切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (04) : 410 -414. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2023.04.009

论著

达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究
贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科()   
  1. 710061 西安交通大学第一附属医院胸外科
    710075 西安高新医院核医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-20 出版日期:2023-08-18
  • 通信作者: 付军科

Comparative study of Da Vinci robotic versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair surgery

Zhuoqi Jia, Weiru Zhou, Yong Zhang, Guangjian Zhang, Junke Fu()   

  1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710061, China
    Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xi'an Gaoxin Hospital, Xi'an 710075, China
  • Received:2023-02-20 Published:2023-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Junke Fu
引用本文:

贾卓奇, 周维茹, 张勇, 张广健, 付军科. 达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.

Zhuoqi Jia, Weiru Zhou, Yong Zhang, Guangjian Zhang, Junke Fu. Comparative study of Da Vinci robotic versus laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2023, 17(04): 410-414.

目的

对比分析达·芬奇机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术的临床疗效和近期生活质量。

方法

纳入2016年3月至2021年1月,由西安交通大学第一附属医院胸外科连续所行微创食管裂孔疝修补术患者共70例资料进行回顾分析,依患者手术意愿分为机器人组23例,采用达·芬奇机器人食管裂孔疝修补术(RHH)治疗,腹腔镜组47例,采用腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术(LHH)治疗。对比分析两组临床特征及手术指标,术后主要并发症情况及近期生活质量。

结果

两组临床特征比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组手术时间、术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组术后肺炎、心律失常、吞咽困难发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后平均住院时间机器人组为(3.4±1.6)d,低于腹腔镜组(5.7±1.9)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者90 d死亡率均为0。机器人组疝复发率为0,明显低于腹腔镜组的6.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。近期生活质量:患者术后3、12个月,消化病生存质量指数(GIQLI)总评分均高于术前,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);但两组GIQLI评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

达·芬奇机器人食管裂孔疝修补术安全可行,与腹腔镜相比,在促进患者术后快速康复、降低疝复发率方面具有明显优势,对患者术后近期生活质量有显著改善。

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy and short-term quality of life between the Da Vinci robotic and laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair surgeries.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 70 patients who underwent minimally invasive hiatal hernia repair surgery consecutively performed by the Department of Thoracic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, between March 2016 and January 2021 was conducted. Based on patient surgical preferences, 23 were assigned to the robot-assisted group, receiving Da Vinci robotic hiatal hernia repair (RHH), and 47 to the laparoscopic group, receiving laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair (LHH). Clinical characteristics, surgical indices, post-operative major complications, and short-term quality of life were compared between the two groups.

Results

No significant difference in clinical characteristics was found between the two groups (P>0.05). Surgery duration and intraoperative blood loss were also comparable (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in post-operative complications such as pneumonia, arrhythmia, and dysphagia (P>0.05). The average post-operative hospital stay for the robot-assisted group was (3.4±1.6) days, significantly shorter than the laparoscopic group's (5.7±1.9) days (P<0.05). The 90-day mortality rate for both groups was 0%. The hernia recurrence rate for the robotic group was 0%, significantly lower than the 6.3% in the laparoscopic group (P<0.05). In terms of short-term quality of life, Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) scores at 3 and 12 months post-operatively were significantly higher than pre-operation (P<0.05) for both groups, with no significant difference between the two groups' scores (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The Da Vinci robotic hiatal hernia repair surgery is safe and feasible. Compared to the laparoscopic method, it provides notable advantages in promoting faster post-operative recovery and reducing hernia recurrence rates, significantly improving patients' short-term quality of life.

图1 机器人食管裂孔疝修补+Nissen胃底折叠术注:1A游离疝囊,将疝内容物回纳腹腔。1B充分显露食管下段及双侧膈肌脚,缩小食管裂孔。1C补片覆盖疝环并缝合固定于膈肌脚两侧。1D游离部分胃底,行胃底折叠术。
图2 腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补+Nissen胃底折叠术注:2A完整游离疝囊。2B充分暴露食管下段及双侧膈肌脚,缩小食管裂孔。2C双侧膈肌脚未见薄弱,且疝环<4 cm。2D游离部分胃底,行胃底折叠术。
表1 两组患者临床特征比较[例(%)]
表2 两组患者手术相关指标比较(±s
表3 两组患者术后并发症、90 d死亡率及复发情况比较[例(%)]
表4 两组患者消化病生存质量指数评分比较(分,±s
[1]
Musbahi A, Mahawar K. Hiatal hernia[J]. Br J Surg, 2023, 110(4): 401-402.
[2]
Sfara A1, Dumitrascu DL. The management of hiatal hernia: an update on diagnosis and treatment[J]. Med Pharm Rep, 2019, 92(4): 321-325.
[3]
麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 多力坤·牙生, 伊尔夏提江·艾尼瓦尔, 等. 机器人和腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术短期临床疗效回顾性队列研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2023, 61(6): 498-502.
[4]
Peters JH. SAGES guidelines for the management of hiatal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2013, 27(12): 4407-4408.
[5]
中国医师协会外科医师分会胃食管反流病专业委员. 成人胃食管反流病外科诊疗共识(2020版)[J/OL]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2021, 8(1): 1-8.
[6]
Aiolfi A, Cavalli M, Sozzi A, et al. Paraesophageal hernia repair with laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication: impact on pulmonary function, respiratory symptoms and quality of life[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(6): 1679-1685.
[7]
Campos V, Palacio DS, Glina F, et al. Laparoscopic treatment of giant hiatal hernia with or without mesh reinforcement: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 77: 97-104.
[8]
Lekarczyk A, Sinha H, Dvir D, et al. Similar hospital profits with robotic-assisted paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair, despite higher or supply costs[J]. Surg Endosc, 2023, 37(5): 3952-3955.
[9]
Tartaglia N, Pavone G, Di Lascia A, et al. Robotic voluminous paraesophageal hernia repair: a case report and review of the literature[J]. J Med Case Rep, 2020, 14(1): 25.
[10]
Morelli L, Guadagni S, Mariniello MD, et al. Robotic giant hiatal hernia repair: 3 year prospective evaluation and review of the literature[J]. Int J Med Robot, 2015, 11(1):1-7.
[11]
Brenkman HJ, Parry K, van Hillegersberg R, et al. Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair: Promising Anatomical and Functional Results[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2016, 26(6): 465-469.
[12]
Sebastian R, Ghanem OM, Cornejo J, et al. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic approach to concurrent bariatric surgery and hiatal hernia repair: propensity score matching analysis using the 2015-2018 MBSAQIP[J]. Surg Endosc, 2022, 36(9): 6886-6895.
[13]
Ma L, Luo H, Kou S, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for hiatal hernia repair: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis[J]. J Robot Surg, 2023, Online ahead of print.
[14]
Tjeerdsma M, Quinn KR, Helmer SD, et al. Comparing Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hiatal Hernia Repair[J]. Kans J Med, 2022, 15: 365-368.
[15]
O'Connor SC, Mallard M, Desai SS, et al. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Hiatal Hernia Repair: Results After 7 Years of Robotic Experience[J]. Am Surg, 2020, 86(9): 1083-1087.
[16]
Rodier S, Henning J, Kukreja J, et al. Robotic Primary and Revisional Hiatal Hernia Repair is Safe and Associated with Favorable Perioperative Outcomes: A Single Institution Experience[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2023, Online ahead of print.
[17]
杨媛媛, 黄鹤光. 机器人辅助食管裂孔疝手术临床应用进展[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 449-451, 458.
[18]
Ekeke CN, Vercauteren M, Baker N, et al. Surgical Techniques for Robotically-Assisted Laparoscopic Paraesophageal Hernia Repair[J]. Thorac Surg Clin, 2019, 29(4): 369-377.
[19]
亚力坤·吐尔洪, 伊尔夏提江·艾尼瓦尔, 买买提·依斯热依力, 等. 机器人在食管裂孔疝修补术中的应用研究进展与争议[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2023, 28(1): 72-74, 80.
[20]
Guan L, Nie Y, Yuan X, et al. Laparoscopic repair of giant hiatal hernia for elderly patients[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(8): 704.
[21]
Tolboom RC, Draaisma WA, Broeders IA. Evaluation of conventional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic redo hiatal hernia and antireflux surgery: a cohort study[J]. J Robot Surg, 2016, 10(1): 33-39.
[1] 任俊筱, 浦路桥, 王志豪, 施洪鑫, 刘爱峰, 齐保闯, 徐永清, 李川. 机器人辅助全膝关节置换术的临床疗效对照研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 469-476.
[2] 丁莹莹, 宋恺, 金姬延, 田华. 机器人辅助膝髋关节置换术后精细化临床护理[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 553-557.
[3] 王振宁, 杨康, 王得晨, 邹敏, 归明彬, 王雅楠, 徐明. 机器人与腹腔镜手术联合经自然腔道取标本对中低位直肠癌患者远期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 437-442.
[4] 嵇晋, 吴胜文, 姜明瑞, 汪刘华, 王伟, 任俊, 王道荣, 马从超. 三种方式关闭盆底联合改良造口在直肠癌腹会阴联合切除术的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-410.
[5] 孙昭, 刘琪, 王殿琛, 姜建武, 符洋. 机器人对比腹腔镜及开放式腹股沟疝修补术的Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 588-598.
[6] 李海云, 赵敏娴, 申英末, 杨慧琪. 胃底折叠术预防食管裂孔疝术后并发症的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 485-490.
[7] 玉素江·图荪托合提, 韩琦, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 黄旭东, 王浩, 克力木·阿不都热依木, 艾克拜尔·艾力. 腹腔镜袖状胃切除或联合食管裂孔疝修补术对肥胖症合并胃食管反流病的中期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 501-506.
[8] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[9] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[10] 周艳, 李盈, 周小兵, 程发辉, 何恒正. 不同类型补片联合Nissen 胃底折叠术修补食管裂孔疝的疗效及复发潜在危险因素[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 528-533.
[11] 刘明昊, 李晨, 王冰, 万政, 田文. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 376-382.
[12] 魏孔源, 仵正, 王铮, 黎韡. 机器人胰腺中段切除后远端胰腺消化道不同重建方式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 295-300.
[13] 胡志伟, 吴继敏, 邓昌荣, 战秀岚, 纪涛, 王峰, 田书瑞, 陈冬, 张玉, 刘健男, 宋庆. 抗反流黏膜套扎治疗顽固性胃食管反流病[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 227-233.
[14] 曾纪晓, 徐晓钢, 王欣星, 刘斐, 兰梦龙, 陶波圆, 梁子建, 叶志华, 罗媛圆. 达芬奇机器人辅助Swenson-like巨结肠根治术[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 239-243.
[15] 唐小久, 胡曼, 许必君, 肖亚. 肥胖合并胃食管反流病患者严重程度与其焦虑抑郁及营养状态的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 360-364.
阅读次数
全文


摘要