切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06) : 638 -644. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.06.007

专家论坛

机器人手术在疝和腹壁外科领域国内外应用现状及展望
彭鹏, 陈杰()   
  1. 100034 北京大学人民医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-04 出版日期:2025-12-18
  • 通信作者: 陈杰

Current status and future perspectives of robotic surgery in hernia and abdominal wall surgery

Peng Peng, Jie Chen()   

  1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Peking University People Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
  • Received:2025-12-04 Published:2025-12-18
  • Corresponding author: Jie Chen
引用本文:

彭鹏, 陈杰. 机器人手术在疝和腹壁外科领域国内外应用现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 638-644.

Peng Peng, Jie Chen. Current status and future perspectives of robotic surgery in hernia and abdominal wall surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(06): 638-644.

微创外科的迅猛发展推动了疝和腹壁外科手术技术的持续革新。机器人手术系统作为腹腔镜技术的延伸和升级,凭借其三维高清视野、可转腕的手术器械以及滤除震颤的稳定性等优势,在疝和腹壁外科领域的应用日益广泛。本文旨在系统阐述机器人手术技术平台的特点、在疝和腹壁外科的临床应用现状与高级别循证医学证据,深入探讨其成本效益、学习曲线与规范化培训等关键问题,并对该领域的未来发展方向进行展望,以期为临床实践和未来研究提供参考。

The rapid development of minimally invasive surgery has promoted the continuous innovation of hernia and abdominal wall surgery. As an extension and upgrade of laparoscopic technology, the robotic surgery system has been widely used in the field of hernia and abdominal wall surgery with its advantages of three-dimensional high-definition vision, rotatable wrist surgical instruments and stability of filtering tremor. The purpose of this paper is to systematically describe the characteristics of robotic surgery technology platform, its clinical application status in hernia and abdominal wall surgery, and the evidence of high-level evidence-based medicine, to explore the key issues such as cost-effectiveness, learning curve and standardized training, and to look forward to the future development direction of this field, so as to provide reference for clinical practice and future research.

[1]
Huerta S, Garza AM. A Systematic Review of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: Management of Inguinal Hernias in the 21st Century[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(3): 990.
[2]
Qabbani A, Aboumarzouk OM, Elbakry T, et al. Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91(11): 2277-2287.
[3]
Ferri V, Vicente E, Quijano Y, et al. Earlier Experience of Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With the New HugoTM Robotic System in Europe[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2025, 4: 13880.
[4]
Fry BT, Howard RA, Thumma JR, et al. Surgical Approach and Long-Term Recurrence After Ventral Hernia Repair[J]. JAMA Surg, 2024, 159(9): 1019-1028.
[5]
Capoccia Giovannini S, Vierstraete M, Frascio M, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on robotic assisted ventral hernia repair: the ROVER review[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 95.
[6]
Lima DL, Nogueira R, Kasakewich JPG, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair-An ACHQC Database 5-Year Analysis [J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2025, 4: 13352.
[7]
Gantner L, Mignot H, Pochhammer J, et al. Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic systemTM: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation[J]. Surg Endosc, 2024, 38(12): 7647-7655.
[8]
Mignot H, Diack B, Capitaine J, et al. Retrospective evaluation of a single surgeon's experience in robot-assisted inguinal repair with the Dexter SystemTM during the learning curve[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Her, 2024, 7(2):75.
[9]
Katsimperis S, Tzelves L, Feretzakis G, et al. Beyond Da Vinci: Comparative Review of Next-Generation Robotic Platforms in Urologic Surgery[J]. J Clin Med, 2025, 14(19): 6775.
[10]
Kallidonis P, Gkeka K, TataniS V, et al. Novel Robotic Platforms for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery in Urology: A Narrative Review[J]. J Endourol, 2024, 38(7): 652-660.
[11]
Andreou C, Maksimovic S, Riboni C, et al. Laparoscopic TAPP to treat inguinal hernia. Is the robot preferable? A review and cohort-study on anatomical landmarks of robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal groin hernia repair (r-TAPP)[J]. Cir Esp (Engl Ed), 2023, 101 Suppl 1: S3-S10.
[12]
孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 等. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(5): 588.
[13]
Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Rocco G, et al. Differences in the learning curve of robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair according to surgeon’s robotic experience[J]. Hernia, 2023, 27(5): 1123-1129.
[14]
Latif J, Brazkiewicz M, Inan I, et al. Outcomes During the Learning Curve and Feasibility of Implementing the European Hernia Society Recommendation Guidelines for Robotic Abdominal Wall Surgery Within a UK Centre[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2025, 4: 15008.
[15]
Viera OJ, Florin JL, Morales KE. Long-term outcomes of robotic inguinal hernia repair (r-TAPP): a retrospective review of 434 consecutive cases by a single surgeon with 3-8 years of follow-up[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 57.
[16]
Baginski B, Tran D, Ogola g, et al. A single-center retrospective review of laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal versus robotic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent), 2024, 37(6): 897-902.
[17]
Kotecha K, Loh CK, Bhimani N, et al. Long-term quality of life outcomes following robotic inguinal hernioplasty: a single-centre experience of 100 cases[J]. J Robot Surg, 2025, 19(1): 160.
[18]
Prabhu AS, Carbonell A, Hope W, et al. Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2020, 155(5): 380-387.
[19]
Peltrini R, Corcione F, Pacella D, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) approaches to bilateral hernia repair: a multicenter retrospective study using propensity score matching analysis[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(2): 1188-1193.
[20]
Allaeys M, Poortmans N, Berrevoet F. Robot-assisted repair of complicated inguinal hernia: Advantages in comparison with conventional repair[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Her, 2023, 6(2):105.
[21]
Christoffersen MW, Andresen K, Perregaard H, et al. Robotic Surgical Procedures for Ventral Hernia Repair[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2025, 4: 14212.
[22]
Singh A, Toh WH, Elzahed N, et al. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Ventral Hernia Repair With Intraperitoneal Mesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Perioperative Outcomes Randomised Controlled Trials[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2024, 3: 13809.
[23]
Vogel R, Heinzelmann F, Büchler P, et al. Robot-Assisted Extraperitoneal Ventral Hernia Repair-Experience From the First 160 Consecutive Operations With Lateral eTEP and eTAR Techniques[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2024, 3: 13055.
[24]
Bindal V, Sethi D, Khetan M, et al. Robotic Extended-View Totally Extraperitoneal Transversus Abdominis Release (eTEP/TAR) Without Crossover for a Large Right Boundary Incisional Hernia[J]. CRSLS, 2020, 7(2): e2020.00025.
[25]
Chelliah DE, Schroeder AD, Johnson CJ, et al. Outcomes from 306 consecutive robotic ventral hernia repairs in the community setting[J]. J Robot Surg, 2024, 19(1): 32.
[26]
Henriksen NA, Marckmann M, Christoffersen MW, et al. Cost analysis of open versus robot-assisted ventral hernia repair – a retrospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(5): 1823-1829.
[27]
Loh WS, Howard RA, Fry BT, et al. Learning Curves for Robotic-Assisted Ventral Hernia Repair[J]. JAMA Netw Open, 2024, 7(12): e2448521.
[28]
Bhatt H, Wei B. Comparison of laparoscopic vs. robotic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review[J]. J Thorac Dis, 2023, 15(3): 1494-1502.
[29]
Elissavet S, Ioannis G, Panagiotis P, et al. Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg, 2023, 26(3): 134-145.
[30]
Bassiri A, Pawar OS, Boutros C, et al. Robotic vs Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair: A Comparative Study of Short- and Long-Term Surgical Outcomes[J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2025, 120(5): 947-956.
[31]
AlFataftah S, Hammadeh BM, Yaghi G, et al. Safety and efficacy of robotic versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 305.
[32]
Liu Q, Wang D, Sun Z, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic repair in hiatal hernia with kyphosis: A case report with meta-analysis[J]. Int J Abdom Wall Her, 2023, 6(2): 92.
[33]
O’connor SC, Mallard M, Desai SS, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair: Results After 7 Years of Robotic Experience[J]. Am Surg, 2020, 86(9): 1083-1087.
[34]
Violante T, Ferrari D, Gomaa IA, et al. Robotic parastomal hernia repair in Ileal-conduit patients: short-term results in a single-center cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(6): 2245-2253.
[35]
Violante T, Sassun R, Ferrari D, et al. Robotic parastomal hernia repair: an updated systematic review[J]. Minerva Surg, 2025, 80(2): 160-164.
[36]
Bloemendaal ALA. Robotic Retromuscular (Recurrent) Parastomal Hernia Repair(r-Pauli-Repair) With Synthetically Reinforced Biological Mesh; Technique, Early Experience, and Short-Term Follow-Up[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2023, 2: 12059.
[37]
Watanaskul S, Schwab ME, Colley A, et al. Robotic repair of perineal hernias: a video vignette and review of the literature[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(3): 2290-2294.
[38]
Jung S, Lee HS. Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for bilateral obturator hernia: a video vignette[J]. J Minim Invasive Surg, 2024, 27(1): 40-43.
[39]
Zeng F, Shames B, Appel E, et al. Bilateral sciatic hernias in an elderly woman successfully managed with robotic surgery: A case report and literature review[J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2021, 86: 106333.
[40]
Fridling J, Gontarz B, Stein J, et al. Robotic-Assisted Repair of a Ureterosciatic Hernia with Combined Ureteral Stenting[J]. CRSLS, 2023, 10(2): e2023.00015.
[41]
Bianco FM, Dreifuss NH, Chang B, et al. Robotic single-port surgery: Preliminary experience in general surgery[J].Int J Med Robot, 2022, 18(6): e2453.
[42]
Mathur M, Yankovsky A, Kreaden U. CO184 A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Benign Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair Using the da Vinci Surgical Systems to Laparoscopic or Open Approach[J]. Value Health, 2025, 28(6): S57.
[43]
Sabbatini F, La Regina D, Murgante Testa N, et al. Hospital costs of robotic-assisted and open treatment of large ventral hernias[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 11523.
[44]
Carbonell AM, Warren JA, Prabhu AS, et al. Reducing Length of Stay Using a Robotic-assisted Approach for Retromuscular Ventral Hernia Repair: A Comparative Analysis From the Americas Hernia Society Quality Collaborative[J]. Ann Surg, 2018, 267(2): 210-217.
[45]
Vogel R, Mück B. Artificial Intelligence-What to Expect From Machine Learning and Deep Learning in Hernia Surgery[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2024, 3: 13059.
[46]
Liu A, Liyanage A, Chen B, et al. Artificial intelligence use in abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review[J]. Art Int Surg, 2025, 5(3): 425-433.
[47]
彭晓煜, 石和凯, 宋致成, 等. 人工智能在疝与腹壁外科的应用与未来发展[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2024, 33(10): 1580-1587.
[48]
Restrepo-Rodas G, Barajas-Gamboa JS, Ortiz Aparicio FM, et al. The Role of AI in Modern Hernia Surgery: A Review and Practical Insights[J]. Surg Innov, 2025, 32(3): 301-311.
[49]
邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 王明刚. 人工智能技术在疝和腹壁外科领域的应用及展望[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(4): 390-393.
[50]
Goyal A, Mendoza M, Munoz AE, et al. Artificial intelligence for real-time surgical phase recognition in minimal invasive inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review on behalf of TROGSS-the robotic global surgical society[J]. Artif Intell Surg, 2025, 5(3): 450-464.
[51]
Taha A, Enodien B, Frey DM, et al. The Development of Artificial Intelligence in Hernia Surgery: A Scoping Review[J]. Front Surg, 2022, 9: 908014.
[52]
Riddle EW, Kewalramani D, Narayan M, et al. Surgical Simulation: Virtual Reality to Artificial Intelligence[J]. Curr Probl Surg, 2024, 61(11): 101625.
[53]
Rahmah L, Sukadiono S, Mundakir M, et al. A Review of Telesurgery in Extreme Settings: A Narrative Review[J]. Telemed J E Health, 2025, 31(6): 701-715.
[54]
杨丽晓, 侯正松, 唐伟, 等. 近年手术机器人的发展[J]. 中国医疗器械杂志, 2023, 47(1): 1-12.
[55]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹壁切口疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(1): 9-17.
[56]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科专家工作组. 腹股沟疝诊疗指南(2024版)[J/OL]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2025, 24(2): 143-150.
[1] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[2] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜疝修补术式选择与原则[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 362-365.
[3] 唐健雄, 李绍杰, 李绍春. 疝病微创技术核心体系的发展与应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 605-608.
[4] 王平, 黄永刚, 金华. 腹壁外科新概念:腹壁核心健康[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 609-613.
[5] 李健文, 乐飞, 李金东. 增强视野全腹膜外修补术(e-TEP)的起源和进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 623-628.
[6] 陈双, 李英儒. 单孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术的技术与方法[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 629-632.
[7] 邱忠伟, 陈坤, 唐成, 许超, 向青锋. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟嵌顿疝手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 544-546.
[8] 郑小龙, 李挺, 隋永健, 徐辉. 疝囊进入阴囊的腹股沟直疝CT表现[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 559-562.
[9] 王思懿, 耿苗苗, 王增旭. 手术室中不同术前准备方式对腹壁疝手术效率影响和患者满意度分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 563-566.
[10] 王珺, 黄敏. 舒适护理联合大黄芒硝外敷对腹股沟疝术后阴囊水肿的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 567-570.
[11] 靳翠红, 申英末, 储诚兵. 腹腔镜手术模拟器在腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术教学培训中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 595-598.
[12] 陆进, 周世勇, 艾飞, 石若飞, 付安迪, 杨鑫. 双侧腹股沟疝合并隐睾患者一例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 602-604.
[13] 徐安军, 覃炳志, 吴德俊, 王一豪, 赵杰炳, 李诗媛, 王廷峰. 新型生物补片在污染/感染性腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 505-510.
[14] 李宝山, 满艺, 王荫龙, 张新, 黄皇. 经机器人与经腹腔镜造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 523-528.
[15] 罗彬予, 柏丹, 滕庆, 郭炜, 黄斌, 田云鸿. 基于倾向评分匹配评价70岁及以上患者在日间手术模式下行腹股沟疝修补术的安全性及可行性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 427-433.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?