切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 203 -206. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.021

所属专题: 文献

护理论著

量化评估策略在老年腹股沟疝患者围手术期护理中的应用效果
张鸽1,(), 张笑1, 安学伟1, 薛丹1, 田丽1   
  1. 1. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院医保外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-21 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 张鸽

Application effect of quantitative evaluation strategy in perioperative nursing of elderly patients with inguinal hernia operation

Ge Zhang1,(), Xiao Zhang1, Xuewei An1, Dan Xue1, Li Tian1   

  1. 1. Medical Insurance Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
  • Received:2019-12-21 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Ge Zhang
引用本文:

张鸽, 张笑, 安学伟, 薛丹, 田丽. 量化评估策略在老年腹股沟疝患者围手术期护理中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 203-206.

Ge Zhang, Xiao Zhang, Xuewei An, Dan Xue, Li Tian. Application effect of quantitative evaluation strategy in perioperative nursing of elderly patients with inguinal hernia operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 203-206.

目的

探讨量化评估策略在老年腹股沟疝患者围手术期护理中的应用效果。

方法

选取2018年1月至2019年1月,首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院医收治的60例老年腹股沟疝手术患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表的方法分为观察组和对照组,每组30例。其中对照组仅实施常规的围术期护理干预,而观察组在此基础上配合量化评估策略干预。分别对2组患者的手术相关指标(手术时间、自行排气时间、术后进食时间和首次下床时间)、自我护理能力(自我护理技能、自我护理责任感、自我概念和自我护理知识)以及生活质量(生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康)进行客观的评价和比较。

结果

2组患者的手术时间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但观察组患者与对照组的自行排气时间、术后进食时间以及首次下床时间等手术相关指标比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组与对照组患者间的自我护理技能、自我护理责任感、自我概念和自我护理知识等自我护理能力评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);经随访1年发现,观察组患者术后的生理功能、生理职能、躯体疼痛、总体健康、活力、社会功能、情感职能和精神健康评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

量化评估策略干预有助于促进老年腹股沟疝手术患者培养正确的自我护理能力,且提高了患者的术后恢复以及生活质量,值得推广。

Objective

To explore the effect of quantitative evaluation strategy in perioperative nursing of elderly patients with inguinal hernia.

Methods

From January 2018 to January 2019, 60 cases of elderly patients with inguinal hernia surgery in Beijing Friendship Hospital were selected as the research object.According to random number table method, they were divided into observation group (n=30) and control group (n=30). The control group onlyimplementats conventional perioperative nursing intervention, while the observation group was added with quantitative assessment strategies for intervention. The patients' indicators related to the operation (operation time, exhaust time, postoperative time of food intake and ambulant time), self-care ability (self-care skill, self-care responsibility, self-concept and self-care knowledge) and quality of life (physiological function, physiological function, body pain, general health, vitality, social function, emotional function and mental health) were objectively evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Results

After comparison, there was no statistically significant difference in operation time between the two groups (P>0.05), but there were statistically significant differences between the observation group and the control group in operation related indicators such as exhaust time, postoperative feeding time and the first ambulant time (P<0.05). The scores of self-care ability, such as self-care skill, self-care responsibility, self-concept and self-care knowledge were significantly different between the observation group and the control group (P<0.05). In addition, after one-year follow-up, postoperative physiological function, physiological function, body pain, overall health, vitality, social function, emotional function and mental health scores in observation group were significantly different (P<0.05).

Conclusion

Quantitative evaluation strategy intervention can promote the cultivation of correct self-care ability in elderly patients undergoing inguinal hernia surgery, and improve the postoperative recovery and quality of life of the patients, and it is worthy of promotion.

表1 2组患者的手术相关指标比较(±s
表2 2组患者的自我护理能力评分比较(分,±s
表3 2组患者的生活质量水平比较(分,±s
[1]
张云,郝晓晖,李健文, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2016, 15(10): 967-971.
[2]
王兴良,王超洋. 老年腹股沟疝患者患病影响因素调查分析[J]. 实用预防医学, 2015, 22(5): 568-569.
[3]
张永刚,杨瑞明,刘永奋. 不同方式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效及复发情况比较[J]. 检验医学与临床, 2017, 14(12): 1811-1813.
[4]
姚竞智,徐洪全,王贻东, 等. 不同方式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2019, 20(5): 31-32.
[5]
王青青,蒋红娜,顾燕儿, 等. 综合护理干预对腹股沟疝手术患者恢复情况并发症疼痛及护理满意度的影响[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(14): 2491-2493.
[6]
章晓娟,吉沥,刘海露. 腹腔镜下与经下腹部正中切口疝无张力修补术治疗成人腹股沟斜疝临床疗效分析[J]. 临床军医杂志, 2019, 47(6): 93-94+97.
[7]
杜记国. 无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝临床疗效对比[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(3): 434-435.
[8]
王平. 老年腹股沟疝的手术时机选择[J]. 实用老年医学, 2013, 27(5): 366-368.
[9]
杨大勇,解寒冰,孙德利. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术在老年腹股沟复发疝中的应用[J]. 中国临床研究, 2013, 26(3): 42-43.
[10]
李萌. 腹腔镜治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的围手术期护理[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2016, 21(2): 136, 140.
[11]
张娟. 临床护理路径在腹股沟斜疝手术患者护理中的应用[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2013, 38(1): 111-112.
[12]
王晓瑛,田莲莲,王俊萍. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术治疗复发疝的围手术期护理[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(6): 82-83.
[13]
孙叶飞,陈晓晨. 腹腔镜下腹股沟嵌顿疝修补术全程护理干预效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2019, 49(1): 84-86.
[1] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[2] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[3] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[4] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[5] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[6] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[7] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[8] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[9] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[10] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[11] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[12] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[13] 蓝冰, 王怀明, 王辉, 马波. 局部晚期结肠癌膀胱浸润的研究进展[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 505-511.
[14] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[15] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
阅读次数
全文


摘要