切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 502 -505. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.05.014

临床论著

不同麻醉方式对老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者麻醉效果的影响
周红娟1, 肖春龙1, 王波1, 冯传涛1, 赵伟2, 周曦3,()   
  1. 1. 721100 陕西宝鸡市中医医院麻醉科
    2. 710061 西安交通大学第一附属医院普外科
    3. 442099 湖北省,十堰市妇幼保健院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-06 出版日期:2021-10-14
  • 通信作者: 周曦

Influence of different anesthesia methods on the effect of anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing tension-free inguinal hernia repair

Hongjuan Zhou1, Chunlong Xiao1, Bo Wang1, Chuantao Feng1, Wei Zhao2, Xi Zhou3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Baoji Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Baoji 721100, Shaanxi Province, China
    2. Department of Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710061, China
    3. Department of Anesthesia, Shiyan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shiyan 442099, Hubei Province, China
  • Received:2020-01-06 Published:2021-10-14
  • Corresponding author: Xi Zhou
引用本文:

周红娟, 肖春龙, 王波, 冯传涛, 赵伟, 周曦. 不同麻醉方式对老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者麻醉效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 502-505.

Hongjuan Zhou, Chunlong Xiao, Bo Wang, Chuantao Feng, Wei Zhao, Xi Zhou. Influence of different anesthesia methods on the effect of anesthesia in elderly patients undergoing tension-free inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 502-505.

目的

对比不同麻醉方式对老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者的麻醉效果。

方法

选择2017年5月至2018年5月宝鸡市中医医院收治的90例腹股沟疝无张力修补术患者作为研究对象,按照随机数表法随机分为2组,每组45例。对照组予以持续硬膜外麻醉方式,试验组予以局部麻醉方式。比较2组患者的麻醉效果、不良反应发生率及不同时间点的平均动脉压(MAP)及心率(HR)。

结果

试验组患者的麻醉起效时间、手术时间、术后下地活动时间、住院时间及住院费用均显著优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001);试验组的不良反应发生率明及疼痛程度显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);试验组患者MAP水平值及HR指数在T2、T3时的指标明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.001)。

结论

局部麻醉应用于老年腹股沟疝无张力修补术中能迅速而有效降低患者疼痛程度、有利于患者术后恢复,减少不良反应发生率,值得在临床中应用和推广。

Objective

To compare the anesthesia effects of different anesthesia methods on elderly patients undergoing tension-free inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

90 patients with tension-free inguinal hernia repair in our ospital from May 2017 to May 2018 were selected as the research subjects. According to the random grouping method, they were divided into a control group and an experimental group, 45 cases in each group. The control group was given continuous epidural anesthesia, and the experimental group was given local anesthesia. The anesthesia effect, incidence of adverse reactions, mean artery pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) at different time points were compared between the two groups.

Results

The onset time of anesthesia, operation duration, postoperative time in the field, hospitalization duration, and hospitalization expenses of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.001); the adverse reaction rate and the pain degree of the experimental group were significantly lower than those of the control group (P<0.05); the MAP and the HR index at T2 and T3 of the experimental group were significantly better than those of the control group (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Local anesthesia used in tension-free repair of the elderly inguinal hernia can quickly and effectively reduce the pain of the patient, help the patient recover after surgery, and reduce the incidence of adverse reactions. It is worthy of clinical application and promotion.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者手术情况比较(±s
表3 2组患者不同时间点MAP和HR水平比较(±s
表4 2组不良反应发生率比较
[1]
刘晓. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术与开放式无张力疝修补术的临床对比分析[J]. 医药论坛杂志, 2017, 38(7): 77-78.
[2]
麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明,赛甫丁·艾比布拉,艾克拜尔, 等. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后慢性疼痛发生率及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1106-1110.
[3]
潘茂恩,黄鹤光,陈燕昌, 等. 腹腔镜经腹部分腹膜前修补术治疗下腹边缘疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1037-1042.
[4]
徐进. 开放式完全腹膜外疝修补术与传统无张力疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝比较[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2019, 39(22): 5524-5527.
[5]
陈向清,张宇,侯品连, 等. 腹腔镜无张力疝修补术与开放无张力疝可吸收补片修补术治疗巨大腹股沟疝的疗效对比[J]. 中国实用医药, 2020, 15(26): 86-88.
[6]
Hakeem A, Shanmugam V. Inguinodynia following Lichtenstein tension-free hernia repair: a review[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2011, 17(14): 1791-1796.
[7]
Aguilar-García J, Cano-González HA, Martínez-Jiménez MA, et al. Unilateral Lichtenstein tension-free mesh hernia repair and testicular perfusion: a prospective control study[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 479-482.
[8]
Percalli L, Pricolo R, Passalia L, et al. Comparison between self-gripping, semi re-absorbable meshes with polyethylene meshes in Lichtenstein, tension-free hernia repair: preliminary results from a single center[J]. Acta Biomed, 2018, 89(1): 72-78.
[9]
Xie Y, Song Y, Ma D, et al. A prospective study on femoral hernia repair: is the inguinal better than the infrainguinal approach?[J]. J Surg Res, 2019, 233: 420-425.
[10]
Jeroukhimov I, Wiser I, Karasic E, et al. Reduced postoperative chronic pain after tension-free inguinal hernia repair using absorbable sutures: a single-blind randomized clinical trial [J]. J Am Coll Surg, 2014, 218(1): 102-107.
[11]
Magnusson J, Thorell A, Nygren J, et al. Rates of and methods used at reoperation for recurrence after primary inguinal hernia repair with Prolene Hernia System and Lichtenstein[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 439-444.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[4] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[5] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[6] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[7] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[8] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[9] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[10] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[11] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[12] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[13] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[14] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[15] 王贝贝, 崔振义, 王静, 王晗妍, 吕红芝, 李秀婷. 老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后贫血预测模型的构建与验证[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 355-362.
阅读次数
全文


摘要