切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 135 -141. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.02.003

论著

腹腔镜下Sugarbaker修补术用于造口旁疝的手术细节优化及临床效果分析
张荣华, 刘景磊, 石玉龙()   
  1. 250021 济南,山东第一医科大学附属省立医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-03-09 出版日期:2026-04-18
  • 通信作者: 石玉龙
  • 基金资助:
    山东省自然科学基金(ZR2024MH290); 山东第一医科大学(山东省医学科学院)临床科研先导专项(603D25010)

Surgical details optimization and clinical effect analysis of the laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia

Ronghua Zhang, Jinglei Liu, Yulong Shi()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250021, China
  • Received:2026-03-09 Published:2026-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Yulong Shi
引用本文:

张荣华, 刘景磊, 石玉龙. 腹腔镜下Sugarbaker修补术用于造口旁疝的手术细节优化及临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 135-141.

Ronghua Zhang, Jinglei Liu, Yulong Shi. Surgical details optimization and clinical effect analysis of the laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 135-141.

目的

总结腹腔镜下Sugarbaker修补术在造口旁疝治疗中的手术细节优化策略,并探讨该改良术式的围手术期情况及短期随访结果。

方法

本研究为单中心回顾性病例系列研究。选取2024年1月至2025年12月在山东第一医科大学附属省立医院胃肠外科收治并接受完全腹腔镜下改良Sugarbaker修补术的24例造口旁疝患者的临床资料。收集患者一般情况、围手术期相关指标(手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气及排便时间、住院时间等)、造口排便功能评分、术后并发症及随访资料,评估手术安全性、术后疗效及疝复发情况。

结果

24例患者均成功完成改良术式,无中转开腹。患者平均年龄为(69.08±8.31)岁,男、女各12例。围手术期指标[MQ1Q3)]:手术时间118(97.75,127.25)min,术中出血量20(10.0,32.5)ml,术后排气时间1(1,2)d,术后排便时间3(2,3)d,术后住院时间5(4,5)d。术后未见肠穿孔、肠梗阻、网片感染及造口缺血坏死等严重并发症。术后造口排便功能评分显示大多数患者排便意识与控便能力、感觉能力总体处于较好水平。随访3~24个月,中位随访时间13个月。所有患者均未出现造口旁疝复发,多数患者腹壁外观、造口舒适度及活动能力明显改善。

结论

对腹腔镜下Sugarbaker修补术的手术细节进行优化后,用于治疗造口旁疝安全可行。患者围手术期恢复较快,短期随访未见复发。但本研究为单中心、小样本回顾性研究,随访时间有限,上述结果仍需进一步验证。

Objective

To summarize the optimization strategies for the surgical details of laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair in the treatment of parastomal hernia, and to investigate the perioperative outcomes and short-term follow-up results of the modified technique.

Methods

This study is a single-center retrospective case series study. We selected 24 patients with parastomal hernia who were treated with totally laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker repair in the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, from January 2024 to December 2025. Clinical data were collected, including baseline characteristics, perioperative parameters (operative time, intraoperative blood loss, time to first flatus and defecation, length of postoperative hospital stay, etc.), stoma defecation function scores, postoperative complications, and follow-up outcomes, in order to assess surgical safety, postoperative efficacy, and hernia recurrence.

Results

All 24 patients successfully completed modified repair without conversion to open surgery. The mean age was (69.08±8.31) years, with 12 males and 12 females. Perioperative indicators were expressed as median (interquartile range, Q1, Q3): operative time 118 (97.75, 127.25) minutes, intraoperative blood loss 20 (10.0, 32.5) ml, time to first flatus 1 (1, 2) days, time to first defecation 3 (2, 3) days, and postoperative hospital stay 5 (4, 5) days. No severe postoperative complications such as bowel perforation, intestinal obstruction, mesh infection, or stomal ischemia and necrosis were observed. Postoperative stoma defecation function scores indicated that most patients had generally favorable outcomes in defecation awareness, continence, and sensory function. During a follow-up of 3-24 months (median, 13 months), no parastomal hernia recurrence was detected. In addition, most patients showed significant improvement in abdominal wall appearance, stoma comfort, and physical activity.

Conclusion

With optimization of key surgical details, laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia appears safe and feasible, with rapid postoperative recovery and no recurrence observed in the short-term follow-up. However, this was a single-center retrospective study with a small sample size and limited follow-up duration; further studies are needed to validate these findings.

图1 腹腔镜下改良Sugarbaker修补术用于造口旁疝修补的穿刺孔布局
图2 造口旁疝(腹膜内造口)改良Sugarbaker手术过程 2A 腹腔镜下分离粘连及游离造口肠管后效果;2B 不可吸收缝线间断关闭疝环;2C 间断关闭疝环效果;2D 倒刺线双向缝合关闭疝环后效果;2E "三点悬吊"展平网片;2F 钉枪固定网片;2G 倒刺线缝合网片和造口肠管系膜;2H 倒刺线缝合关闭造口肠管外侧腹膜间隙;2I 网片固定完成效果
图3 造口旁疝(腹膜外造口)改良Sugarbaker手术过程 3A 腹腔镜下分离粘连及游离造口肠管后效果;3B 不可吸收缝线间断关闭疝环;3C 间断关闭疝环效果;3D 倒刺线双向缝合关闭疝环后效果;3E "三点悬吊"展平网片;3F 钉枪固定网片;3G 倒刺线缝合网片和髂血管处腹膜;3H 倒刺线缝合网片和造口肠管系膜与侧腹膜;3I 网片固定完成效果
表1 造口排便功能评分表
表2 24例行完全腹腔镜下改良Sugarbaker修补术的造口旁疝患者术后造口排便功能评分[例(%)]
[1]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[2]
Denti FC, Brambilla D, De Luca G, et al. Parastomal hernia: an overview[J]. Br J Nurs, 2023, 32(16): S22-S30.
[3]
Chan KY, Raftery N, Abdelhafiz T, et al. Parastomal hernia repairs: A nationwide cohort study in the Republic of Ireland[J]. Surgeon, 2024, 22(2): 92-98.
[4]
王金申, 刘景磊, 石玉龙. Keyhole与Sugarbaker术治疗造口旁疝单中心十年疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(6): 644-648.
[5]
Miller BT, Thomas JD, Tu C, et al. Comparing Sugarbaker versus keyhole mesh technique for open retromuscular parastomal hernia repair: study protocol for a registry-based randomized controlled trial[J]. Trials, 2022, 23(1): 251.
[6]
Brandsma HT, Hansson BM, Aufenacker TJ, et al. Prophylactic Mesh Placement During Formation of an End-colostomy Reduces the Rate of Parastomal Hernia: Short-term Results of the Dutch PREVENT-trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2017, 265(4): 663-669.
[7]
何凯, 武振, 陈浩, 等. 结肠造口旁疝Lap-re-Do修补术后造口功能的评估[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2015, 18(11): 1163-1165.
[8]
Kritharides N, Papaconstantinou D, Kykalos S, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: keyhole, Sugarbaker, sandwich, or hybrid technique with 3D mesh? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 448.
[9]
Fleming AM, Phillips AL, Drake JA, et al. Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2023, 27(3): 573-584.
[10]
Sarno G, Iacone B, Tedesco A, et al. End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(3): 723-743.
[11]
杜晨阳, 王勇, 罗文, 等. 造口旁疝修补术后复发的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2023, 38(10): 772-775.
[12]
Luan L, Liu Q, Cui C, et al. Surgical treatment strategy for recurrent parastomal hernia: Experiences from 17 cases[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 928743.
[13]
吴立胜. 造口旁疝修补术的演变和焦点问题[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2022, 21(9): 1191-1196.
[14]
王明刚, 曹金鑫, 刘雨辰, 等. 造口旁疝复发原因和治疗对策[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 758-760.
[15]
王金申, 朱华, 刘景磊, 等. 造口旁疝的诊治浅析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(6): 624-627.
[16]
陈双, 王辉, 吴丁财. 从腹壁结构和生物力学分析造口旁疝的发生与发展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 743-747.
[17]
乐飞, 李健文. 腹腔镜手术治疗造口旁疝的共识与争议[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2022, 42(7): 737-742.
[18]
Sahin OK, Kaya AG, Łajczak P, et al. Comparison of different mesh placement techniques for parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 140.
[19]
Hotouras A, Murphy J, Thaha M, et al. The persistent challenge of parastomal herniation: a review of the literature and future developments[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2013, 15(5): e202-e214.
[20]
Maskal SM, Thomas JD, Miller BT, et al. Open retromuscular keyhole compared with Sugarbaker mesh for parastomal hernia repair: Early results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Surgery, 2024, 175(3): 813-821.
[21]
Fleming AM, Phillips AL, Drake JA, et al. Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: Results of an Artificial Intelligence Large Language Model Post Hoc Analysis[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2023, 27(11): 2567-2570.
[22]
Fu X, Li M, Hua R, et al. Lap-re-Do Keyhole versus Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker techniques in large parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(5): 1945-1950.
[1] 彭兵. 联合血管切除重建的腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术实践与探索[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(1): 23-23.
[2] 杜峻峰, 吕远, 孙亮. 全腹腔镜下远端胃癌根治术(Billroth Ⅱ+Braun吻合)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 115-115.
[3] 燕速, 赵康, 谢宏宇, 霍博文, 梁浩, 李园园, 刘云荣. 无助手减孔腹腔镜SiewertⅡ型食管胃结合部癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 116-116.
[4] 袁浩宇, 肖远松, 杨成林, 胡正飞, 王志勇, 杨悦. 全腹腔镜下回肠膀胱扩大术治疗氯胺酮相关性膀胱炎的疗效[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 154-158.
[5] 马少卫, 王佳, 郑宇, 周保军. 造口旁疝诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 226-232.
[6] 张皓程, 陈明豪, 刘宾, 万方鑫, 李宝玉. 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝术后并发食管胸膜腔瘘一例分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 238-240.
[7] 王书翰, 任振, 刘虎, 吴昊, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 腹腔镜Sugarbaker技术修补造口旁疝关键细节优化及近远期并发症处理分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-148.
[8] 何若琦, 李炳根, 高金军. 腹腔镜下完全腹膜外补片修补术治疗成人脐疝的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 162-167.
[9] 于昆, 司仙科, 郑侃, 陈志升, 李森, 杨佳华, 李炜. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 168-173.
[10] 赵发宽, 梁伟纲, 杨义明, 祁木锐, 段应海. 腔镜定位后逆向穿刺法建立操作空间在完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 174-177.
[11] 章忆晖, 袁廷东, 穆林松, 吕忠船. 国产生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的有效性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 178-182.
[12] 王妮, 赵哲, 王敏, 缪怡. 瑞马唑仑联合右美托咪定滴鼻在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 190-194.
[13] 宋云, 陈光海, 杜尖. Lichtenstein术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的疗效、康复及成本效益对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 195-200.
[14] 高木超, 牛峻坚, 崔海龙, 盛国涛. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和平片式无张力疝修补术对腹股沟疝的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 201-205.
[15] 刘千什, 刘昶. 影响造口旁疝修补术后复发相关因素的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 221-225.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?