切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 243 -246. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2020.03.008

所属专题: 超声医学 文献

临床论著

超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞复合右美托咪定对老年腹股沟斜疝手术患者麻醉效果的影响
付越1,(), 刘俊艳2   
  1. 1. 061000 河北省沧州中西医结合医院麻醉二科
    2. 061000 河北省沧州中西医结合医院康复院区麻醉科
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-17 出版日期:2020-06-18
  • 通信作者: 付越

Effect of ultrasound guided transverse adbominis plane block combined with dexmedetomidine on anesthesia in elderly patients with inguinal hernia

Yue Fu1,(), Junyan Liu2   

  1. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM·Hebei, Cangzhou 061300, China
    2. Department of Anesthesia, Rehabilitation Hospital, Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM·Hebei, Cangzhou 061300, China
  • Received:2019-07-17 Published:2020-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Yue Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Yue, Email: 
引用本文:

付越, 刘俊艳. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞复合右美托咪定对老年腹股沟斜疝手术患者麻醉效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(03): 243-246.

Yue Fu, Junyan Liu. Effect of ultrasound guided transverse adbominis plane block combined with dexmedetomidine on anesthesia in elderly patients with inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2020, 14(03): 243-246.

目的

探讨超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞(TAPB)复合右美托咪定(DEX)对老年腹股沟斜疝手术患者麻醉效果的影响。

方法

选取2017年3月至2018年9月河北省沧州中西医结合医院收治的44例老年腹股沟斜疝手术患者,采用随机数字表法将其分为对照组(22例)和观察组(22例),2组均行平片无张力疝修补术,其中对照组术中给予局部浸润麻醉,观察组术中给予TAPB复合DEX麻醉。比较2组麻醉效果及麻醉起效、持续时间;对比2组麻醉后2 h的神经阻滞、镇痛及镇静评分;统计2组治疗期间的不良反应发率。

结果

观察组总有效率为95.45%,高于对照组的77.27%(P<0.05)。观察组感觉神经阻滞、运动神经阻滞起效时间均短于对照组,维持时间均长于对照组(P<0.05)。麻醉后2 h,2组Bromage、Ramsay评分比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);观察组Prince-Henry评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为9.09%,低于对照组的36.36%(P<0.05)。

结论

TAPB复合DEX对老年腹股沟斜疝手术患者镇痛作用较好,可提高其麻醉效果,且具有较高安全性。

Objective

To investigate the effects of ultrasound-guided transverse abdominis plane block (TAPB) combined with dexmedetomidine (DEX) on anesthetic in elderly patients with inguinal hernia.

Methods

A total of 44 elderly patients with indirect inguinal hernia treated in Cangzhou Hospital of Integrated TCM-WM between March 2017 and September 2018 were selected as the research subjects. Random number table method was used to divide them into the control group (n=22) and the observation group (n=22). Tension-free hernia repair was performed in both groups, the control group was given local infiltration anesthesia in surgery, and the observation group was given anesthesia with TAPB and DEX. The anesthesia effects onset time and duration of anesthesia in the two groups were compared. The scores of the nerve block, analgesia and sedation at 2 hours after anesthesia in both groups were compared. The incidence of adverse reactions during the two groups were counted.

Results

The total satisfaction rate of anesthesia effect in the observation group was 95.45%, which was higher than 77.27% in the control group (P<0.05). The onset time of sensory nerve block and motor nerve block in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group, and their durations were longer than those in the control group (P<0.05). At 2 hours after anesthesia, the scores of Bromage and Ramsay in the two groups were not statistically different (P>0.05); the score of Prince-Henry in the observation group was lower than that in the control group (P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation group was 9.09%, which was lower than the 36.36% in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

TAPB combined with DEX has good analgesic effects on elderly patients in inguinal hernia surgery, can improve the effect of anesthesia, and has high safety.

表1 2组老年腹股沟疝患者麻醉效果比较[例(%)]
表2 2组老年腹股沟疝患者麻醉起效时间及维持时间比较(min,±s
表3 2组老年腹股沟疝患者麻醉后Bromage、Ramsay、Prince-Henry评分比较(分,±s
表4 2组老年腹股沟疝患者不良反应发生情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
梁峰,李飞,聂双发, 等. 平片无张力疝修补术对老年腹股沟斜疝患者术后疼痛程度及康复进程的影响[J]. 河北医学, 2018, 24(9): 1448-1451.
[2]
Wakasugi M, Tei M, Anno K, et al. Single-incision totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair is safe and feasible in elderly patients: a single-center experience of 365 procedures[J]. Asian J Endosc Surg, 2016, 9(4): 281-284.
[3]
Burcharth J, Pommergaard HC, Bisgaard T, et al. Patient-related risk factors for recurrence after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies[J]. Surg Innov, 2015, 22(3): 303-317.
[4]
曹廷宝,杜雪龙,于建平, 等. 局麻下行李金斯坦疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效观察[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(6): 425-427.
[5]
肖甄男,商丽华,龙波. 超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞复合右美托咪定在老年患者腹股沟疝修补术术中及术后的镇痛效果[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2018, 47(6): 507-512.
[6]
李秋萍,韩斌如. 衰弱评估联合麻醉分级对老年患者术后并发症的预测研究[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2019, 54(5): 645-648.
[7]
李亮. 实用腹股沟疝外科学[M]. 西安: 世界图书出版西安有限公司, 2014: 145-146.
[8]
王鹏飞. 老年腹股沟斜疝无张力疝修补术的临床体会[J]. 中国现代药物应用, 2015, 9(17): 50-52.
[9]
Jacob DA, Hackl JA, Bittner R, et al. Perioperative outcome of unilateral versus bilateral inguinal hernia repairs in TAPP technique: analysis of 15, 176 cases from the Herniamed Registry[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(12): 3733-3740.
[10]
欧玉清. 不同麻醉方式应用于腹股沟疝无张力修补术的效果分析[J]. 实用医院临床杂志, 2015, 12(6): 82-83.
[11]
谷佃宝,张健,丁元霞, 等. 局部麻醉下网塞加平片修补术治疗成人股疝效果观察[J]. 现代中西医结合杂志, 2014, 23(36): 4033-4034.
[12]
吴建魏,彭菊香,何强, 等. 超声引导下局麻药复合右美托咪定腹横肌平面阻滞在妇科开腹手术患者中的应用效果[J]. 中国医药导报, 2017, 14(34): 62-65.
[13]
李宏武,张德巍,陈静, 等. 局部麻醉下无张力疝修补术治疗中老年腹股沟疝的体会[J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2015, 18(1): 53-54.
[14]
杨宁,左明章,孟小燕, 等. 超声引导下髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞联合局部浸润麻醉在老年患者腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2017, 45(3): 48-51.
[15]
金秋艳,田秋阁,刘亚宁, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞麻醉对腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术患者血清Tau蛋白、Aβ-42表达的影响[J]. 广西医科大学学报, 2018, 35(12): 1663-1666.
[16]
杨新平,李嵩山,廖长剑, 等. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞和髂腹股沟/髂腹下神经阻滞应用于腹股沟疝修补术镇痛效果比较[J]. 安徽医学, 2016, 37(7): 815-818.
[17]
林兰英,林献忠,林财珠, 等. 右美托咪定辅助超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞在老年患者腹股沟斜疝修补术中的应用[J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2016, 50(5): 325-329.
[18]
钱丽萍,陈俊杰,曹苏. 超声引导下腹横肌平面阻滞在患儿腹腔镜下腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2016, 32(3): 248-250.
[1] 许亚龙, 巩栋, 陈晓涛. 超前镇痛在全膝关节置换术中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 517-523.
[2] 代莉, 郭华静, 邓恢伟. 镇痛-伤害性刺激指数指导下无阿片类药物麻醉对腔镜下甲状腺手术患者术后恢复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 282-286.
[3] 杨小栎, 李万富, 马柱, 马兰, 郑义, 付晓丽, 王晶. 钳式针一步法在小儿腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术中的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 535-538.
[4] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[5] 袁志静, 黄杰, 何国安, 方辉强. 罗哌卡因联合右美托咪定局部阻滞麻醉在老年腹腔镜下无张力疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 557-561.
[6] 张锋, 孙孟奇, 方秀春. 静注右美托咪定、利多卡因对腹腔镜疝修补术患者围手术期心率、麻醉苏醒质量的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 562-565.
[7] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[8] 赵静. 高频超声对腹股沟斜疝的诊断价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 575-578.
[9] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[10] 韦雅丽, 范利杰. 术前右美托咪定滴鼻在腹股沟斜疝患儿腹腔镜下疝囊高位结扎术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 446-450.
[11] 张骞, 唐伟, 刘丽丽. 右美托咪定复合羟考酮对老年经皮椎间孔镜腰椎间盘切除术患者术后认知功能、镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 209-214.
[12] 唐韵, 杨小博, 余愿, 舒化青, 尚游. 苯磺酸瑞马唑仑的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 389-393.
[13] 苗明月, 周建新. 肺保护性镇静:应重视呼吸驱动和吸气努力的床旁评估[J/OL]. 中华重症医学电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 325-328.
[14] 张平骥, 徐钰, 李天水, 庞文翼, 符师宁, 张梦圆. 重症患者镇静治疗现状及期望的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 562-567.
[15] 王文珠, 刘建, 袁常秀, 石亚飞, 尤培军. 竖脊肌平面阻滞对非体外循环冠状动脉旁路移植术中阿片类药物用量的影响[J/OL]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 155-159.
阅读次数
全文


摘要