切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 432 -434. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.04.014

临床论著

多排螺旋CT多平面重建在腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝中的鉴别诊断及临床价值
史日东1, 赵翠娟1, 陈宁2,()   
  1. 1. 014010 内蒙古包头,内蒙古包钢医院消化内科
    2. 014010 内蒙古包头,内蒙古包钢医院医学影像科
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-12 出版日期:2022-08-18
  • 通信作者: 陈宁
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区自然科学基金(2020MS08024)

Clinical value of multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction in the differential diagnosis of indirect inguinal hernia, direct inguinal hernia and femoral hernia

Ridong Shi1, Cuijuan Zhao1, Ning Chen2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Gastroenterology, Inner Mongolia Baotou Iron and Steel Hospital, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China
    2. Medical Imaging, Inner Mongolia Baotou Iron and Steel Hospital, Baotou 014010, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2021-09-12 Published:2022-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Ning Chen
引用本文:

史日东, 赵翠娟, 陈宁. 多排螺旋CT多平面重建在腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝中的鉴别诊断及临床价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 432-434.

Ridong Shi, Cuijuan Zhao, Ning Chen. Clinical value of multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction in the differential diagnosis of indirect inguinal hernia, direct inguinal hernia and femoral hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 432-434.

目的

探究多排螺旋CT多平面重建对腹股沟疝的临床鉴别诊断价值。

方法

回顾性分析2020年2月至2021年2月内蒙古包钢医院收治的100例同时行多排螺旋CT多平面重建扫描及疝修补术的病例,观察疝的影像学征象,类型及发生侧,以手术结果为金标准,分析比较多排螺旋CT多平面重建诊断腹股沟疝的准确率、灵敏与特异度以及阴阳性预测值。

结果

100例患者共有116个疝囊,多排螺旋CT多平面重建扫描诊断腹股沟斜疝的灵敏及特异度分别为93.33%、94.44%,阴阳性预测值分别为92.73%和94.91%;腹股沟直疝的上述指标分别为91.67%、95.65%、96.70%、89.19%;股疝上述指标均为100%。多排螺旋CT检查示股疝疝囊则位于腹股沟韧带后下方,存在股三角填塞,腹股沟斜疝和直疝疝囊均位于腹股沟韧带前上方,且不存在股三角填塞,但腹股沟斜疝疝囊位于腹壁下动脉外侧,直疝疝囊位于腹壁下动脉内侧,伴侧新月征。

结论

斜疝、直疝和股疝具有特征性影像学征像,多排螺旋CT多平面重建可以显示腹股沟区解剖细节,对斜疝、直疝和股疝的诊断与鉴别诊断有重要价值。

Objective

To explore the clinical value of multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction in the differential diagnosis of inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 100 patients who received simultaneous multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction and hernia repair in Inner Mongolia Baotou Iron and steel hospital from February 2020 to February 2021. The imaging signs, types and occurrence sides of hernia were observed, and the surgical results were considered as the gold standard. To analyze and compare the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value of multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia.

Results

There were 116 hernia sacs in 100 patients. The sensitivity and specificity of multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction in the diagnosis of indirect inguinal hernia was 93.33% and 94.44%, and the negative and positive predictive values were 92.73% and 94.91%, respectively. The above indexes of direct inguinal hernia were 91.67%, 95.65%, 96.70% and 89.19%, respectively. The above indexes of femoral hernia were all 100%. Multi-slice spiral CT examination showed that femoral hernia sac was located below after the inguinal ligament, with triangle tamponade. The indirect inguinal hernia and direct hernia sac were located above before the inguinal ligament, without triangle tamponade, but the indirect inguinal hernia sac was located lateral to the inferior epigastric artery, direct hernia sac was located medial to the inferior epigastric artery, with lateral crescent.

Conclusion

Indirect inguinal hernia, direct inguinal hernia and femoral hernia have characteristic imaging features. Multi-slice spiral CT multi-plane reconstruction can reveal the anatomical details of the inguinal region, which is of great value in the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of indirect, direct inguinal hernia and femoral hernia.

表1 手术结果显示腹股沟疝患者的发生侧别及类型(例)
表2 CT检测与手术结果比较(个)
表3 CT检测对各腹股沟疝的诊断价值
[1]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[2]
Mao Y, Chen L, Li J, et al. A network analysis revealed the essential and common downstream proteins related to inguinal hernia[J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(1): e0226885.
[3]
Köckerling F, Simons MP. Current concepts of inguinal hernia repair[J]. Visc Med, 2018, 34(2): 145-150.
[4]
白仲英,路勇,金媛. 动态螺旋CT增强扫描影像对慢性肿块型胰腺炎的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2020, 42(8): 757-759.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2018, 21(7): 721-724.
[6]
齐大鹏,计朝飞,王晓亮, 等. 多排螺旋CT对腹股沟疝患者的影像鉴别与诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(2): 146-149.
[7]
章家强,蔡亲磊,詹兴云. 腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的多排螺旋CT影像学特征及鉴别诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 243-247.
[8]
李华东. 彩超对腹股沟斜疝,直疝的鉴别诊断价值探析[J]. 中国保健营养, 2017, 27(13): 431.
[9]
王宗明,王静,钟必武, 等. 16排螺旋CT在腹股沟斜疝和股疝鉴别诊断中的价值研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2018, 16(10): 125-127.
[10]
白仲英,路勇,金媛. 动态螺旋CT增强扫描影像对慢性肿块型胰腺炎的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 宁夏医学杂志, 2020, 42(8): 757-759.
[11]
赖姝,张静,王银花. 腹股沟疝病人的护理[J]. 特别健康, 2018(22): 215-216.
[12]
余小亚. 多层螺旋CT在腹股沟疝与股疝的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 影像技术, 2020, 32(5): 10-11.
[13]
赵仕懂,李冬菊,丘武应, 等. MSCT重建技术在腹股沟疝分类中的应用[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(11): 1537-1539.
[1] 刘欢, 邢皓, 常正奇, 张记. 机械敏感性离子通道蛋白Piezo1在感染相关疾病中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华实验和临床感染病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 263-269.
[2] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[3] 谢汶歆, 马乐, 刘晔, 曹晓明, 张万春. 前列腺特异性膜抗原PET/CT在肾癌诊疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 514-519.
[4] 王岩, 钱宏阳, 朱寅杰, 董柏君, 潘家骅, 薛蔚. 机器人辅助单孔腹膜外根治性前列腺切除治疗高危前列腺癌的瘤控效果初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 435-440.
[5] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[6] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[7] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[8] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[9] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[10] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[11] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 王永楠, 汤畅通, 殷杰, 谭溢涛. 微创钻孔引流术与神经内镜血肿清除术治疗临界量基底节脑出血的效果对比分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 286-292.
[14] 陈倩倩, 袁晨, 刘基, 尹婷婷. 多层螺旋CT 参数、癌胚抗原、错配修复基因及病理指标对结直肠癌预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 507-511.
[15] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?