切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (02) : 172 -175. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.02.010

临床论著

SupremeTM喉罩在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的麻醉效果及对应激指标的影响
李善琳1,(), 杨晓斌1, 倪婧婧1   
  1. 1. 243000 安徽省,徳驭医疗马鞍山总医院麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2021-11-29 出版日期:2022-04-18
  • 通信作者: 李善琳
  • 基金资助:
    马鞍山市科技计划基金资助项目(2020-05-09)

Effect of SupremeTM laryngeal mask on anesthesia in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery and its influence on stress index

Shanlin Li1,(), Xiaobin Yang1, Jingjing Ni1   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesiology, Deyu Medical Maanshan General Hospital, Maanshan 243000, Anhui Province, China
  • Received:2021-11-29 Published:2022-04-18
  • Corresponding author: Shanlin Li
引用本文:

李善琳, 杨晓斌, 倪婧婧. SupremeTM喉罩在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的麻醉效果及对应激指标的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 172-175.

Shanlin Li, Xiaobin Yang, Jingjing Ni. Effect of SupremeTM laryngeal mask on anesthesia in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery and its influence on stress index[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(02): 172-175.

目的

探究SupremeTM喉罩与气管插管在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的效果及对应激指标的影响。

方法

将2021年2至10月于徳驭医疗马鞍山总医院接受治疗的62例腹股沟疝患者随机分为对照组和观察组,每组患者31例。对照组采用气管插管进行腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术,观察组采用SupremeTM喉罩进行腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术,对比2组各时间点[麻醉诱导前(T0)、插入气管或喉罩时(T1)、插入5 min时(T2)、拔除气管或者喉罩时(T3)]血流动力学指标,麻醉质量(睁眼时间、拔管时间及完全清醒时间),各时间点气道峰压及气道密闭压变化情况,不良反应发生率。

结果

(1)T1、T2、T3时间点,2组患者平均动脉压(MAP)和心率水平较T0时间点明显升高,且观察组MAP、心率水平低于对照组(P<0.05);(2)观察组睁眼时间、拔管时间和完全清醒时间均低于同期对照组(P<0.05);(3)与对照组相比,观察组患者在T1~T3时气道峰压以及气道密闭压方面均显著下降(P<0.05);(4)观察组的不良反应总发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

SupremeTM喉罩较气管插管在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的麻醉效果更好,且不良反应少、安全性高。

Objective

To investigate the effect of SupremeTM laryngeal mask and endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery and its influence on stress index.

Methods

62 patients with inguinal hernia who came to Deyu Medical Maanshan General Hospital for treatment from February to October 2021 were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 31 patients in each group. The control group received laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery using endotracheal intubation. The observation group adopts SupremeTM laryngeal mask laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery. The hemodynamic index at each time point [before anesthesia induction (T0), when the trachea or laryngeal mask was inserted (T1), 5 min after inserting (T2), removing the trachea or laryngeal mask (T3)], anesthesia quality (eye-opening time, extubation time, fully awake time), changes in airway peak pressure and airway closed pressure at each time point, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

Results

(1) At T1, T2 and T3, mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) levels in 2 groups increased significantly compared with T0, and MAP and HR levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). (2) The eye-opening time, extubation time and full awake time in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group during the same period (P<0.05); (3) Compared with the control group, the peak airway pressure and airway closed pressure of the observation group reduced significantly at T1-T3 (P<0.05); (4) The overall incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

SupremeTM laryngeal mask has better anesthesia effect than endotracheal intubation in laparoscopic inguinal hernia surgery, with fewer adverse reactions and higher safety.

表1 2组患者不同时间点血流动力学指标比较(±s
表2 2组患者麻醉质量比较(min,±s
表3 2组患者气道峰压和气道密闭压变化情况对比(cmH2O,±s
表4 2组患者不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Weaver KL, Poola AS, Gould JL, et al. The risk of developing a symptomatic inguinal hernia in children with an asymptomatic patent processus vaginalis[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2017, 52(1): 60-64.
[2]
Esposito C, Escolino M, Cortese G, et al. Twenty-year experience with laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in infants and children: considerations and results on 1833 hernia repairs[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(3): 1461-1468.
[3]
刘雨辰,朱熠林,陈杰, 等. 不同腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中二氧化碳气腹对酸碱平衡影响随机对照研究[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 415-418.
[4]
Suwa K, Onda S, Yasuda J, et al. Single-blind randomized clinical trial of transinguinal preperitoneal repair using self-expanding mesh patch vs. Lichtenstein repair for adult male patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(1): 173-181.
[5]
Gram-Hanssen A, Jessen ML, Christophersen C, et al. Trends in the use of patient-reported outcome measures for inguinal hernia repair: a quantitative systematic review[J]. Hernia, 2021, 25(5): 1111-1120.
[6]
Pokorny H, Bischof G. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia[J]. Eur Surg, 2004, 36(4): 262-263.
[7]
Miserez M, Peeters E, Aufenacker T, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients[J]. Hernia, 2014, 13(3): 443-444.
[8]
黄俊,蔡小勇,靳小建, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝再次腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的经验[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 3.
[9]
郑文龙,蔡洪彬,赖志鸿. 腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟斜疝术后复发与并发症分析[J]. 数理医药学杂志, 2019, 32(1): 60-61.
[10]
王兴光,王振元,李明颖. Guardian喉罩在腹腔镜成人腹股沟疝修补术全身麻醉中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(3): 4.
[11]
王媛. 喉罩通气和气管插管全麻用于腹腔镜小儿腹股沟斜疝手术的效果比较[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2020, 26(4): 30-33.
[12]
黄朝继. 喉罩置入七氟烷吸入全麻在小儿疝气手术中的应用[J]. 中国处方药, 2020, 18(9): 188-190.
[13]
王赢,李辉. 喉罩麻醉和气管插管麻醉在小儿麻醉中的应用效果[J]. 医疗装备, 2020, 33(5): 115-116.
[14]
李宝龙,张素红. 喉罩麻醉与气管插管麻醉在小儿腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝手术中的比较分析[J]. 当代医学, 2019, 25(1): 45-46.
[15]
龚辉,曹小莹. 喉罩麻醉在小儿腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜手术中的应用效果观察[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2021, 15(13): 51-53.
[1] 池畔, 黄胜辉. 中国腹腔镜直肠癌根治术30年来的巨大进步[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 596-600.
[2] 唐梅, 周丽, 牛岑月, 周小童, 王倩. ICG荧光导航的腹腔镜肝切除术临床意义[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 655-658.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 任传富, 杨志, 徐恩, 何梓芸, 罗板鑫, 陈新, 夏雪峰. 腹腔镜疝修补术联合胃底折叠术治疗食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病40 例临床分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 507-511.
[12] 张蕾, 彭超, 周应芳. 直肠阴道隔子宫内膜异位症腹腔镜手术技巧[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 257-261.
[13] 徐敬云, 丁波, 蒋宇慧, 沈杨. 妊娠期单孔腹腔镜手术实施行与思[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(05): 262-266.
[14] 张宗明, 董家鸿, 何小东, 王秋生, 徐智, 刘立民, 张翀. 老年胆道外科热点问题的争议与思考[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 754-762.
[15] 张迪, 王春霞, 张学东, 李发馨, 庞淅文, 陈一锋, 张维胜, 王涛. 梗阻性左半结直肠癌自膨式金属支架置入后行腹腔镜手术与开腹手术的短期临床疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 375-380.
阅读次数
全文


摘要