切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 532 -535. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.05.017

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响
朱朝霞1,(), 蒋莉莉1, 张安乐1, 邬小龙1   
  1. 1. 243000 安徽省马鞍山市中心医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-01 出版日期:2020-10-20
  • 通信作者: 朱朝霞
  • 基金资助:
    马鞍山市科技厅项目(YL-2019-08)

Effect of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair on postoperative pain and recurrence in patients with uterine prolapse and vaginal prolapse

Zhaoxia Zhu1,(), Lili Jiang1, Anle Zhang1, Xiaolong Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ma'anshan Central Hospital, Ma'anshan 243000, China
  • Received:2020-02-01 Published:2020-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Zhaoxia Zhu
引用本文:

朱朝霞, 蒋莉莉, 张安乐, 邬小龙. 阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 532-535.

Zhaoxia Zhu, Lili Jiang, Anle Zhang, Xiaolong Wu. Effect of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair on postoperative pain and recurrence in patients with uterine prolapse and vaginal prolapse[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 532-535.

目的

探讨阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响。

方法

选取2017年1月到2019年1月,安徽省马鞍山市中心医院收治的90例子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者。采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组。对照组45例采用单纯阴道前后壁修补术进行治疗,观察组45例采用阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术进行治疗,2组术后随访1年。比较2组治疗后的临床疗效及手术前后视觉模拟评分(VAS);统计2组围手术期手术相关指标及并发症发生率和随访1年的复发率。采用SPSS 21.0统计软件进行数据分析。

结果

观察组总有效率为93.33%,显著高于对照组的71.11%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与手术前相比,术后3~7 d,2组VAS评分均呈逐渐降低趋势,且术后3、7 d观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,观察组术中出血量明显较少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的住院时间、肛门排气时间、手术时间等明显较短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率、随访1年复发率分别为6.67%、2.22%,显著低于对照组的26.67%、24.44%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出,可显著改善患者围手术期相关指标的情况,减轻患者术后疼痛,并能降低患者并发症发生率及术后复发率,临床疗效显著。

Objective

To investigate the effect of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair on postoperative pain and recurrence in patients with uterus prolapse and vaginal prolapse.

Methods

From January 2017 to January 2019, ninty cases of uterine prolapse and vaginal prolapse in Ma'anshan central hospital were randomly divided into two groups: control group (n=45 cases) and observation group (n=45 cases). The control group was treated with simple repair of the anterior and posterior walls of the vagina. The observation group was treated with vaginal hysterectomy and repair of anterior and posterior vagina wall. The two groups were followed up for one year. The clinical effect, visual analogue score (VAS) before and after operation were compared between the two groups, and the perioperative operation related indexes, the incidence of complications and the recurrence rate of 1-year follow-up were counted.

Results

The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.33%, which was significantly higher than 71.11% of the control group (P<0.05). Compared with that before operation, the VAS score of the two groups decreased gradually 3-7 days after operation, and the VAS score of the observation group at 3 day and 7 day was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the hospital stay, anal exhaust time, and operation time of observation group were significantly shorter, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications and 1-year follow-up recurrence in the observation group were 6.67% and 2.22%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (26.67% and 24.44%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vagina wall repair can significantly improve the perioperative related indicators, reduce the postoperative pain, and reduce the incidence of complications and postoperative recurrence rate. The clinical effect is significant.

表1 2组临床疗效的比较[例(%)]
表2 2组手术前后VAS评分的比较(±s
表3 2组手术相关指标的比较(±s
[1]
王佳佳. 阴道前后壁修补术联合阴式子宫全切术治疗中重度子宫脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 67-70.
[2]
黄立. 传统手术在子宫脱垂伴阴道壁膨出术中的临床意义分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(25): 4053-4054.
[3]
Sun YH, Kan WC, Wu MP, et al. Application of single-incision transvaginal mesh in a woman undergoing peritoneal dialysis and suffering from refractory advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2017, 6(2): 63-65.
[4]
周春弟. 阴式子宫切除术后患者阴道残端感染的危险因素及防治措施[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(22): 5170-5172.
[5]
沈铿,马丁. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 211-223.
[6]
贾群玲,王华斌,王俊. 两种不同手术方式治疗对中重度子宫脱垂患者的影响[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2019, 10(1): 67-68.
[7]
Elad L, Mona T, Polina S, et al. Long-term outcome(5-10 years) after non absorbable mesh insertion compared to partially absorbable mesh insertion for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair[J]. International Braz J Urol, 2019, 45(6): 11-12.
[8]
李烨. 阴式全宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年性子宫脱垂的围术期护理要点分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2018, 12(9): 207-208.
[9]
李晓,沈明坤. 盐酸右美托咪定在阴式子宫切除术中的应用效果[J]. 贵州医药, 2018, 42(11): 1361-1362.
[10]
油迪,王平. 复发盆腔器官脱垂的手术治疗[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(1): 144-146.
[11]
韩一栩,刘玉珠,陈琨. 阴式全子宫切除及阴道前后壁修补手术对子宫脱垂患者性生活质量的影响分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2018, 27(4): 56-59.
[12]
赵东海. 阴式子宫切除术在妇产科的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2017, 5(33): 172.
[13]
陈文玲. 阴式子宫切除联合盆底重建术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度盆底器官脱垂的效果观察[J]. 临床医学, 2017, 37(12): 84-86.
[14]
仇燕霞. 阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术疗效比较[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2017, 11(17): 68-69.
[15]
李晓华,权祥菊. 阴式子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术的安全性及可行性分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(7): 1631-1633.
[1] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[2] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[3] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 徐逸男. 不同术式治疗梗阻性左半结直肠癌的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 72-75.
[7] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[8] 刘柏隆, 周祥福. 女性尿失禁吊带手术并发症处理的经验分享[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 127-127.
[9] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[10] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[11] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[12] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[13] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?