切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 30 -36. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2024.01.006

疝外科日间手术专栏

成人腹股沟疝日间手术患者住院费用影响因素分析
佟得语1, 刘小莉2, 马秋月2, 申英末2,()   
  1. 1. 100043 北京,首都医科大学附属第三临床医学院
    2. 100043 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院疝和腹壁外科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-01 出版日期:2024-02-18
  • 通信作者: 申英末
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.2021-04-35)

Analysis of factors influencing hospitalization costs for adult patients undergoing daytime surgery for inguinal hernia

Deyu Tong1, Xiaoli Liu2, Qiuyue Ma2, Yingmo Shen2,()   

  1. 1. The Third Clinical Medical School, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
    2. Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100043, China
  • Received:2024-01-01 Published:2024-02-18
  • Corresponding author: Yingmo Shen
引用本文:

佟得语, 刘小莉, 马秋月, 申英末. 成人腹股沟疝日间手术患者住院费用影响因素分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 30-36.

Deyu Tong, Xiaoli Liu, Qiuyue Ma, Yingmo Shen. Analysis of factors influencing hospitalization costs for adult patients undergoing daytime surgery for inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2024, 18(01): 30-36.

目的

探讨成人腹股沟疝日间手术患者住院费用的影响因素,为制定合理的医疗费用控制策略提供依据。

方法

根据纳入和排除标准,从首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院的电子病历系统数据库中选取了2018年1月—2023年6月疝和腹壁外科收治的成人腹股沟疝日间手术患者为研究对象。收集患者的基本信息、疝相关信息、手术相关信息、费用相关信息等资料。采用分位数回归模型和分位数回归曲线图分析影响住院费用的因素,考察不同分位数下的影响因素。

结果

本研究共纳入成人腹股沟疝日间手术患者7985名。男性91.1%(7272/7985)较女性多。单因素分析的结果显示,年龄、住院次数、入院年份、其他诊断个数、手术方式和是否使用抗菌药物不同,住院费用差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。分位数回归模型分析的结果显示,在年龄方面,患者年龄与住院费用在各个分位组呈负相关,年龄较大的患者在q70费用组的住院费用明显降低,年龄每增加1岁,医疗费用平均减少100.681元(P<0.001)。对于住院次数(住院次数>1的患者为既往因其他疾病入院治疗),相较于住院次数≥3次的患者,住院2次的患者在q10q20q50q80q90分位数的住院费用均明显上升(P<0.05),而住院1次的患者在各个分位数的费用显著增加(P<0.001)。随着入院年份的增加,各分位数的住院费用均呈显著上升趋势(P<0.05)。在其他诊断个数方面,比起其他诊断个数≥3个的患者,当存在0个其他诊断时,在q20分位数患者的费用略有下降(P<0.001),而在q60q90分位数的费用明显上升(P<0.05);对于有1个其他诊断的患者,在q40~q60q90分位数,住院费用也显著增加(P<0.05);对于有2个其他诊断的患者,在q40q90分位数的费用明显增加(P<0.05)。手术方式上,腹腔镜手术在q10q90分位数的住院费用均明显高于开放手术,且呈上升趋势(P<0.001)。最后,与未使用抗菌药物的患者相比,使用抗菌药物的患者住院费用显著增加(P<0.001)。

结论

住院费用高更常见于年轻患者、既往住院次数较少、住院年份较晚、其他诊断更多、采用腹腔镜手术技术以及使用抗菌药物的患者。未来研究需进一步拓展到其他疾病和手术类型,以期为医疗费用控制提供更全面的参考依据。

Objective

To investigate the factors influencing hospitalization costs of adult patients undergoing day surgery for inguinal hernia, and to provide a basis for developing rational medical cost control strategies.

Methods

Based on inclusion and exclusion criteria, adult patients who underwent day surgery for inguinal hernia between January 2018 and June 2023 in the Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery of Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, were selected from the electronic medical record system database. Patients' basic information, hernia-related information, surgery-related information, and cost-related information were collected. Quantile regression models and quantile regression curves were used to analyze the factors affecting hospitalization costs and to examine the factors at different quantiles.

Results

A total of 7,985 patients undergoing day surgery for inguinal hernia were included in this study. Male patients constituted 91.1% (7272/7985) of the sample, outnumbering female patients. Univariate analysis showed that age, number of hospitalizations, admission year, number of other diagnoses, surgical method, and the use of antimicrobial drugs were significantly related with different hospitalization costs (P<0.05). Quantile regression model analysis revealed that in terms of age, there was a negative correlation between patient age and hospitalization costs across various quantiles. For older patients in the q70 cost group, hospitalization costs significantly decreased, with an average reduction of 100.681 Yuan per additional year of age (P<0.001). Regarding the number of hospital stays (patients with hospitalizations > 1 were hospitalized for other diseases in the past), compared to patients with ≥3 hospitalizations, patients hospitalized twice showed a significant increase in costs at the q10 to q20, q50, and q80 to q90 quantiles (P<0.05), and patients hospitalized once exhibited a significant increase in costs across all quantiles (P<0.001). As admission years increased, there was a significant upward trend in hospitalization costs at all quantiles (P<0.05). In terms of the number of other diagnoses, compared to patients with ≥3 other diagnoses, patients with no other diagnoses showed a slight decrease in costs at the q20 quantile (P<0.001), while costs significantly increased at the q60 and q90 quantiles (P<0.05); for patients with one other diagnosis, costs significantly increased at the q40-q60, and q90 quantiles (P<0.05); and for patients with two other diagnoses, costs significantly increased from the q40 to q90 quantiles (P<0.05). Regarding surgical methods, costs for laparoscopic surgery were significantly higher than that for open surgery across the q10 to q90 quantiles, with an upward trend (P<0.001). Finally, compared to patients who did not use antimicrobial drugs, those who did showed a significant increase in hospitalization costs (P<0.001).

Conclusion

Higher hospitalization costs were more common among patients who were younger, had fewer previous hospitalizations, were admitted in later years, had more other diagnoses, underwent laparoscopic surgery, and used antimicrobial drugs. Future research should further expand to other diseases and types of surgery to provide a more comprehensive reference for medical cost control.

表1 主要变量赋值及处理
表2 住院费用及其取对数后的正态性检验
表3 成人腹股沟疝日间手术患者的基本特征及住院费用差异的单因素分析(n=7985)
图1 不同变量的分位数回归曲线图注:图1A年龄升高对总费用的影响;图1B住院次数1次对总费用的影响(以住院次数≥3次为基准);图1C住院次数2次对总费用的影响(以住院次数≥3次为基准);图1D入院年份对总费用的影响(以2018—2020年为基准);图1E其他诊断个数0个对总费用的影响(以其他诊断个数≥3个为基准);图1F其他诊断个数1个对总费用的影响(以其他诊断个数≥3个为基准);图1G其他诊断个数2个对总费用的影响(以其他诊断个数≥3个为基准);图1H手术方式对总费用的影响(以开放手术为基准);图1I是否使用抗菌药物对总费用的影响(以未使用抗菌药物为基准)。
表4 不同变量的分位数回归模型结果
变量 低分位费用组
q10 q20 q30
β P β P β P
年龄 -27.250 <0.001 -38.194 <0.001 -51.890 <0.001
住院次数            
≥3次 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
1次 2845.380 <0.001 1783.620 <0.001 1281.230 <0.001
2次 1532.850 <0.001 1400.120 <0.001 161.080 0.696
入院年份 2389.540 <0.001 833.640 <0.001 1137.070 <0.001
其他诊断个数            
≥3个 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
0个 183.350 0.220 -259.200 0.001 -249.400 0.096
1个 167.580 0.234 -140.790 0.054 6.380 0.964
2个 -220.180 0.130 -1118.610 0.115 212.950 0.143
手术方式 1744.990 <0.001 2586.850 <0.001 2808.8890 <0.001
是否使用抗菌药物 1595.010 <0.001 1161.410 <0.001 1876.020 <0.001
变量 中分位费用组
q40 q50 q60
β P β P β P
年龄 -57.905 <0.001 -62.917 <0.001 -77.899 <0.001
住院次数            
≥3次 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
1次 2300.980 <0.001 2545.890 <0.001 2606.080 <0.001
2次 454.790 0.215 713.560 0.034 969.190 0.060
入院年份 880.530 <0.001 293.000 0.003 817.680 <0.001
其他诊断个数            
≥3个 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
0个 192.050 0.183 169.280 0.203 370.000 0.043
1个 373.410 0.006 276.410 0.027 346.350 0.045
2个 648.760 <0.001 465.190 <0.001 763.660 <0.001
手术方式 2983.850 <0.001 3229.700 <0.001 3709.050 <0.001
是否使用抗菌药物 2593.730 <0.001 2205.330 <0.001 2194.390 <0.001
变量 高分位费用组
q70 q80 q90
β P β P β P
年龄 -100.681 <0.001 -93.053 <0.001 -100.315 <0.001
住院次数            
≥3次 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
1次 3481.970 <0.001 3460.420 <0.001 4361.770 <0.001
2次 1025.070 0.094 1434.440 0.015 2028.850 0.033
入院年份 1285.230 <0.001 577.690 <0.001 1852.120 <0.001
其他诊断个数            
≥3个 Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref. Ref.
0个 34.820 0.884 279.430 0.190 1806.230 <0.001
1个 257.120 0.254 42.520 0.832 1187.520 <0.001
2个 604.760 0.009 489.670 0.018 1412.530 <0.001
手术方式 4225.300 <0.001 4501.450 <0.001 4879.250 <0.001
是否使用抗菌药物 2966.340 <0.001 3101.520 <0.001 2596.110 <0.001
[1]
Bush M. Addressing the Root Cause: Rising Health Care Costs and Social Determinants of Health[J]. N C Med J, 2018, 79(1): 26-29.
[2]
中国日间手术合作联盟疝和腹壁外科专业日间手术专家委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会, 等. 腹股沟疝日间手术规范化流程与标准中国专家指南(2023版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(5): 497-503.
[3]
Tao L, Tai L, Tian M. Quantile regression for static panel data models with time-invariant regressors[J]. PLoS One. 2023, 18(8): e0289474.
[4]
Adamou H, Magagi IA, Habou O, et al. Epidemiology and treatment of groin and ventral hernias in the Zinder region, Niger Republic[J]. International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery, 2023, 6(1): 23-29.
[5]
Sánchez N, Fernando Cetolini, Scaravonati R, et al. Ambulatory laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: Feasibility and cost minimization analysis[J]. International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery, 2021, 4(4): 181-187.
[6]
Nguyen OK, Tang N, Hillman JM, et al. What's cost got to do with it? Association between hospital costs and frequency of admissions among "high users" of hospital care[J]. J Hosp Med, 2013, 8(12): 665-671.
[7]
Ning N, Haynes A, Romley J. Trends in the quality and cost of inpatient surgical procedures in the United States, 2002-2015[J]. PLoS One, 2021, 16(11): e0259011.
[8]
Du JY, Shafi K, Blackburn CW, et al. Trends in costs, reimbursements, and surgeon payments for cervical disc arthroplasty cost of care from 2009 to 2019[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2023, 39(5): 690-699.
[9]
张峥岩, 王振中, 张伋, 等. 医疗保健生态学模型在卫生服务研究中的应用现状及启示:一项概况性评价[J]. 中国全科医学, 2024, 27(4): 391-399.
[10]
于良春, 刘慧敏. 后疫情时代中国医疗体制改革的再思考[J]. 经济与管理评论, 2023, 39(2): 59-68.
[11]
Skinner HG, Coffey R, Jones J, et al. The effects of multiple chronic conditions on hospitalization costs and utilization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions in the United States: a nationally representative cross-sectional study[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2016, 16: 77.
[12]
König HH, Leicht H, Bickel H, et al. Effects of multiple chronic conditions on health care costs: an analysis based on an advanced tree-based regression model[J]. BMC Health Serv Res, 2013, 13: 219.
[13]
Hajat C, Siegal Y, Adler-Waxman A. Clustering and Healthcare Costs With Multiple Chronic Conditions in a US Study[J]. Front Public Health, 2021, 8: 607528.
[14]
Locke MC, Davis JC, Brothers RJ, et al. Assessing the outcomes, risks, and costs of local versus general anesthesia: A review with implications for cutaneous surgery[J]. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2018, 78(5): 983-988. e4.
[15]
van der Veen A, van der Meulen MP, Seesing MFJ, et al. Cost-effectiveness of Laparoscopic vs Open Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: An Economic Evaluation Alongside a Randomized Clinical Trial[J]. JAMA Surg, 2023, 158(2): 120-128.
[16]
Territo A, Di Buono G, Buscemi S, et al. Evaluation of predictive factors for i-CLARAS(intraoperative complications in laparoscopic renal and adrenal surgery): a multicentre international retrospective cohort study[J]. Sci Rep, 2024, 14(1): 1372.
[17]
Huang YM, Lee YW, Huang YJ, et al. Comparison of clinical outcomes between laparoscopic and open surgery for left-sided colon cancer: a nationwide population-based study[J]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 75.
[18]
Biondo C. Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens[J]. Pathogens, 2023, 12(1): 116.
[19]
Dadgostar P. Antimicrobial Resistance: Implications and Costs[J]. Infect Drug Resist, 2019, 12: 3903-3910.
[1] 刘嘉嘉, 王承华, 陈绪娇, 刘瑗玲, 王善钰, 屈海花, 张莉. 经阴道子宫-输卵管实时三维超声造影中患者疼痛发生情况及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 959-965.
[2] 陈静, 王晓玲, 安康. 老年进展期胃癌术后腹膜转移的相关因素及治疗进展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 225-228.
[3] 张伟, 蒋童新, 尚培中, 王德淼, 吉玉洁. 3D腹腔镜TEP治疗单纯性腹股沟脂肪斜疝一例报道[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 233-234.
[4] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[5] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[6] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 从文献计量学分析看我国疝和腹壁外科的发展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-12.
[7] 赵家劲, 谢肖俊. 复发性腹壁切口疝的研究进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 21-24.
[8] 张良燕, 曹桢, 刘子嘉. 成人腹股沟疝日间手术麻醉管理[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-29.
[9] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[10] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[11] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[12] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[13] 杨瑞洲, 李国栋, 吴向阳. 腹股沟疝术后感染的治疗方法探讨[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 715-719.
[14] 徐金林, 陈征. 抗菌药物临床应用监测对腹股沟疝修补术预防用药及感染的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 720-723.
[15] 杜振双, 胡清福, 林颖艺, 张月霞, 陈美丽, 李祎祺, 王振华. 社区全科医师激励机制的影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 876-883.
阅读次数
全文


摘要