切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (02) : 199 -202. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.02.020

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

二氧化碳气腹在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补手术中对心电图影响的前瞻性随机对照研究
宋彬彬1, 朱熠林2, 杨继超1, 陈杰2,()   
  1. 1. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院心电图室
    2. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-02 出版日期:2021-04-18
  • 通信作者: 陈杰

Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on electrocardiogram during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair:A prospective randomized controlled study

Binbin Song1, Yilin Zhu2, Jichao Yang1, Jie Chen2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Electrocardiogram, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
    2. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2020-10-02 Published:2021-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Jie Chen
引用本文:

宋彬彬, 朱熠林, 杨继超, 陈杰. 二氧化碳气腹在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补手术中对心电图影响的前瞻性随机对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 199-202.

Binbin Song, Yilin Zhu, Jichao Yang, Jie Chen. Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on electrocardiogram during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair:A prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(02): 199-202.

目的

对比CO2气腹在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)手术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)手术中对心电图的影响结果。

方法

收集2019年6至11月,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科120例原发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。按照随机数表法分为TAPP组和TEP组,通过对比患者手术前后心电图情况及术中血流动力学改变,分析两种手术方式气腹对心电图的影响。

结果

TAPP组手术时间(45.2±12.33)min和TEP组(41.32±8.09)min比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);TAPP组平均麻醉时间(58.4±12.11)min和TEP组(59.27±8.69)min比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。TAPP急性疼痛情况2例(3.33%),TEP组4例(6.67%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);2组患者术中均未出现并发症,如严重出血、输精管损伤、精索血管损伤、肠管或膀胱损伤等;在院期间2组患者未出现尿潴留、谵妄及静脉血栓等围手术期并发症。2组心电图异常发生率、术后心率和术后平均动脉压(MAP)比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组术前心率和术前MAP比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TEP手术在术中心电图影响方面较TAPP存在劣势,TEP手术可能会引起更多的心电图异常改变,需要严密监测。

Objective

To compare the effect of carbon dioxide (CO2) pneumoperitoneum on electrocardiogram (ECG) during laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP).

Methods

Clinical data of 120 patients with primary inguinal hernia in Beijing Chaoyanghospitalbetween June to November 2019 were collected. All patients were randomly divided into the TAPP group and the TEP group. By comparing the electrocardiogram situation of patients before and after operation and intraoperative hemodynamic changes, the influence of pneumoperitoneum on electrocardiogram of the two surgical methods was analyzed.

Results

The operation time of patients in TEP group was (41.32±8.09) minutes, shorter than that in TAPP group [(45.2±12.33) minutes], and the difference was significant (P<0.05).There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of anesthesia duration [(58.4±12.11) minutes vs (59.27±8.69) minutes, P>0.05]. Acute pain occurred in 2 cases (3.33%) in TAPP group, and 4 cases (6.67%) in TEP group, without statistical significance (P>0.05). There were no intraoperative complications in both groups, such as severe bleeding, vas deferens injury, spermatic vessels injury, andintestinal or bladder injury. There were no perioperative complications in both groups, such as urinary retention, delirium and venous thrombosis.In terms of the abnormalities in electrocardiogram, postoperative heart rate (HR) and postoperative mean arterial pressure (MAP), the differences between the two groups were significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in preoperative HR and preoperative MAP between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Compared with TAPP, TEP surgery has a disadvantage in terms of intraoperative ECG influence. TEP surgery may cause more abnormal changes in ECG, which requires closely monitoring.

表1 2组患者心电图情况比较
表2 2组患者心率及MAP情况比较
[1]
Pahwa HS, Kumar A, Agarwal P, et al. Current trends in laparoscopic groin hernia repair: A review[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2015, 3(9): 789-792.
[2]
Simons MP, Aufenacker T, Bay-Nielsen M, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2009, 13(4): 343-403.
[3]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[4]
Liu Y, Wang M, ZhuY, et al. Effect of carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum on acid-base balance during laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective randomized controlled study. Hernia, 2020 Sep 4, Online ahead of print.
[5]
中国日间手术合作联盟,中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)编委会,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会, 等. 腹股沟疝日间手术规范化流程专家共识(2019版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 193-197.
[6]
唐健雄,李绍杰. 我国疝与腹壁外科发展和在新世纪创新挑战[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(1): 89-92.
[7]
Gaszyński T. The effect of pneumoperitoneum on haedynamic parameters in morbidly obese patients[J]. AnestezjolIntensTer, 2011, 43(3): 148-152.
[8]
Bittner R, Montgomery MA, Arregui E, et al. Update of guidelines on laparoscopic(TAPP) and endoscopic(TEP) treat of inguinal hernia(International Endohernia Society)[J]. SurgEndosc, 2015, 29(2): 289-321.
[9]
Yilmaz S, Koken T, Tokyol C, et al. Can preconditioning reduce laparoscopy-inducedtissueinjury[J]. SurgEndosc, 2003, 17(5): 819-824.
[10]
兰玲. 二氧化碳气腹对高龄胆囊切除患者呼吸循环功能的影响[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2010, 23(6): 677-678.
[11]
Kckerling F, Simons MP. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair[J]. Visc Med, 2018, 34(2): 145-150.
[12]
Bittner R, Schwarz J. Primary unilateral not complicated inguinal hernia: our choice of TAPP, why, results and review of literature[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(3): 417-428.
[13]
Liu J, Zhu Y, Shen Y, et, al. The feasibility laparoscopic management of incarcerated obturator hernia[J]. SurgEndosc, 2017, 31(2): 656-660.
[14]
Zhu Y, Liu M, Li J, et al. Closure of direct inguinal hernia defect in laparoscopic hernioplasty to prevent seroma formation: a prosctive double-blind randomized controlled trial[J]. SurgLaparosc Endosc Percutan Tech, 2019, 29(1): 18-21.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[3] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[4] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[5] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[6] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[7] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[10] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[11] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[12] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[13] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[14] 孙秀艳, 徐庆蕾, 马鹏涛, 胡志元, 郭传真, 祝成红. 腹腔镜胃癌根治术中患者体温变化与压力性损伤及受压部位微环境的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 480-484.
[15] 刘飞, 王影新, 马骍, 辛灵, 程元甲, 刘倩, 王悦, 张军军. 不同介质腔内心电图定位技术在乳腺癌上臂输液港植入术中应用的随机对照研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 760-764.
阅读次数
全文


摘要