切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04) : 418 -422. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.04.012

论著

腹壁切口疝分型与手术前后腹腔压力的相关性
彭雪峰1, 杨华2, 李慧2, 宋应寒3,(), 张雨晨3, 雷文章3   
  1. 1. 643000 四川,自贡市第四人民医院汇东普外科;610041 成都,四川大学华西医院胃肠疝和腹壁外科
    2. 643000 四川,自贡市第四人民医院汇东普外科
    3. 610041 成都,四川大学华西医院胃肠疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-13 出版日期:2024-08-18
  • 通信作者: 宋应寒
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅重点项目(2022YFS0230); 华西护理学科发展专项基金(HXHL21018)

The correlation analysis between abdominal incisional hernia classification and abdominal pressure before and after operation

Xuefeng Peng1, Hua Yang2, Hui Li2, Yinghan Song3,(), Yuchen Zhang3, Wenzhang Lei3   

  1. 1. Department of Huidong general surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong 643000, Sichuang Province, China; Department of Gastrointestinal Hernia Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China
    2. Department of Huidong general surgery, Zigong Fourth People's Hospital, Zigong 643000, Sichuang Province, China
    3. Department of Gastrointestinal Hernia Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610000, China
  • Received:2023-06-13 Published:2024-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Yinghan Song
引用本文:

彭雪峰, 杨华, 李慧, 宋应寒, 张雨晨, 雷文章. 腹壁切口疝分型与手术前后腹腔压力的相关性[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 418-422.

Xuefeng Peng, Hua Yang, Hui Li, Yinghan Song, Yuchen Zhang, Wenzhang Lei. The correlation analysis between abdominal incisional hernia classification and abdominal pressure before and after operation[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(04): 418-422.

目的

分析腹壁切口疝分型与手术前后腹腔压力变化压力的相关性。

方法

选择2021年9月至2022年9月四川大学华西医院胃肠疝和腹壁外科确诊为切口疝并行手术修补的48例患者进行回顾性研究。通过腹部CT测量疝环大小联合三维重建计算疝囊/腹腔容积比进行分型,并记录手术前后不同时间点腹腔压力、心率、呼吸频率、氧饱和度、平均动脉压及尿量。采用Spearman秩相关系数分析疝环长径和腹腔/疝囊容积比的相关性。

结果

48例患者中型疝13例,大型疝19例,巨大疝16例。疝环长径6~25 cm,平均(11.53±3.79)cm;手术时间(73.5±8)min;疝环大小与疝囊/腹腔容积比相关性分析呈正相关(r=0.669,P<0.001);中型疝,大型疝及巨大型疝组术后48 h最高腹腔压力分别为(11.90±1.90)、(15.00±3.00)、(22.25±2.00)mmHg,提示腹腔压力逐渐升高;肛门排气时间分别为(14.80±2.50)、(17.50±2.00)、(24.00±3.00)h,提示排气时间延迟;术后24 h尿量分别为(1565.92±149.56)、(1285.05±124.87)、(1173.56±48.29)ml,提示尿量逐渐减少,3组差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);3组间在术前麻醉完成后、麻醉清醒时、术后24 h、术后48 h,3组呼吸频率、心率、氧饱和度及平均动脉压,经过LSD检验,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

切口疝术后腹腔压力增高、切口疝分型与术后腹腔压力关系密切,切口疝手术精确分型、术后监测腹腔压力对预防和应对腹腔间室综合征等并发症具有临床意义。

Objective

To analyze the correlation between abdominal wall incisional hernia typing and the pressure of abdominal pressure changes before and after surgery.

Methods

Forty-eight patients diagnosed with incisional hernia and surgical repair in the Department of Gastrointestinal Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of West China Hospital of Sichuan University from September 2021 to September 2022 were selected for retrospective study. The hernia ring size was measured by abdominal CT combined with three-dimensional reconstruction to calculate the hernia sac/abdominal cavity volume ratio for staging, and abdominal pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation, mean arterial pressure, and urine output were recorded at different time points before and after surgery. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the hernia ring length diameter and the abdominal cavity/hernia sac volume ratio.

Results

Thirteen medium-sized hernias, 19 large hernias, and 16 giant hernias were found in 48 patients. Hernia ring length and diameter ranged from 6 to 25 cm, with a mean of (11.53±3.79) cm; operative time (73.5±8) min; the correlation analysis between hernia ring size and hernia sac/abdominal cavity volume ratio showed a positive correlation (r=0.669, P<0.001); the highest abdominal pressures in the medium-sized hernia,large hernia, and giant hernia groups at 48 h postoperatively were (11.90±1.90), (15.00±3.00), (22.25±2.00) mmHg, respectively, suggesting a gradual increase in abdominal pressure; the time of anal defecation was (14.80±2.50), (17.50±2.00), (24.00±3.00) h, suggesting a delay in the time of defecation; the 24-hour postoperative urine volume was (1565.92±149.56), (1285.05±124.87), (1173.56±48.29) ml, suggesting a gradual decrease in urine output, and the differences between the three groups were statistically significant (P<0.05); between the three groups after the completion of preoperative anesthesia, when anesthesia was awake, 24 h postoperative, 48 h postoperative, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation and mean arterial pressure of the three groups, and the differences were not statistically significant after LSD test (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Increased abdominal pressure after incisional hernia surgery, incisional hernia staging and postoperative abdominal pressure are closely related, and precise staging of incisional hernia surgery and postoperative monitoring of abdominal pressure are of clinical significance in preventing and coping with complications such as abdominal compartment syndrome.

图1 疝环长径和腹腔/疝囊容积比相关性
表1 3组患者不同时间点腹腔压力及肛门排气时间比较(±s
表2 3组患者术后24、24~48 h尿量比较(ml,±s
表3 3组患者呼吸频率、心率、氧饱和度及平均动脉压比较(±s
[14]
Yeste JP, Riquelme-Gaona J. When transversus abdominis release (TAR) is not enough during the repair of large midline incisional hernias: the double peritoneal flap to the rescue[J]. Updates Surg, 2022, 74(6): 2031-2037.
[15]
杜宇, 侯清. 巨大腹壁疝修补术中应用主动减容手术对腹腔内高压及预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 365-368.
[1]
Chelala E, Gaede F, Douillez V, et al. The suturing concept for laparoscopic mesh fixation in ventral and incisional hernias: Preliminary results[J]. Hernia, 2003, 7(4): 191-196.
[2]
Fassiadis N, Roidl M, Hennig M, et al. Randomized clinical trial of vertical or transverse laparotomy for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2005, 92(10): 1208-1211.
[3]
中华医学会急诊医学分会, 北京医学会急诊医学分会, 北京医师协会急救医学专科医师分会, 等. 成人腹腔高压和腹腔间隔室综合征诊治中国急诊专家共识(2024)[J]. 中华危重病急救医学, 2024, 36(5): 449-460.
[4]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 腹壁切口疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(7): 649-652.
[5]
赵玉敏. 腹腔压力监测在外科危重患者中的应用[J]. 现代护理, 2007, 13(29): 2770-2771.
[6]
李辉, 克力木, 王艳, 等. 螺旋CT三维重建技术在腹壁疝中的应用[J]. 放射学实践, 2014(6): 677-679.
[7]
李绍杰, 孟云潇, 李绍春, 等. 腹膜腱膜瓣加强补片修补技术用于腹壁切口疝手术158例报告[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2021, 41(4): 398-401.
[8]
Kirkpatrick AW, Nickerson D, Roberts DJ, et al. Intra-abdominal hypertension and abdominal compartment syndrome after abdominal wall reconstruction: quaternary syndromes?[J]. Scand J Surg, 2017, 106(2): 97-106.
[9]
乐飞, 李健文. 微创腹壁切口疝的术式进展,争议和展望[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(3): 198-201.
[10]
汤福鑫, 马宁, 刘创雄, 等. 术前渐进性气腹联合A型肉毒毒素在巨大切口疝修补术中的应用价值[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2022, 31(4): 441-448.
[11]
龚翔, 潘振宇, 王帆, 等. CT3D技术在腹壁切口疝术前评价中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(3): 252-254.
[12]
汤福鑫, 李英儒, 杨伟胜, 等. 术前渐进性气腹在老年腹壁巨大切口疝修补术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(2): 105-110.
[13]
李志茹, 王华芬, 卢芳燕. 危重症患者腹内压监测的最佳证据总结[J]. 中国护理管理, 2022, 22(5): 750-754.
[1] 郭军, 刘伟, 焦诚, 乔一鸣. 耻骨上切口疝手术治疗现状与进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 71-75.
[2] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[3] 张海泳, 吕思扬, 黄静, 商玉环. 外科医护人员预防腹壁切口疝知信行现状的调查研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 355-360.
[4] 柯瑞盛, 吴雅琳, 黄坤寨, 刘昭晖, 张福星. IPOM与Sublay术对腹壁切口疝的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 258-261.
[5] 陈传勤, 张凯, 单世涵, 陶亮, 傅巧美. 腹壁巨大切口疝修补术后早期疼痛的危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 178-183.
[6] 仲洁, 逯景辉, 林振华, 程文悦, 代京, 张剑, 刘成虎. 模拟临床的猪腹壁切口疝模型建立研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 168-172.
[7] 师帅, 马文星, 陈昕, 单良, 王泽正, 段降龙, 吴云桦. 腹壁切口疝围手术期并发症发生危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 83-88.
[8] 贵诗雨, 方向, 黄丹, 朱佳琳, 周小雨, 郭文恺. 腹膜前间隙补片修补对切口疝大鼠碱性成纤维生长因子(bFGF)的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 70-74.
[9] 赵家劲, 谢肖俊. 复发性腹壁切口疝的研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[10] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 从文献计量学分析看我国疝和腹壁外科的发展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-12.
[11] 邢晓伟, 刘雨辰, 赵冰, 王明刚. 基于术前腹部CT的卷积神经网络对腹壁切口疝术后复发预测价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 677-681.
[12] 李梅, 孔珊珊. Robocare护理模式联合高频胸壁振荡在腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[13] 毛永欢, 仝瀚文, 康星, 朱兴亚, 徐恩, 夏雪峰. 造口还纳术后切口疝的发生率及危险因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-534.
[14] 王帆, 马秋月, 刘小莉. 基于分位数回归模型的切口疝手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-529.
[15] 刘文宇. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 437-440.
阅读次数
全文


摘要