切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (01) : 52 -57. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.01.010

论著

局部浸润联合神经阻滞麻醉下Lichtenstein疝修补术在腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝中的应用
潘振坤1, 张洪海2, 倪永健1, 叶晋生3,()   
  1. 1102100 北京中医医院延庆医院外科
    2101300 北京中医医院顺义医院外科
    3100010 首都医科大学附属北京中医医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-31 出版日期:2026-02-18
  • 通信作者: 叶晋生
  • 基金资助:
    北京市属医院科研培育计划(PZ2023019)

Application of Lichtenstein hernia repair under local infiltration combined with nerve block anesthesia in peritoneal dialysis–associated inguinal hernia

Zhenkun Pan1, Honghai Zhang2, Yongjian Ni1, Jinsheng Ye3,()   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery, Yanqing Hospital of Beijing Chinese Medicine Hospital, Beijing 102100, China
    2Department of General Surgery, Shunyi Hospital, Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Beijing 101300, China
    3Department of General Surgery, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100010, China
  • Received:2025-07-31 Published:2026-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Jinsheng Ye
引用本文:

潘振坤, 张洪海, 倪永健, 叶晋生. 局部浸润联合神经阻滞麻醉下Lichtenstein疝修补术在腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 52-57.

Zhenkun Pan, Honghai Zhang, Yongjian Ni, Jinsheng Ye. Application of Lichtenstein hernia repair under local infiltration combined with nerve block anesthesia in peritoneal dialysis–associated inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(01): 52-57.

目的

评估局部浸润联合神经阻滞麻醉下行开放Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术在腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝患者中的安全性与有效性。

方法

回顾性分析2015年2月至2025年2月首都医科大学附属北京中医医院及其医联体单位(北京中医医院顺义医院、北京中医医院延庆医院)收治的63例腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。所有患者均在局部浸润联合神经阻滞麻醉下接受开放Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术。收集患者人口学特征、疝类型、手术相关指标、围手术期并发症及随访结局。采用描述性统计方法,连续变量以中位数(四分位数)[MQ1Q3)]表示,分类变量以例数(%)表示。

结果

63例患者均顺利完成手术。患者年龄64(60,67)岁,腹膜透析龄33(17,50)个月。疝类型以腹股沟斜疝为主(87.3%),双侧疝占27.0%。手术时长50(45,58)min,术后住院时间1.5(1.0,2.0)d,术后24 h疼痛视觉模拟评分法评分2(1,2)分。围手术期按既定方案管理透析:术前短期停腹膜透析并过渡血液透析,术后7(7,7)d后分阶段恢复腹膜透析。围手术期未发生透析液渗漏或腹膜炎。术后30 d内轻微并发症发生率为6.3%,均经保守治疗缓解。在完成术后1年随访的60例患者中未观察到疝复发。

结论

在腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝患者中,局部麻醉下开放Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术结合规范的围手术期透析管理总体安全可行,可实现低疼痛、短住院及良好的短中期随访结局,但仍需前瞻性对照研究进一步验证并优化透析管理策略。

Objective

To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of open Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair under local infiltration combined with nerve block anesthesia in patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related inguinal hernia.

Methods

Clinical data of 63 patients with peritoneal dialysis-related inguinal hernia who were treated between February 2015 and February 2025 at Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Capital Medical University, and its affiliated centers (Yanqing Hospital of Beijing Chinese Medicine Hospital and Shunyi Hospital, Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent open Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair under local infiltration combined with nerve block anesthesia. Demographic characteristics, hernia type, operative indicators, perioperative complications, and follow-up outcomes were collected. Using descriptive statistical methods, continuous variables are presented as median (Q1,Q3), and categorical variables as number (%).

Results

All 63 patients successfully completed the procedure. The median age was 64 (60, 67) years, and the median duration of peritoneal dialysis was 33 (17, 50) months. Indirect inguinal hernia was the predominant type (87.3%), and bilateral hernias accounted for 27.0%. The median operative time was 50 (45, 58) minutes, and the median postoperative hospital stay was 1.5 (1.0, 2.0) days. The median Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score at 24 hours postoperatively was 2 (1, 2) points. Perioperative dialysis was managed according to a standardized protocol, including temporary cessation of peritoneal dialysis with transition to hemodialysis preoperatively and stepwise resumption of peritoneal dialysis postoperatively after a median of 7 (7,7) days. No dialysate leakage or peritonitis occurred during the perioperative period. Minor complications within 30 days occurred in 6.3% of patients and resolved with conservative management. In the 60 patients who completed the 1-year postoperative follow-up, no hernia recurrence was observed.

Conclusions

For patients with peritoneal dialysis-related inguinal hernia, open Lichtenstein tension-free repair under local anesthesia combined with standardized perioperative dialysis management appears to be safe and feasible. It can achieve low postoperative pain, short hospital stay, and favorable short- to mid-term outcomes. Prospective controlled studies are warranted to further validate these findings and optimize dialysis management strategies.

图1 腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝患者的围手术期透析管理
表1 63例腹膜透析相关腹股沟疝患者的基线数据
[1]
Iorga C, Iorga CR, Andreiana I, et al. Management and outcomes for peritoneal dialysis patients diagnosed with abdominal hernias[J]. Life, 2024, 14(8): 1003.
[2]
Banshodani M, Kawanishi H, Moriishi M, et al. Inguinal hernia in hemodialysis versus peritoneal dialysis patients: a case-control study[J]. Ren Replace Ther, 2016, 2: 24.
[3]
Banshodani M, Kawanishi H, Kajikawa R, et al. Sudden onset abdominal wall leakages of inguinal hernia in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis: report of two cases with literature review[J]. Ren Replace Ther, 2024,10: 62.
[4]
唐荣, 刘卓, 杨建平, 等. 老年腹股沟疝患者在超声引导下髂腹下与髂腹股沟腹横肌平面阻滞的麻醉效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 655-659.
[5]
Wakasugi M, Hirata T, Okamura Y, et al. Perioperative management of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery[J]. Surg Today, 2011, 41(2):297-299.
[6]
Balentine CJ, Meier J, Berger M, et al. Using local rather than general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair is associated with shorter operative time and enhanced postoperative recovery[J]. Am J Surg, 2021, 221(5): 902-907.
[7]
Chi Q, Shi Z, Zhang Z, et al. Inguinal hernias in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis: is tension-free mesh repair feasible?[J]. BMC Surg, 2020, 20(1):310.
[8]
Luk Y, Li JYY, Law TT, et al. Tension-free mesh repair of inguinal hernia in patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2020, 40(1):62-66.
[9]
Balentine CJ, Meier J, Berger M, et al. Using local rather than general anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair is associated with shorter operative time and enhanced postoperative recovery[J]. Am J Surg, 2021, 221(5): 902-907.
[10]
Argo M, Favela J, Phung T, et al. Local VS. other forms of anesthesia for open inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Am J Surg, 2019, 218(5): 1008-1015.
[11]
Giuffrida M, Nita GE, Biolchini F. Old but gold: the surgeon’s affair to manage inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Tech Dev, 2023, 12(2): 87-98.
[12]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师学组. Lichtenstein手术规范化操作中国专家共识(2021版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(7): 747-753.
[13]
周晓华, 芮鸿庆, 徐光齐, 等. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术与李金斯坦术对原发性腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(4): 432-436.
[14]
Barta B, Dumitraș M, Bucur Ș, et al. Extraperitoneal laparoscopic approach in inguinal hernia—the ideal solution?[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(19): 5652.
[15]
Ulutas ME, Yilmaz AH. Comparison of open and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the elderly patients: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 179.
[16]
叶静, 黄永刚, 郭自成, 等. Lichtenstein手术治疗腹膜透析患者腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(6): 598-600.
[17]
Calomino N, Poto GE, Carbone L, et al. Weighing the benefits: exploring the differential effects of light-weight and heavy-weight polypropylene meshes in inguinal hernia repair in a retrospective cohort study[J]. Am J Surg, 2024, 238:115950.
[1] 魏平, 赵鑫, 田广健. 腹腔镜下置入IPST专用疝补片并开放原位造口重建治疗造口旁疝疗效分析(附52例报告)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 67-70.
[2] 程必盛, 吴芃. 2025EAU年会要点:微创、远程与精准泌尿外科的发展趋势[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 693-699.
[3] 王宝山, 郑若彤, 赵敏娴, 邢晓伟, 申英末. 日间手术模式在腹股沟疝合并肝硬化及中少量腹水患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 26-32.
[4] 刘永飞, 王璐婷, 刘雨辰, 赵凤林, 张洪铭. Lichtenstein手术在口服抗血小板药物的日间手术患者应用安全性对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 33-36.
[5] 刘宗航, 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 嵇振岭. 腹腔镜膈疝修补术的单中心临床经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 37-41.
[6] 闫红林, 任海强, 李京, 郝俊强, 王子康, 杨彦伟. 羟考酮在腹腔镜疝修补术患者中应用价值的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 42-47.
[7] 黄建朋, 宗华, 杨骏波. 基于神经分布的局部浸润麻醉在Lichtenstein手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 48-51.
[8] 中国日间手术合作联盟疝和腹壁外科专业日间手术专家委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组, 中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华消化外科菁英荟疝与腹壁外科学组, 中华志愿者协会中西医结合专家工作委员会疝和腹壁外科全国专业组, 中国非公立医疗机构协会日间手术与疝外科专业委员会. 腹股沟疝日间手术规范化流程与标准专家指南(2026版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 1-9.
[9] 钟秋润, 严丹檎, 范小莉, 陈蓉, 罗坤. 腹股沟疝修补术后发生血清肿危险因素的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 701-706.
[10] 刘沐阳, 沈晓军, 史立洲, 谭华志, 王睿杰, 程杰, 吴凡, 顾隆淼. 术后血清肿:腹股沟疝修补术的潜在挑战及干预策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 712-716.
[11] 王佳杰, 李文波. 3D腹腔镜在腹股沟疝治疗中的临床应用进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 717-721.
[12] 陈双, 李英儒. 单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术的技术与方法[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 629-632.
[13] 彭鹏, 陈杰. 机器人手术在疝和腹壁外科领域国内外应用现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 638-644.
[14] 王宏, 董国强, 刘韦鋆, 张楠. 布比卡因脂质体用于Lichtenstein术后镇痛效果及安全性分析:一项单中心随机对照试验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 645-651.
[15] 彭泉, 陈亮, 于华杰, 郑玉, 陈旭, 张明金. 腔镜下不同入路腹膜外补片修补治疗腰疝的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 658-662.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?