切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 651 -654. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.06.016

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

超声自动全容积扫查系统在腹股沟疝诊断价值研究
高立霓1,(), 刘秉彦1, 孙阳2   
  1. 1. 570311 海口,海南省人民医院超声科
    2. 300222 天津,南开大学附属医院
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-03 出版日期:2020-12-20
  • 通信作者: 高立霓

Value of ultrasound automatic full volume scanning system in diagnosis of inguinal hernia

Lini Gao1,(), Bingyan Liu1, Yang Sun2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hainan Provincial People's Hospital, Haikou 570311, China
    2. the Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University, Tianjin 300222, China
  • Received:2019-01-03 Published:2020-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Lini Gao
引用本文:

高立霓, 刘秉彦, 孙阳. 超声自动全容积扫查系统在腹股沟疝诊断价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 651-654.

Lini Gao, Bingyan Liu, Yang Sun. Value of ultrasound automatic full volume scanning system in diagnosis of inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 651-654.

目的

腹股沟疝应用超声自动全容积扫查系统(AVSS)诊断价值分析。

方法

选取2017年1月至2018年5月就诊于海南省人民医院100例疑似腹股沟疝患者的资料。按照患者使用的诊断设备不同,分为传统超声组(对照组)和AVSS组(研究组)。分析研究组疝口径、2组诊断准确率、疝各类型准确率及不同年资医师的诊断情况。采用SPSS 20.0统计学软件进行数据处理。

结果

对照组测量患者的平均疝口宽径为(14.85±5.95)mm、长径为(16.24±6.15)mm;研究组测量疝口宽径为(14.51±5.28)mm、长径为(16.18±6.63)mm,2组疝口径比较,差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组诊断准确率为92.00%,对照组诊断准确率为82.00%,研究组准确率比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组低年资医师对斜疝、直疝等各类型诊断准确率分别为92.86%、86.36%及91.00%等,比对照组80.00%、54.55%、71.00%高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组高年资医师各个类型的诊断准确率,差异有统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

腹股沟疝应用AVSS诊断的准确性较高,能清晰显示疝口内径及类型,其中低年资医师操作准确性高于常规超声检查,可结合实际优先选择AVSS,对腹股沟疝各类型诊治具有积极意义。

Objective

To analyze the diagnostic value of automatic ultrasonic full-volume scanning system for inguinal hernia.

Methods

The clinical data of 100 patients with inguinal hernia diagnosed and treated in Hainan provincial people's hospital from January 2017 to May 2018 were enrolled. The patients diagnosed by traditional ultrasound were set as the control group and those diagnosed by automatic ultrasound full-volume scanning system as the study group. The hernia width and length, diagnostic accuracy, diagnostic accuracy for various types of hernia, and accuracy of diagnosis by physicians of different seniorities were compared between the two groups.

Results

The width and length of hernia were (14.85±5.95) mm and (16.24±6.15) mm in the control group, and were (14.51±5.28) mm and (16.18±6.63) mm in the study group, respectively. And the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant (P>0.05). The diagnostic accuracy in the study group was 92.00%, higher than that in the control group, which was 82.00% (P<0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of various types of hernia such as indirect hernia and direct hernia, etc. in the study group was 95.71%, 86.36% and 91.00%, respectively, higher than the control group where the data were 80.00%, 54.55% and 71.00%, and the differences were statistically significant (P<0.05). The accuracy of diagnosis for different types of hernia made by physicians of different seniorities showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasonic automatic full-volume scanning system (AVSS) is accurate in diagnosis of inguinal hernia and can clearly show the size and type of hernia. The accuracy of diagnosis with automatic ultrasound full-volume automatic scanning system made by younger physicians is higher than that with conventional ultrasound. Therefore, based on the actual situations, automatic ultrasound full-volume scanning system should be prioritized since it is with positive significance for the diagnosis and treatment of various types of inguinal hernia.

表1 2组诊断准确性
表2 2组不同类型及年资诊断准确性的比较[n(%)]
[1]
刘沁,杨小红,陈欣林, 等. 产前超声联合磁共振成像在单纯性腹股沟斜疝临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(11): 878-883.
[2]
别世杰,夏瑞. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿腹股沟疝修补术中的效果[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 331-334.
[3]
Thomassen I, van Suijlekom JA, van de Gaag A, et al. Ultrasound-guided ilioinguinal/iliohypogastric nerve blocks for chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2013, 17(3): 329-332.
[4]
罗小玲,桂珩. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞技术对小儿腹股沟疝术后早期镇痛效果的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 339-342.
[5]
Inage K, Mizusawa H, Mimura YJ, et al. Patient with inguinal hernia containing the urinary bladder complicated by bladder stones[J]. IJU Case Rep, 2019, 2(5): 276-278.
[6]
Nassiri SJ. Contralateral exploration is not mandatory in unilateral inguinal hernia in children: a prospective 6-year study[J]. Pediatr Surg Int, 2002, 18(5-6): 470-471.
[7]
荆春丽,韩璐,刘彧, 等. 胎儿先天性膈疝产前超声筛查及妊娠结局分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(3): 186-192.
[8]
庄楠,李文波,朱庆莉, 等. 经腹肠道超声在克罗恩病术后复发及合并症中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(3): 232-236.
[9]
陈伟,陈娴,张俊. 超声引导下幼儿骶管麻醉在小儿疝手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(3): 221-225.
[10]
秦朗,赵福敏,陈娇, 等. 产前经腹胎儿超声诊断体外受精-胚胎移植胎儿鼻骨发育异常的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(4): 389-395.
[11]
Amato G, Romano G, Puleio R, et al. Neomyogenesis in 3D Dynamic Responsive Prosthesis for Inguinal Hernia Repair[J]. Artif Organs, 2018, 42(12): 1216-1223.
[12]
朱利君,俞玉龙,王钰, 等. 超声引导下腹直肌后鞘阻滞联合腹横肌阻滞对开腹结直肠癌术患者应激反应的影响[J]. 中华全科医学, 2019, 17(9): 1515-1517.
[13]
杨学林,张凯,杜颖, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞对老年腹股沟疝修补术患者术后疼痛的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 441-444.
[14]
张歌,闫静茹,巨艳, 等. 自动乳腺超声成像系统在乳腺癌筛查和诊断中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(11): 805-809.
[15]
王宁,王晓曼,贾立群, 等. 新生儿期膈疝的超声表现及诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(8): 583-586.
[16]
Matsuda A, Miyashita M, Matsumoto S, et al. Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair for strangulated inguinal hernia[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2018, 11(2): 155-159.
[17]
田航,李新宇,黄俊祥, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(3): 206-210.
[18]
林方才,孙欣,矫健, 等. 自动全容积乳腺超声成像和超声光散射对乳腺结节诊断的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(23): 7898-7899.
[19]
黄亮,罗文勇,吴华. 彩色多普勒超声评价儿童腹股沟疝腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术对睾丸血供的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(1): 21-23.
[20]
潘旭,何颖,黄月, 等. 自动乳腺全容积扫查系统与常规超声诊断乳腺肿瘤的价值比较[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2019, 16(1): 90-92.
[21]
韩若凌,纪晓惠,戴安, 等. 联合应用乳腺自动全容积扫查系统与传统手持超声检查法鉴别乳腺病灶良恶性的临床价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2014, 23(12): 1092-1093.
[22]
余方芳,倪贤伟,杨琰. 超声自动全容积扫查系统在腹股沟疝诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 35(1): 49-51.
[1] 奚玲, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 毛永欢, 沈晓菲, 杜峻峰, 刘晔. 基于肌少症构建的造口旁疝危险因素预测模型[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 48-51.
[2] 司钦亮, 毕世龙, 焦慧骁, 李世照, 陈哲禹, 武玉东. 精索去分化脂肪肉瘤两例并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 585-590.
[3] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
[4] 江志鹏, 钟克力, 陈双. 复杂腹壁疝手术后腹腔高压与腹腔间室综合征的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 612-615.
[5] 王学虎, 赵渝. 复杂腹壁疝手术中血管损伤并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 616-619.
[6] 曹能琦, 张恒, 郑立锋, 陶庆松, 嵇振岭. Ad-Hoc 自裁剪补片用于造口旁疝Sugarbaker 修补术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 620-623.
[7] 皮尔地瓦斯·麦麦提玉素甫, 李慧灵, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 李赞林, 王志, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 生物补片修补巨大复发性腹壁切口疝临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 624-628.
[8] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[9] 林凯, 潘勇, 赵高平, 杨春. 造口还纳术后切口疝的危险因素分析与预防策略[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 634-638.
[10] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[11] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[12] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[13] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[14] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[15] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
阅读次数
全文


摘要