切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 527 -531. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.05.016

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

不同浓度右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉对老年腹股沟疝开放修补术患者的镇静作用及安全性分析
刘煜鑫1, 陈红1, 闫东2,()   
  1. 1. 400014 重庆市永川区儿童医院麻醉科
    2. 402160 重庆医科大学附属永川医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2019-11-08 出版日期:2020-10-20
  • 通信作者: 闫东

Sedative effect and safety analysis of different concentrations of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil assisted local infiltration anesthesia on elderly patients with inguinal hernia repair

Yuxin Liu1, Hong Chen1, Dong Yan2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Chongqing Yongchuan children's Hospital, Chongqing 400014, China
    2. Department of Anesthesiology, Yongchuan Hospital Affiliated of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 402160, China
  • Received:2019-11-08 Published:2020-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Dong Yan
引用本文:

刘煜鑫, 陈红, 闫东. 不同浓度右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉对老年腹股沟疝开放修补术患者的镇静作用及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 527-531.

Yuxin Liu, Hong Chen, Dong Yan. Sedative effect and safety analysis of different concentrations of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil assisted local infiltration anesthesia on elderly patients with inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 527-531.

目的

探究不同浓度右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉对老年腹股沟疝开放修补术患者的镇静作用及安全性。

方法

2019年1至10月于重庆医科大学附属永川医院行局部浸润麻醉下腹股沟疝修补术治疗的90例老年腹股沟疝患者。通过随机数字表法将其分为对照组(45例)和观察组(45例)。对照组予以高剂量[0.6 μg/(kg·h)]盐酸右美托咪定注射液联合注射用盐酸瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉;观察组予以低剂量[0.3μg/(kg·h)]盐酸右美托咪定注射液联合注射用盐酸瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉。比较2组患者用药前(T1)、用药后10 min(T2)、20 min(T3)、30 min(T4)、患者清醒后(T5)的警觉/镇静(OAA/S)评分和血流动力学指标;观察2组局麻时、切皮时、手术中、缝皮时的疼痛程度及治疗期间的安全性。

结果

T1~T4 2组OAA/S评分呈降低趋势,T5时OAA/S评分升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);T1~T4观察组平均动脉压(MAP)、心率(HR)呈降低趋势,T5时MAP、HR升高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);且T3、T4时,观察组OAA/S评分、MAP、HR低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组在各时间点(局麻时、切皮时、手术中、缝皮时)的视觉模拟评分(VAS)均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组患者躁动、恶性呕吐的发生率为2.22%、4.44%,低于对照组的17.78%、17.78%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

低剂量右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部浸润麻醉可显著改善老年腹股沟疝患者的血流动力学,镇静、镇痛效果显著,安全性高。

Objective

To investigate the sedative effect and safety of different concentrations of dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil assisted local infiltration anesthesia for inguinal hernia repair in elderly patients.

Methods

Between January 2019 and October 2019, ninty elderly inguinal hernia patients undergoing laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair under local infiltration anesthesia in Chongqing Yongchuan children's hospital were randomly divided into the control group (n=45 cases) and the observation group (n=45 cases). The control group was given high dose [0.6μg/(kg·h)]) dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection combined with remifentanil hydrochloride for injection to assist local infiltration anesthesia. The observation group was given low dose [0.3μg/ (kg·h)] dexmedetomidine hydrochloride injection combined with remifentanil hydrochloride for injection to assist local infiltration anesthesia. The alert/sedation (OAA/S) scores and hemodynamic indexes of the two groups before (T1), 10 min after medication (T2), 20 min after medication (T3), 30 min after medication (T4) and patients after waking (T5) were compared. The pain degree during local anesthesia, skin incision, operation and skin suture and the safety during treatment were observed.

Results

The OAA/S scores in the two groups showed a decreasing trend at T1-T4, and increased at T5 (P<0.05). The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) in the observation group showed a decreasing trend at T1-T4, while MAP and HR increased at T5 (P<0.05). At T3 and T4, OAA/S scores, MAP and HR in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The visual analogue scale (VAS) score in the observation group was lower than that in the control group at all time points (local anesthesia, skin incision, surgery and skin suture) (P<0.05). The incidence rates of agitation and malignant vomiting in the observation group were 2.22% and 4.44%, which were lower than those in the control group (17.78% and 17.78%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Low dose dexmedetomidine combined with remifentanil assisted local infiltration anesthesia can significantly improve the hemodynamics of elderly patients with inguinal hernia, with significant sedative and analgesic effects and high safety, and it is worthy of promotion.

表1 2组患者OAA/S评分的比较(分,±s
表2 2组患者血流动力学指标比较(±s
表3 2组患者疼痛程度比较(分,±s
表4 2组患者安全性分析[例(%)]
[1]
Miyaki A, Yamaguchi K, Kishibe S, et al. Diagnosis of inguinal hernia by prone-vs. supine-position computed tomography[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(5): 705-713.
[2]
彭泉,王雷,于华杰, 等. 局部浸润麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 223-225.
[3]
张笛,谭嗣伟,梁存河, 等. 腹股沟疝手术多模式镇痛及快通道外科研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(4): 365-369.
[4]
Bhana N, Goa KL, McClellan KJ. Dexmedetomidine[J]. Drugs, 2000, 59(2): 263-270.
[5]
吴新华,王全胜,徐桂萍, 等. 不同浓度右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部麻醉在高龄腹股沟疝修补术的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 128-131.
[6]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(7): 803-807.
[7]
徐丽,李兆,田国刚. 小波指数用于腰-硬联合麻醉下右美托咪定镇静深度监测的有效性[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2018, 34(12): 1202-1204.
[8]
王冬梅,修文明,孙雅宁, 等. 乳痈汤联合针灸对乳痈患者视觉模拟评分法评分、数字分级法评分和生命质量评价量表-36评分的影响[J]. 世界中医药, 2019, 14(4): 1016-1019.
[9]
Wakasugi M, Tei M, Anno K, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible in elderly patients: A single-center experience of 365 procedures[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2016, 9(4): 281-284.
[10]
梁明超,梁盛枝,吴跃锐, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与疝环填充式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效比较[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(12): 1744-1746.
[11]
奚晓华,冯镇平,郑庆君. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补与开放性腹股沟疝修补的临床疗效比较[J]. 中国现代医生, 2017, 55(36): 49-51.
[12]
徐桂萍,潘阳阳,乔南南, 等. 腹横平面阻滞在老年高危患者腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2018, 34(7): 639-642.
[13]
曾丽蓉,郭瑞,许锦雄, 等. 静吸复合麻醉与瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚复合全凭静脉麻醉对老年肺部肿瘤开胸手术患者术后认知功能的影响[J]. 中国医药, 2018, 13(12): 1835-1838.
[14]
张引吉,翁浩,高玉蓓, 等. 右美托咪定与芬太尼对无痛人流患者血清应激激素水平和血流动力学的影响[J]. 贵州医科大学学报, 2019, 44(1): 81-85.
[15]
李浩文,陈晓贞,张旭彤, 等. 右美托咪定镇静下瑞芬太尼抑制清醒气管插管反应的半数有效效应室浓度测定[J]. 中国临床药学杂志, 2017, 26(2): 119-123.
[16]
吴新华,王全胜,徐桂萍, 等. 不同浓度右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼辅助局部麻醉在高龄腹股沟疝修补术的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(2): 128-131.
[17]
Chlebny T, Zelga P, Pryt M, et al. Safe and uncomplicated inguinal hernia surgery in the elderly-message from anesthesiologists to general surgeons[J]. Pol Przegl Chir, 2017, 89(2): 5-10.
[18]
屈启才,胡平,思永玉, 等. 右美托咪定和咪达唑仑在老年患者疝修补术中的应用[J]. 昆明医科大学学报, 2016, 37(6): 93-96.
[19]
张华,刘海生,旷艳春, 等. 盐酸右美托咪定联合瑞芬太尼在骨科手术中的麻醉效果观察[J]. 海南医学, 2015, 26(1): 34-36.
[20]
沈亮,胡湘,李浪平, 等. PainVision法与视觉模拟评分评估腹腔镜疝修补术术后疼痛程度的相关性[J]. 上海医学, 2016, 39(6): 336-339.
[1] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[2] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[3] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[4] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[5] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[6] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[7] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[8] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[9] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[10] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[11] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[12] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[13] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[14] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[15] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
阅读次数
全文


摘要