切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (03) : 253 -258. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.03.003

专家论坛

食管裂孔疝手术并发症的预防与处理:以单中心经验为核心的实践策略
马宁1,2,3, 周太成1,2,3, 陈双1,2,3,()   
  1. 1510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院普通外科(疝和腹壁外科)
    2510655 广州,广东省结直肠盆底疾病研究重点实验室
    3510655 广州市黄埔区中六生物医学创新研究院
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-14 出版日期:2026-06-18
  • 通信作者: 陈双

Prevention and management of surgical complications in hiatal hernia repair: A practical strategy based on single-center experience

Ning Ma1,2,3, Taicheng Zhou1,2,3, Shuang Chen1,2,3,()   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery (Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery), The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
    2Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, Guangzhou 510655, China
    3Zhongliu Biomedical Innovation Research Institute, Huangpu District, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2026-04-14 Published:2026-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Shuang Chen
引用本文:

马宁, 周太成, 陈双. 食管裂孔疝手术并发症的预防与处理:以单中心经验为核心的实践策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 253-258.

Ning Ma, Taicheng Zhou, Shuang Chen. Prevention and management of surgical complications in hiatal hernia repair: A practical strategy based on single-center experience[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(03): 253-258.

腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术已成为治疗中重度食管裂孔疝的标准术式,但其术中出血、术后吞咽困难、疝复发及补片相关并发症仍不容忽视。本文结合2018—2023年在中山大学附属第六医院疝和腹壁外科行腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术的432例中重度食管裂孔疝患者的临床资料及手术经验,系统总结上述核心并发症的防治策略。432例患者总并发症发生率为15.3%(66例)。其中术中并发症以出血最常见,30例(6.9%);术后并发症以吞咽困难最常见,52例(12.0%);疝复发8例(1.9%);补片相关并发症3例(0.7%)。单因素分析显示年龄≥50岁及行Nissen折叠术是术后吞咽困难发生的相关因素(P均<0.05)。通过规范术前评估、优化术式选择、强化术中精细操作及建立阶梯化管理流程,可有效降低并发症发生率。基于精准解剖的个体化术式选择、规范化操作流程及阶梯化管理策略是降低并发症、提升手术安全性的关键。

Laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with fundoplication has become the standard surgical procedure for moderate to severe hiatal hernia, but intraoperative bleeding, postoperative dysphagia, hernia recurrence, and mesh-related complications remain significant concerns. This article summarizes the prevention and management strategies for these core complications based on the clinical data and surgical experience of 432 patients with moderate to severe hiatal hernia who underwent laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair combined with fundoplication at the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, from 2018 to 2023. The overall complication rate in the 432 patients was 15.3% (66 cases). Among intraoperative complications, bleeding was the most common, occurring in 30 cases (6.9%). Among postoperative complications, dysphagia was the most frequent, occurring in 52 cases (12.0%). Hernia recurrence occurred in 8 cases (1.9%), and mesh-related complications in 3 cases (0.7%). Univariate analysis showed that age ≥50 years and Nissen fundoplication were associated factors for postoperative dysphagia (both P<0.05). By standardizing preoperative evaluation, optimizing surgical approach selection, strengthening intraoperative precise manipulation, and establishing stepwise management protocols, the incidence of complications can be effectively reduced. Individualized surgical strategies based on precise anatomy, standardized operative procedures, and stepwise management approaches are key to reducing complications and improving surgical safety.

表1 432例中重度食管裂孔疝患者的基线资料及术式分布
表2 432例中重度食管裂孔疝患者腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术术中出血及术后并发症发生、处理及转归情况
表3 432例中重度食管裂孔疝患者腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补联合胃底折叠术术后吞咽困难危险因素的单因素分析[例(%)][1]
图1 食管裂孔疝修补术中补片"对位对线放置法"示意图 1A 补片放置前状态;1B 补片最终固定效果注:1A中箭头示标记的解剖中线,与缝合后的食管裂孔中线重叠对合,即对位线;"X"示补片固定点,即对位点。1B中可见"U"形补片(M)平整包绕于食管(E)后方,无皱缩,补片与食管后壁之间保留了适当的间隙(双箭头示)。
图2 1例补片侵蚀食管胃结合部病例术中及术后所见 2A 术中见侵蚀的补片(箭头)紧密粘连并侵入胃食管结合部管腔,周围组织炎性增生明显;2B 完整取出的补片标本,质地坚硬,边缘不规整;2C 补片取出并重建消化道后,上消化道恢复通畅
[1]
马宁, 黄浩男, 周浩楠, 等. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝补片修补联合胃底折叠术的手术并发症原因及防治:单中心432例分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(4): 660-667.
[2]
Daly S, Kumar SS, Collings AT, et al. SAGES guidelines for the surgical treatment of hiatal hernias[J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(9): 4765-4775.
[3]
周太成, 马宁, 陈双. 食管裂孔疝的腔镜修补规范化操作七步法[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2019, 28(10): 1186-1191.
[4]
中国医师协会外科医师分会胃食管反流病专家工作组. 食管裂孔疝及胃食管反流病规范化腹腔镜手术七步法操作指南(2025版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2025, 34(4): 600-613.
[5]
陈双, 周太成, 马宁. 食管裂孔疝修补——力求结构与功能的统一[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 734-739.
[6]
Coccolini F, Montori G, Catena F, et al. Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients[J]. World J Emerg Surg, 2017, 12: 40.
[7]
Imai TA, Soukiasian HJ. Management of Complications in Paraesophageal Hernia Repair[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2019, 29(4): 351-358.
[8]
凯依赛尔·麦麦提, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术后并发吞咽困难的诊治研究进展[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2024, 29(4): 308-311.
[9]
Oor JE, Roks DJ, Broeders JA, et al. Seventeen-year Outcome of a Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Laparoscopic and Conventional Nissen Fundoplication: A Plea for Patient Counseling and Clarification [J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 266(1): 23-28.
[10]
刘山, 佟思羽, 刘国栋, 等. Bougie管支撑下腹腔镜Nissen胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流临床效果分析[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2023, 27(4): 269-274.
[11]
周太成, 于洪燕, 马宁, 等. 食管裂孔疝患者胃底折叠术后吞咽困难的处理[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2019, 6(2): 61-65.
[12]
Analatos A, Håkanson BS, Lundell L, et al. Tension-free mesh versus suture-alone cruroplasty in antireflux surgery: a randomized, double-blind clinical trial[J]. Br J Surg, 2020, 107(13): 1731-1740.
[13]
韩硕, 杨慧琪, 聂玉胜, 等. 腹腔镜下补片修补食管裂孔疝的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 8-13.
[14]
Antoniou SA, Antoniou GA, Koch OO, et al. Lower recurrence rates after mesh-reinforced versus simple hiatal hernia repair: a meta- analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2012, 22(6): 498-502.
[15]
夏克热提·依力帕, 王丹, 李义亮. 生物补片在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(4): 470-474.
[16]
马宁, 汤福鑫, 黄恩民, 等. "对位对线"补片放置法在腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术中应用:单中心120例分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2023, 32(10): 1483-1490.
[17]
Angeramo CA, Schlottmann F. Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair: To Mesh or not to Mesh. Systematic Review and Meta- analysis[J]. Ann Surg, 2022, 275(1): 67-72.
[18]
Huddy JR, Markar SR, Ni MZ, et al. Laparoscopic repair of hiatus hernia: Does mesh type influence outcome? A meta-analysis and European survey study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(12): 5209-5221.
[19]
Birolini C, Faro Junior MP, Terhoch CB, et al. Microbiology of chronic mesh infection[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(4): 1017-1023.
[20]
Håkanson BS, Lundell L, Bylund A, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic 270° posterior partial fundoplication vs total fundoplication for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2019, 154(6): 479-486.
[1] 王茹文, 潘辰, 车颖, 佟梦萦. 甲状腺热消融术后结节破裂三例病例报道及基于文献的系统分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(04): 316-323.
[2] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[3] 贾亚南, 尚迎晓, 甄江涛. 乳腺术后皮下高引流量淋巴漏1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 303-304.
[4] 张锰钢, 刘悦泽, 张太平. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的关键技术和质量控制[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 210-214.
[5] 杨永君, 王槐志. 腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术主要并发症及处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 215-218.
[6] 付丽坤, 崔红梅, 高福来, 乔红, 冯钟煦. 腹腔镜下胆总管探查“T”管引流术与经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术治疗继发性胆总管结石的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 226-230.
[7] 赵方, 陈廷昊, 陈泳松, 王健宇, 刘希. 腹腔镜胆囊切除术在高龄患者中的安全性及有效性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 231-234.
[8] 王学军, 唐水斌, 艾武. LCBDE与ERCP+EST分别联合LC治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 235-238.
[9] 李伟, 张伟, 崔啸晨, 张涛涛, 王海超. 腹腔镜精准肝蒂解剖法切除术与常规切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 244-247.
[10] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后常见并发症防治与管理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 248-251.
[11] 赵军抗, 张前进, 庄惠杰. 腹腔镜直肠癌根治术保留左结肠动脉的疗效及对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 257-260.
[12] 魏利敏, 金鲜珍, 刘萍, 王光辉. 两种微创术式治疗低位直肠癌的学习曲线与近期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-266.
[13] 张艺宝, 黄万伟, 沙显燊, 伍国豪, 郑涵达, 陈智慧, 骆峰, 叶东明, 赖彩永. 基于膜解剖的3D腹腔镜舌黏膜补片输尿管成形术治疗输尿管中长段狭窄的初步应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 307-316.
[14] 王亚楠, 宋岩, 王胤, 郭城, 陈俊涛, 李锋, 苑小雷. 术前血小板聚集功能与凝血指标预测老年胃肠肿瘤患者术后并发症的价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 199-205.
[15] 梁玮龙, 王鹏飞, 高怀新. 氟比洛芬酯联合腹横肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的麻醉效果及对COX-2、MMP-9水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 256-261.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?