切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 219 -222. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.002

临床论著

腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中疝环关闭技术的应用
李炳根1,(), 龚独辉1, 赖泽如1, 崔文博1, 张文杰1, 陈仲鹏1, 谢志华1, 彭永辉1, 聂向阳1   
  1. 1. 511400 广州,南方医科大学附属何贤纪念医院普通外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-21 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 李炳根
  • 基金资助:
    吴阶平医学基金会临床科研专项资助基金(320.6750.18393)

Application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect inguinal hernia

Binggen Li1,(), Duhui Gong1, Zeru Lai1, Wenbo Cui1, Wenjie Zhang1, Zhongpeng Chen1, Zhihua Xie1, Yonghui Peng1, Xiangyang Nie1   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hexian Memorial Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 511400, China
  • Received:2021-01-21 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Binggen Li
引用本文:

李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 崔文博, 张文杰, 陈仲鹏, 谢志华, 彭永辉, 聂向阳. 腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中疝环关闭技术的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 219-222.

Binggen Li, Duhui Gong, Zeru Lai, Wenbo Cui, Wenjie Zhang, Zhongpeng Chen, Zhihua Xie, Yonghui Peng, Xiangyang Nie. Application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 219-222.

目的

探讨腹腔镜腹股沟斜疝无张力修补术中关闭疝环的临床价值,阐述手术操作流程和技术细节,分析其可行性及有效性。

方法

本研究为前瞻性研究,选择2019年5月至2020年11月南方医科大学附属何贤纪念医院腹股沟斜疝患者(内环缺损≥3 cm或者为阴囊疝)的临床资料。研究患者均行腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)或腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)手术,并采取缝合关闭内环口的操作,记录围手术期情况以及术后并发症情况,包括术后疼痛及疝复发率,观察术后血清肿发生情况。

结果

共完成27例34侧TEP手术和12例15侧TAPP手术,所有手术均顺利完成。TEP组手术时间单侧平均55 min,双侧平均95 min;TAPP组单侧平均63 min,双侧平均115 min。术中出血少,术后伤口疼痛轻,术后平均住院时间18 h。随访时间2~17个月,未见复发,无慢性疼痛病例。TEP组5例,TAPP组3例发生术后血清肿,程度均较轻,持续1~3个月自行吸收,无需穿刺抽或其他治疗。

结论

腹腔镜下斜疝的内环口缝合是安全可行的,能有效减少术后血清肿及其相关的并发症,适合在Ⅲ型斜疝或者阴囊疝病例中施行。

Objective

To investigate the application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect hernia. The procedure will be described in details and its safety and efficacy are evaluated.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted from May 2019 to November 2020. Patients with EHS type Ⅲ indirect hernia or scrotal hernia were recruited, and they were treated by TEP/TAPP repair according to the individual situation. A hernia defect closure manipulation was performed before the mesh implantation. Perioperative data and the postoperative complications were recorded, including pain issue and hernia recurrence. The seroma formation issue was the key parameter that be focused on.

Results

A consecutive of 27 patients of 34 sides TEP procedures and 12 patients of 15 sides TAPP procedures were enrolled in our study. All operations were successful without open conversion. The mean operative time in TEP group was 55 minutes for unilateral hernia and 95 minutes for bilateral, while it was 63 minutes and 115 minutes correspondingly in TAPP group. Intraoperative bleeding was minimal and postoperative pain was mild. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 18 hours. During a follow-up period of 2 to 17 months, no hernia recurrence or chronic pain was noted. The seroma formation was 5 cases in TEP group and 3 cases in TAPP group, and they were all mild and resolved in 1 to 3 months spontaneously, without need for aspiration or other treatment.

Conclusion

The application of defect closure technique in laparoscopic herniorraphy for indirect hernia is safe and feasible, and it can significantly reduce the postoperative seroma formation and relative complications, which is recommended to implement in type Ⅲ indirect hernia or scrotal hernia patients.

图8 真正的疼痛三角包含红色阴影区域,比原来的范围更大[15]
[1]
HerniaSurge Group. International guidelines for groin hernia management[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(1): 1-165.
[2]
Berney CR. The Endoloop technique for the primary closure of direct inguinal hernia defect during the endoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach [J]. Hernia, 2011, 16(3): 301-305.
[3]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[4]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Adolf D, et al. Seroma following transabdominalpreperitoneal patch plasty(TAPP): incidence, risk factors, and preventive measures[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(5): 2222-2231.
[5]
乐飞,李健文,王文瑞, 等. 单中心腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术4445例[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2016, 31(9): 724-727.
[6]
Ruze R, Yan Z, Wu Q, et al. Correlation between laparoscopic transection of an indirect inguinal hernial sac and postoperative seroma formation: a prospective randomized controlled study[J]. Surg Endosc, 2019, 33(4): 1147-1154.
[7]
Li W, Li Y, Ding L, et al. A randomized study on laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with hernia sac transection vs complete sac reduction[J]. Surg Endosc, 2020, 34(4): 1882-1886.
[8]
Choi YY, Kim Z, Hur KY. Transection of the hernia sac during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty: is it safe and feasible?[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2011, 21(2): 149-152.
[9]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[10]
莫佳丽,解基良,张楠, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿的相关因素及预测指标分析[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(13): 2143-2147.
[11]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组,大中华腔镜疝外科学院. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术操作指南(2017版)[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(6): 401-406.
[12]
Orenstein SB, Novitsky YW. Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair with defect closure[M]//Hernia Surgery. Springer International Publishing, 2016.
[13]
Li B, Yu J, Qin C, et al. Retroperitoneal totally endoscopic prosthetic repair of primary lumbar hernia[J]. Hernia, 2020 Nov 18. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-020-02334-z. Epub ahead of print.
[14]
刘国忠,翁山耕,张建斌. 疝囊剥离与横断在男性腹股沟斜疝中的随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(4): 264-267.
[15]
Reinpold W, Schroeder AD, Schroeder M, et al. Retroperitoneal anatomy of the iliohypogastric, ilioinguinal, genitofemoral, and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve: consequences for prevention and treatment of chronic inguinodynia[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(4): 539-548.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?