切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (05) : 495 -500. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2026.05.003

论著

腹膜前间隙补片放置联合Lap-re-Do术式治疗造口旁疝
沙贺, 李俊廷, 杨世炜, 周佳其, 梁贺, 雷文章, 宋应寒, 王永†()   
  1. 610044 成都,四川大学华西医院胃肠外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-12-31 出版日期:2026-10-18
  • 通信作者: 王永
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划诊疗装备与生物医用材料重点专项项目(2022YFC2409801); 四川大学华西医院医疗新技术、新项目/四川大学华西医院学科卓越发展1·3·5工程项目(20HXJS009)

Preperitoneal mesh placement combined with Lap-re-Do technique for parastomal hernia repair

Ali Shahid, Junting Li, Shiwei Yang, Jiaqi Zhou, He Liang, Wenzhang Lei, Yinghan Song, Yong Wang†()   

  1. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610044, China
  • Received:2025-12-31 Published:2026-10-18
  • Corresponding author: Yong Wang
引用本文:

沙贺, 李俊廷, 杨世炜, 周佳其, 梁贺, 雷文章, 宋应寒, 王永. 腹膜前间隙补片放置联合Lap-re-Do术式治疗造口旁疝[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 495-500.

Ali Shahid, Junting Li, Shiwei Yang, Jiaqi Zhou, He Liang, Wenzhang Lei, Yinghan Song, Yong Wang. Preperitoneal mesh placement combined with Lap-re-Do technique for parastomal hernia repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2026, 20(05): 495-500.

目的

分析在腹膜前间隙放置补片修复并加强腹壁的同时联合Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker或Keyhole术式重建造口的可行性及治疗效果。

方法

本研究采用回顾性描述性研究方法。回顾性分析2020年7月至2022年7月,四川大学华西医院采用Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker或Keyhole术式,行造口旁疝无张力修补术联合腹膜前间隙补片修复的8例患者的临床资料。纳入患者均合并腹腔污染、造口质量不佳、腹腔粘连等情况。对患者一般资料、手术情况、住院时长等进行分析,并随访记录患者术后并发症情况。

结果

所有患者均顺利完成目标手术,手术时间162~620 min,平均为(454.63±113.38)min;中位疝囊大小(长×宽)为8.38(5.00,10.00)cm×7.63(4.00,8.50)cm;疝环直径7~15 cm,平均(9.50±2.88)cm;术后住院时长7~41 d,平均(18.25±9.06)d。术后随访2年,所有患者均未见造口旁疝复发。仅1例(1/8)患者因切口局部感染再次入院,经负压吸引、抗感染等对症治疗20 d后治愈出院。

结论

制定严格纳入标准,对于接受造口旁疝无张力修补术合并腹腔污染、造口质量不佳、腹腔粘连等的高危人群,选择在腹膜前间隙放置补片安全且有效,在加强腹壁强度的同时可能会减少患者术后感染、腹腔粘连等并发症的发生。

Objective

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of preperitoneal mesh reinforcement combined with the Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker or Keyhole technique for parastomal hernia repair and stoma reconstruction.

Methods

This was a retrospective descriptive study. A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 8 patients who underwent tension-free parastomal hernia repair with preperitoneal mesh placement and Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker/Keyhole at West China Hospital, Sichuan University between July 2020 and July 2022. All enrolled patients had concurrent conditions including intra-abdominal contamination, poor stoma construction, and intra-abdominal adhesions. Patient demographics, operative details, and length of hospital stay were analyzed, and postoperative complications were recorded during follow-up.

Results

All patients successfully completed the planned procedure. Operative time ranged from 162 to 620 minutes, with a mean of (454.63±113.38) minutes; Median hernia sac size (length×width) was 8.38 (5.00, 10.00) cm×7.63 (4.00, 8.50) cm; Hernial ring diameter: 7-15 cm (mean 9.50±2.88 cm); Postoperative hospitalization: 7-41 days (mean 18.25±9.06 days). During the 2-year follow-up, no parastomal hernia recurrence was observed. One patient (1/8) required readmission for localized wound infection, which resolved after 20 days of negative-pressure wound therapy and anti-infection treatments.

Conclusion

With strict inclusion criteria, for high-risk patients undergoing tension-free parastomal hernia repair with concomitant abdominal cavity contamination, poor stoma quality, or intra-abdominal adhesions, mesh placement in the preperitoneal space is safe and effective. It can reinforce abdominal wall strength, and may potentially reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications such as infection and intra-abdominal adhesions.

图1 CT断层扫描下可见造口旁疝形成
图2 造口旁疝合并降结肠肿瘤患者手术情况 2A术前外观;2B术中腹腔镜下病变肠段;2C术中病变肠段标本;2D术中补片放置在腹膜前间隙后;2E重建造口后腹腔内情况;2F术后外观
表1 8例造口旁疝患者的临床数据及手术特征
[1]
Mäkäräinen E, Rautio T, Rintala J, et al. Incidence of parastomal and incisional hernia following emergency surgery for hinchey Ⅲ-Ⅳ diverticulitis: A systematic review[J]. Scand J Surg, 2022, 111(2): 14574969221107276.
[2]
Kritharides N, Papaconstantinou D, Kykalos S, et al. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair: keyhole, Sugarbaker, sandwich, or hybrid technique with 3D mesh? An updated systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2023, 408(1): 448.
[3]
Rendell VR, Pauli EM. Parastomal hernia repair[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 2023, 103(5): 993-1010.
[4]
Chan KY, Raftery N, Abdelhafiz T, et al. Parastomal hernia repairs: A nationwide cohort study in the Republic of Ireland[J]. Surgeon, 2024, 22(2): 92-98.
[5]
Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European hernia society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias [J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 183-198.
[6]
Yang X, He K, Hua R, et al. Laparoscopic repair of parastomal hernia[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2017, 5(3): 45.
[7]
Styliński R, Alzubedi A, Rudzki S. Parastomal hernia - current knowledge and treatment[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2018, 13(1): 1-8.
[8]
Denti FC, Brambilla D, De Luca G, et al. Parastomal hernia: An overview[J]. Br J Nurs, 2023, 32(16): S22-S30.
[9]
马海涛, 朱晓峰, 王莹, 等. 一种筋膜锁定环形连续缝合造口技术预防造口旁疝的应用效果[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2025, 28(4): 408-411.
[10]
Frigault J, Lemieux S, Breton D, et al. Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention: A retrospective cohort study of permanent colostomies and ileostomies[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(2): 495-506.
[11]
Maskal SM, Ellis RC, Fafaj A, et al. Open retromuscular Sugarbaker vs Keyhole mesh placement for parastomal hernia repair: A randomized clinical trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2024, 159(9): 982-989.
[12]
Maskal SM, Thomas JD, Miller BT, et al. Open retromuscular Keyhole compared with Sugarbaker mesh for parastomal hernia repair: Early results of a randomized clinical trial[J]. Surgery, 2024, 175(3): 813-821.
[13]
Bloemendaal ALA. Robotic retromuscular(recurrent) parastomal hernia repair(r-Pauli-Repair) with synthetically reinforced biological mesh; technique, early experience, and short-term follow-up[J]. J Abdom Wall Surg, 2023, 2: 12059.
[14]
Hinojosa-Gonzalez DE, Saffati G, Kronstedt S, et al. Use of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia formation: A systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis[J]. Hernia, 2024, 29(1): 22.
[15]
吴昊, 任振, 刘虎, 等. 预防性补片置入对肠造口术后造口旁疝的预防效果及安全性Meta分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2026, 25(5): 692-699.
[16]
Frigault J, Lemieux S, Breton D, et al. Prophylactic retromuscular mesh placement for parastomal hernia prevention: A retrospective cohort study of permanent colostomies and ileostomies[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(2): 495-506.
[17]
Kosuge M, Ohkuma M, Koyama M, et al. Evaluation of the outcome of local surgery for stomal prolapse[J]. J Clin Med, 2021, 10(22): 5438.
[18]
Maskal SM, Ellis RC, Miller BT. Parastomal hernia repair, trying to optimize the impossible reconstruction[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(3): 931-936.
[19]
Fu YY, Ma Y, Zhang CK, et al. The clinical applications of D-type parastomal hernia repair surgery[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(2): 427-434.
[20]
杜晨阳, 王勇, 罗文, 等. 造口旁疝修补术后复发的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2023, 38(10): 772-775.
[21]
李绍春, 唐健雄, 顾岩, 等. 腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术和开放Sublay修补术治疗造口部位切口疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2026, 25(5): 666-670.
[22]
刘杰, 张军, 李洪涛, 等. 腹腔镜辅助下完全腹膜外结肠造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补1例报告[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2024, 29(8): 637-640.
[23]
Szczepkowski M, Skoneczny P, Przywózka A, et al. New minimally invasive technique of parastomal hernia repair - methods and review[J]. Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne, 2015, 10(1): 1-7.
[24]
Sarno G, Iacone B, Tedesco A, et al. End-colostomy parastomal hernia repair: A systematic review on laparoscopic and robotic approaches[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(3): 723-743.
[25]
Djebbara-Bozo N, Zinther NB, Søgaard A, et al. Outcomes after surgical repair of primary parastomal hernia[J]. Hernia, 2025, 29(1): 72.
[26]
Tivenius M, Näsvall P, Sandblom G. Parastomal hernias causing symptoms or requiring surgical repair after colorectal cancer surgery-a national population-based cohort study[J]. Int J Colorectal Dis, 2019, 34(7): 1267-1272.
[27]
Asif A, Ruiz M, Yetasook A, et al. Laparoscopic modified Sugarbaker technique results in superior recurrence rate[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 26(12): 3430-3434.
[28]
Gillern S, Bleier JI. Parastomal hernia repair and reinforcement: the role of biologic and synthetic materials[J]. Clin Colon Rectal Surg, 2014, 27(4): 162-171.
[29]
Köhler G, Fischer I, Wundsam H. A novel technique for parastomal hernia repair combining a laparoscopic and ostomy-opening approach[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2018, 28(2): 209-214.
[30]
Fu X, Li M, Hua R, et al. Lap-re-Do Keyhole versus Lap-re-Do Sugarbaker techniques in large parastomal hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2024, 28(5): 1945-1950.
[31]
Shi H, Wang R, Dong W, et al. Synthetic versus biological mesh in ventral hernia repair and abdominal wall reconstruction: a systematic review and recommendations from evidence-based medicine[J]. World J Surg, 2023, 47(10): 2416-2424.
[32]
Nishiguchi A, Ito S, Nagasaka K, et al. Tissue-adhesive decellularized extracellular matrix patches reinforced by a supramolecular gelator to repair abdominal wall defects[J]. Biomacromolecules, 2023, 24(4): 1545-1554.
[33]
Burger JW, Halm JA, Wijsmuller AR, et al. Evaluation of new prosthetic meshes for ventral hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(8): 1320-1325.
[34]
江志鹏, 侯泽辉, 甘文昌, 等. 生物补片在合并造口旁疝的肠造口还纳术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 342-345.
[35]
李绍杰, 胡星辰, 黄磊, 等. 单中心造口旁疝10年诊治经验(附220例报告)[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2016, 21(2): 121-125.
[36]
陈浩, 姚琪远. 造口旁疝的修补方式与预防[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(5): 407-410.
[1] 徐一航, 彭丽婷, 林嘉谊, 曹清华, 汪跃锋, 陈丽丽, 廖冰. 结构化病理报告对肝细胞癌手术病理报告质量的影响:一项回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 30-34.
[2] 魏平, 赵鑫, 田广健. 腹腔镜下置入IPST专用疝补片并开放原位造口重建治疗造口旁疝疗效分析(附52例报告)[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 67-70.
[3] 余安, 高敬, 冯莉, 李陈娇, 刘瑜, 周颖, 薛振峰. 基于奥马哈系统联合知信行理论对肠造口患者进行干预预防造口旁疝的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 448-452.
[4] 李俊生, 曹睿, 邵翔宇. 回肠代膀胱术后造口旁疝的治疗现状[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 369-373.
[5] 代静, 张俊, 魏星星. 腹腔镜下腹膜前间隙补片修补术对成人脐疝患者术后早期疼痛及生活质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 301-306.
[6] 张荣华, 刘景磊, 石玉龙. 腹腔镜下Sugarbaker修补术用于造口旁疝的手术细节优化及临床效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 135-141.
[7] 马少卫, 王佳, 郑宇, 周保军. 造口旁疝诊疗进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 226-232.
[8] 刘千什, 刘昶. 影响造口旁疝修补术后复发相关因素的系统评价及Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 221-225.
[9] 王书翰, 任振, 刘虎, 吴昊, 潘晨, 吴立胜. 腹腔镜Sugarbaker技术修补造口旁疝关键细节优化及近远期并发症处理分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 142-148.
[10] 王宏, 董国强, 张兴洲, 刘韦鋆, 张楠. 机器人辅助对比腹腔镜下复杂腹壁疝手术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 68-73.
[11] 李宝山, 满艺, 王荫龙, 张新, 黄皇. 经机器人与经腹腔镜造口旁疝Sugarbaker修补术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 523-528.
[12] 李俊廷, 杨世炜, 易张弛, 李晨晔, 周佳其, 梁贺, 毛语霏, 王永. Sublay术式腹壁重建用于腹壁韧带样纤维瘤根治性切除的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 407-411.
[13] 朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. SD大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后腹壁肌肉的病理变化[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 311-316.
[14] 王海波, 王守练, 潘春鹏, 倪晓春, 张弛豪, 俞继卫. 腹腔镜造口旁疝IPST和Sugarbaker修补术的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(02): 89-93.
[15] 王春茂, 王隽, 王子彤. Thopaz数字化胸腔引流系统在肺结核术后持续性漏气治疗中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(05): 341-345.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI
小
编
AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?