切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (05) : 544 -546. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.05.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟嵌顿疝手术中的应用
邱忠伟, 陈坤, 唐成, 许超, 向青锋()   
  1. 432000 湖北省孝感市第一人民医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-05-19 出版日期:2025-10-18
  • 通信作者: 向青锋

The application of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in incarcerated inguinal hernia surgery

Zhongwei Qiu, Kun Chen, Cheng Tang, Chao Xu, Qingfeng Xiang()   

  1. Department of General Surgery, Xiaogan No.1 People's Hospital, Xiaogan 432000, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2025-05-19 Published:2025-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Qingfeng Xiang
引用本文:

邱忠伟, 陈坤, 唐成, 许超, 向青锋. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术在腹股沟嵌顿疝手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 544-546.

Zhongwei Qiu, Kun Chen, Cheng Tang, Chao Xu, Qingfeng Xiang. The application of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair in incarcerated inguinal hernia surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(05): 544-546.

目的

比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)与平片无张力疝修补术(Lichtenstein)在腹股沟嵌顿疝中的临床疗效及安全性。

方法

回顾性收集2019年1月至2023年12月湖北省孝感市第一人民医院接受疝修补手术的118例腹股沟嵌顿疝患者的临床资料。按照术式不同分为2组,TAPP组患者接受TAPP治疗(56例),Lichtenstein组患者接受Lichtenstein手术治疗(62例)。比较2组患者的住院时间、手术时间、术中出血量以及术后疼痛视觉模拟评分。记录并分析2组患者术后并发症及随访复发率发生情况。

结果

TAPP组与Lichtenstein组手术时间和术后复发率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TAPP组在术中出血量、术后疼痛评分及手术并发症发生率方面均显著低于Lichtenstein组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

腹股沟嵌顿疝手术TAPP与Lichtenstein手术同样安全有效,TAPP在术中出血量、术后疼痛及术后并发症方面更具优势。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) and Lichtenstein's tension-free hernia repair in the treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernia.

Methods

Clinical data of 118 patients with incarcerated inguinal hernia who underwent hernia repair surgery at Xiaogan No.1 People's Hospital in Hubei Province from January 2019 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into two groups based on the surgical method: the TAPP group (56 cases) underwent TAPP surgery, and the Lichtenstein group (62 cases) underwent Lichtenstein's procedure. The hospital stay, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative pain visual analog scale (VAS) scores were compared between the two groups. Postoperative complications and follow-up recurrence rates were recorded and analyzed.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in operative time and postoperative recurrence rates between the TAPP group and the Lichtenstein group (P>0.05). The TAPP group showed significantly lower intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain scores, and surgical complication rates compared to the Lichtenstein group, with statistically significant differences (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Both TAPP and Lichtenstein procedures are safe and effective for the treatment of incarcerated inguinal hernia. TAPP demonstrates advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss, postoperative pain, and postoperative complications.

表1 2组腹股沟嵌顿疝患者一般资料比较
表2 2组腹股沟嵌顿疝患者临床资料比较(±s
表3 2组腹股沟嵌顿疝患者并发症及复发情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Köckerling F, Heine T, Adolf D, et al. Trends in emergent groin hernia repair—ananalysis from the Herniamed Registry[J]. Front Surg, 2021, 8(1): 655755.
[2]
Jiang XM, Sun RX, Huang WH, et al. Midline preperitoneal repair for incarceratedand strangulated femoral hernia[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(2): 323-328.
[3]
Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, et al. Outcomes after emergency versuselective ventral hernia repair: a prospective nationwide study[J]. World J Surg, 2013, 37(10): 2273-2279.
[4]
王明刚,申英末,杨硕,等. 经腹膜前腹股沟疝无张力修补术治疗嵌顿疝和(或)绞窄疝效果分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(8): 650-653.
[5]
Poelman MM, Van Den Heuvel B, Deelder JD, et al. EAES consensus development conference on endoscopic repair of groin hernias[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(10): 3505-3519.
[6]
李鹏胜,向国安,王汉宁,等. 急性腹股沟嵌顿性疝腹腔镜处理策略(附60例报告)[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2008, (10): 1089-1090, 1093.
[7]
任项项,张萌,谢天皓,等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的疗效分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2024, 29(12): 921-924.
[8]
Chihara N, Suzuki H, Sukegawa M, et al. Is the laparoscopic ap-proach feasible for reduction and herniorrhaphy in cases ofacutely incarcerated/strangulated groin and obturator hernia?: 17-year experience from open to laparoscopic approach[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2019, 29(5): 631-637.
[9]
Lockhart K, Dunn D, Teo S, et al. Mesh versus non-mesh for in-guinal and femoral hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2018, 9(9): CD011517.
[1] 熊余送, 许东民, 张伟伟, 汪扬, 陶勇, 朱峰. LCBDE术中胆总管单纯一期缝合的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 654-657.
[2] 王毅, 孔剑桥, 张鹏, 代扬, 李恒平. 腹腔镜超声引导十二指肠镜治疗胆囊合并胆总管结石[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 658-661.
[3] 陈敏, 陈挺, 范杰, 陈霄. PTCSL与LCBDE对肝内胆管结石患者应激反应和结石清除率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 662-665.
[4] 张超, 常剑. 混合入路与中间入路行腹腔镜右半结肠癌根治术的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 685-688.
[5] 杜晓辉, 谢天宇, 晏阳. 我国腹腔镜结直肠癌外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 600-604.
[6] 张建锋, 田若曦, 李保坤, 马洪庆, 胡旭华, 曹龙飞, 王贵英. 我国腹腔镜右半结肠癌的手术难点及对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 605-608.
[7] 陈朝乾, 赵宗贤, 徐顺, 姚远, 孙杰. 腹腔镜Dixon术中保留左结肠动脉对老年低位直肠癌患者的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 611-614.
[8] 严征远, 张恒, 曹能琦, 方兴超, 陈大敏. 单孔+1腹腔镜结直肠癌根治切除术的有效性及安全性临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 615-618.
[9] 薛兆强, 袁寅. 双镜联合保功能胃癌根治术治疗早期近端胃癌的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 628-632.
[10] 贺子蕗, 张靖, 刘卓, 李昊楠, 赵鑫鑫, 孙泽辉. 改良内翻手工缝合的Overlap吻合法在腹腔镜全胃切除术中的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 633-636.
[11] 周丽君, 李姣姣, 孙燕, 王露, 钱蓉. 不同吻合方式对腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术患者术后恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 642-645.
[12] 向涵, 母德安, 王强, 黄英杰, 张伟. 3D荧光反染超微创单孔腹腔镜Ⅵ段、Ⅴ段背侧段解剖性肝切除[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 610-610.
[13] 燕速, 梁浩, 黄涛. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌扩大切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 609-609.
[14] 唐玥, 陈家璐, 覃德龙, 李宗龙, 汤朝晖, 全志伟. 腹腔镜肝切除治疗复发性肝癌的焦点与难点问题探讨[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 667-672.
[15] 袁文康, 张冲, 张超. 肝脏外科治疗理念的变迁与技术进步[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 673-679.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?