切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 219 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.002

临床论著

腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中疝环关闭技术的应用
李炳根1,(), 龚独辉1, 赖泽如1, 崔文博1, 张文杰1, 陈仲鹏1, 谢志华1, 彭永辉1, 聂向阳1   
  1. 1. 511400 广州,南方医科大学附属何贤纪念医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-21 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 李炳根
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.18393)

Application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect inguinal hernia

Binggen Li1,(), Duhui Gong1, Zeru Lai1, Wenbo Cui1, Wenjie Zhang1, Zhongpeng Chen1, Zhihua Xie1, Yonghui Peng1, Xiangyang Nie1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Received:2021-01-21 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Binggen Li
引用本文:

李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 崔文博, 张文杰, 陈仲鹏, 谢志华, 彭永辉, 聂向阳. 腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中疝环关闭技术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 219-222.

Binggen Li, Duhui Gong, Zeru Lai, Wenbo Cui, Wenjie Zhang, Zhongpeng Chen, Zhihua Xie, Yonghui Peng, Xiangyang Nie. Application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect inguinal hernia[J]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 219-222.

目的

探讨腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中关闭疝环的临床价值,阐述手术操作流程和技术细节,分析其可行性及有效性。

方法

本研究为前瞻性研究,选择2019年5月至2020年11月南方医科大学附属何贤纪念医院腹股沟斜疝患者(内环缺损≥3 cm或者为阴囊疝)的临床资料。研究患者均行腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)或腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)手术,并采取缝合关闭内环口的操作,记录围手术期情况以及术后并发症情况,包括术后疼痛及疝复发率,观察术后血清肿发生情况。

结果

共完成27例34侧TEP手术和12例15侧TAPP手术,所有手术均顺利完成。TEP组手术时间单侧平均55 min,双侧平均95 min;TAPP组单侧平均63 min,双侧平均115 min。术中出血少,术后伤口疼痛轻,术后平均住院时间18 h。随访时间2~17个月,未见复发,无慢性疼痛病例。TEP组5例,TAPP组3例发生术后血清肿,程度均较轻,持续1~3个月自行吸收,无需穿刺抽或其他治疗。

结论

腹腔镜下斜疝的内环口缝合是安全可行的,能有效减少术后血清肿及其相关的并发症,适合在Ⅲ型斜疝或者阴囊疝病例中施行。

Objective

To investigate the application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect hernia. The procedure will be described in details and its safety and efficacy are evaluated.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted from May 2019 to November 2020. Patients with EHS type Ⅲ indirect hernia or scrotal hernia were recruited, and they were treated by TEP/TAPP repair according to the individual situation. A hernia defect closure manipulation was performed before the mesh implantation. Perioperative data and the postoperative complications were recorded, including pain issue and hernia recurrence. The seroma formation issue was the key parameter that be focused on.

Results

A consecutive of 27 patients of 34 sides TEP procedures and 12 patients of 15 sides TAPP procedures were enrolled in our study. All operations were successful without open conversion. The mean operative time in TEP group was 55 minutes for unilateral hernia and 95 minutes for bilateral, while it was 63 minutes and 115 minutes correspondingly in TAPP group. Intraoperative bleeding was minimal and postoperative pain was mild. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 18 hours. During a follow-up period of 2 to 17 months, no hernia recurrence or chronic pain was noted. The seroma formation was 5 cases in TEP group and 3 cases in TAPP group, and they were all mild and resolved in 1 to 3 months spontaneously, without need for aspiration or other treatment.

Conclusion

The application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect hernia is safe and feasible, and it can significantly reduce the postoperative seroma formation and relative complications, which is recommended to implement in type Ⅲ indirect hernia or scrotal hernia patients.

图8 真正的疼痛三角包含红色阴影区域,比原来的范围更大[15]
[1]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[2]
Berney CR. The Endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach [J]. Hernia, 2011, 16(3): 301-305.
[3]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[4]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, et al. Seroma following transabdominalpreperitoneal patch plasty(TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5): 2222-2231.
[5]
乐飞,李健文,王文瑞, 等. 单中心腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术4445例[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(9): 724-727.
[6]
Ruze R, Yan Z, Wu Q, et al. Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sac and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(4): 1147-1154.
[7]
Li W, Li Y, Ding L, et al. A randomized study on laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with hernia sac transection vs complete sac reduction[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1882-1886.
[8]
Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY. Transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: is it safe and feasible?[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011, 21(2): 149-152.
[9]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[10]
莫佳丽,解基良,张楠, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿的相关因素及预测指标分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(13): 2143-2147.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406.
[12]
Orenstein SB, Novitsky YW. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with defect closure[M]//Hernia Surgery. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[13]
Li B, Yu J, Qin C, et al. Retroperitoneal totally endoscopic prosthetic repair of primary lumbar hernia[J]. Hernia, 2020 Nov 18. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02334-z. Epub ahead of print.
[14]
刘国忠,翁山耕,张建斌. 疝囊剥离与横断在男性腹股沟斜疝中的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 264-267.
[15]
Reinpold W, Schroeder AD, Schroeder M, et al. Retroperitoneal anatomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: consequences for prevention and treatment of chronic inguinodynia[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(4): 539-548.
[1] 李凯, 陈淋, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种U型记忆合金线在经脐单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 15-15.
[2] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[3] 周岩冰, 刘晓东. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术消化道吻合重建方式的选择[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 9-13.
[4] 张焱辉, 张蛟, 朱志贤. 留置肛管在中低位直肠癌新辅助放化疗后腹腔镜TME术中的临床研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 25-28.
[5] 王春荣, 陈姜, 喻晨. 循Glisson蒂鞘外解剖、Laennec膜入路腹腔镜解剖性左半肝切除术临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 37-40.
[6] 李晓玉, 江庆, 汤海琴, 罗静枝. 围手术期综合管理对胆总管结石并急性胆管炎患者ERCP +LC术后心肌损伤的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 57-60.
[7] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[8] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[9] 曹迪, 张玉茹. 经腹腔镜生物补片修补直肠癌根治术后盆底疝1例[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 115-116.
[10] 易明超, 汪鑫, 向涵, 苏怀东, 张伟. 一种T型记忆金属线在经脐单孔腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 599-599.
[11] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 不断推进中国腹腔镜疝手术规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 591-594.
[12] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[13] 王可, 范彬, 李多富, 刘奎. 两种疝囊残端处理方法在经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 692-696.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要