切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 243 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.008

临床论著

腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的多排螺旋CT影像学特征及鉴别诊断价值
章家强1,(), 蔡亲磊2, 詹兴云3   
  1. 1. 571500 海南,万宁市人民医院放射科
    2. 570311 海口,海南省人民医院 海南医学院附属海南医院放射科
    3. 571500 海南,万宁市人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-01 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 章家强
  • 基金资助:
    海南省科技计划项目(2020wnkj04)

Imaging features and differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT for indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia

Jiaqiang Zhang1,(), Qinlei Cai2, Xingyun Zhan3   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Wanning People's Hospital, Wanning 571500, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Hainan Hospital Affiliated to Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570311, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Wanning People's Hospital, Wanning 571500, China
  • Received:2020-03-01 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Jiaqiang Zhang
引用本文:

章家强, 蔡亲磊, 詹兴云. 腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的多排螺旋CT影像学特征及鉴别诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 243-247.

Jiaqiang Zhang, Qinlei Cai, Xingyun Zhan. Imaging features and differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT for indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 243-247.

目的

分析腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝多排螺旋CT影像学特点及鉴别价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年1月,万宁市人民医院收治的腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝患者共120例,总结三种疝多排螺旋CT影像学特点及鉴别要点。

结果

多排螺旋CT诊断斜疝灵敏度、特异度及准确率分别为95.24%、95.83%、95.45%;诊断直疝分别为92.86%、96.15%、95.45%;诊断股疝分别为100.00%、94.64%、95.45%;斜疝位于耻骨结节前内侧比例高于直疝、股疝(P<0.05);直疝位于耻骨结节前外侧、检出新月征比例高于斜疝、股疝(P<0.05);股疝位于耻骨结节后外侧比例、股三角填塞征检出率高于直疝、斜疝(P<0.05);斜疝肠系膜内容物所占比例高于直疝、股疝(P<0.05),直疝膀胱内容物所占比例高于斜疝、股疝(P<0.05),直疝、股疝脂肪内容物所占比例高于斜疝(P<0.05),直疝、股疝发生肠梗阻所占比例高于斜疝(P<0.05);斜疝腹股沟内环扩大所占比例高于直疝与股疝(P<0.05)。

结论

腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝均存在特异性多排螺旋CT影像学征象;多排螺旋CT对鉴别斜疝、直疝、股疝均有较高价值,可清晰显示疝囊与腹股沟区解剖特点、疝内容物特点及并发症判断,有助于指导疝类型鉴别及手术方式的确立。

Objective

To analyze the imaging features and differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) for indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia who were admitted to Wanning people's hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively collected. The imaging features and identification key points of MSCT for the three types of hernia were summarized.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MSCT in diagnosis of indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia were (95.24%, 95.83%, 95.45%), (92.86%, 96.15%, 95.45%) and (100.00%, 94.64%, 95.45%), respectively. The ratio of indirect hernia located at medial anterior pubic tubercle was higher than that of direct hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of direct hernia located at lateral anterior pubic tubercle and detection rate of crescent sign were higher than those of indirect hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of femoral hernias located at posterolateral pubic tubercle and the detection rate of femoral triangle packing sign were higher than those of direct hernia and indirect hernia (P<0.05). The ratios of mesenteric contents in indirect hernia were higher than those in direct hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratios of bladder contents in direct hernia were higher than those in indirect hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratios of fat contents in direct hernia and femoral hernia were higher than those in indirect hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of intestinal obstruction in direct hernia and femoral hernia was higher than that in indirect hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of enlarged inguinal inner circle in indirect hernia was higher than that in direct hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05).

Conclusion

There are specific MSCT imaging signs in indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia. MSCT is of high value in identifying the three types of hernia, and it can clearly display the anatomical features of hernia sac and inguinal region, features of hernia contents and complications determining, and can help guide the identification of hernia types and determining surgical methods.

表1 多排螺旋CT诊断腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝结果及其与手术结果对照(个)
表2 腹股沟斜疝、股疝、直疝多排螺旋CT位置特点、影像学征象比较[个(%)]
表3 腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝疝内容物检出情况[个(%)]
表4 腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝腹股沟内环解剖改变比较[个(%)]
[1]
Fernando H, Garcia C, Hossack T, et al. Incidence, predictive factors and preventive measures for inguinal hernia following robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Urol, 2019, 201(6): 1072-1079.
[2]
Joseph M, Aylish T, Rola S, et al. Radiologic reporting and interpretation of occult inguinal hernia[J]. J Ame Coll Surg, 2018, 227(5): 489-495.
[3]
孙中琪,李鑫,王奕乔, 等. CT影像技术在腹内疝诊断中的应用[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2019, 18(12): 1178-1182.
[4]
Maisenbacher T, Kratzer W, Formentini A, et al. Value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia-A? Retrospective Study[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2018, 39(6): 690-696.
[5]
朱止平,窦文广,岳军艳, 等. 成人腹股沟斜疝与直疝和股疝的多排螺旋CT检查影像学特征[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1127-1133.
[6]
Youn JK, Kim HY, Huh YJ, et al. Inguinal hernia in preterms in neonatal intensive care units: optimal timing of herniorrhaphy and necessity of contralateral exploration in unilateral presentation[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 53(11): 2155-2159.
[7]
陈大伟,李君. 多排螺旋CT以及多重平面重组在腹股沟疝和股疝诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 164-167.
[8]
姜萍,刘文军,罗敏, 等. 64层螺旋CT在腹内疝中的诊断价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2019, 29(8): 1434-1437.
[9]
赵仕懂,李冬菊,丘武应, 等. MSCT重建技术在腹股沟疝分类中的应用[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(11): 1537-1539.
[10]
唐健雄,李航宇. 老年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 12-15.
[11]
李廷坚,王博智,翁少涛, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与开放腹股沟疝修补术并发血清肿的比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2018, 25(23): 3078-3081.
[12]
甘雄辉,黄民顺,刘铁军. 多层螺旋CT在诊断肠梗阻中的临床应用[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(16): 2295-2298.
[13]
王宗明,王静,钟必武, 等. 16排螺旋CT在腹股沟斜疝和股疝鉴别诊断中的价值研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2018, 16(10): 125-127.
[14]
葛权昌,冷梅娜,齐兴芹, 等. CT征象诊断腹部术后继发性腹内疝的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2019, 35(9): 1453-1456.
[15]
万明军,雷立章,翟采文, 等. CT在巨大切口疝患者疝修补术前渐进性气腹中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 113-115.
[16]
杨思阔,秦伟,戴勇. 多层螺旋CT三维重建技术在疝补片大小选择中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 142-143.
[17]
来卫忠,李海学,张亚栋, 等. 腹股沟区疝的综合影像诊断分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(18): 3111-3113.
[18]
王倩蒨,刘刚磊,周建平. 腹股沟疝的影像学检查应用研究进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(12): 1429-1432.
[1] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[2] 司钦亮, 毕世龙, 焦慧骁, 李世照, 陈哲禹, 武玉东. 精索去分化脂肪肉瘤两例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 585-590.
[3] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[4] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[5] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[6] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[7] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[8] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[9] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[10] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[11] 王小琴, 汪丽, 崔建英. 无张力疝修补术治疗慢性肾功能衰竭合并腹股沟疝患者的疗效[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 538-542.
[12] 丁佳宝, 梁晓辉, 武敬维, 张福. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术在腹股沟嵌顿斜疝患者中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 543-547.
[13] 闫亚飞, 范学圣, 张舰, 吴勇. 经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗复发腹股沟疝的临床效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 552-556.
[14] 陈慧, 邹祖鹏, 周田田, 张艺丹, 张海萍. 皮肤镜对头皮红斑性皮肤病辅助鉴别诊断的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 692-698.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?