切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (03) : 274 -277. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.03.006

临床论著

麻醉方式对开放腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛因素的影响
张洁1, 马宏光1,()   
  1. 1. 100029 北京,中日友好医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-11 出版日期:2022-06-20
  • 通信作者: 马宏光

Effects of anesthesia on pain factors after open inguinal hernia repair

Jie Zhang1, Hongguang Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing 100029, China
  • Received:2022-01-11 Published:2022-06-20
  • Corresponding author: Hongguang Ma
引用本文:

张洁, 马宏光. 麻醉方式对开放腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛因素的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 274-277.

Jie Zhang, Hongguang Ma. Effects of anesthesia on pain factors after open inguinal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(03): 274-277.

目的

探讨开放腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛的相关因素。

方法

前瞻性收集2016年3月至2018年2月中日友好医院普外科进行手术治疗的腹股沟疝患者188例。所有手术均由同一位主刀医师完成。收集患者的基本临床信息,利用数字量表评分(NRS)对患者术前输液穿刺疼痛,术后6、24 h伤口疼痛程度进行评估。相关性分析采用Pearson相关分析和Spearman秩相关分析。采用多因素Logistic回归分析风险因素与疼痛的独立相关关系。

结果

术后6 h伤口疼痛与年龄呈负相关(R=-0.152,P<0.05)。与麻醉方式具有显著相关性(R=0.164,P<0.05)。与性别、体质量指数(BMI)、手术部位、腹股沟疝分型、手术方式、手术时间无显著相关性。术后24 h伤口疼痛与年龄呈负相关(R=-0.18,P<0.05)。与手术部位、麻醉方式及手术时间具有显著相关性(P<0.05)。与性别、BMI、腹股沟疝分型、手术方式无显著相关性。经过性别、年龄和BMI校正,Logistic多因素分析结果显示麻醉方式是术后伤口疼痛的独立相关因素。

结论

在局部麻醉加强化的麻醉方式下施行小切口无张力疝修补术,能有效减轻患者术后伤口早期疼痛感,有利于患者早期出院,对临床具有一定的参考意义。

Objective

To explore the related risk factors for pain in patients under open inguinal hernia repair.

Methods

A total of 188 patients with inguinal hernia from March 2016 to February 2018 were prospectively collected, who underwent surgical treatment in the general surgery department of China-Japan Friendship Hospital. All operations were performed by the same chief surgeon. The basic clinical information of patients was collected, and the numerical rating scale (NRS) was used to evaluate the pain of infusion puncture before the operation and the degree of wound pain at 6 h and 24 h after the operation. Pearson correlation analysis and Spearman rank correlation analysis were used for correlation analysis. Logistic regression analysis was used in multivariate analysis.

Results

There was a negative correlation between pain scores at 6 h after surgery and age (R=-0.152, P<0.05). It was significantly correlated with the mode of anesthesia (R=0.164, P<0.05). There was no significant correlation with gender, body mass index (BMI), operation site, inguinal hernia classification, operation method and operation time. There was a negative correlation between pain scores at 24 hours after the operation and age (R=-0.18, P<0.05). It was significantly correlated with the surgical site, anesthesia methods, and operation time (P<0.05). There was no significant correlation with gender, BMI, inguinal hernia classification and operation mode. Multivariate analysis showed that anesthesia mode was an independent related factor of postoperative wound pain, after adjusted for gender, age, and BMI.

Conclusion

The combination of local and enhanced anesthesia for small incision tension-free hernia repair can effectively meliorate the early postoperative pain, which is conducive to the early discharge of patients, and has a certain reference significance for clinical practice.

表1 纳入患者的基本临床特征
表2 术后6 h伤口疼痛与各指标的相关分析
表3 术后24 h伤口疼痛与各指标的相关分析
表4 多因素Logistc回归分析术后不同时间伤口疼痛等级的相关风险因素
[1]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(7): 645-648.
[2]
徐建国. 成人日间手术后镇痛专家共识(2017)[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2017, 33(8): 812-815.
[3]
孙小亮, 赵瑾, 马宏光. 小切口无张力腹股沟疝修补术十年临床观察和评价[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(5): 371-374.
[4]
陈晓鑫. 不同手术路径下腹股沟疝修补术后疼痛比较及慢性疼痛因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 265-269.
[5]
Bringman S, Ramel S, Heikkinen TJ, et al. Tension-free Inguinal hernia repair: TFP versus mesh-plug, versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. Ann Surg, 2003, 237(1): 142-147.
[6]
Merskey H, Bogduk N. Classification of chronic pain. Descriptions of chronic pain syndromes and definitions of pain terms. Prepared by the International Association for the Study of Pain, Task Force on Taxonomy[M]. Seattle, WA: IASP Press, 1994.
[7]
臧鸣, 孙程程, 王晶, 等.不同麻醉方式在腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及疼痛感受[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(3): 274-276.
[8]
Bay-Nielsen M, Kehlet H. Anaesthesia and post-operative morbidity after elective groin hernia repair: a nation-wide study[J]. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2008, 52(2): 169-174.
[9]
Humes DJ, Abdul-Sultan A, Walker AJ, et al. Duration and magnitude of postoperative risk of venous thromboembolism after planned inguinal hernia repair in men: a population-based cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 447-453.
[10]
李绍杰, 杨子昂, 黄磊, 等. 成人腹股沟疝修补术后静脉血栓栓塞症调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7): 793-796.
[11]
Lundstrom KJ, Sandblom G, Smedberg S, et al. Risk factors for complications in groin hernia surgery: a national register study[J]. Ann Surg, 2012, 255(4): 784-788.
[12]
Sivasankaran MV, Pham T, Divino CM. Incidence and risk factors for urinary retention following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Am J Surg, 2014, 207(2): 288-292.
[13]
赵健, 郭天康. 腹腔镜与开放式无张力疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝疗效Meta分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2015, 35(1): 86-93.
[14]
孟令勤, 杨福全. 腹股沟疝无张力修补术后慢性疼痛治疗研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2014, 34(5): 419-421.
[1] 宋玟焱, 杜美君, 陈佳丽, 石冰, 黄汉尧. 唇腭裂手术围手术期疼痛管理的研究进展及基于生物材料治疗新方法的展望[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 397-405.
[2] 杜伟, 廖土明, 李雄才, 关刚强, 何燊, 吴佳桥, 朱和荣. 2%利多卡因凝胶和润滑剂凝胶在女性尿流动力学检查中应用的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 613-617.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[5] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[6] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[7] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[8] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[9] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[10] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[11] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后血清中VEGF 和Ang-1 的表达情况[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 703-707.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 杨媛媛, 林贤超, 林荣贵, 陆逢春, 黄鹤光. 肌后/腹膜前补片修补巨大切口疝术后并发症防治[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 645-648.
[14] 韦巧玲, 黄妍, 赵昌, 宋庆峰, 陈祖毅, 黄莹, 蒙嫦, 黄靖. 肝癌微波消融术后中重度疼痛风险预测列线图模型构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 715-721.
[15] 蔡晓雯, 李慧景, 丘婕, 杨翼帆, 吴素贤, 林玉彤, 何秋娜. 肝癌患者肝动脉化疗栓塞术后疼痛风险预测模型的构建及验证[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 722-728.
阅读次数
全文


摘要