切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (02) : 142 -148. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.02.004

论著

腹腔镜Sugarbaker技术修补造口旁疝关键细节优化及近远期并发症处理分析
王书翰1, 任振1, 刘虎1, 吴昊1, 潘晨2, 吴立胜2,()   
  1. 1233030 安徽,蚌埠医科大学研究生院
    2230001 合肥,中国科学技术大学附属第一医院(安徽省立医院)疝及肥胖外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-02-27 出版日期:2026-04-18
  • 通信作者: 吴立胜
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项项目(WK2340000111)

Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia: Experience with refinements in key technical details and management of short-and long-term complications

Shuhan Wang1, Zhen Ren1, Hu Liu1, Hao Wu1, Chen Pan2, Lisheng Wu2,()   

  1. 1Graduate School of Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu 233030, Anhui Province, China
    2Department of Hernia and Obesity Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC (Anhui Provincial Hospital), Hefei 230001, China
  • Received:2026-02-27 Published:2026-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Lisheng Wu
引用本文:

王书翰, 任振, 刘虎, 吴昊, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 腹腔镜Sugarbaker技术修补造口旁疝关键细节优化及近远期并发症处理分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-148.

Shuhan Wang, Zhen Ren, Hu Liu, Hao Wu, Chen Pan, Lisheng Wu. Laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia: Experience with refinements in key technical details and management of short-and long-term complications[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(02): 142-148.

目的

分析行腹腔镜Sugarbaker术治疗造口旁疝的手术操作关键步骤及技术细节优化,探讨术后并发症的发生情况,以期进一步规范腹腔镜Sugarbaker术式关键细节,降低术后并发症发生率。

方法

采用单中心回顾性队列研究,分析2015年1月至2025年12月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院疝及肥胖外科行腹腔镜Sugarbaker术修补造口旁疝的161例患者的临床资料。记录有无中转开放、术后并发症、手术时间、疝环缺损等信息并完成随访。

结果

161例手术均顺利完成,2例中转开放手术,无围手术期死亡病例。中位手术时间135(110,180)min,中位疝环缺损面积19.6(12.6,28.3)cm2。中位随访时间24(12,36)个月,症状学复发率为5.0%(8/161),影像学复发率为5.6%(9/161);采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析,结果显示:基于十年研究数据(最长随访96个月),术后8年累积症状学复发率为7.4%,8年累积影像学复发率为8.1%。其他并发症总发生率为7.5%(12/161),包括肠梗阻3例,造口皮肤黏膜分离3例,造口感染2例,疝囊腔肠管迟发瘘、疝囊积液、复发再次手术、切口愈合不良各1例。

结论

关键技术优化对于腹腔镜Sugarbaker术对造口旁疝修补具有良好的疗效,可有效控制术后并发症发生率。

Objective

To analyze the key procedural steps and technical refinements of laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia, and to investigate the incidence of postoperative complications, aiming to further standardize the critical details of the laparoscopic Sugarbaker technique and reduce postoperative complication rates.

Methods

A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to analyze the clinical data of 161 patients who underwent laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia at the Department of Hernia and Obesity Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China, from January 2015 to December 2025. Data such as conversion to open surgery, postoperative complications, operative time, hernia defect size were recorded, and follow-up was completed.

Results

All 161 surgeries were successfully completed, with 2 conversions to open surgery and no perioperative deaths. The median operative time was 135 (110, 180) minutes and the median hernia defect area was 19.6 (12.6, 28.3) cm2. The median follow-up time was 24 (12, 36) months. The symptomatic recurrence rate was 5.0% (8/161), and the radiological recurrence rate was 5.6% (9/161). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that, based on 10-year study data (maximum follow-up of 96 months), the 8-year cumulative symptomatic recurrence rate was 7.4% and the 8-year cumulative radiological recurrence rate was 8.1%. The overall incidence of other complications was 7.5% (12/161), including intestinal obstruction (n=3), stoma mucocutaneous separation (n=3), stoma infection (n=2), and one case each of delayed intestinal fistula from the hernia sac, hernia sac effusion, reoperation for recurrence, and poor wound healing.

Conclusion

Optimized key techniques in laparoscopic Sugarbaker repair demonstrate favorable outcomes for parastomal hernia, and can effectively control the incidence of postoperative complications.

图5 选用合适补片完成补片固定
[1]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[2]
Carne PWG, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Sur, 2003, 90(7): 784-793.
[3]
Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, et al. Parastomal Hernia: A Growing Problem with New Solutions[J]. Dig Surg, 2014, 31(4-5): 366-376.
[4]
Hansson BME, Slater NJ, Van Der Velden AS, et al. Surgical Techniques for Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Systematic Review of the Literature[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 685-695.
[5]
Fleming AM, Phillips AL, Drake JA, et al. Sugarbaker Versus Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Comparative Studies[J]. J Gastrointest Surg, 2023, 27(3): 573-584.
[6]
Kritharides N, Papaconstantinou D, Kykalos S, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: keyhole, Sugarbaker, sandwich, or hybrid technique with 3D mesh? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 448.
[7]
Martín-Arévalo J, Lopez-Callejon VA, Moro-Valdezate D, et al. Outcomes of surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a bayesian network meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2025, 30(1): 40.
[8]
DeAsis FJ, Lapin B, Gitelis ME, et al. Current state of laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: A meta-analysis[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2015, 21(28): 8670-8677.
[9]
Köhler G, Mayer F, Wundsam H, et al. Changes in the Surgical Management of Parastomal Hernias Over 15 Years: Results of 135 Cases[J]. World J Surg, 2015, 39(11): 2795-2804.
[10]
Bittner R, Bain K, Bansal VK, et al. Update of Guidelines for laparoscopic treatment of ventral and incisional abdominal wall hernias(International Endohernia Society(IEHS))-Part A[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(10): 3069-3139.
[11]
Keller P, Totten CF, Plymale MA, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair delays recurrence relative to open repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2021, 35(1): 415-422.
[12]
Suwa K, Nakajima S, Uno Y, et al. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair with 2-point anchoring and zigzag tacking of ParietexTM Parastomal Mesh technique[J]. Surg Endosc, 2016, 30(12): 5628-5634.
[13]
Muysoms FE, Miserez M, Berrevoet F, et al. Classification of primary and incisional abdominal wall hernias[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 407-414.
[14]
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of Surgical Complications: A New Proposal With Evaluation in a Cohort of 6336 Patients and Results of a Survey[J]. Ann Surg, 2004, 240(2): 205-213.
[15]
Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, et al. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(12): 1598-1607.
[16]
Maskal SM, Ellis RC, Fafaj A, et al. Open Retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole Mesh Placement for Parastomal Hernia Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2024, 159(9): 982.
[17]
Mäkäräinen-Uhlbäck E, Vironen J, Falenius V, et al. Parastomal Hernia: A Retrospective Nationwide Cohort Study Comparing Different Techniques with Long-Term Follow-Up[J]. World J Surg, 2021, 45(6): 1742-1749.
[18]
Aly OE. Addressing parastomal herniation through biomechanical simulation[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(3): 565-573.
[19]
Harries RL, Daniels IR, Smart NJ. Outcomes of surgically managed recurrent parastomal hernia: the Sisyphean challenge of the hernia world[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(1): 133-140.
[20]
Tastaldi L, Haskins IN, Perez AJ, et al. Single center experience with the modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for parastomal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(6): 941-949.
[21]
Barranquero AG, Espert JJ, Llompart Coll MM, et al. Analysis of recurrence and risk factors in laparoscopic sandwich technique for parastomal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(12): 9125-9131.
[22]
Reali C, Thrikandiyur AA, Begum M, et al. Parastomal hernia repair: a five-year experience from a single centre in the UK[J]. Updates Surg, 2023, 75(3): 643-648.
[23]
Halabi WJ, Jafari MD, Carmichael JC, et al. Laparoscopic versus open repair of parastomal hernias: an ACS-NSQIP analysis of short-term outcomes[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(11): 4067-4072.
[24]
Fu X, Li M, Hua R, et al. Lap-re-Do Keyhole versus Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker techniques in large parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(5): 1945-1950.
[25]
Polcz ME, Holland A, Wiley A, et al. Robotic sugarbaker parastomal hernia repair: updated series and outcomes[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 61.
[26]
任振, 韦笑韩, 刘虎, 等. 补片两点标识引导下腹腔镜Sugarbaker造口旁疝修补术单中心120例分析[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2024, 33(10): 1697-1704.
[27]
Howard R, Rob F, Thumma J, et al. Contemporary Outcomes of Elective Parastomal Hernia Repair in Older Adults[J]. JAMA Surg, 2023, 158(4): 394.
[28]
Djebbara-Bozo N, Zinther NB, Søgaard A, et al. Outcomes after surgical repair of primary parastomal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 72.
[1] 李玮璇, 杜峻峰, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜胃癌根治术主要并发症与处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 111-114.
[2] 樊伟伟, 许怀利, 杨喜佳. 中间入路与左侧前入路在中老年进展期胃癌腹腔镜根治术中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 117-120.
[3] 朱田雨, 施海, 杨洁. 预先小切口辅助腹腔镜根治术治疗进展期远端胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 130-133.
[4] 汝干, 翟春涛, 田昳程, 陈正荣. 腹腔镜下不同手术方式治疗cT1N0M0期胃癌的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 134-137.
[5] 魏平, 赵鑫, 田广健. 腹腔镜下置入IPST专用疝补片并开放原位造口重建治疗造口旁疝疗效分析(附52例报告)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 67-70.
[6] 李晓英, 金芳, 张润萍, 陈晓丽, 庞粉萍, 翟佳琪, 王兰, 尚培中. 3D腹腔镜切除Hartmann术后远端残留直肠再发癌一例报道[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 99-100.
[7] 宋再桪, 胡锦中, 殷秋萍, 陈艺凌, 党天安, 牟泽中, 徐晨阳, 姜昊文. 凝血酶原时间与膀胱癌患者接受内镜下冷冻消融治疗后复发的相关性分析[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 147-153.
[8] 必拉里·艾尔肯, 王丹, 李义亮. 腹外疝无张力修补术后迟发性补片感染相关危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 108-111.
[9] 王宝山, 郑若彤, 赵敏娴, 邢晓伟, 申英末. 日间手术模式在腹股沟疝合并肝硬化及中少量腹水患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 26-32.
[10] 刘永飞, 王璐婷, 刘雨辰, 赵凤林, 张洪铭. Lichtenstein手术在口服抗血小板药物的日间手术患者应用安全性对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 33-36.
[11] 刘宗航, 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 嵇振岭. 腹腔镜膈疝修补术的单中心临床经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 37-41.
[12] 闫红林, 任海强, 李京, 郝俊强, 王子康, 杨彦伟. 羟考酮在腹腔镜疝修补术患者中应用价值的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 42-47.
[13] 潘振坤, 张洪海, 倪永健, 叶晋生. 局部浸润联合神经阻滞麻醉下Lichtenstein疝修补术在腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 52-57.
[14] 吴杰嵘, 严庆, 胡健垣, 陈焕伟. 复发性肝细胞癌再次手术切除与射频消融临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(02): 211-218.
[15] 赵瑾洁, 仲伟, 郑国学. 糖尿病下肢ASO患者血糖控制水平对介入术后凝血功能及复发风险的影响[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2026, 14(01): 20-25.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?