切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (04) : 477 -480. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.04.023

综述

疝与腹壁外科修补材料的发展:从人工假体到组织工程支架
许成裘1, 李亮2,(), 严聪1   
  1. 1524033 广东,湛江中心人民医院普外三科(腹壁、疝外科)
    2518017 深圳,中山大学附属第七医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2026-01-01 出版日期:2026-08-18
  • 通信作者: 李亮

Development of repair materials in hernia and abdominal wall surgery: from artificial prostheses to tissue-engineering scaffolds

Chengqiu Xu1, Liang Li2,(), Cong Yan1   

  1. 1Department of General Surgery Ⅲ (Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery), Central People's Hospital of Zhanjiang, Zhanjiang 524033, Guangdong Province, China;
    2Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Seventh Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Shenzhen 518017, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2026-01-01 Published:2026-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Liang Li
引用本文:

许成裘, 李亮, 严聪. 疝与腹壁外科修补材料的发展:从人工假体到组织工程支架[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 477-480.

Chengqiu Xu, Liang Li, Cong Yan. Development of repair materials in hernia and abdominal wall surgery: from artificial prostheses to tissue-engineering scaffolds[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(04): 477-480.

合成疝修补网片(合成补片)是一种高分子材料,是第一种作为实用人工假体对各种腹壁疝进行修补的材料,后来发展到生物补片的应用,由于生物补片是一种脱细胞支架,有再生医学的作用但再生医学作用并不完全,因此,促使了各种疝的修补从人工假体修补向再生医学发展。目前,各种人工合成的组织工程支架在疝与腹壁外科中成为研究热点,其再生医学意义较生物补片完全,因此有很大的潜在应用价值。

Synthetic hernia repair mesh, also referred to as synthetic mesh, is a type of polymer material and was the first material to be used as a practical artificial prosthesis for the repair of various abdominal wall hernias. This was followed by the application of biological meshes. Biological meshes are decellularized scaffolds with regenerative properties; however, their regenerative capacity remains incomplete. Nevertheless, their introduction has promoted a transition in hernia repair from artificial prosthetic repair toward regenerative medicine. At present, various synthetic tissue-engineering scaffolds have become a major research focus in hernia and abdominal wall surgery. Compared with biological meshes, these scaffolds have more comprehensive regenerative potential and therefore possess substantial potential for clinical application.

[1]
Patsouris S, Mallis P, Michalopoulos E, et al. Advances in innovative surgical implant manufacturing for hernia repair and soft tissue reconstruction[J]. Bioengineering(Basel), 2025, 12(11): 1182.
[2]
Ellis R, Miller BT. Mesh selection in abdominal wall reconstruction: an update on biomaterials[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2023, 103(5): 1019-1028.
[3]
Kaufmann R, Isemer FE, Strey CW, et al. Non-cross-linked biological mesh in complex abdominal wall hernia: a cohort study[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2020, 405(3): 345-352.
[4]
Carvalho AC, Santos FAV, De Carvalho Garcia DP. Meta-analysis of controlled studies comparing biologic and synthetic unabsorbable mesh in contaminated fields[J]. Surg Endosc, 2025, 39(7): 4094-4101.
[5]
谢天皓, 李晓龙, 刘领云, 等. 污染和感染区域中应用生物补片的研究进展[J]. 医学综述, 2022, 28(10): 1965-1969.
[6]
毛永欢, 朱浩, 张简之, 等. 结肠造口还纳联合生物补片置入术的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(4): 434-437
[7]
Shao JM, Ayuso SA, Deerenberg EB, et al. Biologic mesh is non-inferior to synthetic mesh in CDC class 1 & 2 open abdominal wall reconstruction[J]. Am J Surg, 2022, 223(2): 375-379.
[8]
Romano C, Silva H, Gray LA, et al. Comparative outcomes of synthetic and biological mesh use in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. BMC Surg, 2025, 25(1): 458.
[9]
Jakob MO, Haltmeier T, Candinas D, et al. Biologic mesh implantation is associated with serious abdominal wall complications in patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery: a randomized- controlled clinical trial[J]. J Trauma Acute Care Surg, 2020, 89(6): 1149-1155.
[10]
Seefeldt CS, Knievel J, Deeb M, et al. Biological vs synthetic mesh in laparoendoscopic inguinal hernia repair: the BIOLAP randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2025, 8: e254071.
[11]
Mazzola Poli de Figueiredo S, Tastaldi L, Mao RD, et al. Biologic versus synthetic mesh in open ventral hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials[J]. Surgery, 2023, 173(4): 1001-1007.
[12]
Shi H, Wang R, Dong W, et al. Synthetic versus biological mesh in ventral hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review and recommendations from evidence-based medicine[J]. World J Surg. 2023. 47(10): 2416-2424.
[13]
Rosen MJ, Krpata DM, Petro CC, et al. Biologic vs synthetic mesh for single-stage repair of contaminated ventral hernias: a randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2022, 157(4): 293-301.
[14]
Koshy RM, Kane EG, Grocock C. A review of the use of biological mesh products in modern UK surgical practice: a religious and cultural perspective[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 2020, 102(8): 566-570.
[15]
李崇崇, 陈大雷, 刘丽, 等. 生物补片组织方向性对其力学性能的影响[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2024, 43(6): 619-625.
[16]
Sawyer M, Ferzoco S, DeNoto G 3rd. A polymer-biologic hybrid hernia construct: review of data and early experiences[J]. Polymers (Basel), 2021, 13(12): 1928.
[17]
周思宇, 平毅. 浅谈间充质干细胞结合新型生物补片在盆腔器官脱垂治疗中的优势[J]. 中国性科学, 2023, 32(10): 34-38.
[18]
Zhong W, Chen J, Xie Q, et al. A novel UBM/SIS composite biological scaffold for 2-year abdominal defect repairing and strength recovery in canine model[J]. Adv Biol(Weinh), 2025, 9(1): e2400131.
[19]
Greco Lucchina A, Koleva Radica M, Costa AL, et al. Mesh-tissue integration of synthetic and biologic meshes in wall surgery: brief state of art[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2022, 26(3 Suppl): 21-25.
[20]
He X, Li W, Liu S, et al. Fabrication of high-strength, flexible, porous collagen-based scaffolds to promote tissue regeneration[J]. Mater Today Bio, 2022, 16: 100376.
[21]
Andronic O, Palcau AC, Bolocan A, et al. Nanocomposite biomaterials for tissue-engineered hernia repair: a review of recent advances[J]. Biomolecules, 2025, 15(9): 1348.
[22]
Wang M, Chen W, Xie Z. Evolution of research in hernia repair materials: a 20-year bibliometric and visualization study[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2025, 104(26): e43021.
[23]
Yadav P, Mukherjee A, Hind Rajput J, et al. Gelatin multiwalled carbon nanotube composite 3D printed semi biological mesh for abdominal hernia treatment[J]. Chem Asian J, 2025, 20(5): e202401136.
[24]
Lin M, Lu Y, Chen J. Tissue-engineered repair material for pelvic floor dysfunction[J]. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2022, 10: 968482.
[25]
Zahn K, Curry J, Eastwood P, et al. Congenital diaphragmatic hernia repair: Patches, muscle flaps, and the search for the ideal technique[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2025, 21: 162752.
[26]
Reed C, Huynh T, Schluns J, et al. Cell-derived extracellular matrix fiber scaffolds improve recovery from volumetric muscle loss[J]. Tissue Eng Part A, 2024, 30(5-6): 181-191.
[27]
Skepastianos G, Mallis P, Kostopoulos E, et al. Efficient decellularization of the full-thickness rat-derived abdominal wall to produce acellular biologic scaffolds for tissue reconstruction: promising evidence acquired from in vitro results[J]. Bioengineering (Basel), 2023, 10(8): 913.
[28]
Zanolla I, Tiengo E, Zanotti F, et al. Tissue reconstruction of abdominal wall with butyric acid-based nets: preliminary in vitro test using tissue engineering strategies[J]. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci, 2022, 26(3 Suppl): 11-20.
[29]
Olmos-Juste R, Olza S, Gabilondo N, et al. Tailor-made 3D printed meshes of alginate-waterborne polyurethane as suitable implants for hernia repair[J]. Macromol Biosci, 2022, 22(9): e2200124.
[30]
Liu H, Chen W, Zhao B, et al. Autologous bionic tissue for inguinal hernia repair[J]. J Biomed Mater Res A, 2020, 108(6): 1351-1368.
[1] 王博, 李全, 胡静, 李洋洋, 从嘉男, 海日罕, 曹胜军. 丝素蛋白修饰的羊脱细胞真皮基质复合人脂肪间充质干细胞膜片对小鼠全层皮肤缺损创面的影响及其机制[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2026, 21(04): 289-298.
[2] 邹振玉, 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 王明刚. 生物补片在疝修补中的应用和评价[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 207-212.
[3] 张鑫, 余朝文, 王孝高, 李金泽, 陈世远. 颈动脉长段病变行颈动脉内膜剥脱生物补片成形术[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 382-382.
[4] 李茂林, 杨骏波, 江志鹏, 徐金桥. 腹腔镜下巴西尼原理腹股沟管后壁重建短期可行性分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 386-389.
[5] 陈康, 王光远, 苟天相, 刘勇, 瞿涛. 生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 313-317.
[6] 章忆晖, 袁廷东, 穆林松, 吕忠船. 国产生物补片在腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的有效性及安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 178-182.
[7] 张佳贺, 王新龙, 李金龙. 生物补片在腹股沟疝修补中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 96-100.
[8] 赵思琦, 孟岩, 孙中伟. 复合补片与生物补片在腹腔镜脐疝修补术中疗效对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 535-538.
[9] 徐安军, 覃炳志, 吴德俊, 王一豪, 赵杰炳, 李诗媛, 王廷峰. 新型生物补片在污染/感染性腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 505-510.
[10] 陈佳威, 杨松, 陆瑶, 张剑. 基底膜生物疝修补补片防治空盆腔综合征的有效性和安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 498-504.
[11] 陈国良, 苏宁, 邵国益, 张剑. 基底膜生物补片内脏保护囊在负压辅助临时关腹治疗期间预防肠空气瘘的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 493-497.
[12] 杨松, 彭欢, 骆申英, 陈佳威, 陆瑶, 谢奇峰, 张剑. 基于肌耻骨孔修补原则对累及前盆与侧盆肿瘤的髂腹股沟区整块切除重建的策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 485-492.
[13] 王裕康, 周洁, 付爽, 刘语菲, 周振宇, 王淑芳. 肝脏脱细胞支架的制备及其对胰岛细胞活性的作用[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(04): 209-217.
[14] 陈荣琳, 赵庆辉. 干细胞资源库研究进展及发展对策探索[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 170-175.
[15] 马妮娜, 柯红琴, 刘海. 静电纺丝与生物活性基质复合策略在眼表重建中应用的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(02): 106-110.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?