切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (05) : 598 -602. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.05.021

论著

超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果
党情超, 魏星(), 詹必伟, 何振   
  1. 431600 湖北孝感,汉川市人民医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2023-01-08 出版日期:2023-10-18
  • 通信作者: 魏星

Application of ultrasound-guided ilioinguino-iliohypogastric nerve block combined with local anesthesia in the repair of inguinal hernia in elderly patients

Qingchao Dang, Xing Wei(), Biwei Zhan, Zhen He   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Hanchuan People's Hospital, Xiaogan 431600, Hubei, China
  • Received:2023-01-08 Published:2023-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Xing Wei
引用本文:

党情超, 魏星, 詹必伟, 何振. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 598-602.

Qingchao Dang, Xing Wei, Biwei Zhan, Zhen He. Application of ultrasound-guided ilioinguino-iliohypogastric nerve block combined with local anesthesia in the repair of inguinal hernia in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(05): 598-602.

目的

探究超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞(IINB)联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用效果。

方法

选取2019年2月至2021年2月在汉川市人民医院进行腹股沟无张力疝修补术的老年患者104例为研究对象,进行前瞻性研究。采用随机数字表法将患者分为试验组及对照组,各52例。对照组行蛛网膜下腔神经阻滞麻醉,试验组行超声引导下IINB联合局部麻醉。比较2组术后24、48、72 h疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),术前及术后24、48 h的应激反应指标[白细胞介素-6(IL-6)、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)、C反应蛋白(CRP)、皮质醇]及在T0(麻醉前)、T1(麻醉10 min)、T2(切皮时)及T3(牵拉疝囊)及T4(缝皮时)时的血流动力学[心率、平均动脉压(MAP)及血氧饱和度(SpO2)]水平差异。

结果

静息时,试验组术后24、48、72 h的VAS评分低于对照组且差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。活动时,2组患者术后24 h VAS评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),术后48、72 h的VAS评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。T1、T2、T3、T4时刻,试验组心率高于对照组,T1、T4时刻,试验组MAP均高于对照组;T2、T3时刻SpO2高于对照组(P<0.05);术后24、48 h试验组血清IL-6、TNF-α、CRP及皮质醇水平均低于对照组(P<0.05)。试验组总不良反应发生率较对照组低(9.62% vs 23.08%),但差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.847,P=0.065)。

结论

超声引导下IINB联合局部麻醉在老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的麻醉效果好且安全性较高,可有效降低患者围手术期的应激及炎性反应,维持机体血流动力学稳定。

Objective

To investigate the effect ultrasound-guided ilioinguino-iliohypogastric nerve block (IINB) combined with local anesthesia in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients.

Methods

A prospective study was conducted on 104 elderly patients who underwent tension-free inguinal hernia repair in Hanchuan People's Hospital of Hubei Province from February 2019 to February 2021. Patients were divided into experimental group and control group using a random number table method, with 52 patients in each group. The control group was given subarachnoid nerve block anesthesia, and the experimental group was given IINB combined with local anesthesia under ultrasound guidance. The visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain at 24, 48, and 72 hours after operation was compared between the two groups, and the stress response indexes [interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP) and cortisol] before and 24, 48 hours after surgery, and hemodynamic [heart rate, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and oxygen saturation (SpO2) levels] at T0 (before anesthesia), T1 (after anesthesia for 10 minutes), T2 (during skin incision), T3 (when pulling hernia sac) and T4 (during skin suture) were compared.

Results

At rest, the VAS scores of the experimental group were lower than those of the control group at 24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). During activity, the difference in VAS scores between the two groups was not statistically significant at 24 h after surgery (P>0.05), and the differences in VAS scores at 48 and 72 h after surgery were statistically significant (P<0.05). The heart rate of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group at the moments of T1, T2, T3, T4, and the MAP values of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group at the moments of T1 and T4; the SpO2 values of the experimental group were higher than those of the control group at the moments of T2 and T3 (P<0.05); serum IL-6, TNF-α, CRP and cortisol levels in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group at 24 and 48 h after surgery (P<0.05). The incidence rate of total adverse reactions in the experimental group was lower than that in the control group (9.62% vs 23.08%), but the difference was not statistically significant (χ2=1.847, P=0.065).

Conclusion

Under ultrasound guidance, IINB has good anesthesia effect and high safety in tension-free inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients, which can effectively reduce stress and inflammatory response during perioperative period and maintain hemodynamic stability of the body.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者疼痛情况比较(分,±s
表3 2组患者血流动力学水平比较
表4 2组患者应激及炎性因子比较
表5 2组患者不良反应比较[例(%)]
[1]
Chen F, Liu M, Jin C, et al. Tension-Free Mesh Repair for Incarcerated Groin Hernia: A Comparative Study[J]. Surg Innov, 2020, 27(4): 352-357.
[2]
Solaini L, Cavaliere D, Avanzolini A, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2022, 16(4): 775-781.
[3]
林丽, 潘在礼, 黄良诚, 等. 局部神经阻滞麻醉对腹股沟无张力疝修补镇痛效果及应激反应影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(1): 61-64.
[4]
黄翠景, 吴永丰, 刘兴洲. 无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床效果及安全性评价[J]. 中国医刊, 2021, 56(4): 439-442.
[5]
张邓新, 王叶纯, 宗剑, 等. 超声引导下神经阻滞技术对腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的治疗作用[J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2020, 37(7): 1306-1308.
[6]
杨振龙, 吴纯东, 左东. 超声引导髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经联合阻滞与全身麻醉对腹股沟疝手术患儿生理参数的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 138-141.
[7]
林塔斯. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞复合局部浸润麻醉在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中国医学创新, 2023, 20(10): 36-39.
[8]
邱全明, 余婷, 聂立雄. 罗哌卡因联合地塞米松超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞用于老年腹股沟疝无张力修补手术的效果[J]. 福建医药杂志, 2022, 44(3): 97-99.
[9]
Dogan S, Gurleyik E. Video-endoscopic Tension-free Groin Hernia Repair via Total Extraperitoneal Approach[J]. Cureus, 2020, 12(2): e6839.
[10]
扈红亮. 腹横肌神经阻滞联合喉罩全麻在老年腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的应用[J]. 罕少疾病杂志, 2022, 29(2): 78-81.
[11]
周兴凤, 程浩, 傅颖. 不同麻醉方式在成人开放式腹股沟疝无张力修补术中镇痛效果比较[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2021, 26(4): 753-754.
[12]
刘松华, 方懿, 曹理言, 等. 右美托咪啶联合超声引导下神经阻滞在合并基础疾病的老年患者开放性腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J]. 中国医师杂志, 2019, 21(6): 810-813.
[13]
杨宁, 左明章, 孟小燕, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部浸润麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2017, 45(3): 48-51.
[14]
公艳芳, 李光, 李希明. 超声引导下神经阻滞麻醉在高龄无张力腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2021, 24(3): 215-216, 219.
[15]
颜振艺, 莫坚, 曹殿青, 等. 超声引导下髂腹下、髂腹股沟神经、腹横肌平面及生殖股神经联合阻滞对疝气修补术有效性及安全性评价[J]. 吉林医学, 2019, 40(1): 59-61.
[16]
黄志, 夏维, 柯晋源, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞联合生殖股神经生殖支阻滞在老年腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2020, 36(2): 135-139.
[17]
彭秋萍. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在腹股沟无张力疝修补术中的效果研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2021, 50(S02): 246-247.
[18]
纪健, 李亚春, 鲁应军, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果及安全性分析[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2019, 37(10): 8-9.
[19]
朱尤壮, 柴军, 杨福全, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面两点阻滞在高危老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2021, 36(11): 835-840.
[1] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[2] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[3] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[4] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[5] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[6] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[7] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[8] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[9] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[10] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[11] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[12] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要