切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06) : 598 -600. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.06.003

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

Lichtenstein手术治疗腹膜透析患者腹股沟疝的临床效果
叶静1, 黄永刚1,(), 郭自成1, 吴浩1, 张方捷1, 高国栋1, 王平1   
  1. 1. 310006 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-10-12 出版日期:2020-12-20
  • 通信作者: 黄永刚
  • 基金资助:
    杭州市医药卫生科技项目(OO20191031)

Clinical outcomes of Lichtenstein procedure on inguinal hernia in peritoneal dialysis patients

Jing Ye1, Yonggang Huang1,(), Zicheng Guo1, Hao Wu1, Fangjie Zhang1, Guodong Gao1, Ping Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • Received:2019-10-12 Published:2020-12-20
  • Corresponding author: Yonggang Huang
引用本文:

叶静, 黄永刚, 郭自成, 吴浩, 张方捷, 高国栋, 王平. Lichtenstein手术治疗腹膜透析患者腹股沟疝的临床效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 598-600.

Jing Ye, Yonggang Huang, Zicheng Guo, Hao Wu, Fangjie Zhang, Guodong Gao, Ping Wang. Clinical outcomes of Lichtenstein procedure on inguinal hernia in peritoneal dialysis patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(06): 598-600.

目的

探讨Lichtenstein手术治疗腹膜透析患者腹股沟疝患者的临床效果和经验。

方法

回顾性分析2014年6月至2018年6月浙江大学医学院附属杭州市第一人民医院集团收治并接受腹膜透析的患者腹股沟疝42例。其中男性27例(64.3%),女性15例(35.7%)。

结果

42例腹膜透析腹股沟患者中,平均年龄66.7±13.2岁,身体质量指数(19.73±3.34)kg/m2。平均腹透年数(2.27±1.65)年。42例患者均采用Lichtenstein手术行无张力修补,疝囊行完全剥离或高位结扎处理,单股不可吸收线固定补片。平均手术时间(47.6±13.2)min。术后12~24 h恢复半量或全量腹透。平均住院时间(5.2±2.1)d。有1例浅表切口感染和1例腹透管相关感染。无严重血清肿、肠梗阻、腹腔感染及补片感染等并发症。平均随访时间为(25.6±12.1)个月,随访期内未发现慢性疼痛和复发病例。

结论

Lichtenstein手术治疗腹膜透析患者腹股沟疝具有手术操作简洁,风险小,恢复快,并发症发生率低,不影响腹透治疗的持续性,是腹膜透析腹股疝患者的较理想的手术方式之一。

Objective

To investigate the clinical experiences and outcomes of Lichtenstein approach in inguinal hernia repair of peritoneal dialysis patients.

Methods

Retrospectively studied fourteen cases of peritoneal dialysis patients with inguinal hernias admitted to affiliated Hangzhou first people's hospital of Zhejiang university school of medicine from June 2014 to June 2018 Among the 42 cases of patients, there were 27 males (64.3%) and 15 females (35.7%). Clinical materials were collected and analyzed.

Results

Mean age was (66.7±13.2) years, BMI were (19.73±3.34) kg/m2. Mean length of peritoneal dialysis was (2.27±1.65) years. All patients underwent Lichtenstein repair. The hernia sac was completely dissected or highly ligated, and the mesh was fixed with monofilament non-absorbable suture. The average operation time was (47.6±13.2) minutes. Half or full peritoneal dialysis was resumed 12 to 24 hours postoperatively. The average length of hospital stay was (5.2±2.1) days. One case had superficial incision infection and one case had peritoneal dialysis related infection. There were no severe complications such as seroma, intestinal obstruction, abdominal infection, and mesh infection. The mean follow-up time were (25.6±12.1) months. No chronic pain or recurrence cases were recorded during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia in peritoneal dialysis patients has the advantages of simple to operate, quick recovery, low incidence of complications, and does not affect the persistence of peritoneal dialysis. It is an ideal operation for peritoneal dialysis patients with inguinal hernia.

[1]
Yang SF, Liu CJ, Yang WC, et al. The Risk Factors and the Impact of Hernia Development on Technique Survival in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients: A Population-Based Cohort Study[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2015, 35(3): 351-359.
[2]
Schneider CR, Cobb W, Patel S, et al. Elective surgery in patients with end stage renal disease: what's the risk?[J]. Am Surg. 2009, 75(9): 790-793.
[3]
García-Ureña MA, Rodríguez CR, Vega Ruiz V, et al. Prevalence and management of hernias in peritoneal dialysis patients[J]. Perit Dial Int, 2006, 26(2): 198-202.
[4]
Gajdos Cl, Hawn MT, Kile D, et al. Risk of majornonemergent inpatient general surgical procedures in patients on long-term dialysis[J]. JAMA Surg, 2013, 148(2): 137-143.
[5]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 244-246.
[6]
Tam, SF, Au JT, Chung PJ, et al. Is it time to rethink our management of dialysis patients undergoing elective ventral hernia repair? Analysis of the ACS NSQIP database[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 827-833.
[7]
张成,王志,牛伟亚, 等. 腹膜透析患者腹股沟疝修补术的围手术期处理[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(1): 17-19.
[8]
银东智,郑启昌. 腹膜透析治疗中合并腹壁疝的治疗经验[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(4): 941-942.
[9]
卞正乾,钟鸣,林爱武, 等. 腹膜透析患者合并腹壁疝的临床诊治体会[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2009, 14(4): 415-419.
[10]
钟克力,夏利刚,李涌泉, 等. 手术治疗腹膜透析并发腹股沟疝的对比分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(5): 336-338.
[1] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[2] 吴畏, 吴永哲, 李宗倍, 崔宏力, 李华志, 许臣. 轻质大网孔补片腹腔镜下疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的疗效及炎症因子的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-73.
[3] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[4] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[5] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[6] 孟飞龙, 华帅, 张莹, 路广海. 经脐单孔腹腔镜后鞘后入路在全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 658-660.
[7] 孔博, 张璟, 吕珂. 超声技术在复杂腹壁疝诊治中的作用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 670-673.
[8] 张起尧, 刘子文. 复杂腹壁疝的解剖和生物力学基础[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 674-676.
[9] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[10] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 缪骥, 王行舟, 沈晓菲, 喻春钊. 造口旁疝危险因素预测模型构建[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 682-687.
[11] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[12] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[13] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[14] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[15] 姜明, 罗锐, 龙成超. 闭孔疝的诊断与治疗:10年73例患者诊疗经验总结[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
阅读次数
全文


摘要