切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 223 -227. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.003

临床论著

腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术疝环缺损关闭对预防血清肿的效果分析
田广健1, 刘鹏1, 杨佩1, 赵鑫1, 韩威1,()   
  1. 1. 101149 首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院普外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-02 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 韩威

Effect of closure of hernia defect in laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair on the prevention of seroma

Guangjian Tian1, Peng Liu1, Pei Yang1, Xin Zhao1, Wei Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 101149, China
  • Received:2020-03-02 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Wei Han
引用本文:

田广健, 刘鹏, 杨佩, 赵鑫, 韩威. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术疝环缺损关闭对预防血清肿的效果分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 223-227.

Guangjian Tian, Peng Liu, Pei Yang, Xin Zhao, Wei Han. Effect of closure of hernia defect in laparoscopic direct inguinal hernia repair on the prevention of seroma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 223-227.

目的

探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟直疝修补术中疝环缝合关闭对预防术后血清肿形成的临床疗效。

方法

前瞻性随机选择2017年1月至2019年12月于首都医科大学附属北京潞河医院普外科疝中心收治的154例行腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)腹股沟直疝患者。按照随机数字表法将患者随机分为试验组和对照组,每组77例。试验组给予关闭缺损组,术中将腹横筋膜关闭并固定于耻骨梳韧带或腹直肌下缘及腹壁坚韧组织或仅做疝环腹横筋膜的"十字"缝合关闭;对照组给予不关闭缺损组,术中对突出变薄的腹横筋膜予以旷置处理。比较2组患者手术情况及手术相关并发症情况,此外通过超声检查对2组患者术后血清肿发生的情况进行对比分析。

结果

试验组和对照组的手术时间分别为(52.34±11.29)min和(46.33±7.96)min,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组患者术中和围手术期并发症情况比较的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。试验组和对照组术后1 d血清肿范围分别为(3.65±1.50)cm和(5.14±1.77)cm,术后7 d的血清肿直径分别为(2.66±1.24)cm和(3.51±1.36)cm,术后1个月血清肿发生率分别为12.99%和28.57%,术后3个月血清肿发生率分别为2.60%和5.19%,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。

结论

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟直疝修补术中通过缝合腹横筋膜关闭直疝缺损,尽管增加手术时间,但能够有效地降低术后血清肿的发生率,其安全性好,尤其对于较大的直疝而言效果显著,具有较高的可行性。

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect and application of hernia defect closure in the laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) direct inguinal hernia repair for the prevention of postoperative seroma formation.

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 154 cases of direct inguinal hernia who underwent TAPP repair in Beijing Luhe hospital from January 2017 to December 2019. According to random grouping method, the patients were randomly assigned into the experimental group (closed defect group, closed and fixed transverse fascia to Cooper's ligament or lower edge of the rectus abdominis and tough tissue of abdominal wall, or only "cross" mattress suture of the transverse fascia) and control group (did not close the defect, separated the "false" hernial sac without any intervention). Compared two groups of patients with operation parameters and surgery related complications. In addition, the incidence of postoperative seroma in the two groups were examined by ultrasound and analyzed.

Results

In terms of operation-related indicators, the operative time of the experimental group and the control group was (52.34±11.29) minutes vs (46.33±7.96) minutes, respectively, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the intraoperative and preoperative complications between the two groups (P>0.05). In terms of seroma, the range of postoperative seroma in the experimental group and the control group was (3.65±1.50) cm vs (5.14±1.77) cm, and (2.66±1.24) cm vs (3.51±1.36) cm, respectively, on the 1st day and 7th day after surgery. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant. In the follow-up period, the seroma incidence of the experimental group and the control group at 1 month and 3 months after surgery was 12.99% vs 28.57% and 2.60% vs 5.19%, respectively. The seroma incidence of the experimental group was also significantly lower than that of the control group, with statistical significance (P<0.05).

Conclusion

In laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal direct inguinal hernia repair, the closure of direct hernia defect by suturing the transverse fascia can effectively reduce the incidence of postoperative seroma. Although the operation time is increased, it is safe and effective, especially for large direct hernia.

图1 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术
表1 2组患者基线资料对比情况
表2 2组患者手术和围手术期资料对比情况
表3 2组患者血清肿及随访期情况比较
[1]
Reiner MA, Bresnahan ER. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair outcomes[J]. JSLS, 2016, 20(3): e2016.00043.
[2]
Tandon A, Pathak S, Lyons NJR, et al. Meta-analysis of closure of the fascial defect during laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2016, 103(12): 1598-1607.
[3]
Li J, Gong W, Liu Q. Intraoperative adjunctive techniques to reduce seroma formation in laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a systematic review[J]. Hernia, 2019, 23(4): 723-731.
[4]
Bittner R, Arregui ME, Bisgaard T, et al. Guidelines for laparoscopic (TAPP) and endoscopic(TEP) treatment of inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2012, 25: 2773-2843.
[5]
Reddy VM, Sutton CD, Bloxham L, et al. Laparoscopic repair of direct inguinal hernia: a new technique that reduces the development of postoperative seroma[J]. Hernia, 2007, 11(5): 393-396.
[6]
Gilbert AI. Hernia repair in the aged and infirmed[J]. J Fla Med Assoc, 1988, 75(11): 742.
[7]
Köckerling F, Simons MP. Current Concepts of Inguinal Hernia Repair[J]. Visc Med, 2018, 34(2): 145-150.
[8]
Köckerling F, Bittner R, Jacob DA, et al. TEP versus TAPP: comparison of the perioperative outcome in 17, 587 patients with a primary unilateral inguinal hernia[J]. Surg Endosc, 2015, 29(12): 3750-3760.
[9]
Gao D, Wei S, Zhai C, et al. Clinical research of preperitoneal drainage after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2015, 19(5): 789-794.
[10]
Lau H, Lee F. Seroma following endoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty[J]. Surg Endosc, 2003, 17(11): 1773-1777.
[11]
Misra MC, Bhowate PD, Bansal VK, et al. Massive scrotal hernias: problems and solutions[J]. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 2009, 19(1): 19-22.
[12]
Cihan A, Ozdemir H, Uçan BH, et al. Fade or fate. Seroma in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2006, 20(2): 325-328.
[13]
Belyansky I, Daes J, Radu VG, et al. A novel approach using the enhanced-view totally extraperitoneal(eTEP) technique for laparoscopic retromuscular hernia repair[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(3): 1525-1532.
[14]
Janis JE, Khansa L, Khansa I. Strategies for postoperative seroma prevention: a systematic review[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2016, 138(1): 240-252.
[15]
Elango S, Perumalsamy S, Ramachandran K, et al. Mesh materials and hernia repair[J]. Biomedicine, 2017, 7(3): 16.
[16]
Papageorge CM, Funk LM, Poulose BK, et al. Primary fascial closure during laparoscopic ventral hernia repair does not reduce 30-day wound complications[J]. Surg Endosc, 2017, 31(11): 4551-4557.
[17]
Morales-Conde S. A new classification for seroma after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair[J]. Hernia, 2012, 16(3): 261-267.
[18]
Fan JKM, Liu J, Chen K, et al. Preperitoneal closed-system suction drainage after totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty in the prevention of early seroma formation: a prospective double-blind randomised controlled trial[J]. Hernia, 2018, 22(3): 455-465.
[19]
刘星伟,莫湘琼,苏永辉, 等. 经腹白线穿刺处理腹股沟直疝假疝囊在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(4): 96-99.
[20]
付焱,李恒. 腹腔镜腹股沟直疝修补术中假性疝囊处理的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(1): 64-67.
[21]
Li J, Zhang W. Closure of a direct inguinal hernia defect in laparoscopic repair with barbed suture: a simple method to prevent seroma formation?[J]. Surg Endosc, 2018, 32(2): 1082-1086.
[1] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[2] 母德安, 李凯, 张志远, 张伟. 超微创器械辅助单孔腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 14-14.
[3] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[4] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[5] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[6] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[8] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[9] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[10] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[11] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[12] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
[13] 郭兵, 王万里, 何凯, 黄汉生. 腹腔镜下肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 143-143.
[14] 李凯, 陈淋, 苏怀东, 向涵, 张伟. 超微创器械在改良单孔腹腔镜巨大肝囊肿开窗引流及胆囊切除中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 144-144.
[15] 魏丽霞, 张安澜, 周宝勇, 李明. 腹腔镜下Ⅲb型肝门部胆管癌根治术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(01): 145-145.
阅读次数
全文


摘要