切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 261 -264. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.03.013

所属专题: 文献

临床论著

改良Kugel修补术与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究
李益敏1,()   
  1. 1. 572928 海南省琼中县阳江医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-19 出版日期:2020-06-18
  • 通信作者: 李益敏

Analysis of modified Kugel repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia

Yimin Li1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Yangjiang Hospital, Qiongzhong 572928, China
  • Received:2019-02-19 Published:2020-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Yimin Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Yimin, Email:
引用本文:

李益敏. 改良Kugel修补术与Lichtenstein修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 261-264.

Yimin Li. Analysis of modified Kugel repair and Lichtenstein repair for inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 261-264.

目的

探讨改良腹膜前Kugel修补术与Lichtenstein无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床效果。

方法

选取2015年6月至2018年3月,海南省琼中县阳江医院收治的70例腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。按随机数法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组35例。对照组采用Lichtenstein修补术进行治疗,观察组采用改良Kugel修补术进行治疗。比较2组围手术期相关指标情况,对比2组术后1、3 d及1、6个月的疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS);统计2组术后并发症发生率以及随访复发率。

结果

观察组手术时间、术中出血量、术后首次下床时间及术后住院时间与对照组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1、3 d以及术后1个月,观察组VAS评分与对照组比较,差异均无统计意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,观察组VAS评分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症总发生率8.57%低于对照组28.57%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组无复发患者,对照组复发情况2例(5.71%),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

改良Kugel修补术治疗腹股沟疝患者,能够明显改善患者手术相关指标,并能缓解患者疼痛,降低其并发症发生率以及复发率。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of modified pre-peritoneal (Kugel) repair and Lichtenstein repair in the treatment of inguinal hernia.

Methods

A total of 70 patients with inguinal hernia admitted to Yangjiang hospital between June 2015 and March 2018 were selected. They were divided into the control group and the observation group by random number method, with 35 cases in each group. The control group was treated with Lichtenstein repair, and the observation group was treated with modified Kugel repair. The relevant indicators of the two groups during the perioperative period were compared; the score of visual analogue scale (VAS) in the two groups at 1, 3 days, 1, 6 months after operation were compared; the incidence of postoperative complications and the rate of recurrence in follow-up period between the two groups were counted.

Results

The operation time, the first time to leave bed, and the postoperative hospital stay were obviously shorter in the observation group than those in the control group. The intraoperative blood loss was obviously lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). At 6 months after operation, the score of VAS in the observation group was obviously lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The total incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was 8.57%, which was obviously lower than that of the control group 28.57% (P<0.05). The recurrence rate in the observation group was 0, which was lower than that in the control group was 5.71%, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Modified Kugel repair in patients with inguinal hernia can significantly improve the relevant indicators, relieve pain symptom, and reduce the incidence of complications and recurrence rate.

表1 2组腹股沟疝患者围手术期相关指标情况比较(±s
表2 2组腹股沟疝患者不同时间点疼痛视觉模拟评分比较(分,±s
表3 2组腹股沟疝患者术后并发症发生率比较
[1]
顾卯林,郭吕,朱景元, 等. 改良Kugel术与免固定TAPP治疗腹股沟疝疗效的回顾性对照研究[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2015, 22(6): 719-721.
[2]
马利兵,季学闻,邰沁文, 等. 颈肩技术在改良Kugel腹股沟疝修补术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(1): 13-14.
[3]
Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Bisgaard T, et al. Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22(3): 303-17.
[4]
周上军,周学鲁,占平, 等. 前入路腹膜前Kugel补片治疗无张力腹股沟疝修补术后复发疝[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1): 38-42.
[5]
杨家乐. 无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效研究[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2019, 26(15): 47-48.
[6]
黄永刚,王平. 腹股沟疝常用临床分型标准评价[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1292-1295.
[7]
成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(7): 704-706.
[8]
郑立. Lichtenstein与Modified Kugel修补术治疗腹股沟疝[J]. 郑州大学学报(医学版), 2015, 50(5): 700-702.
[9]
陈佳栋,孙颢,高友福, 等. 腹股沟疝治疗中改良Kugel修补术与Lichtenstein修补术的选择[J]. 中国现代手术学杂志, 2017, 21(3): 191-193.
[10]
Suther KR, Hopp E, Smevik B, et al. Can visual analogue scale be used in radiologic subjective image quality assessment[J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2018, 48(11): 1567-1575.
[11]
马翠红,安娜. 开放式腹膜前间隙腹股沟疝修补术的临床经验[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(3): 211-213.
[12]
马宁,施雪松,肖华, 等. 急诊腹股沟疝无张力修补术的应用体会[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 359-361.
[13]
王帅,吴向阳,顾银燕, 等. 下腹正中切口无张力腹股沟疝修补术的手术配合[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(4): 312-314.
[14]
柯恩明,杨传玉. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗斜疝Kugel术后复収幵膀胱滑动疝一例[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 477-479.
[15]
马学强,朱雄文,聂寒秋. 两种后入路腹膜前间隙修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床观察[J/CD]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2017, 11(2): 93-95.
[16]
杨家乐. 无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床疗效研究[J]. 首都食品与医药, 2019, 26(15): 47.
[17]
张卫东,俞远林,彭俊璐, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗成人复发性腹股沟疝[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2019, 19(1): 53-56.
[18]
任清付,何雪妮. 局麻下开放腹膜前复发性腹股沟疝修补术的临床疗效[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 4 47-449.
[19]
王曦滔,黄耿文,申鼎成, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术治疗老年复发性腹股沟疝39例分析[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2018, 38(8): 922-924.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 田文, 杨晓冬. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术式选择及注意事项[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 595-597.
[8] 李涛, 陈纲, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下右侧腹股沟斜疝修补术(TAPP)[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 598-598.
[9] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[10] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[11] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[12] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[13] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[14] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[15] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
阅读次数
全文


摘要