切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 357 -360. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2019.04.019

所属专题: 文献

论著

加速康复外科在小儿腹股沟疝的应用价值
周广林1, 江维1,()   
  1. 1. 518000 广东省,深圳市龙岗区妇幼保健院外科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-24 出版日期:2019-08-18
  • 通信作者: 江维

Application value of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in children with inguinal hernia

Guanglin Zhou1, Wei Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Surgery, Longgang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2019-01-24 Published:2019-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Wei Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Wei, email:
引用本文:

周广林, 江维. 加速康复外科在小儿腹股沟疝的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(04): 357-360.

Guanglin Zhou, Wei Jiang. Application value of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in children with inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2019, 13(04): 357-360.

目的

探讨加速康复外科(ERAS)在小儿腹股沟疝治疗中的安全性、可行性和时效性。

方法

回顾性分析2017年1月至2018年6月,深圳市龙区妇幼保健院开展的腹股沟疝腔镜手术患儿86例,按照治疗方案的不同分为2组。其中腹腔镜常规治疗组46例,ERAS组40例。记录所有患儿术中及术后情况,比较2组的手术时间、切口长度、出血量、皮下气肿发生率、麻醉复苏时间、住院时间、并发症发生率和复发率等情况。

结果

常规腹腔镜组和ERAS组在手术时间、切口长度、出血量和皮下气肿发生率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);ERAS组的手术切口选择在脐周的皮肤褶皱里,患儿及家属的满意度较常规腹腔镜组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组在术后麻醉复苏时间和住院时间方面比较,差异有统计学意义(P均<0.05),在并发症发生率和复发率方面比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。

结论

ERAS在小儿腹股沟疝这一单病种中具有安全性高、可行性高、麻醉复苏时间短、住院时间短及患儿家属满意度高的优点,值得临床推广。

Objective

To explore the safety, feasibility and timeliness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in the treatment of children with inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of 86 children with inguinal hernia who underwent laparoscopic operation from January 2017 to June 2018 in Longgang District Maternal and Child Health Hospital, including 46 patients in the laparoscopic routine treatment group and 40 patients in the ERAS group. All patients were recorded during and after surgery. The operation time, length of incision, amount of bleeding, incidence of subcutaneous emphysema, time of anesthesia recovery, hospital time, rate of complications and recurrence were compared between the two groups.

Results

In the two group, there was no statistically significant difference in the operation time, length of incision, amount of bleeding and incidence of subcutaneous emphysema (P>0.05). The surgical incision in the REAS group was selected in the skin folds of the umbilical cord, and the satisfaction of children and children's families was higher than that of laparoscopic routine treatment group. There was a statistically significant difference in satisfaction, postoperative anesthesia recovery time and hospital time (P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of complications and the number of recurrence cases (P>0.05).

Conclusion

ERAS has the advantages of high safety, high feasibility, short anesthesia resuscitation time, short hospital stay and high satisfaction of children's families in the single disease of inguinal hernia in children, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

表1 2组患儿术中情况比较
表2 2组患儿术后情况比较
[1]
Saha M. Laparoscopic extracorporeal ligation of the internal inguinal ring by a spinal needle: a simple method of hernia repair in children[J]. Indian J Surg, 2016, 78(2): 85-89.
[2]
Lukong CS. Surgical techniques of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in childhood: a critical appraisal[J]. J Surg Techn Case Report, 2012, 4(1): 1-5.
[3]
Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, et al. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation[J]. Lancet, 1995, 345(8952): 763-764.
[4]
Kalogera E, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery pathway in gynecologic surgery: improving outcomes through evidence-based medicine[J]. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, 2016, 43(3): 551-573.
[5]
Ljungqvist O. ERAS-enhanced recovery after surgery: moving evidence-based perioperative care to practice[J]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2014, 38(5): 559-566.
[6]
Yang R, Tao W, Chen YY, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional perioperative care in laparoscopic hepatectomy: a meta-analysis[J]. Int Surg, 2016, 36(Pt A): 274-282.
[7]
Lau CS, Chamberlain RS. Enhanced recovery after surgery programs improve patient outcomes and recovery: a meta-analysis[J]. World J Surg 2017, 41(4): 899-913.
[8]
Mosquera C, Koutlas NJ, Fitzgerald TL. A single surgeon’s experience with enhanced recovery after surgery: an army of one[J]. Am Surg 2016, 82(7): 594-601.
[9]
郭慧. 经脐双孔法腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟斜病的临床效果[J]. 当代医学, 2016, 22(2I): 56-57.
[10]
Shalaby R, Ismaii M, Samaha A, et al. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair; experience with 874 children[J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2014, 49(3): 460-464.
[11]
刘永强, 吕时来, 奥妮, 等. 腹腔镜疝囊高位结扎术治疗儿童腹股沟斜病237例[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(1): 65-68.
[12]
向东洲, 卢宗耀, 工康太, 等. 经脐单手单孔腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟斜病14例体会[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2016, 23(5): 601-603.
[1] 陶宏宇, 叶菁菁, 俞劲, 杨秀珍, 钱晶晶, 徐彬, 徐玮泽, 舒强. 右心声学造影在儿童右向左分流相关疾病中的评估价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 959-965.
[2] 刘琴, 刘瀚旻, 谢亮. 基质金属蛋白酶在儿童哮喘发生机制中作用的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 564-568.
[3] 向韵, 卢游, 杨凡. 全氟及多氟烷基化合物暴露与儿童肥胖症相关性研究现状[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 569-574.
[4] 李月平, 李科, 乔禹铭, 钟美浓. 前列腺热蒸汽消融术医护康一体化快速康复模式初探[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 464-472.
[5] 马东扬, 李斌, 陆安清, 王光华, 雷文章, 宋应寒. Gilbert 与单层补片腹膜前疝修补术疗效的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 629-633.
[6] 周正阳, 陈凯, 仇多良, 邵乐宁, 吴浩荣, 钟丰云. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后出血原因分析及处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 660-664.
[7] 顾熙, 徐子宇, 周澍, 张吴楼, 张业鹏, 林昊, 刘宗航, 嵇振岭, 郑立锋. 腹股沟疝腹膜前间隙无张力修补术后补片感染10 例报道[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 665-669.
[8] 宋俊锋, 张珍珍. 单侧初发性腹股沟斜疝老年患者经腹腹膜前疝修补术中残余疝囊腹直肌下缘固定效果评估[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 670-674.
[9] 高娟, 徐建庆, 闫芳, 丁盛华, 刘霞. Rutkow、TAPP、TEP 手术治疗单侧腹股沟疝患者的临床疗效及对血清炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 675-680.
[10] 于新峰, 曾琦, 后强, 徐浩, 操谢芳. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术和腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术对成人腹股沟疝治疗效果及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 681-686.
[11] 方辉强, 黄杰, 随冰琰. 腰方肌阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞对腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术患者术后镇痛效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 697-702.
[12] 张晋伟, 董永红, 王家璇. 基于GBD2021 数据库对中国与全球老年人疝疾病负担和健康不平等的分析比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 708-716.
[13] 中华医学会器官移植学分会, 中华医学会外科学分会外科手术学学组, 中华医学会外科学分会移植学组, 华南劈离式肝移植联盟. 劈离式供肝儿童肝移植中国临床操作指南[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 593-601.
[14] 刘军, 丘文静, 孙方昊, 李松盈, 易述红, 傅斌生, 杨扬, 罗慧. 在体与离体劈离式肝移植在儿童肝移植中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 688-693.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?