切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (05) : 532 -535. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.05.017

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响
朱朝霞1,(), 蒋莉莉1, 张安乐1, 邬小龙1   
  1. 1. 243000 安徽省马鞍山市中心医院妇产科
  • 收稿日期:2020-02-01 出版日期:2020-10-20
  • 通信作者: 朱朝霞
  • 基金资助:
    马鞍山市科技厅项目(YL-2019-08)

Effect of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair on postoperative pain and recurrence in patients with uterine prolapse and vaginal prolapse

Zhaoxia Zhu1,(), Lili Jiang1, Anle Zhang1, Xiaolong Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ma'anshan Central Hospital, Ma'anshan 243000, China
  • Received:2020-02-01 Published:2020-10-20
  • Corresponding author: Zhaoxia Zhu
引用本文:

朱朝霞, 蒋莉莉, 张安乐, 邬小龙. 阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 532-535.

Zhaoxia Zhu, Lili Jiang, Anle Zhang, Xiaolong Wu. Effect of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair on postoperative pain and recurrence in patients with uterine prolapse and vaginal prolapse[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(05): 532-535.

目的

探讨阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术对子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者术后疼痛及复发的影响。

方法

选取2017年1月到2019年1月,安徽省马鞍山市中心医院收治的90例子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出患者。采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组和观察组。对照组45例采用单纯阴道前后壁修补术进行治疗,观察组45例采用阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术进行治疗,2组术后随访1年。比较2组治疗后的临床疗效及手术前后视觉模拟评分(VAS);统计2组围手术期手术相关指标及并发症发生率和随访1年的复发率。采用SPSS 21.0统计软件进行数据分析。

结果

观察组总有效率为93.33%,显著高于对照组的71.11%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与手术前相比,术后3~7 d,2组VAS评分均呈逐渐降低趋势,且术后3、7 d观察组显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。与对照组相比,观察组术中出血量明显较少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的住院时间、肛门排气时间、手术时间等明显较短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组并发症发生率、随访1年复发率分别为6.67%、2.22%,显著低于对照组的26.67%、24.44%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

阴式子宫切除术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗子宫脱垂合并阴道壁膨出,可显著改善患者围手术期相关指标的情况,减轻患者术后疼痛,并能降低患者并发症发生率及术后复发率,临床疗效显著。

Objective

To investigate the effect of vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vaginal wall repair on postoperative pain and recurrence in patients with uterus prolapse and vaginal prolapse.

Methods

From January 2017 to January 2019, ninty cases of uterine prolapse and vaginal prolapse in Ma'anshan central hospital were randomly divided into two groups: control group (n=45 cases) and observation group (n=45 cases). The control group was treated with simple repair of the anterior and posterior walls of the vagina. The observation group was treated with vaginal hysterectomy and repair of anterior and posterior vagina wall. The two groups were followed up for one year. The clinical effect, visual analogue score (VAS) before and after operation were compared between the two groups, and the perioperative operation related indexes, the incidence of complications and the recurrence rate of 1-year follow-up were counted.

Results

The total effective rate of the observation group was 93.33%, which was significantly higher than 71.11% of the control group (P<0.05). Compared with that before operation, the VAS score of the two groups decreased gradually 3-7 days after operation, and the VAS score of the observation group at 3 day and 7 day was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Compared with the control group, the observation group had significantly less intraoperative blood loss, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); the hospital stay, anal exhaust time, and operation time of observation group were significantly shorter, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The incidence of complications and 1-year follow-up recurrence in the observation group were 6.67% and 2.22%, respectively, which were significantly lower than those in the control group (26.67% and 24.44%, P<0.05).

Conclusion

Vaginal hysterectomy combined with anterior and posterior vagina wall repair can significantly improve the perioperative related indicators, reduce the postoperative pain, and reduce the incidence of complications and postoperative recurrence rate. The clinical effect is significant.

表1 2组临床疗效的比较[例(%)]
表2 2组手术前后VAS评分的比较(±s
表3 2组手术相关指标的比较(±s
[1]
王佳佳. 阴道前后壁修补术联合阴式子宫全切术治疗中重度子宫脱垂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(1): 67-70.
[2]
黄立. 传统手术在子宫脱垂伴阴道壁膨出术中的临床意义分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(25): 4053-4054.
[3]
Sun YH, Kan WC, Wu MP, et al. Application of single-incision transvaginal mesh in a woman undergoing peritoneal dialysis and suffering from refractory advanced stage pelvic organ prolapse[J]. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther, 2017, 6(2): 63-65.
[4]
周春弟. 阴式子宫切除术后患者阴道残端感染的危险因素及防治措施[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2019, 34(22): 5170-5172.
[5]
沈铿,马丁. 妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 211-223.
[6]
贾群玲,王华斌,王俊. 两种不同手术方式治疗对中重度子宫脱垂患者的影响[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2019, 10(1): 67-68.
[7]
Elad L, Mona T, Polina S, et al. Long-term outcome(5-10 years) after non absorbable mesh insertion compared to partially absorbable mesh insertion for anterior vaginal wall prolapse repair[J]. International Braz J Urol, 2019, 45(6): 11-12.
[8]
李烨. 阴式全宫切除联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年性子宫脱垂的围术期护理要点分析[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2018, 12(9): 207-208.
[9]
李晓,沈明坤. 盐酸右美托咪定在阴式子宫切除术中的应用效果[J]. 贵州医药, 2018, 42(11): 1361-1362.
[10]
油迪,王平. 复发盆腔器官脱垂的手术治疗[J]. 四川大学学报(医学版), 2016, 47(1): 144-146.
[11]
韩一栩,刘玉珠,陈琨. 阴式全子宫切除及阴道前后壁修补手术对子宫脱垂患者性生活质量的影响分析[J]. 中国性科学, 2018, 27(4): 56-59.
[12]
赵东海. 阴式子宫切除术在妇产科的临床效果观察[J/OL]. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志, 2017, 5(33): 172.
[13]
陈文玲. 阴式子宫切除联合盆底重建术治疗Ⅲ~Ⅳ度盆底器官脱垂的效果观察[J]. 临床医学, 2017, 37(12): 84-86.
[14]
仇燕霞. 阴式子宫切除术与腹式子宫切除术疗效比较[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2017, 11(17): 68-69.
[15]
李晓华,权祥菊. 阴式子宫切除术与经腹子宫切除术的安全性及可行性分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2018, 33(7): 1631-1633.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[3] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[4] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[5] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[6] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[7] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[8] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[9] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[10] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[11] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[12] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[13] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要