切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (02) : 227 -232. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.02.023

护理论著

责任制护理在腹股沟疝Lichtenstein术中的应用效果分析
夏桃先1, 黄诚2,(), 史红玲1   
  1. 1. 237000 安徽,皖西卫生职业学院附属医院(六安市第二人民医院)手术室
    2. 237000 安徽,皖西卫生职业学院附属医院(六安市第二人民医院)甲乳外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-13 出版日期:2023-04-18
  • 通信作者: 黄诚
  • 基金资助:
    安徽省教育厅高校自然科学研究重点项目(KJ2021A1362)

Analysis of the application effect of responsibility nursing in Lichtenstein operation of inguinal hernia

Taoxian Xia1, Cheng Huang2,(), Hongling Shi1   

  1. 1. Operating room, Affiliated Hospital of Wanxi Health Vocational College (Lu'an Second People's Hospital), Lu'an 237000, Anhui, China
    2. Department of Thyroid Breast Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Wanxi Health Vocational College (Lu'an Second People's Hospital), Lu'an 237000, Anhui, China
  • Received:2022-09-13 Published:2023-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Cheng Huang
引用本文:

夏桃先, 黄诚, 史红玲. 责任制护理在腹股沟疝Lichtenstein术中的应用效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 227-232.

Taoxian Xia, Cheng Huang, Hongling Shi. Analysis of the application effect of responsibility nursing in Lichtenstein operation of inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(02): 227-232.

目的

分析责任制护理干预在腹股沟疝Lichtenstein术中的应用效果。

方法

选取皖西卫生职业学院附属医院2018年1月至2021年1月收治的腹股沟疝患者120例进行前瞻性研究,按随机数字表法分为对照组(60例)和观察组(60例)。对照组接受围手术期传统护理,观察组接受责任制护理干预,2组均干预至出院。观察2组手术情况与术后恢复指标,比较2组入室时、麻醉前应激指标及护理前、出院时舒适度与心理状态,出院时护理满意度及住院期间并发症发生率。

结果

观察组手术、麻醉苏醒、意识恢复及住院时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。麻醉前,2组血氧饱和度(SpO2)低于入室时,而观察组高于对照组(均P<0.05);2组心率、收缩压、平均动脉压、舒张压高于入室时,而观察组低于对照组(均P<0.05)。出院时,2组Kolcaba舒适状况量表评分高于护理前,观察组高于对照组;2组焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分低于护理前,观察组低于对照组(P<0.05)。出院时,观察组护理满意率为95.00%,高于对照组的83.33%(P<0.05);住院期间,观察组并发症发生率为3.33%,低于对照组的13.33%(P<0.05)。

结论

责任制护理干预在腹股沟疝Lichtenstein术中应用效果显著,可改善患者应激反应、舒适度与心理状态,降低其并发症发生率,促进术后恢复,提高患者护理满意度。

Objective

To analyze the application effect of responsibility nursing intervention in Lichtenstein operation of inguinal hernia.

Methods

Data of 120 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to the Affiliated Hospital of Wanxi Health Vocational College from January 2018 to January 2021 were selected for prospective study. Patients were divided into the control group (60 cases) and the observation group (60 cases) according to random number table method. The control group received traditional nursing during perioperative period, while the observation group received responsibility nursing intervention. Both groups received intervention until discharge. The operation conditions and postoperative recovery indexes of the two groups were observed. The stress indexes at the time of entering the room and before anesthesia, comfort level and psychological state before nursing and at discharge, nursing satisfaction at discharge, and incidence of complications during hospitalization were compared between the two groups.

Results

The duration of operation, anesthesia recovery, consciousness recovery and hospitalization time in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05). Before anesthesia, the blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) in the two groups was lower than that at the time of entering the room, and was higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). Heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) in the two groups were higher before anesthesia than those in the room, while those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). At discharge, the scores of Kolcaba Comfort Scale in both groups were higher than those before nursing, and those in observation group were higher than those in control group. The scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) and self-rating depression scale (SDS) in the two groups were lower than those before nursing, while those in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). At discharge, the nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group was 95.00%, which was higher than that of the control group (83.33%, P<0.05). During hospitalization, the incidence of complications in the observation group was 3.33%, which was lower than that in the control group (13.33%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application effect of responsibility nursing intervention in Lichtenstein operation of inguinal hernia is remarkable, which can improve patients' stress response, comfort level and psychological state, reduce the incidence of complications, promote postoperative recovery, and improve patients' nursing satisfaction.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较[例(%)]
表2 2组患者手术情况与术后恢复指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者应激指标比较(±s
表4 2组患者舒适度与心理状态比较(分,±s
表5 2组患者护理满意度与并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
[1]
Bagheri H, Salmani T, Nourian J, et al. The Effects of Inhalation Aromatherapy Using Lavender Essential Oil on Postoperative Pain of Inguinal Hernia: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. J Perianesth Nurs, 2020, 35(6): 642-648.
[2]
张天秀, 王莉. 手术室护理干预对无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝患者麻醉苏醒期躁动的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(4): 417-420.
[3]
游锦燕, 莫玉珠, 李华艳, 等. 个性化护理对老年腹股沟患者无张力疝修补术围手术期并发症和护理满意度的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 457-460.
[4]
王善林, 彭萍, 郭智勇, 等. 医护一体化责任制护理模式在妇科围手术期中的应用[J]. 解放军预防医学杂志, 2020, 38(11): 57, 60.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(7): 495-498.
[6]
朱丽霞, 高凤莉, 罗虹辉, 等. 舒适状况量表的信效度测试研究[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2006, 22(13): 57-59.
[7]
王蒙蒙, 冯驰, 孟娜, 等. 焦虑障碍病人自我管理量表的编制及信效度检验[J]. 护理研究, 2021, 35(17): 3014-3020.
[8]
袁刚, 赵晋, 郑冬, 等. 抑郁自评量表和贝克抑郁量表区分抑郁症严重程度的准确度[J]. 神经疾病与精神卫生, 2021, 21(12): 868-873.
[9]
吴军, 朱俊玲, 刘文斌, 等. 患者性别角色与护理服务满意度现状调查及相关关系探讨[J]. 中国性科学, 2019, 28(10): 157-160.
[10]
Qabbani A, Aboumarzouk OM, ElBakry T, et al. Robotic inguinal hernia repair: systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. ANZ J Surg, 2021, 91(11): 2277-2287.
[11]
Song Y, Hu C, Yan P, et al. Effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery principles in the perioperative period of pediatric inguinal hernia[J]. Am J Transl Res, 2021, 13(5): 5540-5546.
[12]
胡媛媛, 杨丽, 李霞. 手术室综合护理对传统开腹手术治疗腹股沟疝患者焦虑及生理应激的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(4): 434-437.
[13]
喻赛芬. 术前风险评估及对症护理对老年复杂腹股沟疝患者手术安全性的影响及预后恢复情况分析[J]. 医学临床研究, 2020, 37(6): 892-894.
[14]
方瑜, 闫丽, 许琼. 分层级责任制整体护理应用于普外科优质护理中的意义分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2020, 44(1): 157-158.
[15]
朱青, 曹瑶, 李建华. 全程护理干预模式对老年腹股沟疝疝环充填修补患者术后疼痛及应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(5): 564-567.
[16]
黄彦红, 张雪梅, 申传厚. 责任制分组管理在胸腔镜下肺癌根治术患者中的应用效果[J]. 癌症进展, 2020, 18(8): 849-851, 856.
[17]
洪增超, 洪革, 安彩虹. 责任制护理管理在手术室围术期护理中的应用价值[J]. 中国地方病防治杂志, 2018, 33(6): 719-719.
[18]
韩敏. 责任制小组在胃癌术后早期肠内营养护理中的应用效果分析[J]. 川北医学院学报, 2018, 33(4): 629-632.
[19]
陈鹏. 责任制分组管理对手术室护理管理质量及患者满意度的影响[J]. 中华现代护理杂志, 2018, 24(5): 523-526.
[20]
汤松琴, 朱晓兰, 程明云. 鼓励性护理联合共情护理对腹股沟疝手术患者应激反应的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(5): 521-524.
[21]
费广梅, 彭敬, 王蓓. 手术室术前舒适护理干预对≥60岁腹股沟疝患者心理状态及应激反应的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 280-283.
[1] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[2] 赵梓竣, 兰运升. 改良一针法末端回肠造口术对低位直肠癌保肛术后应激反应及安全性的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 611-614.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[5] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[6] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[9] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[10] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[11] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[14] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[15] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
阅读次数
全文


摘要