切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 322 -325. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.03.018

论著

单用喉罩全身麻醉或联合骶管阻滞在儿童疝囊高位结扎术中的效果比较
李志全, 王茜, 赵泽宇()   
  1. 628000 四川省,广元市中心医院麻醉科
    611135 成都,四川省八一康复中心麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2022-08-26 出版日期:2023-06-18
  • 通信作者: 赵泽宇

Comparison of laryngeal mask airway general anesthesia alone versus combined with sacral block in high ligation of hernia sac in children

Zhiquan Li, Qian Wang, Zeyu Zhao()   

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Guangyuan Central Hospital, Guangyuan, Sichuan 628000, China
    Department of Anesthesiology, Sichuan Bayi Rehabilitation Center, Sichuan Chengdu 611135, China
  • Received:2022-08-26 Published:2023-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Zeyu Zhao
引用本文:

李志全, 王茜, 赵泽宇. 单用喉罩全身麻醉或联合骶管阻滞在儿童疝囊高位结扎术中的效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 322-325.

Zhiquan Li, Qian Wang, Zeyu Zhao. Comparison of laryngeal mask airway general anesthesia alone versus combined with sacral block in high ligation of hernia sac in children[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 322-325.

目的

比较单用喉罩全身麻醉或喉罩全身麻醉联合骶管阻滞在儿童疝囊高位结扎术中的效果。

方法

选择2018年6月至2020年5月,在广元市中心医院接受日间手术的疝囊高位结扎术患儿100例为研究对象,按随机数字表法分为喉罩全身麻醉联合骶管阻滞组(S组)和单用喉罩全身麻醉组(L组),每组50例。S组诱导前用0.1%罗哌卡因1 ml/kg行骶管阻滞。2组麻醉诱导和维持方式相同,诱导后插入喉罩,行机械通气。术毕拔除喉罩,送麻醉恢复室。记录2组入室时(T0)、插入喉罩后(T1)、手术开始时(T2)、拔除喉罩后(T3)的平均动脉压(MAP)和心率。记录2组手术时间、麻醉时间以及瑞芬太尼和七氟醚的用量。采用行为学评分法(CRIES评分)评价患儿术后疼痛程度,记录补救镇痛率。记录2组下肢运动功能评分(Bromage评分)和尿潴留的发生率。

结果

2组患儿性别构成、年龄、体重以及手术时间和麻醉时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同时相收缩压和心率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。组间比较,L组MAP和心率在T2时较S组增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),组内与T0比较,S组MAP和心率在T1和T2时降低,L组MAP和心率在T1时降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。S组瑞芬太尼和七氟醚的用量较L组显著减少,CRIES评分和补救镇痛率较L组显著降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。2组术后Bromage评分和尿潴留的发生率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

喉罩全身麻醉联合骶管阻滞在儿童疝囊高位结扎术中麻醉效果好,血流动力学稳定,并发症少,有利于患儿术后早期康复。

Objective

To compare the effect of laryngeal mask airway general anesthesia alone versus laryngeal mask anesthesia combined with sacral block in high ligation of hernia sac in children.

Methods

From June 2018 to May 2020, 100 children of high ligation of hernia sac in Guangyuan Central Hospital were selected as subjects and randomly divided into laryngeal mask anesthesia combined with sacral block group (group S) and laryngeal mask anesthesia alone group (group L) using a random number table method, with 50 cases in each group. Before induction, 0.1% ropivacaine 1 ml/kg was used for sacral block in group S. Anesthesia induction and maintenance methods were the same in the two groups. After induction, laryngeal mask airway was inserted and mechanical ventilation was performed. The laryngeal mask was removed and patient was sent to anesthesia recovery room after operation. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) of the two groups were recorded at the time of entering the room (T0), after laryngeal mask insertion (T1), at the beginning of operation (T2) and after removing laryngeal mask (T3). The operation time, anesthesia time and the dosage of remifentanil and sevoflurane were recorded in the two groups. Postoperative pain was evaluated by CRIES score, and the rate of rescue analgesia was recorded. The lower limbs motor function score (Bromage score) and incidence of urinary retention were recorded in the two groups.

Results

There was no significant difference in gender composition, age, weight, operation time and anesthesia time between the two groups (P>0.05). There were significant differences in MAP and HR at different time points (P<0.05). Compared with group S, MAP and HR in group L were significantly increased at T2 (P<0.01). Compared with T0, MAP and HR in group S were significantly decreased at T1 and T2, while MAP and HR in group L were significantly decreased at T1 (P<0.01). The dosage of remifentanil and sevoflurane in group S was significantly lower than that in group L, the scores of CRIES and the rate of rescue analgesia in group S were significantly lower than those in group L (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in Bromage score and the incidence of urinary retention between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Laryngeal mask airway general anesthesia combined with sacral block in high ligation of hernia sac in children has good anesthetic effect, stable hemodynamics and fewer complications, which is conducive to the early recovery of children after operation.

表1 2组患儿一般资料与各时间指标的比较(±s
表2 2组患儿不同时间点平均动脉压和心率的比较(±s
表3 2组患儿瑞芬太尼和七氟醚用量比较(±s
表4 2组患儿术后CRIES评分及补救镇痛率的比较
表5 2组患儿术后Bromage评分和尿潴留发生率的比较
[1]
吴志强, 姚干. 儿童腹股沟直疝腹腔镜手术治疗探讨[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 240-242.
[2]
Chen Y, Wang FR, Zhong HJ, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis concerning single-site laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for pediatric inguinal hernia and hydrocele[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(12): 4888-4901.
[3]
郭小花, 陈茜, 潘永英, 等. 喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉在低龄儿童日间手术中的比较[J]. 广东医学, 2019, 40(15): 2218-2221.
[4]
李林, 张琳琳, 王炜林. 喉罩与气管插管麻醉在腹股沟疝手术效果的临床比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(4): 369-371.
[5]
Boretsky KR, Camelo C, Waisel DB, et al. Confirmation of success rate of landmark-based caudal blockade in children using ultrasound: A prospective analysis[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2020, 30(6): 671-675.
[6]
章艳君, 刘金柱, 张文静, 等. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞用于患儿疝囊高位结扎术后镇痛[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2015, 31(6): 565-568.
[7]
晏明, 孙剑, 丁松, 等. 罗哌卡因复合纳布啡与罗哌卡因复合芬太尼用于硬膜外分娩镇痛的比较[J]. 国际麻醉学与复苏杂志, 2020, 41(5): 475-478.
[8]
赵泽宇, 刘建波, 张蓉, 等. 右美托咪定对脑瘫患儿七氟醚麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2013, 33(6): 676-679.
[9]
赵泽宇, 张蓉, 程庆, 等. 脑瘫因素对患儿术后疼痛敏感性的影响[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2015, 35(12): 1480-1482.
[10]
Ojo OA, Mehdiratta JE, Gamez BH, et al. Comparison of Programmed Intermittent Epidural Boluses With Continuous Epidural Infusion for the Maintenance of Labor Analgesia: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Study[J]. Anesth Analg, 2020, 130(2): 426-435.
[11]
Sharma AK, Singh S, Hansraj S, et al. Comparative clinical trial of intracameral ropivacaine vs. lignocaine in subjects undergoing phacoemulsification under augmented topical anesthesia[J]. Indian J Ophthalmol, 2020, 68(4): 577-582.
[12]
陶勇, 汪娜, 叶勇, 等. 不同局麻药佐剂用于患儿腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛效果的比较[J]. 四川医学, 2022, 43(5): 426-429.
[13]
周子瑜, 徐世琴, 沈晓凤. 氢吗啡酮硬膜外分娩镇痛对产时发热的影响[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2023, 39(1): 49-53.
[14]
宫延基, 陈元良, 包义勇. 不同麻醉药物联合罗哌卡因行硬膜外阻滞的有效性和安全性分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2022, 37(3): 387-390.
[15]
任静华, 何常佑, 姚洪林. 小儿先天性心脏病介入术中应用非插管全麻联合骶麻的安全性和有效性观察[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2012, 9(2): 84-86.
[16]
Jessula S, Davies DA. Evidence supporting laparoscopic hernia repair in children[J]. Curr Opin Pediatr, 2018, 30(3): 405-410.
[17]
Suvvari P, Mishra S, Bhatnagar S, et al. Comparison of Intranasal Dexmedetomidine Versus Intranasal Ketamine as Premedication for Level of Sedation in Children Undergoing Radiation Therapy: A Prospective, Randomised, Double-Blind Study[J]. Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim, 2020, 48(3): 215-222.
[18]
魏肇余, 薛瑞, 李光香, 等. 氯胺酮单次注射对创伤后应激障碍模型动物场景恐惧行为的影响及机制[J]. 中国药理学与毒理学杂志, 2020, 34(2): 104-111.
[19]
王琼, 赖国忠, 劳建新, 等. 舒芬太尼预先镇痛对妇科腹腔镜患者应激反应的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2010, 26(13): 2408-2410.
[20]
魏巍, 方桥, 李维, 等. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩全身麻醉在小儿疝囊高位结扎术的镇痛效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 327-330.
[21]
刘炯峰, 李敬业, 黄志强. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞联合喉罩通气全身麻醉在小儿疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J]. 吉林医学, 2018, 9(3): 490-492.
[1] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[4] 刘婷婷, 林妍冰, 汪珊, 陈幕荣, 唐子鉴, 代东伶, 夏焙. 超声衰减参数成像评价儿童代谢相关脂肪性肝病的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 787-794.
[5] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[6] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[7] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[8] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[9] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[10] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 吕垒, 冯啸, 何凯明, 曾凯宁, 杨卿, 吕海金, 易慧敏, 易述红, 杨扬, 傅斌生. 改良金氏评分在儿童肝豆状核变性急性肝衰竭肝移植手术时机评估中价值并文献复习[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 661-668.
[13] 卓少宏, 林秀玲, 周翠梅, 熊卫莲, 马兴灶. CD64指数、SAA/CRP、PCT联合检测在小儿消化道感染性疾病鉴别诊断中的应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 505-509.
[14] 刘笑笑, 张小杉, 刘群, 马岚, 段莎莎, 施依璐, 张敏洁, 王雅晳. 中国学龄前儿童先天性心脏病流行病学研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1021-1024.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要