切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (03) : 255 -263. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.03.005

循证医学

Desarda与Lichtenstein术对腹股沟疝疗效的Meta分析
丁相元, 任效瑛, 闫慧明()   
  1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-08 出版日期:2023-06-18
  • 通信作者: 闫慧明

Comparison of Desarda and Lichtenstein in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis

Xiangyuan Ding, Xiaoying Ren, Huiming Yan()   

  1. General Surgery Department of the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2022-11-08 Published:2023-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Huiming Yan
引用本文:

丁相元, 任效瑛, 闫慧明. Desarda与Lichtenstein术对腹股沟疝疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 255-263.

Xiangyuan Ding, Xiaoying Ren, Huiming Yan. Comparison of Desarda and Lichtenstein in inguinal hernia repair: a meta-analysis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(03): 255-263.

目的

比较Desarda术式与Lichtenstein术式在腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效和安全性。

方法

检索PubMed、EMBASE、Cochrane Library、万方、中国知网、维普中文科技期刊数据库等电子数据库,截取时间为2000年1月至2020年9月的文献,选择关于比较Desarda术式与Lichtenstein术式治疗腹股沟疝的随机对照试验,并由2位研究员分别对其进行质量评估及提取相关数据。主要观察指标为复发率和术后总体并发症。次要观察指标为:手术部位感染(SSI)、慢性腹股沟区疼痛或麻木、血清肿或血肿、手术时间、术后早期疼痛评分、恢复至正常日常活动或工作的总时间、睾丸萎缩。对最终纳入文献的数据整理后进行Meta分析。

结果

共纳入10项随机对照研究,包括3211例患者,其中Desarda组1573例,Lichtenstein组1638例。Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后总体并发症、SSI、慢性腹股沟区疼痛或麻木、血清肿或血肿、手术时间比较,差异均有统计学意义。而复发率、术后早期疼痛评分、恢复至正常日常活动或工作的总时间、睾丸萎缩比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

Desarda术式在减少术后总体并发症方面优于Lichtenstein术式,尤其是在SSI、慢性腹股沟区疼痛或麻木、血肿或血清肿形成方面更具优势。

Objective

To compare the efficacy and safety of Desarda and Lichtenstein in inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

Two researchers searched the electronic medical database (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and VIP Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database) for randomized controlled trials comparing Desarda surgery with Lichtenstein surgery for the treatment of inguinal hernias from January 2000 to September 2020. The quality of the studies was assessed, and the pertinent data were collected. Recurrence rate and total postoperative complications were the primary outcome indicators. Surgical site infection (SSI), chronic groin discomfort or numbness, seroma or hematoma, operation time, early postoperative pain score, total time to return to regular daily activities or a job, and testicular atrophy were secondary outcome measures. Data from the included literature was gathered and subjected to a meta-analysis for analysis.

Results

A total of 10 RCTs involving 3211 patients were included, including 1573 in the Desarda group and 1638 in the Lichtenstein group. There were significant differences between the Desarda group and the Lichtenstein group in postoperative complications, surgical site infection (SSI), chronic groin pain or numbness, seroma or hematoma formation, and operation time. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate, early postoperative pain, the total time to return to normal daily activities or work, and testicular atrophy.

Conclusion

Desarda is superior to Lichtenstein in reducing postoperative complications, especially SSI, chronic inguinal pain or numbness, hematoma, or seroma.

图1 文献筛选流程图
图2 纳入评价的偏倚风险评估总结
表1 纳入研究的人群基线资料
表2 纳入研究的基本特征
图3 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组复发情况的比较
图4 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后总体并发症比较
图5 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后手术部位感染发生率比较
图6 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后慢性腹股沟区疼痛或麻木比较
图7 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后血清肿或血肿形成的比较
图8 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组手术时间比较
图9 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后早期疼痛评分比较
图10 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后恢复至正常日常活动或工作的总时间比较
图11 Desarda组和Lichtenstein组术后发生睾丸萎缩情况比较
图12 文献发表偏倚漏斗图
[1]
Primatesta P, Goldacre M J. Inguinal hernia repair: incidence of elective and emergency surgery, readmission and mortality[J]. Int J Epidemiol, 1996, 25(4): 835-839.
[2]
Kingsnorth A, LeBlanc K. Hernias: inguinal and incisional[J]. Lancet, 2003, 362: 1561-1571.
[3]
Lichtenstein IL, Shulman AG, Amid PK, et al. The tension free hernioplasty[J]. Am J Surg, 1989, 157: 88-193.
[4]
Amid PK, Shulman AG, Lichtenstein IL. Open ''tensionfree’’ repair of inguinal hernias: the Lichtenstein technique[J]. Eur J Surg, 1996, 162: 447-453.
[5]
Vrijland WW, Van Den Tol MP, Luijendijk RW, et al. Randomized clinical trial of non-mesh versus mesh repair of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2002, 89: 293-297.
[6]
Amato B, Moja L, Panico S, et al, Shouldice technique versus other open techniques for inguinal hernia repair[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2009 7(4): CD001543.
[7]
Desarda MP. New method of inguinal hernia: a new solution[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2001, 71(4): 241-244.
[8]
Ahmed AE, Ahmed WB, Omar MA, et al. Desarda versus Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia: a randomized, multi-center controlled trial with promising results[J]. Int Surg, 2018, 5(8): 2723-2726.
[9]
Arafa AS, Saad HA, Fayek F. Desarda vs lichtenstein technique for the treatment of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Egyptian Journal of Surgery, 2020, 39(1): 157.
[10]
Muhammad, AD. Desarda versus Lichtenstein mesh for inguinal hernia repair: a randomized trial[J]. Pak J Med Health Sci, 2017, 13(2): 227-229.
[11]
Poongavanam A, Srikanth R, Arunkumar A, et al. PROSTHESIS REPAIR VERSUS BIOLOGICAL TISSUE REPAIR FOR PRIMARY INGUINAL HERNIA TREATMENT[J]. J Evol Med Dent Sci, 2018, 7(42): 5297-5301.
[12]
Rahman A S M T, Biswas S K, Saha R K, et al. Desarda Versus Lichtenstein Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia in Men: Results of A Randomized Control Trial[J]. Faridpur Medical College Journal, 2019, 14(1): 20-26.
[13]
Rodriguez PRL, Gonzàlez OCL, Rocha JS, et al. A Randomized trial Comparing Desarda repair no Mesh and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia(A study of 2225 patients)[J]. Biomed J Sci & Tech Res, 2018, 6(4).
[14]
Sowmya G R, Udapudi D G. Comparative study of Lichtenstein versus Desarda repair for inguinal hernia[J]. J Evol Med Dent Sci, 2015, 4(97): 16261-16266.
[15]
Szopinski J, Dabrowiecki S, Pierscinski S, et al. Desarda versus Lichtenstein technique for primary inguinal hernia treatment: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. World J Surg, 2012, 36(5): 984-992.
[16]
Vupputuri H, Kumar S, Subramani P, et al. A single-blind, randomized controlled study to compare Desarda technique with Lichtenstein technique by evaluating short-and long-term outcomes after 3 years of follow-up in primary inguinal hernias[J]. International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery, 2019, 2(1): 16.
[17]
Youssef T, El-Alfy K, Farid M. Randomized clinical trial of Desarda versus Lichtenstein repair for treatment of primary inguinal hernia[J]. Int J Surg, 2015, 20: 28-34.
[18]
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions[M].2nd ed. Chichester UK:Wiley-Blackwell,2019.
[19]
Bassini E. Sulla cura radicale dell’ernia inguinale[J]. Arch Soc Ital Chir, 1887, 4: 380.
[20]
Courtney M, Townsend JR, Beauchamp RD, et al. Sabiston textbook of surgery: the biolog-ical basis of modern surgical practice[M]. 17th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc, 2007.
[21]
张斌, 侯海金, 闫慧明. ProGrip型与UHS型补片在相应术式下治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 436-439.
[22]
Ahmad MH, Pathak S, Clement KD, et al. Meta-analysis of the use of sterilized mosquito net mesh for inguinal hernia repair in less economically developed countries[J]. BJS Open, 2019, 3: 429-435.
[23]
Condon RE. groin pain after hernia repair[J]. Ann Surg, 2001, 233(1): 8.
[24]
McRoy LL. Plugoma and the prolene hernia system[J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2010, 212: 424-425.
[25]
Sakorafas GH, Halikias I, Nissotakis C, et al. Open tension free repair of inguinal hernias; the Lichtenstein technique[J]. BMC Surg, 2001, 1: 3.
[26]
Kulacoglu H. Current options in inguinal hernia repair in adult patients[J]. Hippokratia, 2011, 15(3): 223-323.
[27]
Zieren J, Beyersdorff D, Beier KM, et al. Sexual functionand testicular perfusion after inguinal hernia repair with mesh[J]. Am J Surg, 2001, 181(3): 204-206.
[28]
Hay JM, Boudet MJ, Fingerhut A, et al. Shouldice inguinal hernia repair in the male adult: the gold standard? A multicentral controlled trial in 1578 patients[J]. Ann Surg, 1995, 222: 719-727.
[29]
Junge K, Rosch R, Klinge U, et al. Risk factors related to recurrence in inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective analysis[J]. Hernia, 2006, 10(4): 309-315.
[30]
Shouldice EB. The Shouldice repair for groin hernias[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2003, 83: 1163-1187.
[31]
Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan BH, et al. Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(2): 325-328.
[32]
Celdran A, Frieyro O, De La Pinta JC, et al. The role of antibiotic prophylaxis on wound infection after mesh hernia repair under local anesthesia on an ambulatory basis[J]. Hernia, 2004, 8(1): 20-22.
[33]
BayNielsen M, Perkins FM, Kehlet H. Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study[J]. Ann Surg, 2001, 233: 1-7.
[34]
于志远, 杨诗语, 张旭, 等. Lichtenstein疝修补术和网塞修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 75-82.
[35]
赵乐平, 张鑫宇. 局麻下无张力疝修补术368例临床观察及并发症分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2013, 20(11): 180-181.
[36]
Lee SL, DuBois JJ, Rishi M. Testicular damage after surgical groin exploration for elective herniorrhaphy[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2000, 35(2): 327-330.
[37]
Fitzgibbons RJ Jr. The mesh and the spermatic cord[M]. // Recurrent Hernia. Heidelberg: Springer, 2007: 333-337.
[38]
Jones KR, Burney RE, Peterson M, et al. Return to work after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surgery, 2001, 129(2): 128-135.
[1] 蚁淳, 袁冬生, 熊学军. 系统免疫炎症指数与骨密度降低和骨质疏松的关联[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 609-617.
[2] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[3] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[11] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[12] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[13] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[14] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[15] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
阅读次数
全文


摘要