切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 175 -179. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.02.020

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜无张力修补术后疼痛及血气指标的研究
贺杰1, 高树全2, 赵永东3,()   
  1. 1. 075061 张家口,河北北方学院附属第一医院检验科
    2. 075061 张家口,河北北方学院普外科
    3. 075000 河北省,张家口市第四医院检验科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-12 出版日期:2020-04-18
  • 通信作者: 赵永东
  • 基金资助:
    河北省卫计委基金项目(20180868)

Study on pain and blood gas indexes of patients with inguinal hernia after laparoscopic tension-free repair

Jie He1, Shuquan Gao2, Yongdong Zhao3,()   

  1. 1. Department of Laboratory, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075061, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075061, China
    3. Department of Laboratory, the Fourth Hospital of Zhangjiakou, Zhangjiakou 075000, China
  • Received:2019-12-12 Published:2020-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Yongdong Zhao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhao Yongdong, Email:
引用本文:

贺杰, 高树全, 赵永东. 腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜无张力修补术后疼痛及血气指标的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(02): 175-179.

Jie He, Shuquan Gao, Yongdong Zhao. Study on pain and blood gas indexes of patients with inguinal hernia after laparoscopic tension-free repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(02): 175-179.

目的

探讨腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜无张力修补术后疼痛及血气指标的变化情况。

方法

以2017年2月至2019年5月在河北北方学院附属第一医院普外科就诊的60例腹股沟疝患者为研究对象。采用随机数表法将其分为对照组和对照组。其中,对照组27例,对照组33例。对照组采用开放式无张力修补术进行治疗,对照组采用腹腔镜无张力修补术进行治疗。记录2组围术期情况,术后6、24、72 h的疼痛评分;使用血气分析仪观察2组患者气腹前、气腹后20 min及放气后动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、pH及动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)的变化;检测2组术前及术后24、72 h血清炎症因子的含量;统计2组术后不良反应发生情况。计量资料以(±s)表示,用t检验作比较分析。不同时间测量指标用方差分析作比较。计数资料以率(%)表示,用χ2检验作比较分析。

结果

对照组手术时间、住院时间均短于对照组,术中出血量低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.660,13.857,18.661;P<0.05)。与治疗前比,术后24、72 h,2组疼痛评分呈逐渐降低趋势,且对照组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.660,19.351,16.096;P<0.05)。与气腹前比,气腹后20 min,2组pH、PaO2水平均降低,PaCO2水平均升高,且对照组pH、PaO2水平均低于对照组,PaCO2水平高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(F=4.545,28.441,59.922;P<0.05)。与术前比,术后24 h、72 h,2组血清C-反应蛋白、白介素-6水平均降低,且对照组低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(F=69.629,13.489,292.441,65.421;P<0.05)。对照组术后总不良反应率为6.06%,低于对照组的25.93%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=4.596;P<0.05)。

结论

对腹股沟疝患者行腹腔镜无张力修补术治疗,可显著改善患者围手术期的情况及血气指标水平,并可抑制患者炎症反应,缓解疼痛。此外,该手术具有较高安全性,值得推广。

Objective

To investigate the changes of pain and blood gas indexes in patients with inguinal hernia after laparoscopic tension-free repair.

Methods

A total of 60 patients with inguinal hernia were treated in the first affiliated hospital of Hebei north university between February 2017 and May 2019. The patients were divided into the study group and control group, according to random number table. The control group was treated with open tension-free repair. The study group was treated with laparoscopic tension-free repair. The perioperative conditions, and the pain scores at 6, 24, and 72 hours after operation in the two groups were recorded; observing the changes of arterial blood oxygen partial pressure (PaO2), pH and arterial blood carbon dioxide partial pressure (PaCO2) before and after pneumoperitoneum using a blood gas analyzer; the levels of serum inflammatory factors before and after operation in two groups at 24 and 72 hours were detected; the incidence of postoperative adverse reactions in the two groups was counted. The measurement data is represented by (±s), and the t test is used for comparative analysis. The measurement indexes at different times were compared by analysis of variance. The count data is expressed as a rate (%), and the χ2 test is used for comparative analysis.

Results

The operation time and hospitalization time in the study group were shorter than that in the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was smaller than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (t=3.660, 13.857, 18.661; P<0.05). Compared with before treatment, the scores of VAS in the two groups gradually decreased at 24 h and 72 h after operation, and the study group was lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (t=3.660, 19.351, 16.096; P<0.05). Compared with the before pneumoperitoneum, the levels of pH and PaO2 in the two groups decreased at 20 min after pneumoperitoneum, the level of PaCO2 increased, and the levels of pH and PaO2 in the study group were lower than those in the control group, and the level of PaCO2 was higher than that in the control group, the differences were statistically significant (F=4.545, 28.441, 59.922; P<0.05). Compared with preoperative, the levels of serum c-reactive protein, interleukin-6 in the two groups were lower at 24 h and 72 h after operation, and the study group was lower than the control group, the differences were statistically significant (F=69.629, 13.489, 292.441, 65.421; P<0.05). The total adverse reaction rate was 6.06% in the study group, which was significantly lower than that in the control group (25.93%), the difference was statistically significant (χ2=4.596; P<0.05).

Conclusion

Laparoscopic tension-free repair for patients with inguinal hernia hernia can significantly improve the patient's perioperative condition and blood gas index levels, and can inhibit the patient's inflammatory response and relieve pain. In addition, the operation has high safety and is worthy of promotion.

表1 2组围手术期情况的比较(±s
表2 2组不同时间点疼痛视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表3 2组不同时间点血气指标水平的比较(±s
表4 2组手术前后血清CRP、IL-6水平的比较(±s
表5 2组术后不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
吴世乐,宋世铎,赵克昌, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术对手术效果及T淋巴细胞百分比的影响[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2020, 4(10): 1-9.
[2]
Kroese LF, van Eeghem LHA, Verhelst J, et al. Long term results of open complex abdominal wall hernia repair with self-gripping mesh: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2017, 44(1): 255-259.
[3]
李占宝,吴吉,王彤. 腹腔镜手术与开放治疗腹股沟疝的疗效对比[J]. 贵州医药, 2017, 41(12): 1318-1319.
[4]
吴振阳. 无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝治疗中的应用及价值研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2020, 14(4): 73-75.
[5]
刘琪,袁波,杜应莲. 腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2019, 22(6): 832-834.
[6]
李亮. 实用腹股沟疝外科学[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版西安有限公司, 2014: 145-146.
[7]
陈英,李朝,冯晨, 等. TAPP术治疗成年男性腹股沟斜疝与直疝术后血清肿的发生率[J]. 西南国防医药, 2020, 30(1): 43-45.
[8]
吴振阳. 无张力疝修补术在老年腹股沟疝治疗中的应用及价值研究[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2020, 14(4): 73-75.
[9]
王晓平,卞建平. 无张力与传统疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床分析探索[J/CD]. 国际感染病学(电子版), 2019, 8(3): 77-78.
[10]
Patel NG, Ratanshi I, Buchel EW, et al. The best of abdominal wall reconstruction [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(1): 113-136.
[11]
史成宇,李勇,张旭, 等. 腹腔镜疝无张力修补术术后血清肿回顾性分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 202-205.
[12]
贺家勇,杨晨晨,李义亮, 等. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝前间隙修补术、无张力疝修补术与传统疝修补术临床疗效比较[J]. 新疆医科大学学报, 2015, 38(9): 1146-1154.
[13]
邵伟,孙永锋. 腹腔镜小儿腹股沟斜疝内环结扎术对循环及血气指标的影响[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 312-314.
[14]
王兴. 腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的临床分析(附962例报告)[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2019, 24(2): 100-102.
[15]
Pearce A, Thornton L, Sutton PA, et al. Post-operative c-reactive protein profile following abdominal wall reconstruction with transversus abdominis posterior components separation [J]. Int J Surg Case Rep, 2017, 40(1): 17-19.
[16]
姚平. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床效果[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2019, 13(24): 33-34.
[17]
姜景凯. 经脐单孔与两孔腹腔镜手术治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝的疗效分析[J]. 贵州医药, 2019, 43(3): 403-404.
[18]
王毅,齐晟,梁平. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 525-528.
[19]
梁国栋,徐壮,杨玉波. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和李金斯坦手术对老年腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 589-592.
[1] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[2] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[3] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[4] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[5] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[6] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[7] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[8] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[9] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[10] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[11] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要