切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 274 -277. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.03.006

临床论著

麻醉方式对开放腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛因素的影响
张洁1, 马宏光1,()   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,中日友好医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-11 出版日期:2022-06-20
  • 通信作者: 马宏光

Effects of anesthesia on pain factors after open inguinal hernia repair

Jie Zhang1, Hongguang Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2022-01-11 Published:2022-06-20
  • Corresponding author: Hongguang Ma
引用本文:

张洁, 马宏光. 麻醉方式对开放腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛因素的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 274-277.

Jie Zhang, Hongguang Ma. Effects of anesthesia on pain factors after open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 274-277.

目的

探讨开放腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的相关因素。

方法

前瞻性收集2016年3月至2018年2月中日友好医院普外科进行手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者188例。所有手术均由同一位主刀医师完成。收集患者的基本临床信息,利用数字量表评分(NRS)对患者术前输液穿刺疼痛,术后6、24 h伤口疼痛程度进行评估。相关性分析采用Pearson相关分析和Spearman秩相关分析。采用多因素Logistic回归分析风险因素与疼痛的独立相关关系。

结果

术后6 h伤口疼痛与年龄呈负相关(R=-0.152,P<0.05)。与麻醉方式具有显著相关性(R=0.164,P<0.05)。与性别、体质量指数(BMI)、手术部位、腹股沟疝分型、手术方式、手术时间无显著相关性。术后24 h伤口疼痛与年龄呈负相关(R=-0.18,P<0.05)。与手术部位、麻醉方式及手术时间具有显著相关性(P<0.05)。与性别、BMI、腹股沟疝分型、手术方式无显著相关性。经过性别、年龄和BMI校正,Logistic多因素分析结果显示麻醉方式是术后伤口疼痛的独立相关因素。

结论

在局部麻醉加强化的麻醉方式下施行小切口无张力疝修补术,能有效减轻患者术后伤口早期疼痛感,有利于患者早期出院,对临床具有一定的参考意义。

Objective

To explore the related risk factors for pain in patients under open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A total of 188 patients with inguinal hernia from March 2016 to February 2018 were prospectively collected, who underwent surgical treatment in the general surgery department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. All operations were performed by the same chief surgeon. The basic clinical information of patients was collected, and the numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate the pain of infusion puncture before the operation and the degree of wound pain at 6 h and 24 h after the operation. Pearson correlation analysis and Spearman rank correlation analysis were used for correlation analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used in multivariate analysis.

Results

There was a negative correlation between pain scores at 6 h after surgery and age (R=-0.152, P<0.05). It was significantly correlated with the mode of anesthesia (R=0.164, P<0.05). There was no significant correlation with gender, body mass index (BMI), operation site, inguinal hernia classification, operation method and operation time. There was a negative correlation between pain scores at 24 hours after the operation and age (R=-0.18, P<0.05). It was significantly correlated with the surgical site, anesthesia methods, and operation time (P<0.05). There was no significant correlation with gender, BMI, inguinal hernia classification and operation mode. Multivariate analysis showed that anesthesia mode was an independent related factor of postoperative wound pain, after adjusted for gender, age, and BMI.

Conclusion

The combination of local and enhanced anesthesia for small incision tension-free hernia repair can effectively meliorate the early postoperative pain, which is conducive to the early discharge of patients, and has a certain reference significance for clinical practice.

表1 纳入患者的基本临床特征
表2 术后6 h伤口疼痛与各指标的相关分析
表3 术后24 h伤口疼痛与各指标的相关分析
表4 多因素Logistc回归分析术后不同时间伤口疼痛等级的相关风险因素
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(7): 645-648.
[2]
徐建国. 成人日间手术后镇痛专家共识(2017)[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(8): 812-815.
[3]
孙小亮, 赵瑾, 马宏光. 小切口无张力腹股沟疝修补术十年临床观察和评价[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(5): 371-374.
[4]
陈晓鑫. 不同手术路径下腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛比较及慢性疼痛因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 265-269.
[5]
Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. Tension-free Inguinal hernia repair: TFP versus mesh-plug, versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2003, 237(1): 142-147.
[6]
Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Task Force on Taxonomy[M]. Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1994.
[7]
臧鸣, 孙程程, 王晶, 等.不同麻醉方式在腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及疼痛感受[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 274-276.
[8]
Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Anaesthesia and post-operative morbidity after elective groin hernia repair: a nation-wide study[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008, 52(2): 169-174.
[9]
Humes DJ, Abdul-Sultan A, Walker AJ, et al. Duration and magnitude of postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism after planned inguinal hernia repair in men: a population-based cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 447-453.
[10]
李绍杰, 杨子昂, 黄磊, 等. 成人腹股沟疝修补术后静脉血栓栓塞症调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 793-796.
[11]
Lundstrom KJ, Sandblom G, Smedberg S, et al. Risk factors for complications in groin hernia surgery: a national register study[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 784-788.
[12]
Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 207(2): 288-292.
[13]
赵健, 郭天康. 腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝疗效Meta分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(1): 86-93.
[14]
孟令勤, 杨福全. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后慢性疼痛治疗研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(5): 419-421.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[3] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[4] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[5] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[6] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[7] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[8] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[9] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[10] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[11] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[12] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[13] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[14] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
[15] 李静, 张玲玲, 邢伟. 兴趣诱导理念用于小儿手术麻醉诱导前的价值及其对家属满意度的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 812-817.
阅读次数
全文


摘要