切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (04) : 439 -442. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2022.04.016

临床论著

疝囊主动切开技术在腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用
谢先才1, 赖杨义1, 徐继宗2, 张弦3,()   
  1. 1. 433200 湖北省洪湖市人民医院普通外科
    2. 443000 湖北宜昌,三峡大学第二人民医院普外科
    3. 430080 武汉,华中科技大学医院微创外科中心
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-27 出版日期:2022-08-18
  • 通信作者: 张弦

Study on the application of active hernia sac incision in TEP surgery for indirect hernia

Xiancai Xie1, Yangyi Lai1, Jizong Xu2, Xian Zhang3,()   

  1. 1. General Surgery Department, People's Hospital of Honghu County, Honghu 433200, Hubei Province, China
    2. Department of General Surgery, the Second People's Hospital of Three Gorges University, Yichang 443000, Hubei Province
    3. Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery, Hospital of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430080, China
  • Received:2021-08-27 Published:2022-08-18
  • Corresponding author: Xian Zhang
引用本文:

谢先才, 赖杨义, 徐继宗, 张弦. 疝囊主动切开技术在腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 439-442.

Xiancai Xie, Yangyi Lai, Jizong Xu, Xian Zhang. Study on the application of active hernia sac incision in TEP surgery for indirect hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2022, 16(04): 439-442.

目的

探讨疝囊主动切开技术在成人腹股沟斜疝腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)中的应用价值及临床效果。

方法

回顾性分析2018年3月至2020年7月在洪湖市人民医院行腹股沟斜疝TEP手术的225例患者的临床资料,按照疝囊分离方式不同分为2组。观察组患者103例,采取疝囊主动切开分离技术;对照组患者122例,采取疝囊剥离技术。对比分析2组患者手术时间、术后住院时间、术后12 h疼痛评分、手术室费用、术中副损伤(输精管、精索血管、肠管)、并发症发生率(血清肿、切口感染、慢性疼痛)等临床指标。

结果

2组患者手术均顺利完成,无中转开放。观察组手术时间[(50.2±12.6)min]较对照组[(65.6±18.1)min]显著缩短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组患者术后住院时间、术后12 h疼痛评分、手术室费用比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组较对照组术中副损伤明显减少,但是血清肿发生率明显增加,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后均随访6个月,2组患者均无肠梗阻、复发、慢性疼痛及补片感染等严重并发症发生。

结论

TEP术中主动切开疝囊缩短了手术时间,其操作简单、安全可行,不会影响手术空间,尤其适用于病程较长或粘连严重的疝囊分离困难患者。

Objective

To investigate the application value and clinical effect of active hernia sac incision in TEP surgery for adult inguinal hernia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 225 patients who underwent TEP surgery for inguinal hernia in our hospital from March 2018 to July 2020. There were 103 patients in the active hernia sac incision group (observation group) and 122 patients in the hernia sac stripping group (control group).?Clinical indicators such as operation time, postoperative hospital stay, postoperative 12 h pain score, operating room cost, intraoperative collateral injury (vas deferens, spermatic vessels, intestine), and complication rate (seroma, incision infection, chronic pain) were compared and analyzed in the two groups.

Results

The operation was completed successfully in the two groups, and no transit was open.?The operation time of the observation group (50.2±12.6) minutes was significantly shorter than that of the control group (65.6±18.1) minutes, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05);?There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stay, postoperative 12 hours pain score, or operating room cost between the 2 groups (P>0.05). The intraoperative collateral injuries in the observation group were significantly reduced compared with the control group, but the incidence of seroma was significantly increased, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05).?All patients were followed up for 6 months after surgery, and no recurrence, chronic pain, mesh infection or other serious complications occurred in the two groups.

Conclusion

TEP's active incision of the hernia sac can shorten the operation time. The operation is simple, safe, and feasible, and will not affect the operation space. It is especially suitable for patients with a long course of disease or severe adhesion who have difficulty separating the hernia sac.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组患者临床指标比较
[1]
金曜,汪翰,杨帆, 等. 腹腔镜技术在嵌顿性腹股沟疝中的应用[J]. 临床外科杂志, 2021, 29(9): 857-859.
[2]
张迪,张心武,翟宏军, 等. 腹股沟区膜解剖与全腹膜外疝修补术的初步探讨[J]. 腹部外科杂志, 2021, 34(2): 120-123.
[3]
黄晓丹,马东华,沈雄飞, 等. 腹腔镜疝修补术中对单侧腹股沟斜疝两种疝囊处理方法的对比研究[J]. 重庆医学杂志, 2020, 49(9): 1438-1441.
[4]
唐健雄,郑民华,陈杰, 等. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406
[5]
Ansari MM. Posterior rectus canal: not a single anatomical entity & morphology-a laparoscopic study during TEP hernioplasty[J]. Turk J Surg, 2019, 35(4): 299-308.
[6]
Ruze R, Yan Z, Wu Q, et al. Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sca and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(4): 1147-1154.
[7]
周良弼,赵渝. 成人巨大腹股沟疝横断疝囊位置的比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 268-270.
[8]
汤治平,苏远航,陈双. 主动腹膜切开在完全腹膜外疝修补术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2013, 7(3): 210-211.
[9]
徐继宗,张弦,张帅, 等. 腹腔镜全腹膜外疝修补术与开放腹膜前无张力修补术在双侧腹股沟疝中的应用对比[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(4): 318-320.
[10]
李健文. 疝囊离断与术后血清肿的关系[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1235.
[11]
朱凯,姚磊,闵凯. 主动疝囊切开技术在腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术中的临床应用及疗效观察[J]. 腹部外科, 2021, 34(4): 297-300.
[12]
张弦,徐继宗,付广, 等. 完全腹膜外疝修补术与李金斯坦修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2014, 8(6): 511-513.
[1] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[2] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[3] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[4] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[5] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[6] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[7] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[8] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[12] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[13] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[14] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
[15] 林文斌, 郑泽源, 郑文能, 郁毅刚. 外伤性脾破裂腹腔镜脾切除术患者中转开腹风险预测模型构建[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 619-623.
阅读次数
全文


摘要