切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 257 -260. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.03.012

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

改良腹腔镜TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性
张清1,(), 张楠1, 区基文1, 郑小明1   
  1. 1. 526000 肇庆市第一人民医院普外三区
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-18 出版日期:2020-06-18
  • 通信作者: 张清

Effectiveness and safety of modified laparoscopic TEP and TAPP for inguinal hernia

Qing Zhang1,(), Nan Zhang1, Jiwen Qu1, Xiaoming Zheng1   

  1. 1. Third District of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing City 526000, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2019-12-18 Published:2020-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Qing Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Qing, Email:
引用本文:

张清, 张楠, 区基文, 郑小明. 改良腹腔镜TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 257-260.

Qing Zhang, Nan Zhang, Jiwen Qu, Xiaoming Zheng. Effectiveness and safety of modified laparoscopic TEP and TAPP for inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 257-260.

目的

探讨改良腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年1月,肇庆市第一人民医院行改良腹腔镜TEP术治疗的55例腹股沟疝患者作为改良TEP组,同时收集同期行TAPP术治疗的55例腹股沟疝患者作为TAPP组。观察并比较2组的手术指标、住院指标、术中情况以及并发症发生情况。

结果

改良TEP组患者的手术时间、恢复正常活动时间、住院时间均短于TAPP组,术中出血量、术后VAS评分、住院费用均低于TAPP组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者术中情况比较,其大出血、分破腹膜、分破疝囊、肠道损伤、损伤神经、损伤血管、游离腹壁下血管发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。改良TEP组近期及远期并发症发生率与TAPP组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TAPP,改良TEP治疗腹股沟疝,安全性良好,相较于TAPP,改良TEP可缩短手术时间,降低出血量,同时减轻术后疼痛,促进腹股沟疝患者术后恢复,降低住院费用,但其对术者要求较高,临床应根据实际情况进行选择。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic modified total extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Methods

55 patients with inguinal hernia treated by modified laparoscopic TEP in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively selected as the modified TEP group, and 55 patients with inguinal hernia treated by TAPP at the same time were collected as the TAPP group. The operative indexes, hospitalization indexes, intraoperative conditions and complications were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time, recovery time and hospitalization time of patients in the modified TEP group were shorter than those in the TAPP group, and the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score and hospitalization expenses were lower than those in the TAPP group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of massive hemorrhage, peritoneum, hernial sac, intestinal tract injury, nerve injury, blood vessel injury and free inferior epigastric vessel between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of short-term and long-term complications between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

TAPP and modified TEP have good safety in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Compared with TAPP, modified TEP can shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding, reduce postoperative pain, promote postoperative recovery of inguinal hernia patients, and reduce hospitalization expenses. However, it has higher requirements on the operator and should be selected according to the actual situation in clinic.

表1 2组腹股沟疝患者手术指标比较(±s
表2 2组腹股沟疝患者住院指标比较(±s
表3 2组腹股沟疝患者术中情况比较(例)
表4 2组腹股沟疝患者并发症比较(例)
[1]
Sun P, Pandian TK, Abdelsattar JM, et al. Reoperation for groin pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy: does it really work?[J]. AmJ Surg, 2016, 211(3): 637-643.
[2]
陈胜平,谷春伟. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中腹膜破裂对手术的影响及处理[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(12): 1767-1770.
[3]
Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Becerra AZ, et al. Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: A population-based analysis[J]. Surgery, 2017, 162(3): 628-639.
[4]
王毅,齐晟,梁平. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 525-528.
[5]
郑向欣,吴骥,顾书成, 等. 改良腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床应用价值[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(10): 741-745.
[6]
钟文毅,郭国城,吴演清. 改良处理远端疝囊预防巨大腹股沟斜疝术后并发症临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 203-206.
[7]
金哲敏,童伟民. 改良腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2015, 21(5): 513-516.
[8]
汤阳阳,黄世锋,谢德智, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术的对比研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 72-75.
[9]
吴劲风,胡抢,陈剑, 等. 腹腔镜探查联合Lichtenstein或经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(7): 531-534.
[10]
李胜君,祁燕红. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 207-210.
[11]
智永宏,李友全,李凤晓, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前和腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2018, 18(6): 951-953.
[12]
黄鹤光,杨媛媛. 腹股沟复发疝再手术的探讨[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1010-1014.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 马涛, 叶春伟, 刘滔, 彭文希, 李志鹏. 腹腔镜与开放性离断式肾盂成形术治疗小儿肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 605-610.
[11] 刘成, 赖聪, 黄健, 王建辰, 罗茜芸, 许可慰. EDGE SP1000单孔手术机器人辅助腹腔镜下猪输尿管部分切除联合端端吻合术的可行性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 642-646.
[12] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[13] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要