切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 257 -260. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.03.012

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

改良腹腔镜TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性
张清1,(), 张楠1, 区基文1, 郑小明1   
  1. 1. 526000 肇庆市第一人民医院普外三区
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-18 出版日期:2020-06-18
  • 通信作者: 张清

Effectiveness and safety of modified laparoscopic TEP and TAPP for inguinal hernia

Qing Zhang1,(), Nan Zhang1, Jiwen Qu1, Xiaoming Zheng1   

  1. 1. Third District of General Surgery, First People's Hospital of Zhaoqing, Zhaoqing City 526000, Guangdong Province, China
  • Received:2019-12-18 Published:2020-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Qing Zhang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhang Qing, Email:
引用本文:

张清, 张楠, 区基文, 郑小明. 改良腹腔镜TEP与TAPP治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 257-260.

Qing Zhang, Nan Zhang, Jiwen Qu, Xiaoming Zheng. Effectiveness and safety of modified laparoscopic TEP and TAPP for inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 257-260.

目的

探讨改良腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)和腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的有效性和安全性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2019年1月,肇庆市第一人民医院行改良腹腔镜TEP术治疗的55例腹股沟疝患者作为改良TEP组,同时收集同期行TAPP术治疗的55例腹股沟疝患者作为TAPP组。观察并比较2组的手术指标、住院指标、术中情况以及并发症发生情况。

结果

改良TEP组患者的手术时间、恢复正常活动时间、住院时间均短于TAPP组,术中出血量、术后VAS评分、住院费用均低于TAPP组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者术中情况比较,其大出血、分破腹膜、分破疝囊、肠道损伤、损伤神经、损伤血管、游离腹壁下血管发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。改良TEP组近期及远期并发症发生率与TAPP组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

TAPP,改良TEP治疗腹股沟疝,安全性良好,相较于TAPP,改良TEP可缩短手术时间,降低出血量,同时减轻术后疼痛,促进腹股沟疝患者术后恢复,降低住院费用,但其对术者要求较高,临床应根据实际情况进行选择。

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic modified total extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP) in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Methods

55 patients with inguinal hernia treated by modified laparoscopic TEP in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2019 were retrospectively selected as the modified TEP group, and 55 patients with inguinal hernia treated by TAPP at the same time were collected as the TAPP group. The operative indexes, hospitalization indexes, intraoperative conditions and complications were observed and compared between the two groups.

Results

The operation time, recovery time and hospitalization time of patients in the modified TEP group were shorter than those in the TAPP group, and the intraoperative blood loss, postoperative VAS score and hospitalization expenses were lower than those in the TAPP group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of massive hemorrhage, peritoneum, hernial sac, intestinal tract injury, nerve injury, blood vessel injury and free inferior epigastric vessel between the two groups (P>0.05). There was no statistical difference in the incidence of short-term and long-term complications between the two groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

TAPP and modified TEP have good safety in the treatment of inguinal hernia. Compared with TAPP, modified TEP can shorten the operation time, reduce the amount of bleeding, reduce postoperative pain, promote postoperative recovery of inguinal hernia patients, and reduce hospitalization expenses. However, it has higher requirements on the operator and should be selected according to the actual situation in clinic.

表1 2组腹股沟疝患者手术指标比较(±s
表2 2组腹股沟疝患者住院指标比较(±s
表3 2组腹股沟疝患者术中情况比较(例)
表4 2组腹股沟疝患者并发症比较(例)
[1]
Sun P, Pandian TK, Abdelsattar JM, et al. Reoperation for groin pain after inguinal herniorrhaphy: does it really work?[J]. AmJ Surg, 2016, 211(3): 637-643.
[2]
陈胜平,谷春伟. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中腹膜破裂对手术的影响及处理[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2015, 24(12): 1767-1770.
[3]
Aquina CT, Fleming FJ, Becerra AZ, et al. Explaining variation in ventral and inguinal hernia repair outcomes: A population-based analysis[J]. Surgery, 2017, 162(3): 628-639.
[4]
王毅,齐晟,梁平. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(6): 525-528.
[5]
郑向欣,吴骥,顾书成, 等. 改良腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床应用价值[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(10): 741-745.
[6]
钟文毅,郭国城,吴演清. 改良处理远端疝囊预防巨大腹股沟斜疝术后并发症临床研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(3): 203-206.
[7]
金哲敏,童伟民. 改良腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效[J]. 中国内镜杂志, 2015, 21(5): 513-516.
[8]
汤阳阳,黄世锋,谢德智, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术的对比研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 72-75.
[9]
吴劲风,胡抢,陈剑, 等. 腹腔镜探查联合Lichtenstein或经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床对比研究[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(7): 531-534.
[10]
李胜君,祁燕红. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与完全腹膜外疝修补术的疗效对比[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 207-210.
[11]
智永宏,李友全,李凤晓, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前和腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术的对比研究[J]. 中国药物与临床, 2018, 18(6): 951-953.
[12]
黄鹤光,杨媛媛. 腹股沟复发疝再手术的探讨[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2019, 18(11): 1010-1014.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?