑫, 陈高红. 体重指数与Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝多层螺旋CT测量的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 552-556.

Fengyu Wang, Ye Xiao, Kejie Su, Xin Wei, Gaohong Chen. Correlation between body mass index and multidetector computed tomography measurements in patients with type I hiatal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 552-556.

目的

应用多层螺旋CT(MDCT)多平面重建(MPR)技术测量Ⅰ型食管裂孔疝(HH)患者食管裂孔的大小,探讨其与体重指数(BMI)的相关性。

方法

回顾性收集2022年1月至2025年6月徐州医科大学附属医院手术证实的106例Ⅰ型HH患者,分析其临床及影像特点,利用MDCT MPR技术测量患者食管裂孔的表面积(HSA)、前后径(AP)及横径(TD),根据BMI分为正常组、超重组及肥胖组,评估BMI与HSA、AP、TD间的相关性。

结果

3组患者间,BMI与HSA的F值为4.54,P值为0.013,效应值偏η2为0.08;BMI与AP的F值为4.43,P值为0.014,效应值偏η2为0.08;BMI与TD的F值为9.85,P值<0.001,效应值偏η2为0.16,提示BMI对食管裂孔的HSA、AP、TD具有中等至较大的效应规模;3组在性别、年龄、身高、收缩压、舒张压和空腹血糖上差异无统计学意义(P>0.05,偏η2<0.04)。调整了年龄、性别、血压及空腹血糖等因素后,多元线性回归分析显示,BMI每增加1 kg/m2,HSA增加0.46 cm2,AP增加0.08 cm,TD增加0.07 cm(P均<0.001)。BMI与HSA、AP、TD均呈正相关。

结论

能准确测量食管裂孔各项参数,提示BMI可能是I型HH的独立危险因素,BMI越高,食管裂孔的HSA、AP、TD越大。

Objective

To measure the dimensions of the esophageal hiatus in patients with type I hiatal hernia (HH) using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) and to investigate their correlations with body mass index (BMI).

Methods

Clinical and imaging data from 106 patients with surgically confirmed type I HH at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University between January 2022 and June 2025 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The hiatal surface area (HSA), anteroposterior diameter (AP), and transverse diameter (TD) of the esophageal hiatus were measured using MDCT with MPR. According to BMI, the patients were divided into three groups: normal-weight, overweight, and obese groups. The correlations between BMI and HSA, AP, and TD were evaluated.

Results

Comparisons among the three groups showed statistically significant differences in HSA (F=4.54, P=0.013, partial η2=0.08), AP (F=4.43, P=0.014, partial η2=0.08), and TD (F=9.85, P<0.001, partial η2=0.16), indicating medium to large effect sizes for BMI grouping on these esophageal hiatal measurements. No statistically significant differences were observed among the three groups in sex, age, height, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, or fasting blood glucose (P>0.05, partial η2<0.04). After adjustment for age, sex, blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and other factors, multiple linear regression analysis showed that each 1 kg/m2 increase in BMI was associated with an increase of 0.46 cm2 in HSA, 0.08 cm in AP, and 0.07 cm in TD (all P<0.001). BMI was positively correlated with HSA, AP, and TD.

Conclusion

MDCT with MPR can accurately measure various parameters of the esophageal hiatus. The findings suggest that BMI may be an independent risk factor for type I HH, with higher BMI associated with larger HSA, AP, and TD measurements of the esophageal hiatus.

图1 1例62岁女性食管裂孔患者胸腹部多层螺旋CT图像注:1A矢状位,白色细线代表斜轴位,与食管裂孔的前后边缘相交;1B斜冠状位,白色细线代表斜轴位,并且与食管裂孔的左右边缘相交;1C食管裂孔所在的双斜轴位平面,即图中白色箭头所指图形;1D食管裂孔的放大视图,即黄色线圈出部分。
表1 3组HH患者临床资料特征比较
表2 3组HH患者影像资料比较(±s)
图2 BMI与食管裂孔参数的相关性散点图 2A为BMI与HSA的相关性;2B为BMI与TD的相关性;2C为BMI与AP的相关性注:BMI为体重指数;HAS为食管裂孔表面积;AP为前后径;TD为横径。
表3 BMI与食管裂孔参数的多元线性回归分析
[1]
Qi Z, Shi XC, Yan WM, et al. Association of esophageal hiatus size with reflux esophagitis and type I hiatal hernia in patients with obesity[J]. World J Radiol, 2025, 17(5): 106333.
[2]
Lin SH, Li H, Fang XC. Esophageal motor dysfunctions in gastroesophageal reflux disease and therapeutic perspectives[J]. J Neurogastroenterol Motil, 2019, 25(4): 499-507.
[3]
Barratt OA, Badenoch T, Findlay JM. A systematic review of hiatus hernia classifications[J]. Dis Esophagus, 2025, 38(3): doaf044.
[4]
Sfara A, Dumitrascu DL. The management of hiatal hernia: an update on diagnosis and treatment[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2019, 92(4): 321-325.
[5]
Chen WH, Feng J, Wang CC, et al. Effect of concomitant laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and hiatal hernia repair on gastroesophageal reflux disease in patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Obes Surg, 2021, 31(9): 3905-3918.
[6]
Slater BJ, Dirks RC, McKinley SK, et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux(GERD)[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(9): 4903-4917.
[7]
Ketchem CJ, Ocampo AA, Xue ZY, et al. Higher body mass index is associated with decreased treatment response to topical steroids in eosinophilic esophagitis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2023, 21(9): 2252-2259.
[8]
曾毅虹, Widjaja J, 杨建军, 等. 从流行病学角度谈HH的发生与发展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(4): 407-411.
[9]
Karatay E, Gok MA, Javadov M. Measurement of hiatal surface area and other hiatus oesophageal diameters at computed tomography imaging in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and its relationship with hiatal hernia[J]. J Minim Access Surg, 2021, 17(4): 537-541.
[10]
Rengo M, Boru CE, Badia S, et al. Preoperative measurement of the hiatal surface with MDCT: impact on surgical planning[J]. Radiol Med, 2021, 126(12): 1508-1517.
[11]
Batirel HF, Uygur-Bayramicli O, Giral A, et al. The size of the esophageal hiatus in gastroesophageal reflux pathophysiology: outcome of intraoperative measurements[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2010, 14(1): 38-44.
[12]
Moten AS, Ouyang W, Hava S, et al. In vivo measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area using MDCT: description of the methodology and clinical validation[J]. Abdom Radiol, 2020, 45(9): 2656-2662.
[13]
Granderath FA, Schweiger UM, Pointner R. Laparoscopic antireflux surgery: tailoring the hiatal closure to the size of hiatal surface area[J]. Surg Endosc, 2007, 21(4): 542-548.
[14]
刘洋, 刘昶, 王兵, 等. 肥胖合并HH手术治疗策略[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2024, 44(8): 889-893.
[15]
Ouyang W, Dass C, Zhao H, et al. Multiplanar MDCT measurement of esophageal hiatus surface area: association with hiatal hernia and GERD[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(6): 2465-2472.
[16]
Nugraha HG, Agustina M, Nataprawira HM. Diagnostic challenges of hiatal hernia Type IV: An imaging perspective[J]. Radiol Case Rep, 2024, 20(1): 437-441.
[17]
Boru CE, Rengo M, Iossa A, et al. Hiatal Surface Area's CT scan measurement is useful in hiatal hernia's treatment of bariatric patients[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol, 2021, 30(2): 86-93.
[18]
Daly S, Kumar SS, Collings AT, et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias[J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(9): 4765-4775.
[19]
邢颖, 闫文貌, 白日星. 肥胖合并食管裂孔疝患者胃袖状切除术中临床处理策略[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(9): 1153-1156.
[20]
Kroh M. Comment on: impact of concurrent hiatal hernia repair during laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on patient-reported gastroesophageal reflux symptoms: a state-wide analysis[J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2023, 19(7): e6-e7.
[1] 阿巴拜克日·阿卜力孜, 李泽鑫, 张腾辉, 张力为. 补片在食管裂孔疝修补中的临床价值与安全性:系统评价与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 352-361.
[2] 朱江帆, 杜磊, 王玥, 贾许杨, 卢列盛. 胃袖状切除后胃食管移位的修正手术:下段食管复位、食管裂孔修补及四点固定[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 13-13.
[3] 代鑫亮, 李威, 柳子瑜, 杨玙豪, 方灿, 庞俊, 江东根. 前列腺增生手术患者基础代谢指标与膀胱内前列腺突入程度的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 549-555.
[4] 芮梓轩, 费博, 喻春钊, 苟缙, 刘天宇. 抗反流手术患者食管裂孔疝术前检出情况及其相关因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 506-512.
[5] 鲁丁维, 郭洪瑞, 刘迪, 毛显龙, 易泓霖, 王汝娟, 邹春莉, 李鹏. 3+2+1解剖缝合策略在完全机器人食管裂孔疝修补+胃底折叠术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 265-271.
[6] 李赞林, 祖母乃提·玉山, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 李义亮. 机器人3+1模式在食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 272-276.
[7] 蔡理全, 张金龙, 高训锋, 余丹, 张金辉, 张恒. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中保留迷走神经肝支的可行性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 277-283.
[8] 傅晓键, 黄先觉, 储宇霄, 朱志远, 姚琪远, 花荣. 腹腔镜合成补片修补Ⅲ型食管裂孔疝的中期疗效分析:单中心回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 284-288.
[9] 马建惠, 白洁, 赵叶, 张丽. 奥瑞姆自护理论干预模式在食管裂孔疝术后患者中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 289-295.
[10] 吴星宇, 韩海峰, 逯景辉. 合并吞咽困难的食管裂孔疝诊疗策略:基于病因机制的分型与个体化治疗[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 351-356.
[11] 马宁, 周太成, 陈双. 食管裂孔疝手术并发症的预防与处理:以单中心经验为核心的实践策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 253-258.
[12] 周哲琦, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李义亮, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 玉素江·图荪托合提, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人辅助与腹腔镜袖状胃切除联合胃底折叠及食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 259-264.
[13] 王奕阳, 刘昌华, 吕文钰, 曹丽玲, 陈玲. CT多平面重建技术在腹股沟疝术前鉴别诊断与嵌顿风险预测中的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 149-154.
[14] 张皓程, 陈明豪, 刘宾, 万方鑫, 李宝玉. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝术后并发食管胸膜腔瘘一例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 238-240.
[15] 刘富丽, 李丹, 陈燕, 段慧, 李姣, 周正奎. 功能性便秘患者胃肠电图参数与临床特征的相关性及其对不同亚型的诊断价值分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2026, 15(03): 244-255.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?