切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 533 -538. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.05.010

论著

完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与腹横纹小切口手术对小儿腹股沟疝的疗效比较
阿米娜·艾合买提1,2, 刘辉1,2, 王雅琪1,2, 王晶1,2, 阿尔新·哈布丁1,2,†()   
  1. 1830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院小儿普外科
    2830054 乌鲁木齐,新疆医科大学第一附属医院小儿泌尿外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-07-08 出版日期:2026-10-18
  • 通信作者: 阿尔新·哈布丁
  • 基金资助:
    新疆维吾尔自治区科学技术厅重点研发项目(2023B030182-2)

Comparative efficacy of complete transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic surgery and small transverse abdominal skin-crease incision surgery for pediatric inguinal hernia

Ahemaiti Amina1,2, Hui Liu1,2, Yaqi Wang1,2, Jing Wang1,2, Habuding Aerxin1,2,†()   

  1. 1Department of Pediatric General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
    2Department of Pediatric Urology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University, Urumqi 830054, China
  • Received:2026-07-08 Published:2026-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Habuding Aerxin
引用本文:

阿米娜·艾合买提, 刘辉, 王雅琪, 王晶, 阿尔新·哈布丁. 完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与腹横纹小切口手术对小儿腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 533-538.

Ahemaiti Amina, Hui Liu, Yaqi Wang, Jing Wang, Habuding Aerxin. Comparative efficacy of complete transumbilical single-hole laparoscopic surgery and small transverse abdominal skin-crease incision surgery for pediatric inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 533-538.

目的

探讨完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术、腹横纹小切口手术对小儿腹股沟疝的疗效及在不同年龄分层患儿中的疗效差异。

方法

本研究为前瞻性随机对照试验,纳入2023年1月至2025年1月,在新疆医科大学第一附属医院行腹股沟疝治疗的患儿120例,采用简单随机数字法将患儿分为对照组(腹横纹小切口手术)和研究组(完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术),各60例。比较2组患儿的手术相关指标(切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、住院时间)以及术后面部表情、腿部活动、活动度、哭闹、可安慰性疼痛行为量表评分、儿童生活质量评分、并发症发生情况。并将患儿分为3~6岁组及7~12组,比较不同年龄组中2组的疗效差异。

结果

研究组患儿的手术相关指标均较对照组改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05),组间整体差异效应量显著,手术相关指标合并Hedges'g=2.44(大效应)。与术前相比,2组患儿术后疼痛程度均降低,生理功能、情感功能评分均升高,且研究组优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后组间比较各效应量Hedges'g>0.8,均为大效应量。研究组总并发症发生率较对照组更低,差异有统计学意义(OR=0.183,P=0.004)。研究组术中探查发现对侧隐匿性疝8例。在两个年龄分层组中,研究组患儿的手术相关指标、疼痛评分、儿童生活质量评分均优于对照组(P<0.05)。并发症发生率,在7~12岁患儿中,2组差异无统计学意义;在3~6岁患儿中研究组仍低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与腹横纹小切口手术对小儿腹股沟疝均疗效可靠,但完全经脐单孔腹腔镜手术术中可探查发现对侧隐匿性疝,手术创伤小,患儿术后恢复快,在并发症发生方面低龄患儿可能受益更大。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of totally transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery and surgery through a small transverse abdominal skin-crease incision in children with inguinal hernia, and to evaluate differences in treatment outcomes between the two surgical approaches across different age groups.

Methods

This prospective randomized controlled trial included 120 children with inguinal hernia who underwent surgical treatment at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University between January 2023 and January 2025. The children were randomly assigned, using a simple random number method, to either the control group (surgery through a small transverse abdominal skin-crease incision) or the study group (totally transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery), with 60 children in each group. Perioperative outcomes, including incision length, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first postoperative flatus, and length of hospital stay, were compared between the two groups. Pain intensity was assessed using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability (FLACC) scale. Pediatric quality-of-life scores and postoperative complications were also evaluated. In addition, the children were stratified into two age groups (3–6 years and 7–12 years), and treatment outcomes were compared between the two surgical approaches within each age stratum.

Results

All perioperative outcomes were significantly more favorable in the study group than in the control group (all P<0.05). The pooled effect size for the perioperative outcomes indicated a large between-group difference (Hedges' g=2.44). Compared with preoperative values, postoperative pain scores decreased, while physical and emotional functioning scores increased in both groups. These improvements were significantly greater in the study group than in the control group (all P<0.05). All postoperative between-group effect sizes were large (Hedges' g>0.8). The overall incidence of postoperative complications was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group [odds ratio (OR)=0.183, P=0.004]. Intraoperative exploration identified occult contralateral inguinal hernias in eight children in the study group. In both age strata, the study group demonstrated significantly more favorable perioperative outcomes, lower pain scores, and higher pediatric quality-of-life scores than the control group (all P<0.05). Among children aged 7–12 years, the difference in complication rates between the two groups was not statistically significant. However, among children aged 3–6 years, the complication rate remained significantly lower in the study group than in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Both totally transumbilical single-port laparoscopic surgery and surgery through a small transverse abdominal skin-crease incision achieve reliable efficacy for pediatric inguinal hernia. The laparoscopic approach allows intraoperative detection of occult contralateral inguinal hernias, causes less surgical trauma, and facilitates faster postoperative recovery. Younger children may derive greater benefits from this approach in terms of reducing postoperative complications.

表1 2组腹股沟疝患儿术前一般资料比较
表2 2组腹股沟疝患儿手术相关指标比较(±s)
表3 2组腹股沟疝患儿手术前后FLACC疼痛评分比较(分,±s)
表4 2组腹股沟疝患儿手术前后儿童生活质量测定量表评分比较(分,±s)
表5 2组腹股沟疝患儿术后并发症发生情况比较[例(%)]
表6 不同年龄分层2组腹股沟疝患儿临床疗效比较
[1]
HIP Trial Investigators, Blakely ML, Krzyzaniak A, et al. Effect of early vs late inguinal hernia repair on serious adverse event rates in preterm infants: A randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA, 2024, 331(12): 1035-1044.
[2]
Morgado M, Holland AJ. Inguinal hernias in children: Update on management guidelines[J]. J Paediatr Child Health, 2024, 60(11): 648-653.
[3]
Morini F, Dreuning KMA, Janssen Lok MJH, et al. Surgical management of pediatric inguinal hernia: A systematic review and guideline from the European Pediatric Surgeons' Association Evidence and Guideline Committee[J]. Eur J Pediatr Surg, 2022, 32(3): 219-232.
[4]
施锦山. 腹横纹微小切口手术治疗小儿腹股沟疝的效果及对炎性因子的影响[J]. 四川生理科学杂志, 2024, 46(1): 181-184.
[5]
马小鹏, 陈山, 薛亚东, 等. 脐部切口腹腔镜辅助疝钩针和下腹横纹小切口手术在小儿腹股沟疝中的应用比较[J]. 河北医学, 2025, 31(9): 1547-1553.
[6]
中华医学会小儿外科学分会内镜外科学组. 小儿腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术操作指南(2017版)(上篇)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 1-5.
[7]
王娟, 丁敏, 刘小琴, 等. FLACC量表用于学龄前儿童术后疼痛评估的信效度评价[J]. 江苏医药, 2015, 41(11): 1298-1300.
[8]
卢奕云, 田琪, 郝元涛, 等. 儿童生存质量测定量表PedsQL4. 0中文版的信度和效度分析[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2008, 29(3): 328-331.
[9]
Grech G, Shoukry M. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children: Article review and the preliminary Maltese experience[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2022, 57(6): 1162-1169.
[10]
Duan K, Jin C, Yang R, et al. Does inguinal hernia with ovary and/or fallopian tube in female children after herniotomy affect secondary sexual characteristics and/or fertility. A long-term retrospective study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 29(1): 44.
[11]
谢泽翌, 敖润, 彭仟, 等. 针对小儿腹股沟疝分别选用脐部切口腹腔镜辅助疝钩针和下腹横纹小切口手术进行治疗的效果差异[J]. 中国保健营养, 2021, 31(29): 101.
[12]
周胜明. 改良完全腹膜外经脐单孔腹腔镜小儿腹股沟疝的疗效分析[J]. 中外医疗, 2020, 39(22): 58-60.
[13]
苏友云. 腹横纹微小切口手术在小儿腹股沟疝和精索鞘膜积液中的应用[J]. 医学食疗与健康, 2020, 18(17): 54, 57.
[14]
杨星飞, 李珊珊, 李卓. 单孔腹腔镜腹膜外结扎对小儿腹股沟疝患儿手术指标、肠黏膜屏障功能及复发率的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2024, 28(7): 75-78.
[15]
郭欢. 单孔腹腔镜腹膜外结扎术对小儿腹股沟疝患儿术后康复指标及并发症的影响[J]. 中国医学创新, 2025, 22(2): 56-59.
[16]
宋东琦. 腹横纹小切口手术对腹股沟疝患儿炎性症状的影响[J/OL]. 现代医学与健康研究(电子版), 2021, 5(4): 3-5.
[17]
刘雪来, 李龙, 谢向辉, 等. 免水分离完全腹膜外改良钩针辅助单孔腹腔镜内环闭合术治疗儿童腹股沟斜疝[J/OL]. 发育医学电子杂志, 2020, 8(4): 333-337.
[18]
刘洋, 潘朝武. 腹腔镜经脐单孔完全无辅助疝囊高位结扎术在小儿腹股沟斜疝治疗中的应用效果[J]. 系统医学, 2025, 10(19): 134-137.
[19]
刘扬, 王春燕, 邱云, 等. 腹腔镜下单孔完全腹膜外结扎法与单切口腹内缝扎法治疗小儿腹股沟疝并发症的比较[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2020, 20(8): 691-695.
[20]
马卿. 单孔腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术与传统开放手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的临床效果比较[J]. 临床医学研究与实践, 2025, 10(13): 105-108.
[1] 蔡洁琛, 余晓宁, 谢健琦. 根尖周炎根管治疗疗效列线图预测模型的构建及效能验证[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 404-409.
[2] 阿巴拜克日·阿卜力孜, 李泽鑫, 张腾辉, 张力为. 补片在食管裂孔疝修补中的临床价值与安全性:系统评价与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 352-361.
[3] 刘宝平, 徐爱忠. 腹腔镜经腹膜外疝修补术中轻量聚丙烯补片与自固定补片的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 485-489.
[4] 杨洋, 沈可欣, 费秉元, 王琪, 谢忠士. 腹腔镜疝修补术后补片感染合并肠瘘、膀胱瘘1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 406-408.
[5] 黄健斌, 陈棋淋, 巫泓生, 张升敏. 腹腔镜全腹膜外肌后修补术与腹腔内修补术治疗中线腹壁疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 501-505.
[6] 李骏, 马军, 宋康颉. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 513-517.
[7] 钱海婷, 景金凤, 郭芸青. 青年单侧腹股沟疝患者腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术的远期预后比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 518-522.
[8] 段梦平, 李仕虎, 董发庭, 段周彬, 张艳虹, 杨莉, 尹晓燕, 宋代洪. 成人嵌顿性腹股沟疝肠缺血风险与干预时机[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 528-532.
[9] 李文芳, 董孟炜, 杨万彭, 巴特, 南楠, 刘杨, 郝慧琴. 关节腔注射脂肪间充质干细胞对碘乙酸钠诱导大鼠急性软骨损伤的抗炎及组织学修复作用[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 266-277.
[10] 成津, 郭建明. 间充质干细胞治疗糖尿病足溃疡的研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 278-284.
[11] 汪韬, 潘炳权, 郁林海. 经脐入路三通道腹腔镜胆囊切除术的安全性与疗效分析:附10 000例报告[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(05): 791-797.
[12] 李鹏, 冯文博, 王延成, 张佩, 马红霞. 超选择血管介入联合髓芯减压植骨术治疗股骨头缺血性坏死的疗效及对术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(04): 236-242.
[13] 宋宏伟, 张宇, 张珊珊. 四逆散联合西医治疗老年难治性胃食管反流病肝胃不和证患者的疗效及对细胞因子的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(05): 452-456.
[14] 金伟亮, 张福峻晖, 张义森. 国产新型瘤内扰流装置在大脑中动脉分叉部宽颈动脉瘤中的应用[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 501-507.
[15] 左桂超, 刘亚群, 徐秋霜, 李沐阳. 阿加曲班序贯疗法治疗进展性穿支动脉病变型脑梗死的临床疗效及其影响预后的相关因素[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 542-548.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?