切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (03) : 228 -232. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-392X.2021.03.004

临床论著

腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对腹股沟疝患者术后恢复、凝血功能及男性性功能的影响
张美英1,()   
  1. 1. 056001 河北省邯郸市中心医院西区内镜中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-12 出版日期:2021-06-18
  • 通信作者: 张美英

Effect of TAPP operation on postoperative recovery, coagulation function and sexual function of male patients with inguinal hernia

Meiying Zhang1,()   

  1. 1. Endoscopy Center, Handan Central Hospital, Handan 056001, China
  • Received:2020-12-12 Published:2021-06-18
  • Corresponding author: Meiying Zhang
引用本文:

张美英. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术对腹股沟疝患者术后恢复、凝血功能及男性性功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(03): 228-232.

Meiying Zhang. Effect of TAPP operation on postoperative recovery, coagulation function and sexual function of male patients with inguinal hernia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery(Electronic Edition), 2021, 15(03): 228-232.

目的

探讨腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)对腹股沟疝患者术后恢复、凝血功能及预后复发率的影响。

方法

选取2018年2月至2020年4月邯郸市中心医院腹股沟疝患者116例,依据治疗术式分为TAPP组和传统组,每组58例。TAPP组予以TAPP,传统组予以传统无张力疝修补术。比较2组手术有关指标、术前、术后1 d、术后3 d凝血功能指标[活化部分凝血活酶时间(APTT)、凝血酶原时间(PT)、纤维蛋白原(FIB)]水平,统计术后并发症发生情况、术后6个月瘢痕美观度与复发率、术前、术后3个月、6个月性功能指标(睾丸体积与睾丸最大血流速度)。

结果

TAPP组手术时间虽长于传统组,但术后下床活动时间、住院时间较传统组短,术中出血量较传统组低(P<0.05);2组术后1、3 d的血清APTT、PT水平较术前缩短,FIB水平较术前升高(P<0.05),但组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后并发症发生率TAPP组较传统组低(P<0.05);术后6个月TAPP组瘢痕美观度较传统组高(P<0.05),术后6个月TAPP组复发率更低(P<0.05);2组术后3、6个月的睾丸体积及睾丸最大血流速度均较本组术前下降,但TAPP组高于传统组(P<0.05)。

结论

TAPP治疗腹股沟疝患者,具有创伤小、出血少、术后恢复快、并发症少、瘢痕美观度高、复发率低等优势,可改善瘢痕美观度,减轻对男性患者性功能的影响,但手术时间延长,术中应注意气腹对凝血功能的影响。

Objective

To investigate the effect of laparoscopic trans-abdominal preperitoneal hernia repair(TAPP) repair on postoperative recovery, coagulation function and prognostic recurrence rate of patients with inguinal hernia.

Methods

A total of 116 patients with inguinal hernia in Handan Central Hospital from February 2018 to April 2020 were selected, and they were divided into TAPP group (n=58) and traditional group (n=58) according to the treatment method. The TAPP group received TAPP repair, and the traditional group received traditional tension-free hernia repair. To compare the levels of coagulation function indexes [activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen (FIB)] before operation, 1 days after operation, and 3 days after operation in the two groups. The incidence of postoperative complications, recurrence rate and scars aesthetics at 6 months after operation, and the sexual function indexes (testicular volume and maximum blood flow velocity of testis) before operation, 3 months and 6 months after operation were also calculated.

Results

Although the operation time of the TAPP group was longer than that of the traditional group, the postoperative time of getting out of bed and hospital stay were shorter than those of the traditional group, and the intraoperative blood loss was lower than that of the traditional group (P<0.05). The serum APTT and PT levels of the two groups at 1 d and 3 d after operation were shorter than those before operation, and the FIB level was higher than before operation (P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the TAPP group was lower than that in the traditional group (P<0.05). The scars aesthetics in the TAPP group at 6 months after surgery was better than that in the traditional group (P<0.05), and the recurrence rate in TAPP group at 6 months after surgery was lower (P<0.05). The testicular volume and maximum blood flow velocity at 3 and 6 months after surgery in both groups were lower than those before surgery, but those in TAPP group were higher than those in traditional group (P<0.05).

Conclusion

TAPP in the treatment of inguinal hernia patients has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, quick postoperative recovery, fewer complications, better scar aesthetics and low recurrence rate. It can improve the appearance of scar and reduce the impact on the sexual function of male patients. However, the operation time is prolonged, and attention should be paid to the effect of pneumoperitoneum on the coagulation function during the operation.

表1 2组患者一般资料比较
表2 2组手术有关指标较(±s
表3 2组凝血功能指标水平比较(±s
表4 2组并发症比较[例(%)]
表5 2组瘢痕美观度与复发率比较[例(%)]
表6 2组男性患者性功能比较(±s
[1]
De Goede B, Timmermans L, Van Kempen BJ, et al. Risk factors for inguinal hernia in middle-aged and elderly men: results from the Rotterdam Study[J]. Surgery, 2015, 157(3): 540-546.
[2]
刘松,李玉林,张军辉. 腹腔镜疝修补术对腹股沟斜疝患者术后疼痛、生活质量和性功能影响[J]. 国际泌尿系统杂志, 2019, 39(3): 403-406.
[3]
钟诚,汪宏. 双腹腔镜全腹膜外无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的临床应用[J]. 中国微创外科杂志, 2017, 17(6): 524-526.
[4]
任少勋,党涛平,王晓东. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术与开放无张力腹股沟疝术治疗腹股沟疝价值分析[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2020, 49(4): 426-428.
[5]
Yang S, Zhang G, Jin C, et al. Transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic approach for incarcerated inguinal hernia repair: A report of 73 cases[J]. Medicine, 2016, 95(52): e5686.
[6]
王刚,沈根海,高泉根, 等. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与开放无张力腹股沟疝修补术治疗老年腹股沟疝的临床效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2018, 38(7): 1646-1648.
[7]
中华医学会外科学分会疝与腹壁外科学组,中国医师协会外科医师分会疝和腹壁外科医师委员会. 成人腹股沟疝诊断和治疗指南(2018年版)[J]. 中国普通外科杂志, 2018, 27(7): 7-11.
[8]
Miyaki A, Yamaguchi K, Kishibe S, et al. Diagnosis of inguinal hernia by prone-vs. supine-position computed tomography[J]. Hernia, 2017, 21(5): 705-713
[9]
曹金鑫,王明刚,朱熠林, 等. 应用腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗腹股沟复发疝临床价值探讨[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(11): 1250-1253.
[10]
Zulu HG, Mewa Kinoo S, Singh B. Comparison of Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair with the tension-free Desarda technique: a clinical audit and review of the literature[J]. Trop Doct, 2016, 46(3): 125-129.
[11]
曹亮,王步云. 对比分析开放式无张力疝修补术与腹腔镜疝修补术治疗成人腹股沟疝的临床疗效[J]. 贵州医药, 2020, 44(3): 410-412.
[12]
陈昕,徐露,殷骏, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术的临床疗效及术后并发症危险因素分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2017, 16(9): 915-920.
[13]
Tanoue K, Okino H, Kanazawa M, et al. Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty: results in 182 Japanese patients[J]. Hernia, 2016, 20(6): 1-7.
[14]
王向征. 成人腹腔镜疝修补术与无张力疝修补术的疗效对比分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2018, 23(3): 221-224.
[15]
王翀,朱应昌,梁伟潮, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中补片缝合固定对减轻腹股沟疝患者术后疼痛的效果分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2019, 46(9): 631-633.
[16]
吴安定,金朝霞,周宗进, 等. 腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝疗效比较[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2017, 34(11): 1005-1007, 1011.
[17]
Patterson TJ, Beck J, Currie PJ, et al. Meta-analysis of patient-reported outcomes after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair[J]. Br J Surg, 2019, 106(7): 824-836.
[18]
Tokumura H, Nomura R, Saijo F, et al. Tumescent TAPP: laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair after the preperitoneal tumescent injection of diluted lidocaine and epinephrine saline solution and carbon dioxide gas[J]. Surg Today, 2017, 47(1): 52-57.
[19]
王辉,孙杰,陈先志, 等. 腹腔镜下经腹腹膜前疝修补术与疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的疗效比较[J]. 中国临床保健杂志, 2018, 21(2): 271-274.
[20]
刘树仁,董昭良,王帅, 等. 血栓弹力图在胸腰椎结核围手术期凝血功能评价中的应用[J]. 河北医药, 2019, 41(20): 3094-3097.
[21]
吕德珍,赵玉,滕成玲. 体温保护策略对肺癌手术患者凝血功能的影响[J]. 安徽医药, 2017, 21(10): 1799-1802.
[22]
徐浩,郑伦辉,张居易, 等. 腹腔镜腹膜前疝修补术与Lichtenstein疝修补术对腹股沟疝患者凝血功能的影响[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2020, 13(1): 64-66.
[23]
王翀,朱应昌,梁伟潮, 等. 腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术中补片缝合固定对减轻腹股沟疝患者术后疼痛的效果分析[J]. 国际外科学杂志, 2019, 46(9): 631-633.
[1] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[2] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[3] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[4] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[5] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[6] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[7] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[8] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[9] 李博, 贾蓬勃, 李栋, 李小庆. ERCP与LCBDE治疗胆总管结石继发急性重症胆管炎的效果[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 60-63.
[10] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[11] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[12] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[13] 王庆亮, 党兮, 师凯, 刘波. 腹腔镜联合胆道子镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 313-313.
[14] 杨建辉, 段文斌, 马忠志, 卿宇豪. 腹腔镜下脾部分切除术[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 314-314.
[15] 叶劲松, 刘驳强, 柳胜君, 吴浩然. 腹腔镜肝Ⅶ+Ⅷ段背侧段切除[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(02): 315-315.
阅读次数
全文


摘要