切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (05) : 455 -458. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.05.004

临床论著

造口旁疝Sublay-Keyhole原位修补术的疗效
孟相真1, 徐琨1, 杨福全1,()   
  1. 1. 110004 沈阳,中国医科大学附属盛京医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-06 出版日期:2021-10-14
  • 通信作者: 杨福全
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技支撑计划课题(2015BAI13B09)

Efficacy of Sublay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastoma hernia

Xiangzhen Meng1, Kun Xu1, Fuquan Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Colon Rectum, Hernia and Minimum Invasive Surgery Ward, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang 110004, China
  • Received:2020-04-06 Published:2021-10-14
  • Corresponding author: Fuquan Yang
引用本文:

孟相真, 徐琨, 杨福全. 造口旁疝Sublay-Keyhole原位修补术的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 455-458.

Xiangzhen Meng, Kun Xu, Fuquan Yang. Efficacy of Sublay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastoma hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(05): 455-458.

目的

探讨采用一种造口原位Sublay-Keyhole的新技术修补造口旁疝的疗效。

方法

选取2018年1月至2019年12月于中国医科大学附属盛京医院确诊为合并切口疝行造口旁疝修补术患者12例。其中,男性7例,女性5例;年龄59~81岁,平均68.8岁;体质量指数21.5~28.9 kg/m2,平均25.5 kg/m2。所有患者行造口旁疝Sublay-Keyhole原位修补术。

结果

直肠癌患者行永久性结肠造口术10例,结肠癌患者行永久性结肠造口术1例,结肠穿孔患者行永久性回肠造口术1例。全造口为经腹直肌型,右下腹位2例,左下腹位10例。1例患者曾行单纯缝合修补后复发。缺损直径6~12 cm,平均直径9.7 cm。所有患者均为Ⅲ型疝。术后住院3~9 d,平均6.6 d。随访5~14个月,平均9.5个月,所有患者均无复发,无血肿、血清肿、脱垂、狭窄、网片感染及切口感染等并发症发生。

结论

应用Sublay-Keyhole方式原位修补造口旁疝,效果显著,同时操作简单,费用明显降低,值得进一步推广。

Objective

To explore the effect of using a new technique of in situ Sublay-Keyhole to repair parastoma hernia.

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, 12 patients diagnosed with incisional hernia underwent parastomy hernia repair in Shengjing Hospital Affiliated to China Medical University were selected. Among them, 7 were males and 5 were females. Their ages ranged from 59 to 81 years old, with an average age of 68.8 years old. Body mass index (BMI) ranged from 21.5 to 28.9 kg/m2, with an average BMI of 25.5 kg/m2. All patients underwent Sublay-Keyhole in situ repair of parastoma hernia.

Results

Ten patients with rectal cancer underwent permanent colostomy, one patient with colon cancer underwent permanent colostomy, and one patient with colon perforation underwent permanent ileostomy. The total stoma was transrectus abdominis type, with 2 cases in the right lower abdomen and 10 cases in the left lower abdomen. One patient had a relapse after simple suture repair. The diameter of the defect was 6 to 12 cm, with an average diameter of 9.7 cm. All patients had type Ⅲ hernia. The postoperative hospital stay was 3-9 days, with an average of 6.6 days. The follow-up period was 5 to 14 months, with an average of 9.5 months. All patients had no recurrence, and no complications such as hematoma, seroma, prolapse, stenosis, mesh infection, and incision infection occurred.

Conclusion

The application of Sublay-Keyhole method in situ repair of parastoma hernia has significant effect, simple operation and,significantly reduced cost, which is worthy of further promotion.

表1 患者的基本信息
表2 患者的术后信息
[1]
Hansson BM, Slater NJ, van der Velden AS, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 685-695.
[2]
Aquina CT, Iannuzzi JC, Probst CP, et al. Parastomal hernia: a growing problem with new solutions[J]. Digest Surg, 2014, 31(4-5): 366-376.
[3]
Carne PW, Robertson GM, Frizelle FA. Parastomal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2003, 90(7): 784-793.
[4]
Rosin JD, Bonardi RA. Paracolostomy hernia repair with Marlex mesh: a new technique[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1977, 20(4): 299-302.
[5]
Kohler G, Fischer I, Wundsam H. A Novel Technique for Parastomal Hernia Repair Combining a Laparoscopic and Ostomy-Opening Approach[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(2): 209-214.
[6]
Yan Z, Zhang H, Zhan H, et al. The modified laparoscopic keyhole parastomal hernia repair with in situ re-ostomy has low recurrence rate[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 685-690.
[7]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia-Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[8]
Smietanski M, Szczepkowski M, Alexandre JA, et al. European Hernia Society classification of parastomal hernias[J]. Hernia, 2014, 18: 1-6.
[9]
Al Shakarchi J, Williams JG. Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2014, 18(5): 427-432.
[10]
Rubin MS, Schoetz DJ, Jr., Matthews JB. Parastomal hernia. Is stoma relocation superior to fascial repair?[J]. Arch Surg-Chicago, 1994, 129(4): 413-418.
[11]
Sugarbaker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosthetic mesh repair of paraostomy hernias[J]. Ann Surg, 1985, 201(3): 344-346.
[12]
Voitk A. Simple technique for laparoscopic paracolostomy hernia repair[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2000, 43(10): 1451-1453.
[13]
Hansson BM, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Bleichrodt RP. Promising new technique in the repair of parastomal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(11): 1789-1791.
[14]
Alexandre JH, Bouillot JL. Paracolostomal hernia: repair with use of a Dacron prosthesis[J]. World J Surg, 1993, 17(5): 680-682.
[15]
Egun A, Hill J, MacLennan I, Pearson RC. Preperitoneal approach to parastomal hernia with coexistent large incisional hernia[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2002, 4(2): 132-134.
[16]
Fei Y. A modified Sublay-Keyhole technique for in situ parastomal hernia repair[J]. Surg Today, 2012, 42(9): 842-827.
[17]
Rosen MJ, Reynolds HL, Champagne B, et al. A novel approach for the simultaneous repair of large midline incisional and parastomal hernias with biological mesh and retrorectus reconstruction[J]. Am J Surg, 2010, 199(3): 416-420.
[18]
Majumder A, Orenstein SB, Miller HJ, et al. Stapled Transabdominal Ostomy Reinforcement with retromuscular mesh(STORRM): Technical details and early outcomes of a novel approach for retromuscular repair of parastomal hernias[J]. Am J Surg, 2018, 215: 82-87.
[19]
Pauli EM, Juza RM, Winder JS. How I do it: novel parastomal herniorrhaphy utilizing transversus abdominis release[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20: 547-552.
[20]
Tastaldi L, Haskins IN, Perez AJ, et al. Single center experience with the modified retromuscular Sugarbaker technique for parastomal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21: 941-991.
[21]
Kasperk R, Klinge U, Schumpelick V. The repair of large parastomal hernias using a midline approach and a prosthetic mesh in the sublay position[J]. Am J Surg, 2000, 179(3): 186-188.
[22]
Longman RJ, Thomson WH. Mesh repair of parastomal hernias-a safety modification[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2005, 7(3): 292-294.
[23]
Guzmán-Valdivia G, Guerrero TS, Laurrabaquio HV. Parastomal Hernia-Repair Using Mesh and an Open Technique[J]. World J Surg, 2007, 32(3): 465-470.
[24]
Hansson BM, Morales-Conde S, Mussack T, et al. The laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique is safe and has a low recurrence rate: a multicenter cohort study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(2): 494-500.
[25]
Yang X, He K, Hua R, et al. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2017, 5(3): 45.
[26]
Stelzner S, Hellmich G, Ludwig K. Repair of paracolostomy hernias with a prosthetic mesh in the intraperitoneal onlay position: modified Sugarbaker technique[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2004, 47(2): 185-191.
[27]
Bilsel Y, Abci I. The search for ideal hernia repair, mesh materials and types[J]. Int J Surg(London, England), 2012, 10(6): 317-321.
[1] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[2] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[5] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[6] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[9] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[10] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[11] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[12] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[13] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[14] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[15] 陈金水, 陈金福, 郑开福, 祝晓路, 王铁虎, 谭俊, 李正平. 腹腔镜疝修补术治疗原发性耻骨上疝七例的临床体会[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 548-551.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?