切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2025, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03) : 311 -316. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2025.03.013

基础研究

SD大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后腹壁肌肉的病理变化
朱佳琳1, 方向1,(), 贵诗雨1, 黄丹1, 周小雨1, 郭文恺1   
  1. 1. 618000 四川省,德阳市人民医院疝外科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-19 出版日期:2025-06-18
  • 通信作者: 方向
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技计划项目(2019YJ0700)

Pathological changes in abdominal wall muscles after preperitoneal space mesh repair of incision hernia in SD rats

Jialin Zhu1, Xiang Fang1,(), Shiyu Gui1, Dan Huang1, Xiaoyu Zhou1, Wenkai Guo1   

  1. 1. Department of Hernia Surgery, Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang 618000, Sichuan Province, China
  • Received:2022-10-19 Published:2025-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Xiang Fang
引用本文:

朱佳琳, 方向, 贵诗雨, 黄丹, 周小雨, 郭文恺. SD大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后腹壁肌肉的病理变化[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 311-316.

Jialin Zhu, Xiang Fang, Shiyu Gui, Dan Huang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Wenkai Guo. Pathological changes in abdominal wall muscles after preperitoneal space mesh repair of incision hernia in SD rats[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2025, 19(03): 311-316.

目的

探究SD大鼠切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后腹壁肌肉的病理变化情况。

方法

将48只SD大鼠随机分为正常对照组(8只)、切口疝模型组(8只)、补片修补组(术后1、4、8、12周组,各8只)。对照组取大鼠腹壁肌肉标本,切口疝模型组进行切口疝造模,于2周后取腹壁肌肉标本,补片修补组先进行切口疝造模,造模成功后行补片修补术,在植入补片后1、4、8、12周取腹壁肌肉标本,观察腹壁肌肉炎症细胞浸润及纤维组织增生情况。

结果

切口疝腹膜前间隙补片修补术后靠近腹膜的腹壁肌肉组织出现肌纤维坏死、炎细胞浸润、纤维组织增生。(1)炎细胞浸润程度:切口疝模型组与对照组相比,炎细胞浸润程度增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与切口疝模型组相比,补片修补组术后1周组炎细胞浸润程度显著增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),而补片修补组术后4、8、12周组炎细胞浸润程度无明显差异(P>0.05)。(2)纤维组织增生程度:与对照组相比,切口疝模型组纤维组织增生程度增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);与切口疝模型组相比,补片修补组术后1周组纤维组织增生程度增高(P<0.05),而补片修补组术后4、8、12周组无明显差异(P>0.05)。

结论

手术创伤及补片刺激均可致大鼠腹膜前间隙补片修补术后,靠近腹膜的腹壁肌肉组织出现肌纤维坏死、炎细胞浸润、纤维组织增生。此病理变化可能与临床上出现的腹膜前间隙补片修补术后补片置入区域活动时疼痛相关。

Objective

To investigate the pathological changes of abdominal wall muscles after preperitoneal space mesh repair of incision hernia in SD rats.

Methods

Forty-eight SD rats were randomly divided into normal control group (8 rats), incisional hernia model group (8 rats), hernia mesh repair group [1 week postoperative group (8 rats), 4 weeks postoperative group (8 rats), 8 weeks postoperative group (8 rats), 12 weeks postoperative group (8 rats)]. In the control group, rat abdominal wall muscle specimens were taken. In the incision hernia model group, incision hernia modeling was performed, and abdominal wall muscle specimens were taken after 2 weeks. The incision hernia modeling was performed first in the hernia mesh repair group, and mesh repair was performed after successful modeling, and abdominal wall muscle samples were taken 1, 4, 8, 12 weeks after implantation of the mesh,to observe the inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrous tissue proliferation of abdominal wall muscles.

Results

After incision hernia anterior peritoneal space mesh repair, fibrous necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrous tissue hyperplasia occurred in the abdominal wall muscle tissue close to the peritoneum. (1) Degree of inflammatory cell infiltration:compared with the control group, the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration was increased in the incision hernia model group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); compared with the incision hernia model group, the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration was significantly increased in the hernia mesh repair group 1 week after surgery, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the degree of inflammatory cell infiltration in the hernia mesh repair group at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery (P>0.05). (2) Degree of fibrous tissue hyperplasia:Compared with the control group, the degree of fibrous tissue hyperplasia was increased in the incision hernia model group and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05); compared with the incision hernia model group, the degree of fibrous tissue hyperplasia was increased in the hernia mesh repair group one week after surgery (P<0.05), while there was no significant difference in the hernia mesh repair group 4, 8 and 12 weeks after surgery(P>0.05).

Conclusion

After preperitoneal space mesh repair in rats, both surgical trauma and mesh stimulation can lead to muscle fiber necrosis, inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibrous tissue hyperplasia in the abdominal wall muscle tissue close to the peritoneum. This pathological change may be related to the clinical movement pain in the mesh area after preperitoneal space mesh repair.

表1 实验主要材料
表2 实验主要试剂
图1 大鼠切口疝造模及补片修补组补片置入过程大体观察 注:1A 切口疝造模;1B 切口疝造模术后形成典型切口疝;1C 补片修补组进行补片修补术时,可见部分缺损的肌肉;1D 补片修补组游离腹膜;1E 补片修补组将补片置入腹膜前间隙。
图2 对照组HE染色(×200)
图3 切口疝模型组HE染色(×200)
图4 有疝补片修补术后1周组HE染色(×200)
图5 有疝补片修补术后4周组HE染色(×200)
图6 有疝补片修补术后8周组HE染色(×200)
图7 有疝补片修补术后12周组HE染色(×200)
表3 各组大鼠炎细胞浸润程度对比[例(%)]
表4 各组大鼠纤维组织增生程度对比[例(%)]
[1]
唐健雄, 李绍杰. 疝和腹壁外科20年发展的经验[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2021, 26(5):373-376.
[2]
李炯, 曹淑洋, 李训海. 不同补片材料对无张力疝修补术患者术后疼痛、血清疼痛介质及炎症反应的影响[J]. 中国现代医药杂志,2022, 24(11):34-37.
[3]
刘雨辰, 王明刚. 成人腹股沟疝修补术特殊并发症研究进展[J].中国实用外科杂志, 2020, 40(7):854-857.
[4]
杨福全. 腹壁疝修补术后疼痛预防及处理[J]. 中国实用外科杂志,2020, 40(7):778-780.
[5]
秦超, 王超, 李明, 等. SD大鼠使用舒泰®50和盐酸塞拉嗪麻醉比较研究[J]. 中国药事, 2021, 35(11):1239-1245.
[6]
菅凤国, 孙宏杰, 刘国正, 等. 生物补片在腹壁不同层面组织相容性差异的动物实验研究[J/OL]. 临床医药文献电子杂志, 2017,4(12):2188-2189.
[7]
National Toxicology Program. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of pyridine(CAS No. 110-86-1) in F344/N rats, wistar, rats,and B6C3F1 mice(Drinking Water Studies)[R]. National Toxicology Program technical report series, 2000, 470:1-330.
[8]
National Toxicology Program. NTP toxicology and carcinogenesis studies of 4-methylimidazole(CAS No. 822-36-6) in F344/N Rats and B6C3F1 Mice(Feed Studies)[R]. National Toxicology Program technical report series, 2007, 535:1-276.
[9]
Shakil A, Aparicio K, Barta E, et al. Inguinal hernias:diagnosis and management[J]. Am Fam Physician, 2020, 102(8):487-492.
[10]
Sater A H, Fones S, Rosenberg J, et al. High complication and mortality rates after emergency groin hernia repair:a nationwide register-based cohort study[J]. Hernia, 2022, 26(4):1131-1141.
[11]
Yang S, Chen J, Shen Y, et al. Establishment of a rabbit model of giant abdominal wall hernia[J]. Surg Innov, 2019, 26(3):376-380.
[12]
张仕斌, 雷凤琴, 杨胜波. 腹壁切口疝大鼠动物模型的建立与评价[J]. 遵义医学院学报, 2016, 39(4):378-381.
[13]
Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Müller M, et al. Foreign body reaction to meshes used for the repair of abdominal wall hernias[J]. Eur J Surg,1999, 165(7):665-673.
[14]
Dayer J M, Fischer A, Besson A, et al. Polyvinyl alcohol as suture material:results after 1 year[J]. Helv Chir Acta, 1969, 36(3):296-301.
[15]
Sheikh Z, Brooks P J, Barzilay O, et al. Macrophages, foreign body giant cells and their response to implantable biomaterials[J].Materials(Basel), 2015, 8(9):5671-5701.
[16]
Jordan S W, Fligor J E, Janes L E, et al. Implant porosity and the foreign body response[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018, 141(1):103e-112e.
[17]
王亮, 刘梅宝, 陈双. 小肠黏膜下层材料修复大鼠腹壁缺损的研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(4):254-258.
[18]
De Santana Santos T, Martins-Filho PR, Piva MR, et al. Focal fibrous hyperplasia:a review of 193 cases[J]. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol, 2014,18(Suppl 1):S86-S89.
[19]
Bountaniotis F, Tzerbos F, Tosios K, et al. Reactive fibrous hyperplasia of peri-implant mucosa[J]. J Oral Implantol, 2017, 43(5):378-379.
[20]
Marois Y, Cadi R, Gourdon J, et al. Biostability, inflammatory response, and healing characteristics of a fluoropassivated polyester-knit mesh in the repair of experimental abdominal hernias[J]. Artif Organs, 2000, 24(7):533-543.
[1] 田文, 杨晓冬. 我国腹腔镜疝手术治疗难点与对策[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 359-361.
[2] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 我国腹腔镜疝修补术式选择与原则[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 362-365.
[3] 李涛, 朱含放, 李世拥. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前右侧腹股沟疝修补术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 366-366.
[4] 南李刚, 王君妍, 武曦, 伍晓晶, 梁姣, 关蕾, 段降龙. 老年患者开放腹膜前无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 321-324.
[5] 嵇振岭, 刘宗航. 谈谈食管裂孔疝手术中食管裂孔缺损修补的方法[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 245-252.
[6] 仝聪, 李泽雨, 阎立昆. 补片相关并发症:中国疝外科亟待重视的临床挑战[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 253-257.
[7] 杨洋, 张晓贝, 曹栋, 张建岭, 俞永江. 接受抗血栓治疗老年患者行腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术安全性评价[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 269-275.
[8] 高金伟, 张琪, 王泽升, 成晓舟, 张宇鹏, 王小虎, 曹维嘉, 屈坤鹏. 单孔腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中应用不同材质补片的疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 281-285.
[9] 彭泉, 陈亮, 郑玉, 于华杰, 陈旭, 王刚, 张明金. 超声引导下双平面阻滞和局部浸润麻醉在老年腹股沟疝患者手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 301-305.
[10] 黄浩男, 汤福鑫, 马宁, 黄恩民, 马涛, 刘创雄, 周太成. 聚丙烯及其改性疝修补补片的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 150-154.
[11] 李宝山, 王荫龙. 机器人造口旁疝修补的现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 155-159.
[12] 陈佳乐, 张佳贺, 王新龙, 李金龙. 自固定补片在腹腔镜经腹腔腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein 疝修补术中的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 183-188.
[13] 郑志, 郑若彤, 靳翠红, 孙立, 杜华栋, 刘静, 邹振玉, 申英末. 复合化学性医用胶用于TAPP 术中固定补片的安全性与有效性评价:一项前瞻性随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 189-194.
[14] 储修峰, 王苗锋, 周劲松, 李铧杰. 完全内镜下sublay 修补与腹腔镜下腹腔内补片修补对中小型腹壁疝的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 195-201.
[15] 王鹏, 翟洪涛, 刘卓. 老年男性腹股沟疝患者手术方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 206-209.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?