切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 243 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.008

临床论著

腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的多排螺旋CT影像学特征及鉴别诊断价值
章家强1,(), 蔡亲磊2, 詹兴云3   
  1. 1. 571500 海南,万宁市人民医院放射科
    2. 570311 海口,海南省人民医院 海南医学院附属海南医院放射科
    3. 571500 海南,万宁市人民医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-01 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 章家强
  • 基金资助:
    海南省科技计划项目(2020wnkj04)

Imaging features and differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT for indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia

Jiaqiang Zhang1,(), Qinlei Cai2, Xingyun Zhan3   

  1. 1. Department of Radiology, Wanning People's Hospital, Wanning 571500, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Hainan Hospital Affiliated to Hainan Medical College, Haikou 570311, China
    3. Department of General Surgery, Wanning People's Hospital, Wanning 571500, China
  • Received:2020-03-01 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Jiaqiang Zhang
引用本文:

章家强, 蔡亲磊, 詹兴云. 腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝的多排螺旋CT影像学特征及鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 243-247.

Jiaqiang Zhang, Qinlei Cai, Xingyun Zhan. Imaging features and differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT for indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 243-247.

目的

分析腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝多排螺旋CT影像学特点及鉴别价值。

方法

回顾性分析2018年1月至2020年1月,万宁市人民医院收治的腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝患者共120例,总结三种疝多排螺旋CT影像学特点及鉴别要点。

结果

多排螺旋CT诊断斜疝灵敏度、特异度及准确率分别为95.24%、95.83%、95.45%;诊断直疝分别为92.86%、96.15%、95.45%;诊断股疝分别为100.00%、94.64%、95.45%;斜疝位于耻骨结节前内侧比例高于直疝、股疝(P<0.05);直疝位于耻骨结节前外侧、检出新月征比例高于斜疝、股疝(P<0.05);股疝位于耻骨结节后外侧比例、股三角填塞征检出率高于直疝、斜疝(P<0.05);斜疝肠系膜内容物所占比例高于直疝、股疝(P<0.05),直疝膀胱内容物所占比例高于斜疝、股疝(P<0.05),直疝、股疝脂肪内容物所占比例高于斜疝(P<0.05),直疝、股疝发生肠梗阻所占比例高于斜疝(P<0.05);斜疝腹股沟内环扩大所占比例高于直疝与股疝(P<0.05)。

结论

腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝均存在特异性多排螺旋CT影像学征象;多排螺旋CT对鉴别斜疝、直疝、股疝均有较高价值,可清晰显示疝囊与腹股沟区解剖特点、疝内容物特点及并发症判断,有助于指导疝类型鉴别及手术方式的确立。

Objective

To analyze the imaging features and differential diagnosis value of multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) for indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia.

Methods

A total of 120 patients with inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia who were admitted to Wanning people's hospital from January 2018 to January 2020 were retrospectively collected. The imaging features and identification key points of MSCT for the three types of hernia were summarized.

Results

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of MSCT in diagnosis of indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia were (95.24%, 95.83%, 95.45%), (92.86%, 96.15%, 95.45%) and (100.00%, 94.64%, 95.45%), respectively. The ratio of indirect hernia located at medial anterior pubic tubercle was higher than that of direct hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of direct hernia located at lateral anterior pubic tubercle and detection rate of crescent sign were higher than those of indirect hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of femoral hernias located at posterolateral pubic tubercle and the detection rate of femoral triangle packing sign were higher than those of direct hernia and indirect hernia (P<0.05). The ratios of mesenteric contents in indirect hernia were higher than those in direct hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratios of bladder contents in direct hernia were higher than those in indirect hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05). The ratios of fat contents in direct hernia and femoral hernia were higher than those in indirect hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of intestinal obstruction in direct hernia and femoral hernia was higher than that in indirect hernia (P<0.05). The ratio of enlarged inguinal inner circle in indirect hernia was higher than that in direct hernia and femoral hernia (P<0.05).

Conclusion

There are specific MSCT imaging signs in indirect inguinal hernia, direct hernia and femoral hernia. MSCT is of high value in identifying the three types of hernia, and it can clearly display the anatomical features of hernia sac and inguinal region, features of hernia contents and complications determining, and can help guide the identification of hernia types and determining surgical methods.

表1 多排螺旋CT诊断腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝结果及其与手术结果对照(个)
表2 腹股沟斜疝、股疝、直疝多排螺旋CT位置特点、影像学征象比较[个(%)]
表3 腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝疝内容物检出情况[个(%)]
表4 腹股沟斜疝、直疝、股疝腹股沟内环解剖改变比较[个(%)]
[1]
Fernando H, Garcia C, Hossack T, et al. Incidence, predictive factors and preventive measures for inguinal hernia following robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systematic review[J]. J Urol, 2019, 201(6): 1072-1079.
[2]
Joseph M, Aylish T, Rola S, et al. Radiologic reporting and interpretation of occult inguinal hernia[J]. J Ame Coll Surg, 2018, 227(5): 489-495.
[3]
孙中琪,李鑫,王奕乔, 等. CT影像技术在腹内疝诊断中的应用[J]. 中华全科医师杂志, 2019, 18(12): 1178-1182.
[4]
Maisenbacher T, Kratzer W, Formentini A, et al. Value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of inguinal hernia-A? Retrospective Study[J]. Ultraschall Med, 2018, 39(6): 690-696.
[5]
朱止平,窦文广,岳军艳, 等. 成人腹股沟斜疝与直疝和股疝的多排螺旋CT检查影像学特征[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(11): 1127-1133.
[6]
Youn JK, Kim HY, Huh YJ, et al. Inguinal hernia in preterms in neonatal intensive care units: optimal timing of herniorrhaphy and necessity of contralateral exploration in unilateral presentation[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2018, 53(11): 2155-2159.
[7]
陈大伟,李君. 多排螺旋CT以及多重平面重组在腹股沟疝和股疝诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 164-167.
[8]
姜萍,刘文军,罗敏, 等. 64层螺旋CT在腹内疝中的诊断价值[J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2019, 29(8): 1434-1437.
[9]
赵仕懂,李冬菊,丘武应, 等. MSCT重建技术在腹股沟疝分类中的应用[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(11): 1537-1539.
[10]
唐健雄,李航宇. 老年腹股沟疝诊断和治疗中国专家共识(2019版)解读[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2020, 28(1): 12-15.
[11]
李廷坚,王博智,翁少涛, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术与开放腹股沟疝修补术并发血清肿的比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2018, 25(23): 3078-3081.
[12]
甘雄辉,黄民顺,刘铁军. 多层螺旋CT在诊断肠梗阻中的临床应用[J]. 海南医学, 2018, 29(16): 2295-2298.
[13]
王宗明,王静,钟必武, 等. 16排螺旋CT在腹股沟斜疝和股疝鉴别诊断中的价值研究[J]. 中国CT和MRI杂志, 2018, 16(10): 125-127.
[14]
葛权昌,冷梅娜,齐兴芹, 等. CT征象诊断腹部术后继发性腹内疝的价值[J]. 实用放射学杂志, 2019, 35(9): 1453-1456.
[15]
万明军,雷立章,翟采文, 等. CT在巨大切口疝患者疝修补术前渐进性气腹中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 113-115.
[16]
杨思阔,秦伟,戴勇. 多层螺旋CT三维重建技术在疝补片大小选择中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(2): 142-143.
[17]
来卫忠,李海学,张亚栋, 等. 腹股沟区疝的综合影像诊断分析[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2019, 19(18): 3111-3113.
[18]
王倩蒨,刘刚磊,周建平. 腹股沟疝的影像学检查应用研究进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2018, 25(12): 1429-1432.
[1] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[2] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[3] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[4] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[5] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[6] 于智慧, 赵建军. 后路腰方肌阻滞复合全身麻醉在腹股沟斜疝经腹腹膜前手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 734-739.
[7] 田静, 方秀春. 超声引导下横筋膜平面阻滞在儿童腹股沟疝手术的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 740-744.
[8] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[9] 王红艳, 马艳丽, 郑洁灿. 手术室综合护理在腹股沟疝手术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 755-758.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 王蕾, 王少华, 牛海珍, 尹腾飞. 儿童腹股沟疝围手术期风险预警干预[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 768-772.
[13] 朱青青, 卫贞祺. 腹股沟疝患者围手术期自我能效管理探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 773-777.
[14] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[15] 李芳, 许瑞, 李洋洋, 石秀全. 循证医学理念在儿童腹股沟疝患者中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 782-786.
阅读次数
全文


摘要