Sutureless technology in the tension-free hernia repair

doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.03.018

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective

To explore the effect of sutureless technology in the tension-free hernia repair.

Method

A total of 232 patients with inguinal hernia who underwent surgical treatment in Qinhuangdao Changli County People's Hospital was selected. They were randomly divided into observation group and traditional group, and 116 cases in each group of. All patients underwent tension-free hernioplasty. Sutureless technology was used in observation group, and the traditional group applied with the traditional practice of silk suture fixation. The clinical efficacy of the two groups was compared.

Results

The operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative complications and postoperative pain were significantly lower in the observation group than those in the conventional group. The differences between groups were statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion

The application of sutureless technology in tension-free hernia repair can achieve satisfactory clinical efficacy, it is worthy of clinical application.

Key words: Hernia, inguinal, Herniorrhaphy

Xinbo Zhang, Fuming Shi, Fang Zhao, Shifeng Zhang, Wujun Han. Sutureless technology in the tension-free hernia repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2018, 12(03): 229-231.

/ / Recommend

Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

URL: https://zhshfbwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2018.03.018

https://zhshfbwkzz.cma-cmc.com.cn/EN/Y2018/V12/I03/229

Figures/Tables 2

References 15

[1]	王敏，李慧，梁兴国. 局部麻醉下行无张力疝修补术142例护理体会[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(2): 769-772.
[2]	王宪. 腹股沟无张力疝修补术后感染的预防及护理方法研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2): 144-145.
[3]	陈孝平，汪建平. 外科学[M]. 8版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2013: 322-329.
[4]	刘丽娜. 老年无张力疝修补术患者临床护理观察[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7, (3): 294-295.
[5]	余润华. 无张力疝修补术后并发症预防及处理体会[J]. 当代医学, 2016, 21(4): 23-34.
[6]	中华医学会外科学分会疝和腹壁外科学组. 成人腹股沟疝、股疝手术治疗方案(修订稿)[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2004, 19(2): 126.
[7]	丁伟. 局麻下无张力疝修补术42例[J]. 河南外科学杂志, 2008, 14(5): 66-67.
[8]	王栓铎，姚毅明，刘国正. 可吸收缝线在经腹腹膜前疝修补术中的应用[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(2): 123-124.
[9]	游伟，姜彪，邓修健. 不同手术治疗方案对成人腹股沟疝的治疗效果分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 54-56.
[10]	马颂章. 疝和腹壁外科的现状与进展[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2003, 10(1): 1-2.
[11]	周琼，毕艳. 不同麻醉方式在腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的疗效分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 39-42.
[12]	李占武，杨国志，王利. 成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术后切口感染分析[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(5): 464-466.
[13]	李非，孙长怡. 普通外科和急诊外科的核心问题[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2009: 21-30.
[14]	杨承祥，王汉兵，闫哲，等. 麻醉与舒适医疗[M]. 北京: 北京大学医学出版社, 2011: 21.
[15]	邸宣，邱爽，李奎宝, 等. 成人腹股沟疝修补术后镇痛治疗方案研究[J/CD]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2016, 10(1): 29-33.

组别	例数	年龄(岁,±s)	女性[例(%)]	病情[例(%)]			病程(个月)
组别	例数	年龄(岁,±s)	女性[例(%)]	斜疝	直疝	双侧疝	病程(个月)
观察组	116	42.18±12.16	23(19.8)	99(85.3)	11(9.5)	6(5.2)	9(2~23)
对照组	116	42.72±12.26	21(18.1)	99(85.3)	12(10.3)	5(4.3)	9.8(2~23)
P值	?	0.993	0.867	0.935			0.590

组别	例数	年龄(岁,±s)	女性[例(%)]	病情[例(%)]			病程(个月)
组别	例数	年龄(岁,±s)	女性[例(%)]	斜疝	直疝	双侧疝	病程(个月)
观察组	116	42.18±12.16	23(19.8)	99(85.3)	11(9.5)	6(5.2)	9(2~23)
对照组	116	42.72±12.26	21(18.1)	99(85.3)	12(10.3)	5(4.3)	9.8(2~23)
P值	?	0.993	0.867	0.935			0.590

组别	例数	平均手术时间(min)	平均住院时间(d)	丝线反应[例(%)]	术后疼痛(>1周)[例(%)]	复发[例(%)]
观察组	116	33(32~42)	3(3~4)	3(2.6)	4(3.4)	0
对照组	116	59(54~65)	6.5(6~8)	13(11.2)	32(27.6)	0
P值	?	<0.001	<0.001	0.017	<0.001	-

组别	例数	平均手术时间(min)	平均住院时间(d)	丝线反应[例(%)]	术后疼痛(>1周)[例(%)]	复发[例(%)]
观察组	116	33(32~42)	3(3~4)	3(2.6)	4(3.4)	0
对照组	116	59(54~65)	6.5(6~8)	13(11.2)	32(27.6)	0
P值	?	<0.001	<0.001	0.017	<0.001	-

Please choose a citation manager

Content to export